Crysys coming to PS3?

Don't know if this was posted before . http://www.n4g.com/ps3/News-24762.aspx It woul be awsome for PS3 owners if it's true. i hope it is.:)

PS3 is powerful. Programmers just have to know how to utilize its power. I believe it is about 20% more powerful than 360. Great find, thanks. casey7672

[QUOTE="casey7672"]PS3 is powerful. Programmers just have to know how to utilize its power. I believe it is about 20% more powerful than 360. Great find, thanks. monco59

What makes you think I was answering his question?

PS3 is powerful. Programmers just have to know how to utilize its power. I believe it is about 20% more powerful than 360. Great find, thanks. casey7672

[QUOTE="monco59"][QUOTE="casey7672"]PS3 is powerful. Programmers just have to know how to utilize its power. I believe it is about 20% more powerful than 360. Great find, thanks. casey7672

What makes you think I was answering his question?

i read an interview that crytek has no intention whatsoever of porting crysis to any consolevip3r666

If the next gen consoles are able run crysis nearly perfect that should decrease the gap between the PC and the consoles even more.monco59

[QUOTE="casey7672"]PS3 is powerful. Programmers just have to know how to utilize its power. I believe it is about 20% more powerful than 360. Great find, thanks. StarFoxCOM

are u living on the moon..........havent you been looking at CELL benchmarks ?

th e CELL is a minimum of 20x as powerful as XENON.

the GPUs though are evenly matched.............but just like XENOS RSX is based on a completely new architecture with 28 vertex shader and the highest dimensions 258mm2????????

http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/power/library/pa-cellperf/

http://www.mc.com/cell/

http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~samw/projects/cell/LBLTalk.pdf

http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~samw/projects/cell/EDGE06_abstract.pdf

CELL is 50x more powerful than the CONROE 2..............RAPIDMIND and UI both claims ps3 to be a powerful supercomputer

http://ps3.qj.net/RapidMind-Terra-Soft-to-make-PS3-Linux-devkit/pg/49/aid/79090

http://www.consumerelectronicsnet.com/articles/viewarticle.jsp?id=96305

http://www.news-gazette.com/news/local/2007/02/04/ibm_taps_local_researchers_to_turn_playstation_3_chip_to_science

overall: the ps3 is between 3x---10x as powerful as the x360

[QUOTE="casey7672"]PS3 is powerful. Programmers just have to know how to utilize its power. I believe it is about 20% more powerful than 360. Great find, thanks. monco59

u X***** mend yor wayssssssssss......

the ps3 is between 3x--10x as powerful as the x360.

just read the links i posted above

http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/power/library/pa-cellperf/

http://www.mc.com/cell/

http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~samw/projects/cell/LBLTalk.pdf

http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~samw/projects/cell/EDGE06_abstract.pdf

CELL is 50x more powerful than the CONROE 2..............RAPIDMIND and UI both claims ps3 to be a powerful supercomputer

http://ps3.qj.net/RapidMind-Terra-Soft-to-make-PS3-Linux-devkit/pg/49/aid/79090

http://www.consumerelectronicsnet.com/articles/viewarticle.jsp?id=96305

http://www.news-gazette.com/news/local/2007/02/04/ibm_taps_local_researchers_to_turn_playstation_3_chip_to_science

[QUOTE="StarFoxCOM"][QUOTE="casey7672"]PS3 is powerful. Programmers just have to know how to utilize its power. I believe it is about 20% more powerful than 360. Great find, thanks. washimul

are u living on the moon..........havent you been looking at CELL benchmarks ?

th e CELL is a minimum of 20x as powerful as XENON.

the GPUs though are evenly matched.............but just like XENOS RSX is based on a completely new architecture with 28 vertex shader and the highest dimensions 258mm2????????

http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/power/library/pa-cellperf/

http://www.mc.com/cell/

http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~samw/projects/cell/LBLTalk.pdf

http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~samw/projects/cell/EDGE06_abstract.pdf

CELL is 50x more powerful than the CONROE 2..............RAPIDMIND and UI both claims ps3 to be a powerful supercomputer

http://ps3.qj.net/RapidMind-Terra-Soft-to-make-PS3-Linux-devkit/pg/49/aid/79090

http://www.consumerelectronicsnet.com/articles/viewarticle.jsp?id=96305

http://www.news-gazette.com/news/local/2007/02/04/ibm_taps_local_researchers_to_turn_playstation_3_chip_to_science

overall: the ps3 is between 3x---10x as powerful as the x360

just because of the lack of compilers we are having a scenario where ps3 games are looking just a slighly better than x360s but come 2008 .........vast differences would be noticed.

even the MS biased BETHESDA said this.........certain optimizations based on CELL processor would remian exclusive to ps3.

i believe OBLIVION doesnt use more than 20% of ps3's power

I read a comment of the creators of crysis some months back and he said he doesn't look to release crysis on either the ps3 or th3e 360 because neither was powerful enough to support what crysis can do.SmoothBrother1

[QUOTE="casey7672"]PS3 is powerful. Programmers just have to know how to utilize its power. I believe it is about 20% more powerful than 360. Great find, thanks. monco59

[QUOTE="monco59"][QUOTE="casey7672"]PS3 is powerful. Programmers just have to know how to utilize its power. I believe it is about 20% more powerful than 360. Great find, thanks. masterofTS

[QUOTE="masterofTS"][QUOTE="monco59"][QUOTE="casey7672"]PS3 is powerful. Programmers just have to know how to utilize its power. I believe it is about 20% more powerful than 360. Great find, thanks. EyeNixon

washimul, i'm a huge sony fanboy, but even i know the ps3 is not that much more powerful than the 360. on paper, yes, the ps3 is more powerful as it has more raw horsepower. however, the Xenos is more efficient than RSX because of its unified shaders and 10mb of edram making it a tad better than RSX imo. i agree that Cell is better than Xenon, but not by the amount you make it out to be. and because Cell can assist RSX, i think that makes up for it being not as efficient as the Xenos. i think the ps3 has the potential to be 10%-15% better than the 360 overall, but only time will tell. some things, the 360 excels in and some things the ps3 excels in. but we at least know that it will be at least on par with the 360.rahzel54

eDRAM is useless at 1080p..........edram is there to make up for the lack of video bandwidth

25g/s +22g/s  vs 22g/s

the UNIFIED shaders used in XENOS are weak and non dedicated.........the 28 vertex shaders + 8 pixel shaders used in ps3 are dedicated.

dont compare the UNIFIED architecture of 8800gtx with XENOS ( lol)

RSX has the highest dimension till date (258 mm2)

UBISOFT is seeking the help of SONY engineers to maximize the shader performance of RSX>..................RSX has been changed too............IT has more prpgrammable an d non programmable flops compared to XENOS

[QUOTE="rahzel54"]washimul, i'm a huge sony fanboy, but even i know the ps3 is not that much more powerful than the 360. on paper, yes, the ps3 is more powerful as it has more raw horsepower. however, the Xenos is more efficient than RSX because of its unified shaders and 10mb of edram making it a tad better than RSX imo. i agree that Cell is better than Xenon, but not by the amount you make it out to be. and because Cell can assist RSX, i think that makes up for it being not as efficient as the Xenos. i think the ps3 has the potential to be 10%-15% better than the 360 overall, but only time will tell. some things, the 360 excels in and some things the ps3 excels in. but we at least know that it will be at least on par with the 360.washimul

eDRAM is useless at 1080p..........edram is there to make up for the lack of video bandwidth

25g/s +22g/s vs 22g/s

the UNIFIED shaders used in XENOS are weak and non dedicated.........the 28 vertex shaders + 8 pixel shaders used in ps3 are dedicated.

dont compare the UNIFIED architecture of 8800gtx with XENOS ( lol)

RSX has the highest dimension till date (258 mm2)

UBISOFT is seeking the help of SONY engineers to maximize the shader performance of RSX>..................RSX has been changed too............IT has more prpgrammable an d non programmable flops compared to XENOS

Well this would be great if it is true. One more awesome game on the PS3.

Plus try not to flame the mods will lock this then if it keeps up.

[QUOTE="rahzel54"]washimul, i'm a huge sony fanboy, but even i know the ps3 is not that much more powerful than the 360. on paper, yes, the ps3 is more powerful as it has more raw horsepower. however, the Xenos is more efficient than RSX because of its unified shaders and 10mb of edram making it a tad better than RSX imo. i agree that Cell is better than Xenon, but not by the amount you make it out to be. and because Cell can assist RSX, i think that makes up for it being not as efficient as the Xenos. i think the ps3 has the potential to be 10%-15% better than the 360 overall, but only time will tell. some things, the 360 excels in and some things the ps3 excels in. but we at least know that it will be at least on par with the 360.washimul

eDRAM is useless at 1080p..........edram is there to make up for the lack of video bandwidth

25g/s +22g/s vs 22g/s

the UNIFIED shaders used in XENOS are weak and non dedicated.........the 28 vertex shaders + 8 pixel shaders used in ps3 are dedicated.

dont compare the UNIFIED architecture of 8800gtx with XENOS ( lol)

RSX has the highest dimension till date (258 mm2)

UBISOFT is seeking the help of SONY engineers to maximize the shader performance of RSX>..................RSX has been changed too............IT has more prpgrammable an d non programmable flops compared to XENOS

washimul, i'm a huge sony fanboy, but even i know the ps3 is not that much more powerful than the 360. on paper, yes, the ps3 is more powerful as it has more raw horsepower. however, the Xenos is more efficient than RSX because of its unified shaders and 10mb of edram making it a tad better than RSX imo. i agree that Cell is better than Xenon, but not by the amount you make it out to be. and because Cell can assist RSX, i think that makes up for it being not as efficient as the Xenos. i think the ps3 has the potential to be 10%-15% better than the 360 overall, but only time will tell. some things, the 360 excels in and some things the ps3 excels in. but we at least know that it will be at least on par with the 360.rahzel54

this is why:

ps3 is the only consumer hardware to run HAVOK 4.5 at optimum speed.

RIDGE RACER 7 at 1080p at 60fps is only possible on ps3..........:)

http://www.pro-g.co.uk/news/30-10-2006-3931.html

no AI in GEARS/ no PHYSICS in GEARS.

LAIR is only possible on ps3.

DMC 4 and FF13 only possible on ps3.

I know it hurts you to see that x360 is wayy inferior to ps3 but facts are facts

http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/power/library/pa-cellperf/ ...............this is from IBM manufacturer of both XENON AND CELL

http://www.mc.com/cell/

http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~samw/projects/cell/LBLTalk.pdf

http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~samw/projects/cell/EDGE06_abstract.pdf

CELL is 50x more powerful than the CONROE 2..............RAPIDMIND and UI both claims ps3 to be a powerful supercomputer

http://ps3.qj.net/RapidMind-Terra-Soft-to-make-PS3-Linux-devkit/pg/49/aid/79090

http://www.consumerelectronicsnet.com/articles/viewarticle.jsp?id=96305

http://www.news-gazette.com/news/local/2007/02/04/ibm_taps_local_researchers_to_turn_playstation_3_chip_to_science

overall: the ps3 is between 3x---10x as powerful as the x360

CELL is 20x (minimum ) more powerful than XENON

[QUOTE="rahzel54"]washimul, i'm a huge sony fanboy, but even i know the ps3 is not that much more powerful than the 360. on paper, yes, the ps3 is more powerful as it has more raw horsepower. however, the Xenos is more efficient than RSX because of its unified shaders and 10mb of edram making it a tad better than RSX imo. i agree that Cell is better than Xenon, but not by the amount you make it out to be. and because Cell can assist RSX, i think that makes up for it being not as efficient as the Xenos. i think the ps3 has the potential to be 10%-15% better than the 360 overall, but only time will tell. some things, the 360 excels in and some things the ps3 excels in. but we at least know that it will be at least on par with the 360.washimul

this is why:

ps3 is the only consumer hardware to run HAVOK 4.5 at optimum speed.

RIDGE RACER 7 at 1080p at 60fps is only possible on ps3..........:)

http://www.pro-g.co.uk/news/30-10-2006-3931.html

no AI in GEARS/ no PHYSICS in GEARS.

LAIR is only possible on ps3.

DMC 4 and FF13 only possible on ps3.

I know it hurts you to see that x360 is wayy inferior to ps3 but facts are facts

http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/power/library/pa-cellperf/ ...............this is from IBM manufacturer of both XENON AND CELL

http://www.mc.com/cell/

http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~samw/projects/cell/LBLTalk.pdf

http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~samw/projects/cell/EDGE06_abstract.pdf

CELL is 50x more powerful than the CONROE 2..............RAPIDMIND and UI both claims ps3 to be a powerful supercomputer

http://ps3.qj.net/RapidMind-Terra-Soft-to-make-PS3-Linux-devkit/pg/49/aid/79090

http://www.consumerelectronicsnet.com/articles/viewarticle.jsp?id=96305

http://www.news-gazette.com/news/local/2007/02/04/ibm_taps_local_researchers_to_turn_playstation_3_chip_to_science

overall: the ps3 is between 3x---10x as powerful as the x360

CELL is 20x (minimum ) more powerful than XENON

[QUOTE="washimul"]

[QUOTE="rahzel54"]washimul, i'm a huge sony fanboy, but even i know the ps3 is not that much more powerful than the 360. on paper, yes, the ps3 is more powerful as it has more raw horsepower. however, the Xenos is more efficient than RSX because of its unified shaders and 10mb of edram making it a tad better than RSX imo. i agree that Cell is better than Xenon, but not by the amount you make it out to be. and because Cell can assist RSX, i think that makes up for it being not as efficient as the Xenos. i think the ps3 has the potential to be 10%-15% better than the 360 overall, but only time will tell. some things, the 360 excels in and some things the ps3 excels in. but we at least know that it will be at least on par with the 360.Zetabyte91

eDRAM is useless at 1080p..........edram is there to make up for the lack of video bandwidth

25g/s +22g/s vs 22g/s

the UNIFIED shaders used in XENOS are weak and non dedicated.........the 28 vertex shaders + 8 pixel shaders used in ps3 are dedicated.

dont compare the UNIFIED architecture of 8800gtx with XENOS ( lol)

RSX has the highest dimension till date (258 mm2)

UBISOFT is seeking the help of SONY engineers to maximize the shader performance of RSX>..................RSX has been changed too............IT has more prpgrammable an d non programmable flops compared to XENOS

RSX is connected to 2 rams......the bridge between the XDR is what makes a difference.

at 3.2 ghz ........XDR can send data is the form of 16 packets............the execution takes 1/5 as the total time by GDDR 3 or GDDR4.

eDRAM is effective  but not at TRUE HD at 1080p at 60fps.

at 720 p sure eDRAM would come in handy.

[QUOTE="Zetabyte91"][QUOTE="washimul"]

[QUOTE="rahzel54"]washimul, i'm a huge sony fanboy, but even i know the ps3 is not that much more powerful than the 360. on paper, yes, the ps3 is more powerful as it has more raw horsepower. however, the Xenos is more efficient than RSX because of its unified shaders and 10mb of edram making it a tad better than RSX imo. i agree that Cell is better than Xenon, but not by the amount you make it out to be. and because Cell can assist RSX, i think that makes up for it being not as efficient as the Xenos. i think the ps3 has the potential to be 10%-15% better than the 360 overall, but only time will tell. some things, the 360 excels in and some things the ps3 excels in. but we at least know that it will be at least on par with the 360.washimul

eDRAM is useless at 1080p..........edram is there to make up for the lack of video bandwidth

25g/s +22g/s vs 22g/s

the UNIFIED shaders used in XENOS are weak and non dedicated.........the 28 vertex shaders + 8 pixel shaders used in ps3 are dedicated.

dont compare the UNIFIED architecture of 8800gtx with XENOS ( lol)

RSX has the highest dimension till date (258 mm2)

UBISOFT is seeking the help of SONY engineers to maximize the shader performance of RSX>..................RSX has been changed too............IT has more prpgrammable an d non programmable flops compared to XENOS

RSX is connected to 2 rams......the bridge between the XDR is what makes a difference.

at 3.2 ghz ........XDR can send data is the form of 16 packets............the execution takes 1/5 as the total time by GDDR 3 or GDDR4.

eDRAM is effective but not at TRUE HD at 1080p at 60fps.

at 720 p sure eDRAM would come in handy.

[QUOTE="washimul"]

[QUOTE="rahzel54"]washimul, i'm a huge sony fanboy, but even i know the ps3 is not that much more powerful than the 360. on paper, yes, the ps3 is more powerful as it has more raw horsepower. however, the Xenos is more efficient than RSX because of its unified shaders and 10mb of edram making it a tad better than RSX imo. i agree that Cell is better than Xenon, but not by the amount you make it out to be. and because Cell can assist RSX, i think that makes up for it being not as efficient as the Xenos. i think the ps3 has the potential to be 10%-15% better than the 360 overall, but only time will tell. some things, the 360 excels in and some things the ps3 excels in. but we at least know that it will be at least on par with the 360.rahzel54

eDRAM is useless at 1080p..........edram is there to make up for the lack of video bandwidth

25g/s +22g/s vs 22g/s

the UNIFIED shaders used in XENOS are weak and non dedicated.........the 28 vertex shaders + 8 pixel shaders used in ps3 are dedicated.

dont compare the UNIFIED architecture of 8800gtx with XENOS ( lol)

RSX has the highest dimension till date (258 mm2)

UBISOFT is seeking the help of SONY engineers to maximize the shader performance of RSX>..................RSX has been changed too............IT has more prpgrammable an d non programmable flops compared to XENOS

XENOS has 0 edge over RSX.

at 1080p RSX + CELL combo would estroy the quad+8800 combo.

future games are running at 1080i/p..........so XENON would have no edge.

even at 720p when u apply massive enemy AI/ extensive physics calculation.......the edge fades to zero.

but well if you are taking a generic game like FNR3.............at 720 p XENOS has the edge................at 1080p RSX has the edge.

NOTE: -1080p at 60fps is only possible on ps3.

http://www.pro-g.co.uk/news/30-10-2006-3931.html

[QUOTE="rahzel54"][QUOTE="washimul"]

[QUOTE="rahzel54"]washimul, i'm a huge sony fanboy, but even i know the ps3 is not that much more powerful than the 360. on paper, yes, the ps3 is more powerful as it has more raw horsepower. however, the Xenos is more efficient than RSX because of its unified shaders and 10mb of edram making it a tad better than RSX imo. i agree that Cell is better than Xenon, but not by the amount you make it out to be. and because Cell can assist RSX, i think that makes up for it being not as efficient as the Xenos. i think the ps3 has the potential to be 10%-15% better than the 360 overall, but only time will tell. some things, the 360 excels in and some things the ps3 excels in. but we at least know that it will be at least on par with the 360.washimul

eDRAM is useless at 1080p..........edram is there to make up for the lack of video bandwidth

25g/s +22g/s vs 22g/s

the UNIFIED shaders used in XENOS are weak and non dedicated.........the 28 vertex shaders + 8 pixel shaders used in ps3 are dedicated.

dont compare the UNIFIED architecture of 8800gtx with XENOS ( lol)

RSX has the highest dimension till date (258 mm2)

UBISOFT is seeking the help of SONY engineers to maximize the shader performance of RSX>..................RSX has been changed too............IT has more prpgrammable an d non programmable flops compared to XENOS

XENOS has 0 edge over RSX.

at 1080p RSX + CELL combo would estroy the quad+8800 combo.

future games are running at 1080i/p..........so XENON would have no edge.

even at 720p when u apply massive enemy AI/ extensive physics calculation.......the edge fades to zero.

but well if you are taking a generic game like FNR3.............at 720 p XENOS has the edge................at 1080p RSX has the edge.

NOTE: -1080p at 60fps is only possible on ps3.

http://www.pro-g.co.uk/news/30-10-2006-3931.html

lol, it doesn't hurt me to see the x360 is inferior to the ps3... like i said, im a ps3 fanboy. i didn't say the ps3 is inferior, i just dont think that its THAT much better.rahzel54

if you are not then i take back my words and offer you my apology.

Some of you might be disappointed with ps3's performance till date....................just wait for MOTORSTORM and chill.

by mid-2007 -----2008 u wdnt be disappointed anymore when you wd get to see the full glory of HAVOK 4.5/ RAPIDMIND SDK/ UI optimizers for CELL>

be a little bit patient.

when the duel core pcs came out the CUSTOMERS were as disappointed as u guys.

but now they are more than satisfied.

JUST give the CELL based supercomputer some time to bloom!!!

[QUOTE="rahzel54"]lol, it doesn't hurt me to see the x360 is inferior to the ps3... like i said, im a ps3 fanboy. i didn't say the ps3 is inferior, i just dont think that its THAT much better.washimul

if you are not then i take back my words and offer you my apology.

Some of you might be disappointed with ps3's performance till date....................just wait for MOTORSTORM and chill.

by mid-2007 -----2008 u wdnt be disappointed anymore when you wd get to see the full glory of HAVOK 4.5/ RAPIDMIND SDK/ UI optimizers for CELL>

be a little bit patient.

when the duel core pcs came out the CUSTOMERS were as disappointed as u guys.

but now they are more than satisfied.

JUST give the CELL based supercomputer some time to bloom!!!

aagin u are not reading anything.

the 256g/s is the BANDWIDTH to eDRAM..................which is ineffective at 1080i/1080p

however if you are taking the bandwidth to eDRAM ..........then you have to add the EIB of both systems.

the AGRREGATE ps3 bandwidth exceeds 400g/s!!!!

the ps3 has 22g/s VDO bandwidth

25g/s system bandwidth

the x360 has 25g/s for both VDO and SYSTEM.

the eDRAM makes up for the lack of VDO BW at lower resolutions in games having less intensive computations.

the 35 gb fig was invented and debunked at GDC!!! the inquirer made up that figure....it is not the realtime fig though

ps3 has over 480 programmable flops.

x360 has less than 400 programmable flops

[QUOTE="casey7672"]PS3 is powerful. Programmers just have to know how to utilize its power. I believe it is about 20% more powerful than 360. Great find, thanks. monco59

Why dosent every topic on the PS3 board belong in system wars......i mean you fanboys (360 AND ps3) turned 'is crysis on the ps3 ' into how much more powerful is the PS3 than the 360.It seems all the PS fanboys are very inscure to always rise to other fanboys.
Arsenal140

Crysis on the PS3 is a Playstation fan's Greatest Dreams ever come true, hopefully it happens..

PSN ID: Mobius_124