did cod4 recieve as much hate as mw2?

just wondering, i didnt havecurrent gen console when cod4 came out. its obvious mw2 recieves a lot of hate here on gamespot, just wondering, did cod4 get a lot of hate or was it respected? and do plenty of people still play it?

just wondering, i didnt havecurrent gen console when cod4 came out. its obvious mw2 recieves a lot of hate here on gamespot, just wondering, did cod4 get a lot of hate or was it respected? and do plenty of people still play it?

mammojo

NO that game was flawless...IMO No one really hated it like ppl do MW2

[QUOTE="mammojo"]

just wondering, i didnt havecurrent gen console when cod4 came out. its obvious mw2 recieves a lot of hate here on gamespot, just wondering, did cod4 get a lot of hate or was it respected? and do plenty of people still play it?

silentnightmere

NO that game was flawless...IMO No one really hated it like ppl do MW2

I wouldn't call it flawless but it had very little to complain about. Haters were rare for that game thats for sure.

[QUOTE="silentnightmere"]

[QUOTE="mammojo"]

just wondering, i didnt havecurrent gen console when cod4 came out. its obvious mw2 recieves a lot of hate here on gamespot, just wondering, did cod4 get a lot of hate or was it respected? and do plenty of people still play it?

Console_Gamer93

NO that game was flawless...IMO No one really hated it like ppl do MW2

I wouldn't call it flawless but it had very little to complain about. Haters were rare for that game thats for sure.

the only thing i hated was juggernaugt or however its spelled...but then again who didnt ?

[QUOTE="Console_Gamer93"]

[QUOTE="silentnightmere"]

NO that game was flawless...IMO No one really hated it like ppl do MW2

silentnightmere

I wouldn't call it flawless but it had very little to complain about. Haters were rare for that game thats for sure.

the only thing i hated was juggernaugt or however its spelled...but then again who didnt ?

No, because it was the best of the series, and MW2 is a downgraded clone. COD4 had problems, but the ones they fixed in MW2 were replaced with new ones.

No, because it was the best of the series, and MW2 is a downgraded clone. COD4 had problems, but the ones they fixed in MW2 were replaced with new ones.

dimebag667

nope it did not

Not at all. COD4 was great. It wasnt until after the release of COD4 that the series was (in the words of Bobby Kotick) "exploited annually".

No most people (including myself) loved COD4, aside from Frag x3 and martyrdom...

MW2 is hated by people who die alot in that game. Same with CoD4. And I still won't understand why people hate it. MW2 is basically CoD4 only faster and with more variety of guns, perks and killstreaks.

MW2 is hated by people who die alot in that game. Same with CoD4. And I still won't understand why people hate it. MW2 is basically CoD4 only faster and with more variety of guns, perks and killstreaks.

KamuiFei

[QUOTE="mammojo"]

just wondering, i didnt havecurrent gen console when cod4 came out. its obvious mw2 recieves a lot of hate here on gamespot, just wondering, did cod4 get a lot of hate or was it respected? and do plenty of people still play it?

NO that game was flawless...IMO No one really hated it like ppl do MW2

I was here for years, and nope, it doesn't come close to MW2 hate, in fact, it's one of the most loved games this gen!

I like it too.

No, but it got alot of hate around WaW's release. Alot of Waw hypers bashed COD4 to hype up WaW(like me, I was a stupid kid back then though)

The reason why everybody hate MW2 is because they are comparing it to CoD4, a much superior game imo. Flawless as people says.

The only problem with COD4 is the amount of grenades. (3x grenade perk and martyrdom.) Other than that, there's really nothing to complain about.

Well I for one really liked the campaign in MW2 better than in CoD4, but the campaign in CoD4 was still great. As for the online multi-player I really liked CoD4 alot more as it was way more fun to play, but MW2 to me just isn't that great and it tries too hard to be great and that is where it fails.

Nope its muuuuuuuch better

I think both are overated. It is fun? yes. It is intense? yes. is it worth? sure. BUT I think there are SO many better FPS.... Bioshock or Crysis, for exemple, have a richer universe, a more fascinating story, more original concepts and - most important - more complex gameplay. C'mon...COD series you only run, hide and shoot the WHOLE time. It would be nothing without a blockbuster script and "Michael Bayish" cutscenes sequences.

I think both are overated. It is fun? yes. It is intense? yes. is it worth? sure. BUT I think there are SO many better FPS.... Bioshock or Crysis, for exemple, have a richer universe, a more fascinating story, more original concepts and - most important - more complex gameplay. C'mon...COD series you only run, hide and shoot the WHOLE time. It would be nothing without a blockbuster script and "Michael Bayish" cutscenes sequences.

agraciotti

[QUOTE="agraciotti"]

I think both are overated. It is fun? yes. It is intense? yes. is it worth? sure. BUT I think there are SO many better FPS.... Bioshock or Crysis, for exemple, have a richer universe, a more fascinating story, more original concepts and - most important - more complex gameplay. C'mon...COD series you only run, hide and shoot the WHOLE time. It would be nothing without a blockbuster script and "Michael Bayish" cutscenes sequences.

heytheredarlin

No.

I loved that game (COD4), played that game for a year online without even losing interest, not like MW2 that I play rarely.

so does this mean that cod4 is a better game? or just a more respected one?

COD4 was simple yet also complicated once you got into the multi because once you became a high rank you had to decide what would be the best perk to go out with and with what gun. MW2 sucked because they changed all of that and made bull crap. The multi on MW2 was practiclly find the cheapest way to kill your oppenent which is that hard to find. (one man army+danger close+noob toob=super noob tastic man)

They added different killstreaks which was fun but also a let down. Good because now you weren't limited to what you could call out. Bad, because now everybody camps and kills the gameplay. I love hardcore team deathmatch on 4 but it sucked on MW2 because everybody was camping.

I am 50/50 on MW2 guns, I liked most guns except for the fact that my favorite gun in the world (AUG) was made into a LMG when it was a assault in the campagin and in most modern uses it is also an assualt weapon. Also all the snipers where two shots and not one. Even on hardcore I would shot somebody square in the chest and they would keep on going. If you didn't get a headshot then your shot was pointless.

They did what alot of companies do and that is change too much from the orignal. "Don't fix what isn't broken" something that many companies fail to do with sequals and MW2 being an example.

No, I didn't think CoD4 was as great as everyone says though. I'd say MW2 is better (not including MP). I don't know why everyone hates on MW2.