Do you thing Sony doesn't care about current PS3 owners?

  • 67 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for soulreaper-4
soulreaper-4

2247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 soulreaper-4
Member since 2007 • 2247 Posts

In my opinion it was too soon to redesign the form of the current soon to be phase out PS3. The original PS2 took 4 years and the PS3 have not been in the market for at least 3 years. I understand that by redesigning it, promoting it more and by lowering the price more consoles will be sold and more and better games will arrive, i know this is good and all but come on why change the PLAYSTATION 3 logo to PS3 even the colored P in the front, now the the system start you see a different logo and by looking at the picture of the new Japanese gundam slim bundle you can tell that the are going to redesign even game boxes. Maybe they are even going to change the logo that appears before staring to play each game.

Japanese Gundam Bundle



Again in my opinion it was too soon, everyone with one of the current PS3's without BC will feel sooner or later like that they have a old and less modern model, the PS2 Slim arrived after more than 60 millions consoles were sold, only like 24 millions of gamers have the current model. The worse part is that it will arrive like two weeks after the announcement it may even take less time to arrive in stores and if we try to sell it people will think the console is inferior and want it almost free like trash the same for GameStop which will now give like $100.00 in trade-in.

Avatar image for chaplainDMK
chaplainDMK

7004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 chaplainDMK
Member since 2008 • 7004 Posts

In my opinion it was too soon to redesign the form of the current soon to be phase out PS3. The original PS2 took 4 years and the PS3 have not been in the market for at least 3 years. I understand that by redesigning it, promoting it more and by lowering the price more consoles will be sold and more and better games will arrive, i know this is good and all but come on why change the PLAYSTATION 3 logo to PS3 even the colored P in the front, now the the system start you see a different logo and by looking at the picture of the new Japanese gundam slim bundle you can tell that the are going to redesign even game boxes. Maybe they are even going to change the logo that appears before staring to play each game.


Again in my opinion it was too soon, everyone with one of the current PS3's without BC will feel sooner or later like that they have a old and less modern model, the PS2 Slim arrived after more than 60 millions consoles were sold, only like 24 millions of gamers have the current model. The worse part is that it will arrive like two weeks after the announcement it may even take less time to arrive in stores and if we try to sell it people will think the console is inferior and want it almost free like trash the same for GameStop which will now give like $100.00 in trade-in.

soulreaper-4

Erm your complaining that sony is trying to make a profit?
Riiight... Good luck with this thread

Avatar image for Phoenix534
Phoenix534

17774

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Phoenix534
Member since 2008 • 17774 Posts

They changed the logo and design. Big deal. It's still a PS3 and there are many more people that will buy the system now. I don't see what's wrong with change if it means more sales.

Avatar image for soulreaper-4
soulreaper-4

2247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 soulreaper-4
Member since 2007 • 2247 Posts
Ha ha sorry for the grammar, Ha thing without the H.
Avatar image for Leon_Kennedy1
Leon_Kennedy1

1030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Leon_Kennedy1
Member since 2006 • 1030 Posts
And why would I care ? :? It doesn't make any difference to me.
Avatar image for kingofinsane
kingofinsane

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 kingofinsane
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts

does not mind if they resdesgin it

Avatar image for runekey
runekey

697

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 runekey
Member since 2008 • 697 Posts

This proves that the interent will never be content. There will always be someone that will continue to whine and complain.

Avatar image for Phoenix534
Phoenix534

17774

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Phoenix534
Member since 2008 • 17774 Posts

This proves that the interent will never be content. There will always be someone that will continue to whine and complain.

runekey

Yes it does.

Avatar image for Eazy1891
Eazy1891

3089

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#9 Eazy1891
Member since 2009 • 3089 Posts

if you wanted a PS3 with B/C you shouldve bought a PS3 almost about 2 years ago, probably the MGS4 bundle.....but oh well...too bad...thats all i can say to you, moving on well i think they did it a little too early...but they still did it and it turned out pretty good

Avatar image for Bladex2k
Bladex2k

2755

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 Bladex2k
Member since 2003 • 2755 Posts

um it sthe same system just smaller lol. what can the slim do that your ps3 cant do?

Avatar image for Nike_Air
Nike_Air

19737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Nike_Air
Member since 2006 • 19737 Posts

Wow , our system will look a little bitter different than the newowners ps3s.How could you do this to us Sony ?!!!? :cry:

Avatar image for deactivated-5dd711115e664
deactivated-5dd711115e664

8956

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 deactivated-5dd711115e664
Member since 2005 • 8956 Posts

[QUOTE="soulreaper-4"]

In my opinion it was too soon to redesign the form of the current soon to be phase out PS3. The original PS2 took 4 years and the PS3 have not been in the market for at least 3 years. I understand that by redesigning it, promoting it more and by lowering the price more consoles will be sold and more and better games will arrive, i know this is good and all but come on why change the PLAYSTATION 3 logo to PS3 even the colored P in the front, now the the system start you see a different logo and by looking at the picture of the new Japanese gundam slim bundle you can tell that the are going to redesign even game boxes. Maybe they are even going to change the logo that appears before staring to play each game.


Again in my opinion it was too soon, everyone with one of the current PS3's without BC will feel sooner or later like that they have a old and less modern model, the PS2 Slim arrived after more than 60 millions consoles were sold, only like 24 millions of gamers have the current model. The worse part is that it will arrive like two weeks after the announcement it may even take less time to arrive in stores and if we try to sell it people will think the console is inferior and want it almost free like trash the same for GameStop which will now give like $100.00 in trade-in.

chaplainDMK

Erm your complaining that sony is trying to make a profit?
Riiight... Good luck with this thread

Either that, or he's complaining that how new and fashionable looking a console is is more important than the games and capabilities.

I agree the slim LOOKS cool, but in my opinion, it also looks CHEAP compared to the PS3. But either way, they have all the same features, play the same games, etc. So what is the problem. A lot of whiners here since what SHOULD have been a very positive announcement.

Avatar image for 2beers_in_hand
2beers_in_hand

2950

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 2beers_in_hand
Member since 2007 • 2950 Posts

Wow , our system will look a little bitter different than the newowners ps3s.How could you do this to us Sony ?!!!? :cry:

Nike_Air

I'm with you pal!!!:cry: Actually TC it was the right move, better things will come with a larger user base. Hell I paid over $ 800 for two games and the 60gigPS3 in 07. Do I feel cheated? No I knew what I was paying for, a freaking awesome machine!!!

Avatar image for Rakuho
Rakuho

7008

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#14 Rakuho
Member since 2007 • 7008 Posts
yes, because people are so insecure as to how their PS3s look :roll: an example of Sony not caring would be for it to stop releasing firmware updates for older models... but what you're talking about is a non-issue...
Avatar image for queen_vee
queen_vee

438

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#15 queen_vee
Member since 2008 • 438 Posts
I couldnt really care less, Sony released a slimmer PS3 with a different logo. It dosnt make any difference to your own gaming experience, you still have the same console, consider yourself a real PS3 fan if you have the older model rather than the folk running out to buy a Slim for the 'fashion' ?
Avatar image for Cloud850
Cloud850

176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Cloud850
Member since 2009 • 176 Posts
If Sony cared about current PS3 owners, they would add backwards compatibility
Avatar image for Young_Charter
Young_Charter

20067

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 62

User Lists: 0

#17 Young_Charter
Member since 2009 • 20067 Posts
i mean, dont forget they need to make money in their pockets also.... they already gave us free internet... that makes the economy more happier that we dont have to pay for that... i mean their trying..
Avatar image for Gisoid
Gisoid

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Gisoid
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts

If Sony cared about current PS3 owners, they would add backwards compatibilityCloud850

Stop complaining about backwards compatibility pay PS3 games. They are not going to make it B/C they are still making profit off the PS2.

Avatar image for Phoenix534
Phoenix534

17774

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Phoenix534
Member since 2008 • 17774 Posts

[QUOTE="Cloud850"]If Sony cared about current PS3 owners, they would add backwards compatibilityGisoid

Stop complaining about backwards compatibility pay PS3 games. They are not going to make it B/C they are still making profit off the PS2.

Yeah. And the PS2 is only $99.99 USD. If you want to play PS2 games so badly, buy a PS2.

Avatar image for Cloud850
Cloud850

176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Cloud850
Member since 2009 • 176 Posts

[QUOTE="Gisoid"]

[QUOTE="Cloud850"]If Sony cared about current PS3 owners, they would add backwards compatibilityPhoenix534

Stop complaining about backwards compatibility pay PS3 games. They are not going to make it B/C they are still making profit off the PS2.

Yeah. And the PS2 is only $99.99 USD. If you want to play PS2 games so badly, buy a PS2.

I have a PS2, but I bought a PS3 mainly because my PS2 has a ton of problems and I didn't want to buy another PS2
Avatar image for Bladex2k
Bladex2k

2755

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#21 Bladex2k
Member since 2003 • 2755 Posts

sony will add b/c to ps3 1 or 2 years before ps4 comes out when nobody is buying a ps2 lol

Avatar image for Phoenix534
Phoenix534

17774

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Phoenix534
Member since 2008 • 17774 Posts

sony will add b/c to ps3 1 or 2 years before ps4 comes out when nobody is buying a ps2 lol

Bladex2k

Yeah. As long as the PS2 sales, there won't be any b/c

Avatar image for Cloud850
Cloud850

176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Cloud850
Member since 2009 • 176 Posts

sony will add b/c to ps3 1 or 2 years before ps4 comes out when nobody is buying a ps2 lol

Bladex2k
I hope so
Avatar image for Twig978
Twig978

557

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Twig978
Member since 2009 • 557 Posts
Your complaining because Sony is trying to get more people to buy a PS3 and to boost the install base. This will encourage devs to make more games for the PS3 and as for the PS2 slim, the PS2 was always a hot item, the PS3 was kinda sorta so Sony needed something to lower cost and get more sold. You will still get the same games, the same PSN, and on some models even BC, it's the same thing but in a different form factor.
Avatar image for Doolz2024
Doolz2024

9623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#25 Doolz2024
Member since 2007 • 9623 Posts
It's all about making $$$. This was a good move by Sony.
Avatar image for rjxtian
rjxtian

2638

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#26 rjxtian
Member since 2005 • 2638 Posts

We are quite happy theat Sony is bringing out the PS3 SLim. We will buy it, so that both the mighty Helen and I each have a PS3.

Avatar image for 360hammer
360hammer

2596

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 360hammer
Member since 2009 • 2596 Posts

LMAO

Seriously if Sony came out and said no more updates for the Fat I'd be a little sympathetic. Smart people bought the PS3 and knew what it had and what it didn't have (BC) you don't want a PS3 without BC then don't buy one. If you bought a PS3 without BC what exactly is there to complain about?

Avatar image for bluem00se
bluem00se

2185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 bluem00se
Member since 2005 • 2185 Posts
It doesn't matter if Son comes out with a new slimmer model. It's cheaper, smaller, more appealing. It will help them make more profit. How is that bad to any of us who already own PS3's? The one way in which I think your claim has some truth is through the recent fw updates Sony has been giving us. Just look at 3.0. Complete POS for a 'major' update. In that way, and in how Sony has been holding off on giving us b/c via fw update because the PS2 is still selling (face it, that's the #1 reason they won't give it to us), I feel they have been giving us a bit of the finger lately.
Avatar image for Mickeyminime
Mickeyminime

1595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#29 Mickeyminime
Member since 2008 • 1595 Posts
I dont like the look of the new PS3 logo on the front of the Slim, but at the end of the day, im not going to have the slim unless my PS3 dies on me. The thing i will complain about is if they end up having a PS4 made and ready to be sold by the end of this year lol. Like wt! just launched the PS3 slim 5months ago and now you got a PS4 out =S. Not that it would happen, i hope lol, but i like many others are still a proud owner of the current PS3 =]. Anyone who goes to slim, its up to them, i dont know what is so good about it, apart from it being very quite......and it being very slim?
Avatar image for soulreaper-4
soulreaper-4

2247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 soulreaper-4
Member since 2007 • 2247 Posts
They should stop realizing different SKUs, come on 20GB, 60GB, 40GB, 80GB, 160 and now 120GB.
Avatar image for D4NZEL-709
D4NZEL-709

1053

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#31 D4NZEL-709
Member since 2008 • 1053 Posts

I couldnt really care less, Sony released a slimmer PS3 with a different logo. It dosnt make any difference to your own gaming experience, you still have the same console, consider yourself a real PS3 fan if you have the older model rather than the folk running out to buy a Slim for the 'fashion' ?queen_vee

what about the ones who bought day one and got em ruined cause of its dust magnet and in about 1 year or so ur ps3 will be out

it would be wierd if sony would just randomlymake all consoles get YLOD by pressing one buttton so everyone will have to buy a new ps3

Avatar image for Denji
Denji

12757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#32 Denji
Member since 2003 • 12757 Posts

Sony's trying to make the PS3 more affordable to more people. There's nothing wrong with that.

Hopefully it'll bring a bigger market and more support. That is something I'm "all for" when it comes to PS3.

Avatar image for Furi-Kun
Furi-Kun

10903

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 Furi-Kun
Member since 2007 • 10903 Posts

Sony loves me...at least my wallet.

Avatar image for Ospov
Ospov

3708

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Ospov
Member since 2007 • 3708 Posts

tl;dr. stop complaining. if you think they don't care about current PS3 owners, then why are they producing AAA games for use to play later this year and early next year?

Avatar image for AgentZero225
AgentZero225

1718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 AgentZero225
Member since 2007 • 1718 Posts

They did what they had to do. In order for them to catch and pass the 360 they needed to cut the costs of the system. The redesign is exactly what they needed. Too many people have had a bias toward sony since the PS3 came out and now they have nothing to complain about. This does not affect current PS3 owners. We got the system early on because of the value we believed it gave us. Do I regret spending 600 on my 60GB PS3? Not at all. If some one regrets not having the slim trade in your fat PS3 and get one or just buy it. This is a business and success will determine the next gen of systems. I will pick up the Slim in due time to add one more system to my living room.

Avatar image for Wild_Card
Wild_Card

4034

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#36 Wild_Card
Member since 2005 • 4034 Posts
[QUOTE="Rakuho"]yes, because people are so insecure as to how their PS3s look :roll: an example of Sony not caring would be for it to stop releasing firmware updates for older models... but what you're talking about is a non-issue...

i agree. This in no way effects use "fat" owners. The slim alows them to drop the price of the ps3. wich will bring in a boat load of new users wich is a good thing. i can not see what the TC is complaining about. It makes no sense to me what so ever. as time goes on older tech gets cheaper and improved. sony made the right move. in fact i wish they had done so sooner ;)
Avatar image for Wild_Card
Wild_Card

4034

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#37 Wild_Card
Member since 2005 • 4034 Posts
They should stop realizing different SKUs, come on 20GB, 60GB, 40GB, 80GB, 160 and now 120GB.soulreaper-4
And why is that? Gee how dare they improve the system and give people better bang for there buck. You see the fact is right now its cheaper for them to stock 80 gig drives than it would be to do so with 20 gig drives. sony does not build the drives but buys them from other companies in this case segate. segate or any other company no longer mass produce's 20/40/60 gig drives. thus they would have to set up completely defferant producton lines to make the smaller drives wich would drive up the cost. so why the frick would it be a good thing to pay more for less and give buyers less for there money. dude you need to stop whining and just enjoy your ps3
Avatar image for bobaban
bobaban

10560

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 bobaban
Member since 2005 • 10560 Posts
Nope I'm glad, this means more support for the console. Plus I have the definitive version the 60 gig.
Avatar image for DaSaint93
DaSaint93

355

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#39 DaSaint93
Member since 2008 • 355 Posts
Sony is Awesome!
Avatar image for gamer082009
gamer082009

6679

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#40 gamer082009
Member since 2007 • 6679 Posts
Sony doesn't care about anything but the moneyyy. There's no such thing as a company caring about it's users. It cares about money and money only. I think they care about making money which is why they dropped the price by $100, not because they wanted to, but because they HAD TO.
Avatar image for King9999
King9999

11837

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 0

#41 King9999
Member since 2002 • 11837 Posts

They rebranded the PS3, and at the same time dropped the price. How does that sound like not caring?

To me, it sounds like Sony is getting serious.

Avatar image for gamenerd15
gamenerd15

4529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#42 gamenerd15
Member since 2007 • 4529 Posts

The slim enables sony to make a profit again with parts now being cheaper it only costs them 250 to make it. I can't believe people are still whining about BC. If you are playing PS2 games more than 3 then there is no reason for you to get the system. Here is the hint, when buying a new system you should look forward to playing the new games on that system. They had BC and no wanted the PS3 then so there you go. You made your bed. With the exception of BC the people that bought the other models and the people buying the slim are getting the same thing the launch models owners have at a much lower cost. The BC isn't perfect even in the 60GB model. you new owners complain that it isn't fair that you don't have BC. Well it's not fair that the launch owners paid a certain only to have it drop 200 dollars after year 1 and then another hundred another year and a half later. It's not fair I paid $600 while others paid 400 a year later. Hey I made the choice to get the system early and now I live with that decision.

Everyone else waited and so now you have to live with your decision. Everyone who bought the PS3 a year later new they were taking BC out but bought the 40 GB anyway. Maybe if people would have saved up the money to meet the price instead of waiting for it to come down, Sony might have seen that BC was popular and it might have stuck.

But people waited instead because it was "too expensive." Waiting for the price to lower is the same thing as saying you don't care about certain features it offers.

Sony might not have always made the right decision but the consumer also has to look at what the system does and make an educated decision. You can't expect to buy a premium console at 300 or less. You have to be willing to pay the extra price or give up something to get the main functions of the console. The problem is everybody wants a bad a** system for $10 and it isn't happening. "you get what you pay for" rings true with electronics.

Avatar image for ANIALATOR136
ANIALATOR136

1157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#43 ANIALATOR136
Member since 2008 • 1157 Posts
They need to take into consideration their currently ps3 owning community. Give them something in return for their loyalty. Perhaps a free psn card? he he come on Sony
Avatar image for amcallisterni
amcallisterni

366

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 amcallisterni
Member since 2007 • 366 Posts
CHILL THE F*** OUT. and anyway, if they didn't care they wouldn't be constantly adding features (3.00)
Avatar image for codezer0
codezer0

15898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 0

#45 codezer0
Member since 2004 • 15898 Posts
If Sony cared about current PS3 owners, they would add backwards compatibilityCloud850
And at this point, it seems Sony would rather all take a Cyanide cocktail along with a Seppuku special before that will ever happen.
Avatar image for rogerjak
rogerjak

14950

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#46 rogerjak
Member since 2004 • 14950 Posts

It's the same mahcine...with a different logo...Is that so important?

Avatar image for codezer0
codezer0

15898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 0

#47 codezer0
Member since 2004 • 15898 Posts

It's the same mahcine...with a different logo...Is that so important?

rogerjak
... Apparently, yes. Then again, the part I care about is what's inside it. To me, Sony killed off useful ps3's too early in the system's life time.
Avatar image for kramer_inc
kramer_inc

1303

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 129

User Lists: 0

#48 kramer_inc
Member since 2008 • 1303 Posts

This proves that the interent will never be content. There will always be someone that will continue to whine and complain.

runekey

OMG you are so right way,way to much crying and whinning.

Avatar image for Videodogg
Videodogg

12611

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#49 Videodogg
Member since 2002 • 12611 Posts

If the logo on the software boxes bothers you so much, just get rid of all your old games....problem solved.

Avatar image for gamenerd15
gamenerd15

4529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#50 gamenerd15
Member since 2007 • 4529 Posts

he is right you know. Especially those people who think useful PS3's have to have BC. Because in order to play PS3 games you need to be able to play PS2 games.