Did you actually read these posts why so many PS3 users want BC? And don't say the ps2 "only" costs $100. I know the ps2 costs around like $60 bucks on ebay but you don't get it. We don't want to have multiple systems and we don't want to spend "only $100" for new system. And it is hilarious how you say "I have tons of great ps2 games THAT I NEVER HAD THE URGE TO PLAY ANYMORE?!" Obviously they weren't that "great" to you. I have tons of ps2 games that I actually have the urge to play once in a while especially when tekken5>tekken6, RE4>RE5, VF4:Evo>VF5, Need for Speed: Most Wanted>Need for Speed:Carbon, Def Jam: Fight for NY>Def Jam: Icon (what the hell was that)?!, Grand Theft Auto on PS2>Grand Theft Auto4, Burnout3:Takedown>Burnout Paradise and there are many other great ps2 games. Just because your ps2 and your great ps2 games are gathering dust that doesn't mean everybody else don't want to play ps2 games anymore. Don't automatically assume that just because the ps3 has better graphics that those games are superior to classic ps2 games.
EpiphoneMan2008
what games up there have you not beat multiple times already? how fun can games still be after you played them too death?
yes i read the posts and LOL at the fact that every game you listed up there i own except for three of them. i do not now where you read that i said graphics make games superior either. i was simply stating the fact that ps2 games look stretched out and blurry on flat-screens. your crazy if you think sony will charge less than $50 or more for a BC program on the ps3 (they are still making money off ps2 sales), so why not buy a ps2 and stop hoping for BC if you want to play the games so badly. if people still want to play their ps2 games stop whining about BC and buy a ps2 if you dont already have one.
like i said before i do not have the urge to play my ps2 games anymore because i have already played them to death already NOTbecause i think ps3 games are superior (LOL where did you read that).
Thank you. I do not understand the logic behind those people who are opposed to BC for PS3. It will only make the system better. I mean look at the 360 and the wii they both have BC. Plus saying, "it only costs 100 dollars" is such an ignorant comment considering that not everyone is as spoiled/makes as much money as you. BH14
your post is ignorant for assuming im spoiled or make a lot of money. most ps3 games cost $60 some are $40, so for the price of two games you can basically buy a ps2 to play all your ps2 games. im not against BC im just dumbfounded by the fact that people think sony is just gonna give it to them for free. even when old ps3 systems launched with BC they cost $100 more then old ps3 systems without it, so what are you people saying exactly? you would basically be buying a ps2 anyway.
STFU and read the other posts.... I have a PS2, but why have both systems plugged in when I could just have one that played both games. Plus, as has already been mentioned, there are bluetooth controllers, virtual memory cards, upscaling, smoothing, etc... that would make it a much more enjoyable experience. K? Thanks.EpiphoneMan2008
wow nice choice of words i bet your a real cool guy good job. if only it were that simple old ps3 systems with BC only played a quarter of the ps2 library anyway. also the games that did play did not always run smoothly, upscaling does not make much of a difference, and it's not really that much of a hassle to use a wired controller. virtual memory cards are nice though i doubt you will find a transfer cable to get your old saves on your ps3. yes i read the other posts why do people keep bringing that up seriously.
Log in to comment