Do you think Sony should focus more on 3D gaming and less on motion control.

I feel that 3D gaming feels more in place with the PS3 vision and overall package than the weird unnamed motion conrtoller. I heard that the project natal on the xbox 360 is expected to be a huge fail (unsuccessful attempt to overthrow the Wii from it's stupid mindless waggely gaming market) that will possibly make the PS3 the strongest competitor of 2010. On the other hand, 3D gaming just feels right on the PS3. Since the beggining of it's lifecycle PS3's slogan and main mission was to play beyond. Bluray player and PSN are big factors key to the succes of the PS3 so far (and killer first party titles of course).

I think that if Sony spends too much efforts and money on a possible unsuccessful motion controller, PS3's oportunity may fade away. And also, if a person is willing to spend 1000+ dlls on a big screen and 300+ on a PS3, it's not difficult to imagine that same person spending a little more on the technology/gadgets necessary to play in 3D.

no

3d has its negitives too and since most ppl wont run out and buy a 3d ready hdmi 1.4 compadibly tv so soon its better to focus on motion

The thing is... well, first, it doesn't even have an official name yet. Second, you would have to buy a motion controller for each player and a PS camera.

It's supposed to launch on Spring 2010... something just doesn't feel right.

I feel that 3D gaming feels more in place with the PS3 vision and overall package than the weird unnamed motion conrtoller. I heard that the project natal on the xbox 360 is expected to be a huge fail (unsuccessful attempt to overthrow the Wii from it's stupid mindless waggely gaming market) that will possibly make the PS3 the strongest competitor of 2010. On the other hand, 3D gaming just feels right on the PS3. Since the beggining of it's lifecycle PS3's slogan and main mission was to play beyond. Bluray player and PSN are big factors key to the succes of the PS3 so far (and killer first party titles of course).

I think that if Sony spends too much efforts and money on a possible unsuccessful motion controller, PS3's oportunity may fade away. And also, if a person is willing to spend 1000+ dlls on a big screen and 300+ on a PS3, it's not difficult to imagine that same person spending a little more on the technology/gadgets necessary to play in 3D.

nandito3555

No not yet before we only had SDTVs and HDTV's were the the 3DTV's of that time now HDTV's has gone cheaper and currently has as many people as SDTV's use to so its to Early for the 3DTV's so i think in the next gen would be good and it would be the new HDTV of the gen and there will be something new and more expensive maybe 4D or something

The CES that just happened a few days ago was full of 3D. In the months to come the market will be bombarded with 3D as the technology advances. In time a lot of people will have a tv that supports 3D. And... well, 3D is amazing! A lot of people said the CES demos (of PS3 games) were jawdropping.

I feel that 3D gaming feels more in place with the PS3 vision and overall package than the weird unnamed motion conrtoller. I heard that the project natal on the xbox 360 is expected to be a huge fail (unsuccessful attempt to overthrow the Wii from it's stupid mindless waggely gaming market) that will possibly make the PS3 the strongest competitor of 2010. On the other hand, 3D gaming just feels right on the PS3. Since the beggining of it's lifecycle PS3's slogan and main mission was to play beyond. Bluray player and PSN are big factors key to the succes of the PS3 so far (and killer first party titles of course).

I think that if Sony spends too much efforts and money on a possible unsuccessful motion controller, PS3's oportunity may fade away. And also, if a person is willing to spend 1000+ dlls on a big screen and 300+ on a PS3, it's not difficult to imagine that same person spending a little more on the technology/gadgets necessary to play in 3D.

They should focus on the wand thingy first and then 3D. It's easier for Sony to sell the Wand oppose to 3D. If I were to buy into 3D I have to buy a new tv AND a new surround receiver + 1.4v compatible HDMI cables, with the Wand I will only need to buy a bundle with the wand, camera and hopefully some lame mini games (I'm guessing) and I'm guessing Sony knows this. danish-death

They should forget both and invest time into getting these games made instead: Eight Days and Syphon Filter.

If they could make it so you don't have to buy a new TV for the 3D I'm all for it, but I'd rather not spend the money on a new TV just for 3D gaming.Texas2089

[QUOTE="Texas2089"]If they could make it so you don't have to buy a new TV for the 3D I'm all for it, but I'd rather not spend the money on a new TV just for 3D gaming.hot_shot_9

3D TV's and specifically to built to display 3D, its impossible for a firmware update to change the hardware of a TV.

[QUOTE="Texas2089"]If they could make it so you don't have to buy a new TV for the 3D I'm all for it, but I'd rather not spend the money on a new TV just for 3D gaming.hot_shot_9

[QUOTE="hot_shot_9"][QUOTE="Texas2089"]If they could make it so you don't have to buy a new TV for the 3D I'm all for it, but I'd rather not spend the money on a new TV just for 3D gaming.Texas2089

I'm not positive but i believe that the 3d image that appears is really produced by the format of the video AND the TV. Have you ever been to a 3d movie and taken off your glasses? If you have you'd no it looks really dizzying and there appears to be more than one image. I think this is how the tv or projector displays the video so a firmware upday wouldn't be able to change the hardware of the TV.

Nope. I'm not interested in spending the insane sums of money on a 3D capable television just for a bit of depth perception in the handful of games that would support it. :P raven_squad

This whole 3D thing is going to be a huge fail, so no.

I don't have the money to buy a 3-D TV, so that just doesn't matter to me at all. As far as motion control, I think that's just to try to lure some Wii owners over and we'll probably get one or two "real" games per year that use it.

I just want them to continue coming out with lots of good games for the core gamers, as they have been doing.