u also dont understand how bethesda mada a better graphical version for the ps3 why cant they do it for fallout?
the only thing im worried about is the slow down when major things happen, but i hoe it doesnt make a difference
This topic is locked from further discussion.
u also dont understand how bethesda mada a better graphical version for the ps3 why cant they do it for fallout?
the only thing im worried about is the slow down when major things happen, but i hoe it doesnt make a difference
since none of us have played it, it is hard to say. however, i am also worried about the framerate issues, although the mag tha stated the differences in the firs place have played down the issue.
Regardless, it is unacceptable that devs give ps3 owners shoddy versions. DeadSpace, Far Cry 2, COD 4, Burnout and pretty much most other recent multiplats have shown that, with a little bit of work, PS3 games can be just as good.
I think the reality is that the differences will be minor. a bit like the difference between oblivion 360 and ps3. both versions were good and playable, but the ps3 version was slightly better graphically and framerate wise.
Well this time the Ps3 version isn`t released a year later, maybe that`s got something to do with it, i don`t know.sebbi11
yea thats true
the sad fact is that, although the ps3 is capable of a lot, it has a very different arcitecture from the 360 and PC's. As such, games tha are developed primarily on these systems and then later "ported" onto the ps3, generally do not translate very well as the resources of the ps3 are not fully utilised.
it reminds me a bit of when the first dual core processors came out and, despite having a powerhouse of a pC, you would play old games and they would run very badly. It's not exactly the same, but its similar.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment