Duke Nukem Forever: Why the hate?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for volume_three
volume_three

2142

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 volume_three
Member since 2005 • 2142 Posts

I'm actually curious as I'm finding it quite enjoyable... in a lowbrow kinda way :cool:

Albeit I'm only half a dozen or so levels in but so far my only complaint would be the excessively long loading times for such small areas.

Avatar image for Legendaryscmt
Legendaryscmt

12532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Legendaryscmt
Member since 2005 • 12532 Posts

The game was just released too late. Had it come out in 06/07, it would have seen better reviews. Level design, voice acting, etc, are archaic at this point in tim.

Avatar image for flyingmxer
flyingmxer

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 flyingmxer
Member since 2012 • 25 Posts
i thought bout getting it since its 20 bucks but just heard so many bad things bout it
Avatar image for NaviJ
NaviJ

137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 NaviJ
Member since 2012 • 137 Posts
I'm usually not one to complain about graphics but this game....wow. It was different you could tell how they started making it earlier and finished it now some items had such bad graphics all pixelated and everything and then the main stuff looked fine. It was just an eye sore but other than that the gameplay was mediocre for me :\ but the character of duke nukem made up for that :p altogether was an alright game but the graphics were just bad.
Avatar image for SNESMaster420
SNESMaster420

1358

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 SNESMaster420
Member since 2006 • 1358 Posts

I loved it. No hate here man.

Avatar image for MonkeySpot
MonkeySpot

6070

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 MonkeySpot
Member since 2010 • 6070 Posts

It's one of those games I'll pick up when it hits under $10, for the nostalgia, because I played the original when it came out a century ago. But the demo showed me enough that my conviction remained it should have stayed a footnote in history. Some things are better off dead, as the Frankenstein Monster said. It's not unplayable, it's just not very polished.

I like taking the poop out of the toilet, though. That made me giggle...

Duke: "OhNOoo! What're you DOING?!?"

Guess I'm still a juvenile gamer, after all these years...

:lol:

Avatar image for volume_three
volume_three

2142

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 volume_three
Member since 2005 • 2142 Posts

The game was just released too late. Had it come out in 06/07, it would have seen better reviews. Level design, voice acting, etc, are archaic at this point in tim.

Legendaryscmt

LOL I'm actually fond of the über-cheesy voice acting. Then again, my all-time fav voice acting was that of the original Resident Evil

I'd have to agree with the level design though. So far each area has been really small and certainly linear which is the reason I wonder why the game takes so damn long to load

Avatar image for MonkeySpot
MonkeySpot

6070

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 MonkeySpot
Member since 2010 • 6070 Posts

[QUOTE="Legendaryscmt"]

The game was just released too late. Had it come out in 06/07, it would have seen better reviews. Level design, voice acting, etc, are archaic at this point in tim.

volume_three

LOL I'm actually fond of the über-cheesy voice acting. Then again, my all-time fav voice acting was that of the original Resident Evil

I'd have to agree with the level design though. So far each area has been really small and certainly linear which is the reason I wonder why the game takes so damn long to load

Because a ton of it was made over a decade ago, and they didn't want to spend the money to optomize it but instead, simply to complete it. It's like taking a K-car from the 1980s, and giving it new seats and a lick of paint. I'm firmly in the camp of "If You Like It, It's Good" though. You should see some of the crap on MY shelf that no one would want...

... I mean...

... I just bought "LAIR" for $4.

Yeah, I said it, I bought "LAIR".

And for what it is, I'm enjoying it, and certainly will get $4 of fun out of it. The patch for analog stick control makes a big difference in the playability, but I know at heart that most gamers think it's tripe. But so what...

If you like the Duke, I say more power to ya. It'll be on my shelf one day, when it's "LAIR"-priced.

:P

Avatar image for volume_three
volume_three

2142

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 volume_three
Member since 2005 • 2142 Posts

It's one of those games I'll pick up when it hits under $10, for the nostalgia, because I played the original when it came out a century ago. But the demo showed me enough that my conviction remained it should have stayed a footnote in history. Some things are better off dead, as the Frankenstein Monster said. It's not unplayable, it's just not very polished.

I like taking the poop out of the toilet, though. That made me giggle...

Duke: "OhNOoo! What're you DOING?!?"

Guess I'm still a juvenile gamer, after all these years...

:lol:

MonkeySpot

I managed to pick it up for $12 so certainly no complaints here ;)

I wasn't a FPS fan back in the day so this is my first outing with the Duke. I figured much of the negative press may have been due to this game leaving somewhat of a sour taste in the mouth of fans that grew up with the original. IMO Gamespot's 3/10 seems extremely harsh.

Avatar image for AJC3317
AJC3317

2546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#11 AJC3317
Member since 2003 • 2546 Posts
it's not nearly as bad as the reviews made it out to be. it's a pretty average fps, but since it had so much unreachable hype surrounding it for so long the reviews were predictably overly-harsh
Avatar image for volume_three
volume_three

2142

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 volume_three
Member since 2005 • 2142 Posts

You should see some of the crap on MY shelf that no one would want...

... I mean...

... I just bought "LAIR" for $4.

Yeah, I said it, I bought "LAIR"

MonkeySpot

That IS pretty bad... but not as bad as Forever according to GS ;)

I received it with my console way prior to the patch. The game definitely intrigued me but the sixaxis-only controls... Not so much. Sold it the very next day. I know where you're coming from though, I too have enjoyed many a critically panned game. This thread is proof! :P

Avatar image for MountyManGamer
MountyManGamer

209

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 MountyManGamer
Member since 2012 • 209 Posts

Duke Nukem Forever is a great game, but I think most people expect too much from it. It is not meant to be an uber elaborate FPS like so many others on the market today. You got to love it for what it is, which is a rehash of the original kick ass, no sense required, all action old school FPS that many of us spent our childhood playing. It is all about babes, bullets, bombs and gore galore :D

Avatar image for TheFallenDemon
TheFallenDemon

13933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 TheFallenDemon
Member since 2010 • 13933 Posts

Am I the only one who thought the retro Duke Nukem games were terrible in addition to Forever?

Avatar image for DJ_Lae
DJ_Lae

42748

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 73

User Lists: 0

#15 DJ_Lae
Member since 2002 • 42748 Posts
Poor level design, really tired jokes, inconsistent graphics, middling gunplay, and long load times all combined to make a game that just wasn't much fun to play through. Especially when there are a lot of excellent FPS games released in the past few years that are all better than Duke Forever. Having said that, I picked it up for $10, and for that it's almost worth it. At least until you get to the caverns with the slappable breasts on the walls.
Avatar image for MonkeySpot
MonkeySpot

6070

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 MonkeySpot
Member since 2010 • 6070 Posts

Am I the only one who thought the retro Duke Nukem games were terrible in addition to Forever?

TheFallenDemon

This is not a put-down when I ask this -

How old are you?

Often, one's perceptions of this hobby are linked to their age... I still love Atari 2600 games. But that was the console when I was 14, so my perspective is very different than a lot of people on this forum when it comes to seeing the beauty in "retro" titles. If you didn't see Nukem back in the day as a fresh thing, and you started with an N64 or later, you're probably not going to have the nostalgia level required to appreciate the original Nukem games. But the Duke was one of the first games to use up-down aiming... Before the Duke, you had games from iD Software (Wolfenstein 3D, DOOM) which never went into that plane of control. Old-School Duke was an innovator in a lot of ways.

Avatar image for SoNin360
SoNin360

7175

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 328

User Lists: 3

#17 SoNin360
Member since 2008 • 7175 Posts
From a critical standpoint, it's a pretty bad game. Going into it with low expectations and toning my brain down, I actually had some fun with it. It definitely feels like a game that could have been released several years ago, but I did get a few chuckles out of it. It's too bad there were too many dull running around moments. It was worth the rent though, and at this point you can find it for like $5-$10, so to anyone who actually wants to play it, you might as well just buy it :lol:
Avatar image for MonkeySpot
MonkeySpot

6070

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 MonkeySpot
Member since 2010 • 6070 Posts

From a critical standpoint, it's a pretty bad game. Going into it with low expectations and toning my brain down, I actually had some fun with it. It definitely feels like a game that could have been released several years ago, but I did get a few chuckles out of it. It's too bad there were too many dull running around moments. It was worth the rent though, and at this point you can find it for like $5-$10, so to anyone who actually wants to play it, you might as well just buy it :lol:SoNin360

Sow it for $11 at Game Stop today... Almost pulled the trigger. But "F3AR" and a few other games on my to-buy list are also ridiculously low-priced, so I will pro'ly get those first. But I WILL buy it, someday...

Avatar image for killerband55
killerband55

107961

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 killerband55
Member since 2003 • 107961 Posts

this game doesn't have enough ***s

but really i played this game online, and damn it was the laggest online experience i've ever had, i feel sorry for the ppl in my lobby as well playing online with me

Avatar image for mooooo99
mooooo99

1252

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 1

#20 mooooo99
Member since 2008 • 1252 Posts

i picked it up from amazon for 5£, whichi thinkis a fair price from the reviews i have read.so i'l let you know how that goes..