This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for share_jatt
share_jatt

113

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 share_jatt
Member since 2004 • 113 Posts

E3: What's the Deal?
I heard that it would it be any more E3 anymore. Is this true or not

--Neil

It isn't true. E3 has undergone some changes, yes, but it's still around. How's it different? To start, it's now held in July in Santa Monica instead of the LA Convention Center in May. The number of people attending has been downsized too. An estimated four to five thousand industry folk are going this year as opposed to the 50-80 thousand that showed up in earlier years. This population difference is because E3 is now an "Invite Only" event, whereas before it seemed that anyone who touched an electronic device once could get in for the right price.

Other changes to E3 include its presentational format (games will be showcased in a single hangar with restrictions on booth size), its appointment structure (publishers will now show off product in seven or eight hotels spread across a three-mile radius), and its importance (first parties will still make their big announcement, but third parties will unveil most of theirs at their own events prior to July or after the show at bigger venues like Comic-Con).

That last difference is a prediction not a fact, but I'm extremely confident in it.

--Jeremy

http://ps3.ign.com/articles/777/777189p1.html

 

i donno if anyones talked about this but this is new info for me comments... 

Avatar image for jackle2071
jackle2071

5477

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#2 jackle2071
Member since 2004 • 5477 Posts
really what was so bad about the way it was before?
Avatar image for magus-21
magus-21

2868

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 magus-21
Member since 2006 • 2868 Posts
really what was so bad about the way it was before? jackle2071
It cost too much to setup for the effect it had on the industry. E3 is supposed to get information out to the media, and there are realistically only a few thousand people who matter, not 50,000.
Avatar image for jackle2071
jackle2071

5477

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#4 jackle2071
Member since 2004 • 5477 Posts
[QUOTE="jackle2071"]really what was so bad about the way it was before? magus-21
It cost too much to setup for the effect it had on the industry. E3 is supposed to get information out to the media, and there are realistically only a few thousand people who matter, not 50,000.

yeah i guess your rite...*sigh*... i still wish i could have seen it back in its prime
Avatar image for 04JETTA
04JETTA

5769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 04JETTA
Member since 2005 • 5769 Posts

[QUOTE="magus-21"][QUOTE="jackle2071"]really what was so bad about the way it was before? jackle2071
It cost too much to setup for the effect it had on the industry. E3 is supposed to get information out to the media, and there are realistically only a few thousand people who matter, not 50,000.

yeah i guess your rite...*sigh*... i still wish i could have seen it back in its prime

ya likewise it sucks

Avatar image for SOHAIB_MINHAS
SOHAIB_MINHAS

340

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 SOHAIB_MINHAS
Member since 2004 • 340 Posts

[QUOTE="jackle2071"]really what was so bad about the way it was before? magus-21
It cost too much to setup for the effect it had on the industry. E3 is supposed to get information out to the media, and there are realistically only a few thousand people who matter, not 50,000.

You missed out that the conditions were terrible for anyone to actually do any proper reviewing of the game demos that were set up.