Enchanted Arm IGN Review PS3 6.5, Xbox 7.6

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for kenshin1st
kenshin1st

229

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 kenshin1st
Member since 2007 • 229 Posts

This is sad

 

http://www.diggingtheweb.com/4307613.html

 

"Why did it score lower than XBox? What is
different?
"There's no online element to
Enchanted Arms
on the PS3 at all. Over on the 360, players can build their team and
take the squad online to duke it out with other Enchanted Arms
devotees. There's leaderboards for the battles and for the title's
casino games, but not here."

full article inside

Avatar image for bhung207
bhung207

116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 bhung207
Member since 2006 • 116 Posts
Why are you surprised???  This game is bad from the start.  Not to mention it is a multiplatform.
Avatar image for Serge-Chrono
Serge-Chrono

691

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Serge-Chrono
Member since 2007 • 691 Posts
Why are you surprised??? This game is bad from the start. Not to mention it is a multiplatform.bhung207
I wouldn't say that Enchanted arms is bad but I have to agree that the game is a better door stop than a game I would play on my ps3 or 360
Avatar image for Flame_Blade88
Flame_Blade88

39348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#4 Flame_Blade88
Member since 2005 • 39348 Posts
Why are you surprised???  This game is bad from the start.  Not to mention it is a multiplatform.bhung207
I agree.
Avatar image for flash14
flash14

56

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 flash14
Member since 2005 • 56 Posts

The only reason it got a lower score, was because it was review by someone else not the same person that review the one that came out for xbox 360. So different people will have different opinions about the game. 

Avatar image for TimothyB
TimothyB

6564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 TimothyB
Member since 2003 • 6564 Posts
Maybe after a year after the first release, the review scale is based on current offerings and expected quality, so I doesn't get the same review. Kind of like how when they review NES games on the Wii they don't reuse the score back in the 1980s. Plus, I wonder if the fact sometimes it's a different reviewer that can have all the difference.
Avatar image for kenshin1st
kenshin1st

229

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 kenshin1st
Member since 2007 • 229 Posts
i dont think so..if u guys actually took the time to read.....it scored lower bc it wasn't as good due to no online..its multi plat..but i expect these guys to at least make it 'equally bad' not worst..the extra time they had, the hell did they do? put their heads up their arse? these developers are the worst.
Avatar image for kenshin1st
kenshin1st

229

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 kenshin1st
Member since 2007 • 229 Posts
just to re-iterate, i am dying for a japanese RPG, oblivion is not my cup of tea..i was actually somewhat looking forward to this one. This sucks....damn f#$#GJSGI
Avatar image for Lazy_Boy88
Lazy_Boy88

7418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Lazy_Boy88
Member since 2003 • 7418 Posts
Well apparently it's because reviewers put too much emphasis on pointless online modes.
Avatar image for vince7669
vince7669

191

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 vince7669
Member since 2005 • 191 Posts
In the first paragragh of the review he questions why who ever gave the 360 review the score it did, he states it must be a drunken etc...
Avatar image for kakashi_00x000
kakashi_00x000

1159

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 kakashi_00x000
Member since 2005 • 1159 Posts
this game looks crappy anyway, but it is sad that the ps3 version doen't have all the same stuff.
Avatar image for MGSFan27285
MGSFan27285

850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#12 MGSFan27285
Member since 2004 • 850 Posts

Maybe after a year after the first release, the review scale is based
on current offerings and expected quality, so I doesn't get the same
review. Kind of like how when they review NES games on the Wii they
don't reuse the score back in the 1980s. Plus, I wonder if the fact
sometimes it's a different reviewer that can have all the difference.
TimothyB

good idea, and agreed. 

Avatar image for rasstarman
rasstarman

852

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 rasstarman
Member since 2004 • 852 Posts

This is sad

 

http://www.diggingtheweb.com/4307613.html

 

"Why did it score lower than XBox? What is
different?
"There's no online element to
Enchanted Arms
on the PS3 at all. Over on the 360, players can build their team and
take the squad online to duke it out with other Enchanted Arms
devotees. There's leaderboards for the battles and for the title's
casino games, but not here."

full article inside

kenshin1st
Every game that scroes less on the PS3 will get a thread? Come on peopel the 360 has many perks that add to the value so just deal with it.
Avatar image for Deihmos
Deihmos

7819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 Deihmos
Member since 2007 • 7819 Posts
The 360 version has online play and the PS3 does not. What did you expect?
Avatar image for soundthealarm
soundthealarm

316

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 soundthealarm
Member since 2007 • 316 Posts
ahh who cares bouts that game
Avatar image for blue-fish
blue-fish

1389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#16 blue-fish
Member since 2003 • 1389 Posts
Well apparently it's because reviewers put too much emphasis on pointless online modes.Lazy_Boy88

Yea, cus when building arsenals of monsters, pitting them against other peoples monsters is just silly.
Avatar image for kenshin1st
kenshin1st

229

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 kenshin1st
Member since 2007 • 229 Posts
-_-...i am just mad at the developer that's all..and they expect me to drop sixty on them...screw them..i am not getting a xbox and i am not getting this game now..i will wait for the next rpg..its my boycott whoever made...i dont even know who made it..ubisoft? oh well i dont care anymore
Avatar image for setyono
setyono

672

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 setyono
Member since 2006 • 672 Posts
[QUOTE="kenshin1st"]

This is sad

http://www.diggingtheweb.com/4307613.html

"Why did it score lower than XBox? What is
different?
"There's no online element to
Enchanted Arms
on the PS3 at all. Over on the 360, players can build their team and
take the squad online to duke it out with other Enchanted Arms
devotees. There's leaderboards for the battles and for the title's
casino games, but not here."

full article inside

rasstarman
Every game that scroes less on the PS3 will get a thread? Come on peopel the 360 has many perks that add to the value so just deal with it.

dude, why you always here ? go back to your x360 forum. or go play your xbox360. people have the right to start a new thread to discuss about this. you're such a busy guy eh ? just mind your own business will you ?
Avatar image for doogle13
doogle13

278

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#20 doogle13
Member since 2007 • 278 Posts
Like the guy above mention just because a PS3 game gets a lower score than the 360 people don't have to keep posting thread on "Why it go a lower score."  Games like GRAW2, FEAR, Rinbow Six:Vegas, and many more games coming to the PS3 are going to get a lower score on the PS3, so please people stop your crying.
Avatar image for Flavante
Flavante

724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Flavante
Member since 2006 • 724 Posts
wow never even thought of getting this game so who cares this game sucked anyways.
Avatar image for Rakuho
Rakuho

7008

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#22 Rakuho
Member since 2007 • 7008 Posts
Hmmm this truly sucks. they got the score all wrong. It should have been PS3 =0, 360 =0. Bro, don't sweat it.
Avatar image for SkyCastleDan
SkyCastleDan

2015

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 SkyCastleDan
Member since 2006 • 2015 Posts

Like the guy above mention just because a PS3 game gets a lower score than the 360 people don't have to keep posting thread on "Why it go a lower score."  Games like GRAW2, FEAR, Rinbow Six:Vegas, and many more games coming to the PS3 are going to get a lower score on the PS3, so please people stop your crying.doogle13

Yeah, if you check around, the PS3 version of F.E.A.R. is getting much lower scores than other versions. it's just the way it is, being released so much later.

Avatar image for Deihmos
Deihmos

7819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 Deihmos
Member since 2007 • 7819 Posts

[QUOTE="doogle13"]Like the guy above mention just because a PS3 game gets a lower score than the 360 people don't have to keep posting thread on "Why it go a lower score."  Games like GRAW2, FEAR, Rinbow Six:Vegas, and many more games coming to the PS3 are going to get a lower score on the PS3, so please people stop your crying.SkyCastleDan

Yeah, if you check around, the PS3 version of F.E.A.R. is getting much lower scores than other versions. it's just the way it is, being released so much later.



I did realize F.E.A.R has been receiving some rather low scores. I wonder why?
Avatar image for SkyCastleDan
SkyCastleDan

2015

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 SkyCastleDan
Member since 2006 • 2015 Posts
[QUOTE="SkyCastleDan"]

[QUOTE="doogle13"]Like the guy above mention just because a PS3 game gets a lower score than the 360 people don't have to keep posting thread on "Why it go a lower score."  Games like GRAW2, FEAR, Rinbow Six:Vegas, and many more games coming to the PS3 are going to get a lower score on the PS3, so please people stop your crying.Deihmos

Yeah, if you check around, the PS3 version of F.E.A.R. is getting much lower scores than other versions. it's just the way it is, being released so much later.



I did realize F.E.A.R has been receiving some rather low scores. I wonder why?

It's dated already. The PS3 needs to move on and stop porting games and start releasing new ones. MGS4, Lair and Heavenly Sword all look like they're down the road. At least NG: Sigma is a true remake, not just a port. Great, by June I'll have two games worth buying! NG and Resistance. And how am I getting NG? Trade in of Motorstorm, F1 and VF5, games with very little value at all. Oie....

Avatar image for mastermu
mastermu

665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 mastermu
Member since 2004 • 665 Posts
It was a different person reviewing the game.  The guy already thought the review for the 360 was too high (as he stated in the first paragraph by saying the reviewer of the 360 version must've been drunk)
Avatar image for Deihmos
Deihmos

7819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27 Deihmos
Member since 2007 • 7819 Posts
It was a different person reviewing the game.  The guy already thought the review for the 360 was too high (as he stated in the first paragraph by saying the reviewer of the 360 version must've been drunk)mastermu
The gamespot review gave it a 6.8. The 360 got a 7.1.
Avatar image for Brendruis
Brendruis

1016

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#28 Brendruis
Member since 2002 • 1016 Posts
This game sux
Avatar image for mastermu
mastermu

665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#29 mastermu
Member since 2004 • 665 Posts
[QUOTE="mastermu"]It was a different person reviewing the game.  The guy already thought the review for the 360 was too high (as he stated in the first paragraph by saying the reviewer of the 360 version must've been drunk)Deihmos

The gamespot review gave it a 6.8. The 360 got a 7.1.

Oh yeah, forgot about the no online part lol. Thats why it got lower :P
Avatar image for choasgod
choasgod

5710

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 choasgod
Member since 2005 • 5710 Posts
 Owning the PS3 version of the game i must say ...

   its an average game -- the characters are annoying and while what they say is important to the story you'll find yourself wanting to skip it ...

   The lack of online in the PS3 version dosnt hurt it at all -- i mean seriously by the time you have got enough Golems and got them high enough level to complete online - you won't want to ...
     The battle system is medicoke ... its fun at first, but after a while you begin to wish random battles didnt occur as often ...

   In the end i believe PS3 version - 7.2 ... 360 version - 7.3 ...
     PS3 version has problems with freezing ... 360 has tearing problems, framerate problems ...
     PS3 version has 30 odd exclusive Golems -- 360 version has exclusive online ...

  Unless you really dieing for an RPG you can give this one a miss ...
Avatar image for Brendruis
Brendruis

1016

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#31 Brendruis
Member since 2002 • 1016 Posts
Go play Rogue Galaxy instead..  or better yet God of War 2 even though that's a different genre