Fallout 3: PS3 version worst than 360's?

  • 69 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for JKusanagi
JKusanagi

815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 JKusanagi
Member since 2005 • 815 Posts

Once again, PS3 version of a game gets lower score than the 360's, this time with Fallout 3. What i want to know is if anybody has real arguments to say so or if its just that PS3 with lower scores syndrome.

Is there installs on the PS3 version? lower graphics? frame rate issues?
I read there are no mandatory installs, but also read it could be like oblivion, it doesn't make you wait for half an hour but it installs while loading, so it takes up to 4 GB of space doing this

Avatar image for Timmeus
Timmeus

1136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Timmeus
Member since 2007 • 1136 Posts

I believe the graphics quality is inferior to the others versions, maybe you should read the review it might mention it there.

Avatar image for KapG
KapG

1037

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 KapG
Member since 2007 • 1037 Posts

Hrmmmmm, I just played it for an hour I suppose. I am jsut about to escape from the vault.

Anyways, I would have to say that the graphics on this game for the ps3 are REMARKABLE. This game looks sweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet.

As for the bugs. I had the audio bug at the start (that lasted all of .5 seconds). I, fortunately, did not get the bug with the GOAT test.

If you originally wanted to get this game I would suggest going ahead with it!

Avatar image for CyanX73
CyanX73

3389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 CyanX73
Member since 2004 • 3389 Posts

Not putting up with this. You wanna tell me this is microchasm as to which system is better than I'd like you to see MGS4 and Uncharted. Devs just focusing on 360 and PC and putting whatever they want out on PS3. COD4 did it right. Build both versions from the ground up.

it's a shame cuz I was going to pick this one up. Now, my money goes to R2 and LBP.

Avatar image for JKusanagi
JKusanagi

815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 JKusanagi
Member since 2005 • 815 Posts

Not putting up with this. You wanna tell me this is microchasm as to which system is better than I'd like you to see MGS4 and Uncharted. Devs just focusing on 360 and PC and putting whatever they want out on PS3. COD4 did it right. Build both versions from the ground up.

it's a shame cuz I was going to pick this one up. Now, my money goes to R2 and LBP.

CyanX73

I don't care what people think as to wich console is better, i think PS3 is and no one can take me out of there. I'll buy a 360 but just because i want more games. I blame developers for every PS3 issue on multiplatform games.

Anyway, what i do care is wich version of a game is better, if 360's is, then i'll buy it for that console when i get it as long as there's a good reason to wait.

Avatar image for Duckman5
Duckman5

18934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Duckman5
Member since 2006 • 18934 Posts
More bugs = lower score. Not a hard or unfair concept.
Avatar image for JKusanagi
JKusanagi

815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 JKusanagi
Member since 2005 • 815 Posts

More bugs = lower score. Not a hard or unfair concept.Duckman5

I wouldn't be so confident saying stuff like that unless you had a real reason, Dead Space on PS3 runs at higher resolution, 1080p while the 360 version runs 780p and still the PS3 version got lower score. I don't trust scores because of things like that, but i would like to know if anyone knows if there's a real reason why it got a lower score on PS3

Avatar image for Duckman5
Duckman5

18934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Duckman5
Member since 2006 • 18934 Posts

[QUOTE="Duckman5"]More bugs = lower score. Not a hard or unfair concept.JKusanagi

I wouldn't be so confident saying stuff like that unless you had a real reason, Dead Space on PS3 runs at higher resolution, 1080p while the 360 version runs 780p and still the PS3 version got lower score. I don't trust scores because of things like that, but i would like to know if anyone knows if there's a real reason why it got a lower score on PS3

Doesn't matter if it runs at 1080P if that is not it's native resolution. They will most likely look the same if that's the case. The REAL reason is because it has more bugs, I don't know what other reason your trying to get. There is no conspiracy or bias. It's the truth.

Avatar image for pyromaniac223
pyromaniac223

5896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 pyromaniac223
Member since 2008 • 5896 Posts

It's a .5 difference.

Enjoy the game.

Stop blaming devs.

Avatar image for aflakian
aflakian

1557

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 aflakian
Member since 2008 • 1557 Posts
Basically, it's lke this...
From OPM:

"Our exclusive Fallout 3 PS3 review (from PSM3#107) has leaked onto the Internet and, as expected, a single sentence has been dragged out, beaten and interrogated under a spotlight. This one; "The PS3 version compares poorly to its Xbox and PC counterparts." Which, in the parlance of the Internet, obviously means; "THE PS3 VERSION SUCKS! XBOX WINS! ANOTHER CRAPPY PORT!" But that isn't the case. The PS3 version just looks SLIGHTLY WORSE than the other versions.

The PC version of Fallout 3 is gorgeous. The colours are vivid, the draw distance is endless, the textures are high-res and the lighting effects are beautifully subtle, especially when you're gazing over the Capital Wasteland at sunset. It's the best-looking of the three.

The Xbox 360 version's textures are noticeably rougher than on PC, and objects in the distance aren't quite as clear. It does, however, boast an impressively solid frame rate. The game is, otherwise, identical.

NOW, the PS3 version looks the same as on Xbox, but things in the distance are slightly jaggier/rougher, the textures seem 'muddier' up-close and the frame rate is choppier, especially during the last few story missions (which may be the same on Xbox, but we've not seen the equivalent scenes to comment). We won't spoil anything, but the set-pieces here are MASSIVE, and the engine quivers under the weight of what's happening.

So, really, the difference between the Xbox and PS3 versions won't hamper your enjoyment of the game in ANY WAY. High-res textures or not, it's still the same huge, epic, absorbing, brilliant adventure.

And if you're bothered by a slightly inferior frame rate and fractionally blurrier textures, then perhaps, yes, you'd best buy the Xbox version, leaving the rest of us to enjoy an almost-identical, equally brilliant, game on PS3, while you smugly inspect concrete textures at terrifyingly close range to reap the full benefit, rather than, say, losing yourself in a 100 hour epic quest in an evocative post-apocalypse. Or having fun.

Good night."
Avatar image for JKusanagi
JKusanagi

815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 JKusanagi
Member since 2005 • 815 Posts

Basically, it's lke this...
From OPM:

"Our exclusive Fallout 3 PS3 review (from PSM3#107) has leaked onto the Internet and, as expected, a single sentence has been dragged out, beaten and interrogated under a spotlight. This one; "The PS3 version compares poorly to its Xbox and PC counterparts." Which, in the parlance of the Internet, obviously means; "THE PS3 VERSION SUCKS! XBOX WINS! ANOTHER CRAPPY PORT!" But that isn't the case. The PS3 version just looks SLIGHTLY WORSE than the other versions.

The PC version of Fallout 3 is gorgeous. The colours are vivid, the draw distance is endless, the textures are high-res and the lighting effects are beautifully subtle, especially when you're gazing over the Capital Wasteland at sunset. It's the best-looking of the three.

The Xbox 360 version's textures are noticeably rougher than on PC, and objects in the distance aren't quite as clear. It does, however, boast an impressively solid frame rate. The game is, otherwise, identical.

NOW, the PS3 version looks the same as on Xbox, but things in the distance are slightly jaggier/rougher, the textures seem 'muddier' up-close and the frame rate is choppier, especially during the last few story missions (which may be the same on Xbox, but we've not seen the equivalent scenes to comment). We won't spoil anything, but the set-pieces here are MASSIVE, and the engine quivers under the weight of what's happening.

So, really, the difference between the Xbox and PS3 versions won't hamper your enjoyment of the game in ANY WAY. High-res textures or not, it's still the same huge, epic, absorbing, brilliant adventure.

And if you're bothered by a slightly inferior frame rate and fractionally blurrier textures, then perhaps, yes, you'd best buy the Xbox version, leaving the rest of us to enjoy an almost-identical, equally brilliant, game on PS3, while you smugly inspect concrete textures at terrifyingly close range to reap the full benefit, rather than, say, losing yourself in a 100 hour epic quest in an evocative post-apocalypse. Or having fun.

Good night." aflakian

OOOK !! That's the kind of answer i was expecting, not just "more bugs". Thanks

Avatar image for SOedipus
SOedipus

15057

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 SOedipus
Member since 2006 • 15057 Posts
When the game freezes because someone comes online is enough to warrant a .5 deduction in my books, let alone the bugs and graphics.
Avatar image for aflakian
aflakian

1557

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 aflakian
Member since 2008 • 1557 Posts
Quick fix to problem 1:
Stay offline when playing Fallout 3.
Avatar image for Timmeus
Timmeus

1136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Timmeus
Member since 2007 • 1136 Posts

It's a .5 difference.

Enjoy the game.

Stop blaming devs.

pyromaniac223

The devs are responsible so why not blame them?

Review scores are irrelevant, more bugs and and inferior graphics aren't, should people just except an inferior product for same price?

I never wanted to get Fallout 3 but I still think that this is pathetic and people shouldn't stand for it.

Avatar image for pyromaniac223
pyromaniac223

5896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 pyromaniac223
Member since 2008 • 5896 Posts
[QUOTE="pyromaniac223"]

It's a .5 difference.

Enjoy the game.

Stop blaming devs.

Timmeus

The devs are responsible so why not blame them?

Review scores are irrelevant, more bugs and and inferior graphics aren't, should people just except an inferior product for same price?

I never wanted to get Fallout 3 but I still think that this is pathetic and people shouldn't stand for it.

It's the publisher's fault mostly. The PS3's architecture is much different than the 360's and PC's. They needed more time to make a good port, and the publisher didn't give it to them.
Avatar image for SOedipus
SOedipus

15057

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 SOedipus
Member since 2006 • 15057 Posts

Quick fix to problem 1:
Stay offline when playing Fallout 3.
aflakian

You shouldn't have to do that. How many other games do you have to do that for? This is like a slap in the face from Bethesda. I bet they'll release a patch to fix it though.

Avatar image for I_pWnzz_YoU
I_pWnzz_YoU

6032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#17 I_pWnzz_YoU
Member since 2007 • 6032 Posts

I believe the graphics quality is inferior to the others versions, maybe you should read the review it might mention it there.

Timmeus

I guarantee you that you'd have to sit 2cm away from your TV to notice a difference.

Avatar image for Duckman5
Duckman5

18934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Duckman5
Member since 2006 • 18934 Posts
[QUOTE="Timmeus"]

I believe the graphics quality is inferior to the others versions, maybe you should read the review it might mention it there.

I_pWnzz_YoU

I guarantee you that you'd have to sit 2cm away from your TV to notice a difference.

for the 360 and PS3 version i would agree (More or less) but the PC version outshines both.

Avatar image for JKusanagi
JKusanagi

815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 JKusanagi
Member since 2005 • 815 Posts
[QUOTE="Timmeus"][QUOTE="pyromaniac223"]

It's a .5 difference.

Enjoy the game.

Stop blaming devs.

pyromaniac223

The devs are responsible so why not blame them?

Review scores are irrelevant, more bugs and and inferior graphics aren't, should people just except an inferior product for same price?

I never wanted to get Fallout 3 but I still think that this is pathetic and people shouldn't stand for it.

It's the publisher's fault mostly. The PS3's architecture is much different than the 360's and PC's. They needed more time to make a good port, and the publisher didn't give it to them.

Let's blame those publisher's too then. I'm blaming developers because they keep saying "PS3 is too hard to work on!!!" and stuff like that, Itagaki bets you a beer the PS3 is easier to program for than the Famicom, so, if this is true, they should stop complaining and start working better on PS3

Avatar image for Timmeus
Timmeus

1136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Timmeus
Member since 2007 • 1136 Posts
[QUOTE="Timmeus"][QUOTE="pyromaniac223"]

It's a .5 difference.

Enjoy the game.

Stop blaming devs.

pyromaniac223

The devs are responsible so why not blame them?

Review scores are irrelevant, more bugs and and inferior graphics aren't, should people just except an inferior product for same price?

I never wanted to get Fallout 3 but I still think that this is pathetic and people shouldn't stand for it.

It's the publisher's fault mostly. The PS3's architecture is much different than the 360's and PC's. They needed more time to make a good port, and the publisher didn't give it to them.

Yeah your right it would be the publishers fault.

Avatar image for IG_Pug
IG_Pug

144

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 IG_Pug
Member since 2007 • 144 Posts

There are other games that have gotton a 8.5 however I think they will not even compare to what this game has to offer. When ever there is graphical bugs which are always minor gamespot will factor that into the rating how it equates to half a point is beyond me. Either way I will most definitely be purchasing this game for the Ps3 and later for my PC ounce i finish upgrading, but the 360 is a piece of sh*t and I will not support it. Somehow I can not help but feel Gamespot is biased. The PC version is far superior than either of the consoles, and how the Pc version and the 360 version ended up with the same score does not make sense. Either way I am very excited about purchasing this game for the PS3.

Avatar image for mordogox
mordogox

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 mordogox
Member since 2008 • 25 Posts
Ok... I got my PS# version, and it runs just fine and looks fine. I bet that to see these "bugs", you'd have to be like 1 inch from the tv to get a glimpse at them. F**k the arguments, enjoy the version u want, be it ps3, 360 or pc. The game is a masterpiece.
Avatar image for KapG
KapG

1037

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 KapG
Member since 2007 • 1037 Posts

Ok... I got my PS# version, and it runs just fine and looks fine. I bet that to see these "bugs", you'd have to be like 1 inch from the tv to get a glimpse at them. F**k the arguments, enjoy the version u want, be it ps3, 360 or pc. The game is a masterpiece.mordogox

well said bro.

Btw ... the "inferior graphics", those just relate to objects in the distance being slightly jaggier and if you are reallllllllllly close to a wall or something staring at the textures, they may seem muddier lol

Avatar image for BaraChat
BaraChat

3144

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#24 BaraChat
Member since 2008 • 3144 Posts

There are other games that have gotton a 8.5 however I think they will not even compare to what this game has to offer. When ever there is graphical bugs which are always minor gamespot will factor that into the rating how it equates to half a point is beyond me. Either way I will most definitely be purchasing this game for the Ps3 and later for my PC ounce i finish upgrading, but the 360 is a piece of sh*t and I will not support it. Somehow I can not help but feel Gamespot is biased. The PC version is far superior than either of the consoles, and how the Pc version and the 360 version ended up with the same score does not make sense. Either way I am very excited about purchasing this game for the PS3.

IG_Pug

What he said, more or less, is what I think.

Avatar image for mordogox
mordogox

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 mordogox
Member since 2008 • 25 Posts

[QUOTE="mordogox"]Ok... I got my PS# version, and it runs just fine and looks fine. I bet that to see these "bugs", you'd have to be like 1 inch from the tv to get a glimpse at them. F**k the arguments, enjoy the version u want, be it ps3, 360 or pc. The game is a masterpiece.KapG

well said bro.

Btw ... the "inferior graphics", those just relate to objects in the distance being slightly jaggier and if you are reallllllllllly close to a wall or something staring at the textures, they may seem muddier lol

Exacly. The only real bug i got was at the begining...like 2 seconds and went back to normal. Didn't stop me from enjoying the game. My conclusion... there are a bunch of cry babies in this forum. Like i said, any version is GREAT!
Avatar image for JKusanagi
JKusanagi

815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 JKusanagi
Member since 2005 • 815 Posts
[QUOTE="IG_Pug"]

There are other games that have gotton a 8.5 however I think they will not even compare to what this game has to offer. When ever there is graphical bugs which are always minor gamespot will factor that into the rating how it equates to half a point is beyond me. Either way I will most definitely be purchasing this game for the Ps3 and later for my PC ounce i finish upgrading, but the 360 is a piece of sh*t and I will not support it. Somehow I can not help but feel Gamespot is biased. The PC version is far superior than either of the consoles, and how the Pc version and the 360 version ended up with the same score does not make sense. Either way I am very excited about purchasing this game for the PS3.

BaraChat

What he said, more or less, is what I think.

Yup, he maked some really good points. I'm getting the PS3 version :)

Avatar image for resistance93
resistance93

662

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27 resistance93
Member since 2008 • 662 Posts

It's all because of the PS3 being way more advanced than the 360. Since the developers just port the game instead of making an original copy for the ps3, we are basically playing a 360 game that got scratched up on the way to the PS3. It's like taking a picture of a photograph. That is why our exclusives are so good.

Avatar image for TraXxX
TraXxX

1820

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#28 TraXxX
Member since 2006 • 1820 Posts
The PS3 version is buggy.
Avatar image for TraXxX
TraXxX

1820

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#29 TraXxX
Member since 2006 • 1820 Posts

It's all because of the PS3 being way more advanced than the 360. Since the developers just port the game instead of making an original copy for the ps3, we are basically playing a 360 game that got scratched up on the way to the PS3. It's like taking a picture of a photograph. That is why our exclusives are so good.

resistance93

That makes absolutely no sense.

Avatar image for pyromaniac223
pyromaniac223

5896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 pyromaniac223
Member since 2008 • 5896 Posts

It's all because of the PS3 being way more advanced than the 360. Since the developers just port the game instead of making an original copy for the ps3, we are basically playing a 360 game that got scratched up on the way to the PS3. It's like taking a picture of a photograph. That is why our exclusives are so good.

resistance93

Holy

Crap.

I...I don't even know what to say to this.

Avatar image for resistance93
resistance93

662

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#31 resistance93
Member since 2008 • 662 Posts
[QUOTE="resistance93"]

It's all because of the PS3 being way more advanced than the 360. Since the developers just port the game instead of making an original copy for the ps3, we are basically playing a 360 game that got scratched up on the way to the PS3. It's like taking a picture of a photograph. That is why our exclusives are so good.

TraXxX

That makes absolutely no sense.

It wasn't supposed to. It was random ideas blended together.

Avatar image for JKusanagi
JKusanagi

815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#32 JKusanagi
Member since 2005 • 815 Posts
[QUOTE="TraXxX"][QUOTE="resistance93"]

It's all because of the PS3 being way more advanced than the 360. Since the developers just port the game instead of making an original copy for the ps3, we are basically playing a 360 game that got scratched up on the way to the PS3. It's like taking a picture of a photograph. That is why our exclusives are so good.

resistance93

That makes absolutely no sense.

It wasn't supposed to. It was random ideas blended together.

I... think you wanted to say something like "PS3 is better than 360" and putted some weird excuses after that. Anyway, I'm not sure of the reasons why PS3 keeps getting uglier versions of multiplatform games but i'm sure is not lack of power

Avatar image for oscar530
oscar530

4430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 oscar530
Member since 2005 • 4430 Posts
Does the .5 difference really mean that much to people?
Avatar image for resistance93
resistance93

662

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#34 resistance93
Member since 2008 • 662 Posts
[QUOTE="resistance93"][QUOTE="TraXxX"][QUOTE="resistance93"]

It's all because of the PS3 being way more advanced than the 360. Since the developers just port the game instead of making an original copy for the ps3, we are basically playing a 360 game that got scratched up on the way to the PS3. It's like taking a picture of a photograph. That is why our exclusives are so good.

JKusanagi

That makes absolutely no sense.

It wasn't supposed to. It was random ideas blended together.

I... think you wanted to say something like "PS3 is better than 360" and putted some weird excuses after that. Anyway, I'm not sure of the reasons why PS3 keeps getting uglier versions of multiplatform games but i'm sure is not lack of power

PS3 is better than 360 was part of it but the rest was a clear explanation as to why multiplats get higher scores on the 360

Avatar image for 420Token420
420Token420

5173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 420Token420
Member since 2007 • 5173 Posts

Seriously .. can not one person scroll down another one centimeter .. this is like the billionth thread ..

Why does everything get so blown out of proportion?

If you're mad .. don't purchase it .. just miss out on a great game ..

Avatar image for JKusanagi
JKusanagi

815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#36 JKusanagi
Member since 2005 • 815 Posts

Seriously .. can not one person scroll down another one centimeter .. this is like the billionth thread ..

Why does everything get so blown out of proportion?

If you're mad .. don't purchase it .. just miss out on a great game ..

420Token420

I'm not mad, i just wanted to be sure wich version is better to get it. If i'm going to pay 60 dlls i must be sure to get the best version. Why pay the same for lower quality?

Avatar image for 420Token420
420Token420

5173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 420Token420
Member since 2007 • 5173 Posts
[QUOTE="420Token420"]

Seriously .. can not one person scroll down another one centimeter .. this is like the billionth thread ..

Why does everything get so blown out of proportion?

If you're mad .. don't purchase it .. just miss out on a great game ..

JKusanagi

I'm not mad, i just wanted to be sure wich version is better to get it. If i'm going to pay 60 dlls i must be sure to get the best version. Why pay the same for lower quality?

Reading the other 100 threads just below this one .. could have answered your questions .. if you want to believe them, of course ..

Avatar image for Duckman5
Duckman5

18934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 Duckman5
Member since 2006 • 18934 Posts
[QUOTE="420Token420"]

Seriously .. can not one person scroll down another one centimeter .. this is like the billionth thread ..

Why does everything get so blown out of proportion?

If you're mad .. don't purchase it .. just miss out on a great game ..

JKusanagi

I'm not mad, i just wanted to be sure wich version is better to get it. If i'm going to pay 60 dlls i must be sure to get the best version. Why pay the same for lower quality?

Here are the versions in order of best to worst.

PC>360>PS3

Get it on the PC, if you lack one then get it on the 360, and if you lack that then you really shouldn't have made this thread

Avatar image for JKusanagi
JKusanagi

815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#39 JKusanagi
Member since 2005 • 815 Posts
[QUOTE="JKusanagi"][QUOTE="420Token420"]

Seriously .. can not one person scroll down another one centimeter .. this is like the billionth thread ..

Why does everything get so blown out of proportion?

If you're mad .. don't purchase it .. just miss out on a great game ..

Duckman5

I'm not mad, i just wanted to be sure wich version is better to get it. If i'm going to pay 60 dlls i must be sure to get the best version. Why pay the same for lower quality?

Here are the versions in order of best to worst.

PC>360>PS3

Get it on the PC, if you lack one then get it on the 360, and if you lack that then you really shouldn't have made this thread

I'm buying a 360 soon. I have money for Fallout 3 right now, i made the thread to decide if I should wait to get it untill i have a 360 or get it right away. I'm getting it on PS3

Avatar image for TheSystemLord1
TheSystemLord1

7786

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#40 TheSystemLord1
Member since 2006 • 7786 Posts

For those of you who are curious, IGN goes in to detail on all of the issues on the PS3 version in their video review. Apparently characters have a glitchy aura that makes them look cell shaded, sometimes heads disappear leaving only hair and eyes, also sound glitches abound.

If you enjoy talking to floating hair and eyeballs, then perhaps the PS3 version could be seen as equal...

Avatar image for KapG
KapG

1037

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 KapG
Member since 2007 • 1037 Posts

For those of you who are curious, IGN goes in to detail on all of the issues on the PS3 version in their video review. Apparently characters have a glitchy aura that makes them look cell shaded, sometimes heads disappear leaving only hair and eyes, also sound glitches abound.

If you enjoy talking to floating hair and eyeballs, then perhaps the PS3 version could be seen as equal...

TheSystemLord1

lolol and they also said it doesn't happen all the time. Also if thats the case then restart once and it will be fixed they said.

Very simple solutions. Don't try to make things out to be bigger then they are.

Avatar image for Garudo
Garudo

436

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#42 Garudo
Member since 2004 • 436 Posts
oh come on..i'm just about to get my ps3 this saturday together with the fallout 3...now that fallout 3 has this so call bug problem....n even a lower scoreline compare to the other 2 platforms...wht shud i do..? shud i go for gta iv n wait until the patch for fallout releases b4 i buy it...?
Avatar image for ash10692
ash10692

2310

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#43 ash10692
Member since 2008 • 2310 Posts

oh come on..i'm just about to get my ps3 this saturday together with the fallout 3...now that fallout 3 has this so call bug problem....n even a lower scoreline compare to the other 2 platforms...wht shud i do..? shud i go for gta iv n wait until the patch for fallout releases b4 i buy it...?Garudo

Get Fallout 3. From what I hear, the glitches are bad, but not enough to make the game unplayable. GTA IV is also a fantastic game which you should buy in the future.

Avatar image for 417alum
417alum

1468

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#44 417alum
Member since 2007 • 1468 Posts
barely
Avatar image for deactivated-5dd711115e664
deactivated-5dd711115e664

8956

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 deactivated-5dd711115e664
Member since 2005 • 8956 Posts

Once again, PS3 version of a game gets lower score than the 360's, this time with Fallout 3. What i want to know is if anybody has real arguments to say so or if its just that PS3 with lower scores syndrome.

Is there installs on the PS3 version? lower graphics? frame rate issues?
I read there are no mandatory installs, but also read it could be like oblivion, it doesn't make you wait for half an hour but it installs while loading, so it takes up to 4 GB of space doing this

JKusanagi

The review actually states that the PS3 version has a number of serious graphical and sound glitches that the other versions don't have. Frankly, if all the things they say actually happened, you should be happy they only scored it .5 less.

I'm disappointed by these glitches, but I guess it is just one more game where the PS3 version was an afterthought and a poor port is made. The review also says the game is great despite these glitches so I will still be getting it.

Avatar image for dantesergei
dantesergei

2254

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#46 dantesergei
Member since 2004 • 2254 Posts

It's a .5 difference.

Enjoy the game.

Stop blaming devs.

pyromaniac223

stop defending the devs

Avatar image for JKusanagi
JKusanagi

815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#47 JKusanagi
Member since 2005 • 815 Posts
[QUOTE="JKusanagi"]

Once again, PS3 version of a game gets lower score than the 360's, this time with Fallout 3. What i want to know is if anybody has real arguments to say so or if its just that PS3 with lower scores syndrome.

Is there installs on the PS3 version? lower graphics? frame rate issues?
I read there are no mandatory installs, but also read it could be like oblivion, it doesn't make you wait for half an hour but it installs while loading, so it takes up to 4 GB of space doing this

ZIMdoom

The review actually states that the PS3 version has a number of serious graphical and sound glitches that the other versions don't have. Frankly, if all the things they say actually happened, you should be happy they only scored it .5 less.

I'm disappointed by these glitches, but I guess it is just one more game where the PS3 version was an afterthought and a poor port is made. The review also says the game is great despite these glitches so I will still be getting it.

I didn't know there were graphics and sound glitches exclusive to the PS3 version. I care a lot for sound in video games. If that's true i'll change my opinion and get the 360 version. Both are the same price afterall, why get the crapiest one

Avatar image for armyman_22
armyman_22

1492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 95

User Lists: 0

#48 armyman_22
Member since 2004 • 1492 Posts
well I got it on te 360 cause my cousin wanted to play it while we talk (no co op) and downloadable content, BUT the real answer to this is simple GS IS BIAS TOWARDS THE 360.......been saying that for a while myself. They both look the same who is looking at their TV so hard that they will lose intrest cause of minor frame rate issues?
Avatar image for jmig556
jmig556

110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 jmig556
Member since 2003 • 110 Posts
[QUOTE="420Token420"]

Seriously .. can not one person scroll down another one centimeter .. this is like the billionth thread ..

Why does everything get so blown out of proportion?

If you're mad .. don't purchase it .. just miss out on a great game ..

JKusanagi

I'm not mad, i just wanted to be sure wich version is better to get it. If i'm going to pay 60 dlls i must be sure to get the best version. Why pay the same for lower quality?

well then the answer is simple and it goes in this order. pc>xbox360>ps3

Avatar image for rctyke
rctyke

1122

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#50 rctyke
Member since 2005 • 1122 Posts
Does the PS3 version Have 7.1 LPCM audio? I think the reviewers should be set up to listen to the uncompressed audio tracks of some of these PS3 games.