[QUOTE="Wii26"][QUOTE="Dust24311"]I'm a scientist at Southern Research Institute in Maryland, USA.
Â
I think it's important for me to inform everyone that Folding at Home is not for cancer research, but simply to understand how proteins fold based upon their amino acid sequences. That said, this program is limited by the programming and the application of the scientists at Stanford Universities Chemistry department.
Â
The program has led to approximatelly 50 scientific research articles being published on the subject of medicinal chemistry. While this may seem impressive, none of this information has led to clinical research of any significance.
Â
Just wanted to get the word out. This program was made to predict protein folding and that is the ONLY thing it does. It does not magically cure cancer.
Dust24311
It's not only for that but folding@home binds consoles and computers alike to apparently form some super computer to help simulate real life problems. We know it's not going to create a magical cure, but it's helping scientists figure out problems and so forth. It's not only to educate but to help. I think you missed that whole bit.
WRONG, it does not "simulate real life problems". It takes a protein of interest and folds it based upon amino acid folding rules. The program assigns batches (work units) to clusters of processors and returns the information to Stanford. It is simply a scientific tool, not a magical "real life problem" solver. You must understand that it is my duty as a scientist to inform people that they are using a tool so that they don't get disappointed when FAH doesn't cure cancer later this year. I'm really trying to be nice here, but when people are talking about empirical scientific evidence, you can only go with the facts. :)Have you not read up on this? If you have then you would know I am not wrong.
"You can help by simply running a piece of software. Folding@Home is a distributed computing project -- people from through out the world download and run software to band together to make one of the largest supercomputers in the world. Every computer makes the project closer to our goals.
Folding@Home uses novel computational methods coupled to distributed computing, to simulate problems thousands to millions of times more challenging than previously achieved."
Â
Folding@Home Main Page
My apologies not real life problems but problems thousand to million times more challenging. Craziness isn't it? I never said it was a magical cure nor did anyone else. You missed the whole part about people linking together to help increase research. It's not suppose to be a cure. You completely missed the point of the entire program and what people are doing. It is suppose to HELP with cancer research. Everyone knows it's not a cure. Just because you're a scientist doesn't mean anything. It doesn't take one to realize this isn't meant to cure but instead HELP. Sorry I can't emphasize enough how this is suppose to help and not cure. Everyone knows that but you come running here like you can contribute something when all you have done is been a downer. You aren't helping at all. You're just showing that you can brag about scientific knowledge and claim that your a scientist. Whoopie doo who cares?
And did I say it was a real life problem solver? Maybe you should indulge yourself into some reading no? The problem here seems to be more that you can't read what people post so you take it in your hands to educate us. The concept of folding@home is to simulate problems thousand to millions more challenging then real life and previously achieved. That's the point of it! Yes to fold proteins but to help simulate! Go read up on it. It's not that hard to type it into google.Â
The thing that's twitching me right now is that just because we don't have scientific degrees, we know nothing. We know that it won't cure cancer later this year. You state something so obvious that even a child would know. My 14 year old brother understands this simple concept. Sorry but you have contributed next to nothing in this thread except to show that you're arrogant.Â
Log in to comment