Graces f or White Knight Chronicles 2?

Can't decide... both look great :( opinions??

I own both and the person above me is right. I think its only 29.99 now but after playing both I would say I had a better experience with Graces F. White Knights Chronicles 2 which also contains part 1 tends to drag a little bit but visually overall and depth of the towns is pretty amazing. Can be compared to the likes of the old Final Fantasy titles. The combat system is almost like Final Fantasy XIII but not quite complete. FFXXIII gameplay was easier to grasp and White Knights is still incomplete but overall still a good game.

Tales of Graces f is a much better game.

WKC 1 & 2 have a very poor story. I literally fell asleep playing the game.

I haven't played Graces F, but have played Tales of the Abyss and it was a great game. If anything, I'd go with Graces.

As much as I loved the first White Knight Chronicles, I'd go for Tales. The sequal to WKC was a huge let down.

I'm not sure if you've played the first already. but if so, go for that instead. I'm sure on the WKC 2 disc the online community will be buzzing.

Tales of Graces f is a much better game.

_Doomsayer_

I heard both games have bad story so I'm left wondering about those ''free'' moments when you're not progressing the story. Is WKC2 open with lots of side missions and bounties? Something I'd imagine Graces to lack due to its linearity

After playing through FFXII I tried WKC2 starting through the first game (Since both come on the same disk) Needless to say I couldn't stand all the genericness of the story and I absolutely hated that for being a free roaming game I couldn't really tweek my A.I. counterparts...or heck...even auto engage. Although I have to admit it looks pretty.

Get tales of graces f first then get White Knight later on

i played both and i must tell you that Tales of Graces f >> White Knight Chronicles

wkc is the worst purchase of my liferisako9

i got 470 hours on wkc2 then I stopped. as for graces, I still have to purchase that