GT6 question - rewind feature like Forze 4?

Just wondering if anyone knew of such?  That is one of my favorite features in F4.  Was wondering if their is an official statement that shows GT6 will have it.

Its one of the best features for single player and if you don't want to use it you don't have to. Why "God I hope not?" It's not a forced option.caseypayne69

No way it'll have it, go back to arcade racers if you want it.

nop that future is for arcade racers not a game like GT

I wouldn't want to see the rewind feature in gran turismo games. Just wouldn't seem right.

You guys are missing the point. The feature isn't for gamers like us, it allows more casual players to enjoy a racing sim without getting frustrated and having to re-do an entire race cause of one mistake. It would only increase sales. It's not like you can rewind as many times as you want.

You guys are missing the point. The feature isn't for gamers like us, it allows more casual players to enjoy a racing sim without getting frustrated and having to re-do an entire race cause of one mistake. It would only increase sales. It's not like you can rewind as many times as you want.

firefox59

You guys are missing the point. The feature isn't for gamers like us, it allows more casual players to enjoy a racing sim without getting frustrated and having to re-do an entire race cause of one mistake. It would only increase sales. It's not like you can rewind as many times as you want.

firefox59

[QUOTE="firefox59"]

You guys are missing the point. The feature isn't for gamers like us, it allows more casual players to enjoy a racing sim without getting frustrated and having to re-do an entire race cause of one mistake. It would only increase sales. It's not like you can rewind as many times as you want.

caseypayne69

[QUOTE="caseypayne69"][QUOTE="firefox59"]

You guys are missing the point. The feature isn't for gamers like us, it allows more casual players to enjoy a racing sim without getting frustrated and having to re-do an entire race cause of one mistake. It would only increase sales. It's not like you can rewind as many times as you want.

firefox59

LOL 1-2hr races...

Thats nothing, go play 24hr races.

[QUOTE="caseypayne69"][QUOTE="firefox59"]

You guys are missing the point. The feature isn't for gamers like us, it allows more casual players to enjoy a racing sim without getting frustrated and having to re-do an entire race cause of one mistake. It would only increase sales. It's not like you can rewind as many times as you want.

firefox59

I've played many games with a rewind feature, don't think I've ever used it. Instead of putting down those that ask for the feature, why not develop an ounce of self-control?

I've played many games with a rewind feature, don't think I've ever used it. Instead of putting down those that ask for the feature, why not develop an ounce of self-control?

Cobra_nVidia

Agreed.

If they do then they broaden the reach of the game so more people can enjoy it.

GT, especially, is difficult for many people, but they want to try and get into it.  This feature could help someone get used to how the game plays without such severe penalties.  It wouldn't be forced on anyone; likely it could be switched off in options.  That, or, as you said, self-control.  Either way it wouldn't have to affect the hardcore experience.

Nothing wrong with adding the feature, so long as they don't dumb down the game for those that want to keep it hardcore.

Should make all parties happy.

[QUOTE="Cobra_nVidia"]

I've played many games with a rewind feature, don't think I've ever used it. Instead of putting down those that ask for the feature, why not develop an ounce of self-control?

nyc05

Agreed.

If they do then they broaden the reach of the game so more people can enjoy it.

GT, especially, is difficult for many people, but they want to try and get into it. This feature could help someone get used to how the game plays without such severe penalties. It wouldn't be forced on anyone; likely it could be switched off in options. That, or, as you said, self-control. Either way it wouldn't have to affect the hardcore experience.

Nothing wrong with adding the feature, so long as they don't dumb down the game for those that want to keep it hardcore.

Should make all parties happy.

Don't agree with that, they have assists in the game for a reason.

[QUOTE="nyc05"]

[QUOTE="Cobra_nVidia"]

I've played many games with a rewind feature, don't think I've ever used it. Instead of putting down those that ask for the feature, why not develop an ounce of self-control?

GTR12

Agreed.

If they do then they broaden the reach of the game so more people can enjoy it.

GT, especially, is difficult for many people, but they want to try and get into it. This feature could help someone get used to how the game plays without such severe penalties. It wouldn't be forced on anyone; likely it could be switched off in options. That, or, as you said, self-control. Either way it wouldn't have to affect the hardcore experience.

Nothing wrong with adding the feature, so long as they don't dumb down the game for those that want to keep it hardcore.

Should make all parties happy.

Don't agree with that, they have assists in the game for a reason.

They've never had it in the past and have made absolutely no mention of it for GT6 so I'm about 100% sure it won't have it.  I don't really like it myself, it just makes the game more casual - you don't have to pay the price for your mistakes - and that's not what GT is about.

[QUOTE="GTR12"]

[QUOTE="nyc05"]

Agreed.

If they do then they broaden the reach of the game so more people can enjoy it.

GT, especially, is difficult for many people, but they want to try and get into it. This feature could help someone get used to how the game plays without such severe penalties. It wouldn't be forced on anyone; likely it could be switched off in options. That, or, as you said, self-control. Either way it wouldn't have to affect the hardcore experience.

Nothing wrong with adding the feature, so long as they don't dumb down the game for those that want to keep it hardcore.

Should make all parties happy.

firefox59

Don't agree with that, they have assists in the game for a reason.

GT6 is shaping up to be a big joke anyways. Don't waste money on yet another incomplete, yet full priced, game from Polyphony Digital.

GT6 is shaping up to be a big joke anyways. Don't waste money on yet another incomplete, yet full priced, game from Polyphony Digital.

MountyManGamer

Please do elaborate. Do you know something everyone else doesn't? Have you played it yet?

[QUOTE="MountyManGamer"]

GT6 is shaping up to be a big joke anyways. Don't waste money on yet another incomplete, yet full priced, game from Polyphony Digital.

MonoSilver

Please do elaborate. Do you know something everyone else doesn't? Have you played it yet?

My thoughts on why GT6 is not going to be worth the money is here...

http://www.gamespot.com/forums/topic/29401679/will-you-buy-gt6?page=0

[QUOTE="MountyManGamer"]

[QUOTE="MonoSilver"]

[QUOTE="MountyManGamer"]

GT6 is shaping up to be a big joke anyways. Don't waste money on yet another incomplete, yet full priced, game from Polyphony Digital.

MountyManGamer

Please do elaborate. Do you know something everyone else doesn't? Have you played it yet?

My thoughts on why GT6 is not going to be worth the money is here...

http://www.gamespot.com/forums/topic/29401679/will-you-buy-gt6?page=0

[QUOTE="MountyManGamer"] [QUOTE="MountyManGamer"]

 

Please do elaborate. Do you know something everyone else doesn't? Have you played it yet?

The_Rick_14

My thoughts on why GT6 is not going to be worth the money is here...

http://www.gamespot.com/forums/topic/29401679/will-you-buy-gt6?page=0

What this guy said. 1. Rubbish car models (except for a handful) 2. No visual car damage 3. Inconsistent hood camera view (Forza 4 was much better) 4. Triggers on the Dual Shock 3 are no good 5. Menu system and navigation were slow and counterintuitive Don't come bragging to me about 1,200 cars when 500 or what ever looks PS2 ish in 2013. AND their are 20 Civics, 15 fairladies, etc. And only five Corvettes, five Mustangs and four Camaro's. LAME!caseypayne69

1. The car models are not rubbish, maybe you have bad eyesight? Even the standard models look much better than they did on PS2.
2. There is visual car damage. This shouldn't be an issue though if you drove properly and stayed on the track.
3. I don't even understand that.
4. The controls are fully customisable so if you're playing with the triggers and you don't like them, you only have yourself to blame.
5. The menus in GT5 didn't feel any slower than those in Forza 4 to me.

[QUOTE="firefox59"][QUOTE="GTR12"]

Don't agree with that, they have assists in the game for a reason.

MonoSilver

Sell the game back, at least the online lobbies won't be full of crashing kids then, you couldn't play GT5 with strangers at all during the first 5-6 months because they would hit you on purpose.

The online is way better now.

2. There is visual car damage. This shouldn't be an issue though if you drove properly and stayed on the track.MonoSilver

What this guy said. 1. Rubbish car models (except for a handful) 2. No visual car damage 3. Inconsistent hood camera view (Forza 4 was much better) 4. Triggers on the Dual Shock 3 are no good 5. Menu system and navigation were slow and counterintuitive Don't come bragging to me about 1,200 cars when 500 or what ever looks PS2 ish in 2013. AND their are 20 Civics, 15 fairladies, etc. And only five Corvettes, five Mustangs and four Camaro's. LAME!caseypayne69

[QUOTE="caseypayne69"]What this guy said. 1. Rubbish car models (except for a handful) 2. No visual car damage 3. Inconsistent hood camera view (Forza 4 was much better) 4. Triggers on the Dual Shock 3 are no good 5. Menu system and navigation were slow and counterintuitive Don't come bragging to me about 1,200 cars when 500 or what ever looks PS2 ish in 2013. AND their are 20 Civics, 15 fairladies, etc. And only five Corvettes, five Mustangs and four Camaro's. LAME!MountyManGamer

[QUOTE="MountyManGamer"]

[QUOTE="caseypayne69"]What this guy said. 1. Rubbish car models (except for a handful) 2. No visual car damage 3. Inconsistent hood camera view (Forza 4 was much better) 4. Triggers on the Dual Shock 3 are no good 5. Menu system and navigation were slow and counterintuitive Don't come bragging to me about 1,200 cars when 500 or what ever looks PS2 ish in 2013. AND their are 20 Civics, 15 fairladies, etc. And only five Corvettes, five Mustangs and four Camaro's. LAME!MonoSilver

[QUOTE="MonoSilver"][QUOTE="MountyManGamer"] Yea, until Polyphony Digital stops being lazy asses and actually makes a NEW game, I am pulling out of the GT series for the first time ever. GT5 was such a major disappointment to me and many other fans of the series. If is just unfinished rubbish. Maybe they will actually finish the game when they make the PS4 version of GT6, but I doubt it unfortunately :(firefox59

You seem to have some issues with Sony to iron out so I'm not even going to humour you.

[QUOTE="firefox59"][QUOTE="MonoSilver"] You seem to have some issues to sort out with Sony so I'm not even going to humour you. Unfinished rubbish? That's a good one. You do realise it's the biggest racing game available? In fact, enlighten me. How is it unfinished? MonoSilver

You seem to have some issues with Sony to iron out so I'm not even going to humour you.

Now they are releasing the 6th game only on PS3 cause they now the PS4 won't have an install base large enough to make enough money. Sony admitted this. If they cared they'd at least release it on both consoles instead of making gamers wait years for a next gen racing game. But you guys don't care and GT 6 will sell 7 million copies regardless and Sony will keep milking it.firefox59

[QUOTE="firefox59"] Now they are releasing the 6th game only on PS3 cause they now the PS4 won't have an install base large enough to make enough money. Sony admitted this. If they cared they'd at least release it on both consoles instead of making gamers wait years for a next gen racing game. But you guys don't care and GT 6 will sell 7 million copies regardless and Sony will keep milking it.The_Rick_14

[QUOTE="The_Rick_14"][QUOTE="firefox59"] Now they are releasing the 6th game only on PS3 cause they now the PS4 won't have an install base large enough to make enough money. Sony admitted this. If they cared they'd at least release it on both consoles instead of making gamers wait years for a next gen racing game. But you guys don't care and GT 6 will sell 7 million copies regardless and Sony will keep milking it.firefox59

Like you said, they would have to use time and resources to port the game over. It also sounds like they were working on GT6 before PS4 devkits were available so they would have had to start porting mid-development which likely means more time and resources. Personally, I don't think they would get back the amount invested if they did that and at this point, they would be doing it in the wrong direction (Gen3 -> Gen4 instead of Gen4 -> Gen3 like Titanfall). I know for those who want a PS4 near launch and cannot afford to do so without trading in their PS3 will be disappointed, but it makes sense from a business perspective to only release on PS3.

[QUOTE="firefox59"][QUOTE="The_Rick_14"] You know what happens when you try to make a "next-gen" game on both platforms? You don't get a truly next-gen experience because the tech still has to work on current gen so them rushing out a PS4 version would be counter productive at best. So instead, yes good business sense is you release on the platform that has the better install base. It's not greed, it's common sense. Would you try to sell steak to a room full of vegetarians? Fact of the matter is it'll be years before a true next-gen racing game anyway. Personally, I'm excited to get my hands on GT6's demo July 2nd to feel how the new tire, suspension, and aerodynamic models affect the car performance. The_Rick_14

Like you said, they would have to use time and resources to port the game over. It also sounds like they were working on GT6 before PS4 devkits were available so they would have had to start porting mid-development which likely means more time and resources. Personally, I don't think they would get back the amount invested if they did that and at this point, they would be doing it in the wrong direction (Gen3 -> Gen4 instead of Gen4 -> Gen3 like Titanfall). I know for those who want a PS4 near launch and cannot afford to do so without trading in their PS3 will be disappointed, but it makes sense from a business perspective to only release on PS3.