This topic is locked from further discussion.
They're terrible in comparison to even some of the more medicore titles around today, what's worse is the game didn't make up for it anywhere.ONLYDOD
Ouch! Worst than Frontlines: Fuel of War, per say? Would you be so kind to give me an example of a shooter that resembles Haze in graphics? :D
[QUOTE="rrjim1"]I finished Haze and consider it a good game, with good graphics, just not great. I feel I got my moneys worth! Elann2008
With that said, would you say, the final product (full game) looks significantly better than the demo, slightly, or not at all?
The improvements are negligible if there are any (over the demo graphically)
I finished Haze and consider it a good game, with good graphics, just not great. I feel I got my moneys worth! rrjim1
I feel the same and I do go back to the multiplayer. Obviously its not the best graphics out there but they could not be done on a PS2. I did like them but Im not as fussed like you sound as the selling point for me was fun which I had
[QUOTE="Elann2008"][QUOTE="rrjim1"]I finished Haze and consider it a good game, with good graphics, just not great. I feel I got my moneys worth! Evz0rz
With that said, would you say, the final product (full game) looks significantly better than the demo, slightly, or not at all?
The improvements are negligible if there are any (over the demo graphically)
Uh oh..:o Just great...!
They are slightly worse than RFOM imho so not great but ok, they are defo better than quake wars grahpics for sure. I agree with the flamthower though, they are probably the worst fire effects in a ps3 game.
kazanator
Well then, that's not bad! Slightly (if you use that term definitively) worse than RFOM, sounds good to me. RFOM wasnt all that great in terms of graphics but it wasnt average or terrible. Hmm, this is interesting. But you said, they are definitely better than Quake Wars. Ok, I will go download the QW demo and check that out. Thanks. :D
[QUOTE="rrjim1"]I finished Haze and consider it a good game, with good graphics, just not great. I feel I got my moneys worth! BlackendV
I feel the same and I do go back to the multiplayer. Obviously its not the best graphics out there but they could not be done on a PS2. I did like them but Im not as fussed like you sound as the selling point for me was fun which I had
Judging by what you've seen and played so far, it's still better looking than the demo right?
[QUOTE="kazanator"]They are slightly worse than RFOM imho so not great but ok, they are defo better than quake wars grahpics for sure. I agree with the flamthower though, they are probably the worst fire effects in a ps3 game.
Elann2008
Well then, that's not bad! Slightly (if you use that term definitively) worse than RFOM, sounds good to me. RFOM wasnt all that great in terms of graphics but it wasnt average or terrible. Hmm, this is interesting. But you said, they are definitely better than Quake Wars. Ok, I will go download the QW demo and check that out. Thanks. :D
You will be phisically sick when you see QW lol, the gameplay is ok though
They're terrible in comparison to even some of the more medicore titles around today, what's worse is the game didn't make up for it anywhere.ONLYDOD
[QUOTE="BlackendV"][QUOTE="rrjim1"]I finished Haze and consider it a good game, with good graphics, just not great. I feel I got my moneys worth! Elann2008
I feel the same and I do go back to the multiplayer. Obviously its not the best graphics out there but they could not be done on a PS2. I did like them but Im not as fussed like you sound as the selling point for me was fun which I had
Judging by what you've seen and played so far, it's still better looking than the demo right?
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment