Haze is a exlucive to ps3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for rahul_rul210
rahul_rul210

995

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 rahul_rul210
Member since 2006 • 995 Posts
how good is that
Avatar image for JustinBbad
JustinBbad

49

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 JustinBbad
Member since 2002 • 49 Posts
Have you watched the videos? If so, can you really be all that excited about this game?
Avatar image for stygiansanity
stygiansanity

3183

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 stygiansanity
Member since 2005 • 3183 Posts

Have you watched the videos? If so, can you really be all that excited about this game?JustinBbad

owned :P game still has a little hope

Avatar image for longhorn7
longhorn7

4637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#4 longhorn7
Member since 2007 • 4637 Posts

[QUOTE="JustinBbad"]Have you watched the videos? If so, can you really be all that excited about this game?stygiansanity

owned :P game still has a little hope

what do youmean owned? the vidos look great. its actually showing advances in gameplay in the fps genre
Avatar image for BIGDEE06
BIGDEE06

2322

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 BIGDEE06
Member since 2006 • 2322 Posts
It looks like a watered down version of Crysis. I'll probably rent it.
Avatar image for furtherfan
furtherfan

3699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 furtherfan
Member since 2007 • 3699 Posts
it's good news for ps3 owners. it's also very old news (internetz-wize)
Avatar image for 12elic_
12elic_

101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#8 12elic_
Member since 2006 • 101 Posts

listen haze may not have as much eye candy as say gears or killzone 2 but

i assure you the gameplay will be fine they always have great multiplayer.

golden eye 64 timesplitters duh. gameplay will be legit.

Avatar image for Taalon
Taalon

3424

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Taalon
Member since 2006 • 3424 Posts
Look very bland to me. Too repetitive and looks nothing like it did when it was in teaser status.
Avatar image for sonic0491
sonic0491

2508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#10 sonic0491
Member since 2006 • 2508 Posts

Look very bland to me. Too repetitive and looks nothing like it did when it was in teaser status.Taalon

i agree, looks bland, just another shooter to me.

Avatar image for sonic0491
sonic0491

2508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#11 sonic0491
Member since 2006 • 2508 Posts

also OOOOOOOOOLD!

god i hate it when people get all excited when they post old news- they're like proud of themselves but makes them look stupid.

Avatar image for sonic0491
sonic0491

2508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#12 sonic0491
Member since 2006 • 2508 Posts
everybody read this yesterday! (or atleast i did)
Avatar image for -DirtySanchez-
-DirtySanchez-

32760

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#13 -DirtySanchez-
Member since 2003 • 32760 Posts
i doubt its gonna be very good, but we can always hope and its nice seein games get the exclusive treatment again for ps3, even tho its not offical but from the sounds of it it pretty much is
Avatar image for -DirtySanchez-
-DirtySanchez-

32760

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#14 -DirtySanchez-
Member since 2003 • 32760 Posts

listen haze may not have as much eye candy as say gears or killzone 2 but

i assure you the gameplay will be fine they always have great multiplayer.

golden eye 64 timesplitters duh. gameplay will be legit.

12elic_
indeed if this game has multiplayer on teh level of the timesplitters series, includlin splitscreen with bots, then this becomes a must own game for me, as thats what a FPS should be , now if TS4 became a ps3 exclusive *drool*
Avatar image for QuebecSuperstar
QuebecSuperstar

4178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 QuebecSuperstar
Member since 2006 • 4178 Posts

what do youmean owned? the vidos look great. its actually showing advances in gameplay in the fps genre
longhorn7

I totally agree with you! I think the Play Dead thing will be really fun to pull out online.

And concerning the PS3 exclusivity, I got to say I don't understand why people get so worked up about exclusivity. Really, all I'm asking for is for my PS3 version of a game not to suck. Personally, I'd be really happy to play Gears on PS3 and I'd really like Boxers to be able to play the great Warhawk, for example.

Avatar image for fistoflight
fistoflight

7943

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#16 fistoflight
Member since 2005 • 7943 Posts
Are you guys kidding me? Don't tell me your doing this **** again... Most of the people in this forum bashed warhawk because of its graphics than they say the gameplay wouldn't be that good because there was only 5 maps... NOW what are you guys saying about warhawk? That it is fun, and enjoyable correct? Don't start this same thing again with haze till you actually played the game or till the game actually gets a reasonable review...
Avatar image for QuebecSuperstar
QuebecSuperstar

4178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 QuebecSuperstar
Member since 2006 • 4178 Posts

Are you guys kidding me? Don't tell me your doing this **** again... Most of the people in this forum bashed warhawk because of its graphics than they say the gameplay wouldn't be that good because there was only 5 maps... NOW what are you guys saying about warhawk? That it is fun, and enjoyable correct? Don't start this same thing again with haze till you actually played the game or till the game actually gets a reasonable review...fistoflight

Dude, I'm the only one who wrote about Warhawk in this thread and I sure as hell never bashed it! I was one of the lucky few who played the demo and ever since that fateful first day of beta, Warhawk has been my favourite online experience ever.

Avatar image for werty007
werty007

251

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 werty007
Member since 2003 • 251 Posts

[QUOTE="fistoflight"]Are you guys kidding me? Don't tell me your doing this **** again... Most of the people in this forum bashed warhawk because of its graphics than they say the gameplay wouldn't be that good because there was only 5 maps... NOW what are you guys saying about warhawk? That it is fun, and enjoyable correct? Don't start this same thing again with haze till you actually played the game or till the game actually gets a reasonable review...QuebecSuperstar

Dude, I'm the only one who wrote about Warhawk in this thread and I sure as hell never bashed it! I was one of the lucky few who played the demo and ever since that fateful first day of beta, Warhawk has been my favourite online experience ever.

I agree but the fact is that so many people are bashing Haze. The graphics look pretty good and the gameplay will probably be amazing since it is from Free Radical [Knowing what they have done before]. I swear from what I hear from some of the people, not necessarily on this thread, it looks like they have been invited personally to play Haze before everyone else. They bash it to no end.

Jeez, let it release and play it first before telling others how it is.

Avatar image for The_Rick_14
The_Rick_14

9945

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#19 The_Rick_14
Member since 2006 • 9945 Posts

[QUOTE="Taalon"]Look very bland to me. Too repetitive and looks nothing like it did when it was in teaser status.sonic0491

i agree, looks bland, just another shooter to me.

yup because every shooter has the ideas of using necter both for yourself when on one side and against enemies on the other side in a ton of ways varying from necter grenades, necter knives, and direct injections. That's all been done before. And every shooter gives you an option to play dead to fool your enemies as well. Just all standard, bland things like all other shooters. ::rolls eyes::

Avatar image for GeneralX84
GeneralX84

768

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 GeneralX84
Member since 2007 • 768 Posts

they only said the development was based on the PS3, and PC/360 versions have not been confirmed, but there is still possibility that it's multi
don't get to conclusion yet

fyi, the related article: http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3162463

QUOTE:
According to the report, Ubisoft has not ruled out the possibility of "new partnerships" in the future, but that "the official statement on PC and Xbox 360 is that these platforms are not confirmed."

Avatar image for craigx42
craigx42

108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 craigx42
Member since 2004 • 108 Posts

no wonder ps3 never gets exclusives no one appreciates them.

this game looks great to me.

Avatar image for The_Rick_14
The_Rick_14

9945

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#22 The_Rick_14
Member since 2006 • 9945 Posts
You should also read the article here on Gamespot where they say, "Today, Ubisoft amended its statement, saying that currently only the PS3 version of Free Radical's shooter is in development."
Avatar image for Pepsodentalspy
Pepsodentalspy

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#23 Pepsodentalspy
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts

This seems to be the first PS3 exclusive that will rise up from the rivals. But it doesn't mean I'm necessarily gettin this one... Looks pretty decent FPS, but PS3 already has too many of em. But might be gettin this if the ratings are not 18+ (PEGI). would like to find out more about that.

Aaaannd.... BUY THE DAMN WARHAWK! :D

Avatar image for shroom76
shroom76

1764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#24 shroom76
Member since 2007 • 1764 Posts

it will be better than lair.

but im getting UT3

Avatar image for wildchild69
wildchild69

80

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 wildchild69
Member since 2003 • 80 Posts
1) I thought they announced PS3 Exclusiveness at E3 2) I think the game looks amazing in both aspects of graphical design and gameplay mechanics (the whole turning enemies against each other looks really frikin sweet, as well as the play dead mechanic =D) 3) I'm getting this game =D, idk about the state of the online multi-player, but I'll see you all on (the ones that get it anyways)
Avatar image for Flame_Blade88
Flame_Blade88

39348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#26 Flame_Blade88
Member since 2005 • 39348 Posts
It looks cool. I'll most likely get it.
Avatar image for MERC_RECONN
MERC_RECONN

2971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#27 MERC_RECONN
Member since 2006 • 2971 Posts

listen haze may not have as much eye candy as say gears or killzone 2 but

i assure you the gameplay will be fine they always have great multiplayer.

golden eye 64 timesplitters duh. gameplay will be legit.

12elic_

Agreed!!!! Anything and I do mean anything that has Free Radicals name attached to it will have AWSOME gameplay.

Avatar image for Taalon
Taalon

3424

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Taalon
Member since 2006 • 3424 Posts
[QUOTE="sonic0491"]

[QUOTE="Taalon"]Look very bland to me. Too repetitive and looks nothing like it did when it was in teaser status.The_Rick_14

i agree, looks bland, just another shooter to me.

yup because every shooter has the ideas of using necter both for yourself when on one side and against enemies on the other side in a ton of ways varying from necter grenades, necter knives, and direct injections. That's all been done before. And every shooter gives you an option to play dead to fool your enemies as well. Just all standard, bland things like all other shooters. ::rolls eyes::



Gimicky stuff that won't be exciting, in my opinion. I guess it is original but not something that will make me play it over and over again like what Crysis offers.
Avatar image for longhorn7
longhorn7

4637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#29 longhorn7
Member since 2007 • 4637 Posts
[QUOTE="The_Rick_14"][QUOTE="sonic0491"]

[QUOTE="Taalon"]Look very bland to me. Too repetitive and looks nothing like it did when it was in teaser status.Taalon

i agree, looks bland, just another shooter to me.

yup because every shooter has the ideas of using necter both for yourself when on one side and against enemies on the other side in a ton of ways varying from necter grenades, necter knives, and direct injections. That's all been done before. And every shooter gives you an option to play dead to fool your enemies as well. Just all standard, bland things like all other shooters. ::rolls eyes::



Gimicky stuff that won't be exciting, in my opinion. I guess it is original but not something that will make me play it over and over again like what Crysis offers.

so you consider major gameplay additions as gimmicks and instead would take something that has shown absolutely no advancements in gameplay as of right now over that because it has great graphics? makes no sense whatsoever. imagine in a multiplayer match being able to drop right before you die and letting your enemy pass over you just before you pop up behind them and put a knife in the back of their neck. sounds pretty gimmicky huh?
Avatar image for werty007
werty007

251

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 werty007
Member since 2003 • 251 Posts
[QUOTE="Taalon"][QUOTE="The_Rick_14"][QUOTE="sonic0491"]

[QUOTE="Taalon"]Look very bland to me. Too repetitive and looks nothing like it did when it was in teaser status.longhorn7

i agree, looks bland, just another shooter to me.

yup because every shooter has the ideas of using necter both for yourself when on one side and against enemies on the other side in a ton of ways varying from necter grenades, necter knives, and direct injections. That's all been done before. And every shooter gives you an option to play dead to fool your enemies as well. Just all standard, bland things like all other shooters. ::rolls eyes::



Gimicky stuff that won't be exciting, in my opinion. I guess it is original but not something that will make me play it over and over again like what Crysis offers.

so you consider major gameplay additions as gimmicks and instead would take something that has shown absolutely no advancements in gameplay as of right now over that because it has great graphics? makes no sense whatsoever. imagine in a multiplayer match being able to drop right before you die and letting your enemy pass over you just before you pop up behind them and put a knife in the back of their neck. sounds pretty gimmicky huh?

Agreed.

Avatar image for Taalon
Taalon

3424

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Taalon
Member since 2006 • 3424 Posts
[QUOTE="Taalon"][QUOTE="The_Rick_14"][QUOTE="sonic0491"]

[QUOTE="Taalon"]Look very bland to me. Too repetitive and looks nothing like it did when it was in teaser status.longhorn7

i agree, looks bland, just another shooter to me.

yup because every shooter has the ideas of using necter both for yourself when on one side and against enemies on the other side in a ton of ways varying from necter grenades, necter knives, and direct injections. That's all been done before. And every shooter gives you an option to play dead to fool your enemies as well. Just all standard, bland things like all other shooters. ::rolls eyes::



Gimicky stuff that won't be exciting, in my opinion. I guess it is original but not something that will make me play it over and over again like what Crysis offers.

so you consider major gameplay additions as gimmicks and instead would take something that has shown absolutely no advancements in gameplay as of right now over that because it has great graphics? makes no sense whatsoever. imagine in a multiplayer match being able to drop right before you die and letting your enemy pass over you just before you pop up behind them and put a knife in the back of their neck. sounds pretty gimmicky huh?


The graphics aren't that great, and just that one feature isn't going to buy it for me. It doesn't look bad, I admit that, but there isn't really anything exciting enough for me to buy it. To play it with friends and as a rental I would consider buying it.

Avatar image for longhorn7
longhorn7

4637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#32 longhorn7
Member since 2007 • 4637 Posts
But it isn't just one feature. you also get to use the enemies against each other by manipulating their levels of nectar. Makes it feel more like you arent some god-like rambo rip off that can take out an entire army without even breaking a sweat. You actually have to rely on strategy. Not only that but the graphics are on par with games like COD4 and higher than those of games like Halo 3. but my comment about the graphcs is that i think it is odd that you would choose crysis over it even though as far as we know crysis adds nothing new to the genre but great graphics, while haze is actually trying to change things up.
Avatar image for Taalon
Taalon

3424

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 Taalon
Member since 2006 • 3424 Posts
Never mind the fact that Crysis has almost perfect physics, clever AI, completely customizable weapons, environment effects such as trees that snap as they are shot, real-time weather and sunlight engine, and about a million other things. From the video, Haze looks alright but just the same thing over and over. I've played plenty of games where you turn the enemy against each other, and playing dead isn't exactly a genre-changing feature.