This topic is locked from further discussion.
Still pretty poor. Very muddy, dull, lifeless. If you've got a PC that can pull it off, your MUCH better off going that route. If not, it's still worth picking up. raven_squadPretty ignorant post...I'm sorry but Fallout is suposed to be muddy, dull and lifeless seeing that the game is a apocaliptic nuclear wasteland...So it's good it looks like that...It shows that the developers kept what they had in mind!
[QUOTE="raven_squad"]Still pretty poor. Very muddy, dull, lifeless. If you've got a PC that can pull it off, your MUCH better off going that route. If not, it's still worth picking up. x2926014Pretty ignorant post...I'm sorry but Fallout is suposed to be muddy, dull and lifeless seeing that the game is a apocaliptic nuclear wasteland...So it's good it looks like that...It shows that the developers kept what they had in mind!
+1
Pretty ignorant post...I'm sorry but Fallout is suposed to be muddy, dull and lifeless seeing that the game is a apocaliptic nuclear wasteland...So it's good it looks like that...It shows that the developers kept what they had in mind![QUOTE="x2926014"][QUOTE="raven_squad"]Still pretty poor. Very muddy, dull, lifeless. If you've got a PC that can pull it off, your MUCH better off going that route. If not, it's still worth picking up. shhbob
+1
+2[QUOTE="raven_squad"]Still pretty poor. Very muddy, dull, lifeless. If you've got a PC that can pull it off, your MUCH better off going that route. If not, it's still worth picking up. x2926014Pretty ignorant post...I'm sorry but Fallout is suposed to be muddy, dull and lifeless seeing that the game is a apocaliptic nuclear wasteland...So it's good it looks like that...It shows that the developers kept what they had in mind! I'm sorry if your in denial, but apparently you haven't seen the PC version. By Dull and muddy, I was referring to the textures. The PS3 version is absolutely atrocious looking in comparison. Of course the color palate is supposed to be muddy looking, but not the textures and shadows. It's also ridden with jaggies.
You can do a comparisonhttp://www.gamespot.com/features/6202552/index.html?sid=6202552
Pretty ignorant post...I'm sorry but Fallout is suposed to be muddy, dull and lifeless seeing that the game is a apocaliptic nuclear wasteland...So it's good it looks like that...It shows that the developers kept what they had in mind! I'm sorry if your in denial, but apparently you haven't seen the PC version. By Dull and muddy, I was referring to the textures. The PS3 version is absolutely atrocious looking in comparison. Of course the color palate is supposed to be muddy looking, but not the textures and shadows. It's also ridden with jaggies.[QUOTE="x2926014"][QUOTE="raven_squad"]Still pretty poor. Very muddy, dull, lifeless. If you've got a PC that can pull it off, your MUCH better off going that route. If not, it's still worth picking up. raven_squad
You can do a comparisonhttp://www.gamespot.com/features/6202552/index.html?sid=6202552
Dunno about the ps3 version...I have the 360 one but if you can't like this awesome game...Well... Get back to mirror's edge?[QUOTE="raven_squad"]I'm sorry if your in denial, but apparently you haven't seen the PC version. By Dull and muddy, I was referring to the textures. The PS3 version is absolutely atrocious looking in comparison. Of course the color palate is supposed to be muddy looking, but not the textures and shadows. It's also ridden with jaggies.[QUOTE="x2926014"] Pretty ignorant post...I'm sorry but Fallout is suposed to be muddy, dull and lifeless seeing that the game is a apocaliptic nuclear wasteland...So it's good it looks like that...It shows that the developers kept what they had in mind!x2926014
You can do a comparisonhttp://www.gamespot.com/features/6202552/index.html?sid=6202552
Dunno about the ps3 version...I have the 360 one but if you can't like this awesome game...Well... Get back to mirror's edge? lmao. Who said I didn't like the game? In fact, In my first post I said despite the visuals its still worth picking up if your PC can't handle it. The question was on the visuals, and I answered honestly. PC version is superior. Get back to Saints Row. :lol:[QUOTE="raven_squad"]I'm sorry if your in denial, but apparently you haven't seen the PC version. By Dull and muddy, I was referring to the textures. The PS3 version is absolutely atrocious looking in comparison. Of course the color palate is supposed to be muddy looking, but not the textures and shadows. It's also ridden with jaggies.[QUOTE="x2926014"] Pretty ignorant post...I'm sorry but Fallout is suposed to be muddy, dull and lifeless seeing that the game is a apocaliptic nuclear wasteland...So it's good it looks like that...It shows that the developers kept what they had in mind!x2926014
You can do a comparisonhttp://www.gamespot.com/features/6202552/index.html?sid=6202552
Dunno about the ps3 version...I have the 360 one but if you can't like this awesome game...Well... Get back to mirror's edge?Wow.......So your saying bad graphicsautomatically make a bad game? Thatsnot just incredibly ignorant of you , thats just plain stupid. Raven is obviously saying the PS3 Version is inferior, but an inferior Fallout III (compared to the other versions) is still a better game then 90 percent of whats on the gaming market. Dont' be so quick to insult people, I get what your saying, but denying the simple truth that the PS3 Version has worse graphics (without actually having played it), just makes you sound like a brainless fanboy.
By the way, just to throw my own opinion of the game out there. I disliked it. Its indeed a Wasteland, and saying that was Bethesda's intent is a pretty weak argument, since what it comes down to is this.........A dead, lonely Wasteland, is by definition pretty boring.
Pretty ignorant post...I'm sorry but Fallout is suposed to be muddy, dull and lifeless seeing that the game is a apocaliptic nuclear wasteland...So it's good it looks like that...It shows that the developers kept what they had in mind!x2926014I'm sorry if your in denial, but apparently you haven't seen the PC version. By Dull and muddy, I was referring to the textures. The PS3 version is absolutely atrocious looking in comparison. Of course the color palate is supposed to be muddy looking, but not the textures and shadows. It's also ridden with jaggies.
You can do a comparisonhttp://www.gamespot.com/features/6202552/index.html?sid=6202552
Dunno about the ps3 version...I have the 360 one but if you can't like this awesome game...Well... Get back to mirror's edge? Well im not going to come up with something better than faller so ill just shout slogans at you until you submit CURRYS ALWAYS CUTTING PRICES TESCO EVERY LITTLE HELPS Erm...... CASH CONVERTERS but seriously listen before you insult dont live up to your gamertag......Dunno about the ps3 version...I have the 360 one but if you can't like this awesome game...Well... Get back to mirror's edge? lmao. Who said I didn't like the game? In fact, In my first post I said despite the visuals its still worth picking up if your PC can't handle it. The question was on the visuals, and I answered honestly. PC version is superior. Get back to Saints Row. :lol:[QUOTE="x2926014"][QUOTE="raven_squad"] I'm sorry if your in denial, but apparently you haven't seen the PC version. By Dull and muddy, I was referring to the textures. The PS3 version is absolutely atrocious looking in comparison. Of course the color palate is supposed to be muddy looking, but not the textures and shadows. It's also ridden with jaggies.
You can do a comparisonhttp://www.gamespot.com/features/6202552/index.html?sid=6202552
raven_squad
God damn Raven.. my respect for you went up like +50 points. :P Keep pwning man :D
[QUOTE="x2926014"][QUOTE="raven_squad"] I'm sorry if your in denial, but apparently you haven't seen the PC version. By Dull and muddy, I was referring to the textures. The PS3 version is absolutely atrocious looking in comparison. Of course the color palate is supposed to be muddy looking, but not the textures and shadows. It's also ridden with jaggies.
You can do a comparisonhttp://www.gamespot.com/features/6202552/index.html?sid=6202552
Dunno about the ps3 version...I have the 360 one but if you can't like this awesome game...Well... Get back to mirror's edge? lmao. Who said I didn't like the game? In fact, In my first post I said despite the visuals its still worth picking up if your PC can't handle it. The question was on the visuals, and I answered honestly. PC version is superior. Get back to Saints Row. :lol: I did get back to saints row! It's a good game... And good for you the pc version is good...KUDOS!!! But now saying the game is crap cuz of the " muddy,blablabla" graphics it's stupid...[QUOTE="shhbob"][QUOTE="x2926014"] Pretty ignorant post...I'm sorry but Fallout is suposed to be muddy, dull and lifeless seeing that the game is a apocaliptic nuclear wasteland...So it's good it looks like that...It shows that the developers kept what they had in mind!Jono789
+1
+2 +3! But it does look, from those screenshots, a bit better on PC. Just a bit! But if you base your judgement of a game on graphics, I pity you.[QUOTE="raven_squad"]lmao. Who said I didn't like the game? In fact, In my first post I said despite the visuals its still worth picking up if your PC can't handle it. The question was on the visuals, and I answered honestly. PC version is superior. Get back to Saints Row. :lol: I did get back to saints row! It's a good game... And good for you the pc version is good...KUDOS!!! But now saying the game is crap cuz of the " muddy,blablabla" graphics it's stupid... You are really, really slow. Wow. It's remarkable actually. I see where you got your gamertag. Read my post again. Read it Sloooooooowly so you can comprehend it.[QUOTE="x2926014"] Dunno about the ps3 version...I have the 360 one but if you can't like this awesome game...Well... Get back to mirror's edge?x2926014
[QUOTE="Jono789"][QUOTE="shhbob"]+2 +3! But it does look, from those screenshots, a bit better on PC. Just a bit! But if you base your judgement of a game on graphics, I pity you. I actually don't see anyone here who did that. :) I said the game was worthy of picking up, but answered his question about the graphics with all honesty. And if you think those graphics are only a little better....whoa. Pay special attention to the grass, water, and trees in the second image. ;)+1
BaraChat
[QUOTE="Jono789"][QUOTE="shhbob"]+2 +3! But it does look, from those screenshots, a bit better on PC. Just a bit! But if you base your judgement of a game on graphics, I pity you.+1
BaraChat
As far as I could tell just about everyone, said the same thing...No one said the game was bad, it was "a good game but it looked washed out on the console versions" simply it was better looking on the PC.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment