How does fallout 3 look on a 1080P tv?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for soldine
soldine

1980

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#1 soldine
Member since 2007 • 1980 Posts
Just wondering if it looks kickass or not
Avatar image for TROD_BING
TROD_BING

768

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 TROD_BING
Member since 2008 • 768 Posts
I didnt think it was anything spectacular, but KZ2 on the other hand... well u kno
Avatar image for raven_squad
raven_squad

78438

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#3 raven_squad
Member since 2007 • 78438 Posts
Still pretty poor. Very muddy, dull, lifeless. If you've got a PC that can pull it off, your MUCH better off going that route. If not, it's still worth picking up.
Avatar image for Ian_Michael
Ian_Michael

368

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4 Ian_Michael
Member since 2002 • 368 Posts

It looks fine to me. Don't have a complaint about it.

Avatar image for shhbob
shhbob

1035

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 shhbob
Member since 2008 • 1035 Posts

It looks fine to me. Don't have a complaint about it.

Ian_Michael

yeah same here

EDIT - just looked at the back of the box and it says 720p

Avatar image for Bolero89
Bolero89

136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Bolero89
Member since 2005 • 136 Posts

Does the game even run at 1080p?

Avatar image for Eviljeem
Eviljeem

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Eviljeem
Member since 2008 • 25 Posts
I thought it ran at 720.
Avatar image for x2926014
x2926014

1372

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#8 x2926014
Member since 2006 • 1372 Posts
Still pretty poor. Very muddy, dull, lifeless. If you've got a PC that can pull it off, your MUCH better off going that route. If not, it's still worth picking up. raven_squad
Pretty ignorant post...I'm sorry but Fallout is suposed to be muddy, dull and lifeless seeing that the game is a apocaliptic nuclear wasteland...So it's good it looks like that...It shows that the developers kept what they had in mind!
Avatar image for Freebird8877
Freebird8877

3407

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Freebird8877
Member since 2006 • 3407 Posts
It looks decent enough.
Avatar image for shhbob
shhbob

1035

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#10 shhbob
Member since 2008 • 1035 Posts

[QUOTE="raven_squad"]Still pretty poor. Very muddy, dull, lifeless. If you've got a PC that can pull it off, your MUCH better off going that route. If not, it's still worth picking up. x2926014
Pretty ignorant post...I'm sorry but Fallout is suposed to be muddy, dull and lifeless seeing that the game is a apocaliptic nuclear wasteland...So it's good it looks like that...It shows that the developers kept what they had in mind!

+1

Avatar image for Jono789
Jono789

2118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#11 Jono789
Member since 2009 • 2118 Posts

[QUOTE="x2926014"][QUOTE="raven_squad"]Still pretty poor. Very muddy, dull, lifeless. If you've got a PC that can pull it off, your MUCH better off going that route. If not, it's still worth picking up. shhbob

Pretty ignorant post...I'm sorry but Fallout is suposed to be muddy, dull and lifeless seeing that the game is a apocaliptic nuclear wasteland...So it's good it looks like that...It shows that the developers kept what they had in mind!

+1

+2
Avatar image for I_Object
I_Object

85

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#12 I_Object
Member since 2008 • 85 Posts

Fallout 3 is an amazing game, no doubt about that, its graphics are amazing and the gameplay too.Don't expect a living world like Grand Theft Auto or Saint's Row whichmakes the play world looking a bit lineair and boring.

Avatar image for raven_squad
raven_squad

78438

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#13 raven_squad
Member since 2007 • 78438 Posts

[QUOTE="raven_squad"]Still pretty poor. Very muddy, dull, lifeless. If you've got a PC that can pull it off, your MUCH better off going that route. If not, it's still worth picking up. x2926014
Pretty ignorant post...I'm sorry but Fallout is suposed to be muddy, dull and lifeless seeing that the game is a apocaliptic nuclear wasteland...So it's good it looks like that...It shows that the developers kept what they had in mind!

I'm sorry if your in denial, but apparently you haven't seen the PC version. By Dull and muddy, I was referring to the textures. The PS3 version is absolutely atrocious looking in comparison. Of course the color palate is supposed to be muddy looking, but not the textures and shadows. It's also ridden with jaggies.

You can do a comparisonhttp://www.gamespot.com/features/6202552/index.html?sid=6202552

Avatar image for x2926014
x2926014

1372

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#14 x2926014
Member since 2006 • 1372 Posts

[QUOTE="x2926014"][QUOTE="raven_squad"]Still pretty poor. Very muddy, dull, lifeless. If you've got a PC that can pull it off, your MUCH better off going that route. If not, it's still worth picking up. raven_squad

Pretty ignorant post...I'm sorry but Fallout is suposed to be muddy, dull and lifeless seeing that the game is a apocaliptic nuclear wasteland...So it's good it looks like that...It shows that the developers kept what they had in mind!

I'm sorry if your in denial, but apparently you haven't seen the PC version. By Dull and muddy, I was referring to the textures. The PS3 version is absolutely atrocious looking in comparison. Of course the color palate is supposed to be muddy looking, but not the textures and shadows. It's also ridden with jaggies.

You can do a comparisonhttp://www.gamespot.com/features/6202552/index.html?sid=6202552

Dunno about the ps3 version...I have the 360 one but if you can't like this awesome game...Well... Get back to mirror's edge?
Avatar image for raven_squad
raven_squad

78438

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#15 raven_squad
Member since 2007 • 78438 Posts

[QUOTE="raven_squad"]

[QUOTE="x2926014"] Pretty ignorant post...I'm sorry but Fallout is suposed to be muddy, dull and lifeless seeing that the game is a apocaliptic nuclear wasteland...So it's good it looks like that...It shows that the developers kept what they had in mind!x2926014

I'm sorry if your in denial, but apparently you haven't seen the PC version. By Dull and muddy, I was referring to the textures. The PS3 version is absolutely atrocious looking in comparison. Of course the color palate is supposed to be muddy looking, but not the textures and shadows. It's also ridden with jaggies.

You can do a comparisonhttp://www.gamespot.com/features/6202552/index.html?sid=6202552

Dunno about the ps3 version...I have the 360 one but if you can't like this awesome game...Well... Get back to mirror's edge?

lmao. Who said I didn't like the game? In fact, In my first post I said despite the visuals its still worth picking up if your PC can't handle it. The question was on the visuals, and I answered honestly. PC version is superior. Get back to Saints Row. :lol:

Avatar image for Faller88
Faller88

7277

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#16 Faller88
Member since 2006 • 7277 Posts

[QUOTE="raven_squad"]

[QUOTE="x2926014"] Pretty ignorant post...I'm sorry but Fallout is suposed to be muddy, dull and lifeless seeing that the game is a apocaliptic nuclear wasteland...So it's good it looks like that...It shows that the developers kept what they had in mind!x2926014

I'm sorry if your in denial, but apparently you haven't seen the PC version. By Dull and muddy, I was referring to the textures. The PS3 version is absolutely atrocious looking in comparison. Of course the color palate is supposed to be muddy looking, but not the textures and shadows. It's also ridden with jaggies.

You can do a comparisonhttp://www.gamespot.com/features/6202552/index.html?sid=6202552

Dunno about the ps3 version...I have the 360 one but if you can't like this awesome game...Well... Get back to mirror's edge?

Wow.......So your saying bad graphicsautomatically make a bad game? Thatsnot just incredibly ignorant of you , thats just plain stupid. Raven is obviously saying the PS3 Version is inferior, but an inferior Fallout III (compared to the other versions) is still a better game then 90 percent of whats on the gaming market. Dont' be so quick to insult people, I get what your saying, but denying the simple truth that the PS3 Version has worse graphics (without actually having played it), just makes you sound like a brainless fanboy.

By the way, just to throw my own opinion of the game out there. I disliked it. Its indeed a Wasteland, and saying that was Bethesda's intent is a pretty weak argument, since what it comes down to is this.........A dead, lonely Wasteland, is by definition pretty boring.

Avatar image for Jono789
Jono789

2118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#17 Jono789
Member since 2009 • 2118 Posts
[QUOTE="x2926014"][QUOTE="raven_squad"]

Pretty ignorant post...I'm sorry but Fallout is suposed to be muddy, dull and lifeless seeing that the game is a apocaliptic nuclear wasteland...So it's good it looks like that...It shows that the developers kept what they had in mind!x2926014
I'm sorry if your in denial, but apparently you haven't seen the PC version. By Dull and muddy, I was referring to the textures. The PS3 version is absolutely atrocious looking in comparison. Of course the color palate is supposed to be muddy looking, but not the textures and shadows. It's also ridden with jaggies.

You can do a comparisonhttp://www.gamespot.com/features/6202552/index.html?sid=6202552

Dunno about the ps3 version...I have the 360 one but if you can't like this awesome game...Well... Get back to mirror's edge?

Well im not going to come up with something better than faller so ill just shout slogans at you until you submit CURRYS ALWAYS CUTTING PRICES TESCO EVERY LITTLE HELPS Erm...... CASH CONVERTERS but seriously listen before you insult dont live up to your gamertag......
Avatar image for H-A-V-O-K
H-A-V-O-K

6975

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#18 H-A-V-O-K
Member since 2008 • 6975 Posts
I agree all the way around, although I own and played through Fallout 3 a few times, it did look pretty washed out compared to the PC version but it was still a good game regardless of the lifeless wasteland, It seemed to me like they only built the capital wastes and somone said "uhh..dude...its too small" so they just expanded and forgot to actually put stuff there. Also not to nitpick but I had some issues with the game crashing on me, repeatedly.
Avatar image for R0rschach-
R0rschach-

1482

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 R0rschach-
Member since 2009 • 1482 Posts

[QUOTE="x2926014"][QUOTE="raven_squad"] I'm sorry if your in denial, but apparently you haven't seen the PC version. By Dull and muddy, I was referring to the textures. The PS3 version is absolutely atrocious looking in comparison. Of course the color palate is supposed to be muddy looking, but not the textures and shadows. It's also ridden with jaggies.

You can do a comparisonhttp://www.gamespot.com/features/6202552/index.html?sid=6202552

raven_squad

Dunno about the ps3 version...I have the 360 one but if you can't like this awesome game...Well... Get back to mirror's edge?

lmao. Who said I didn't like the game? In fact, In my first post I said despite the visuals its still worth picking up if your PC can't handle it. The question was on the visuals, and I answered honestly. PC version is superior. Get back to Saints Row. :lol:

God damn Raven.. my respect for you went up like +50 points. :P Keep pwning man :D

Avatar image for poppazee
poppazee

216

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 poppazee
Member since 2005 • 216 Posts

Just wondering if it looks kickass or notsoldine

Doesn't matter, Fallout 3doesn't have 1080P only 720P.

Avatar image for x2926014
x2926014

1372

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#21 x2926014
Member since 2006 • 1372 Posts
[QUOTE="raven_squad"]

[QUOTE="x2926014"][QUOTE="raven_squad"] I'm sorry if your in denial, but apparently you haven't seen the PC version. By Dull and muddy, I was referring to the textures. The PS3 version is absolutely atrocious looking in comparison. Of course the color palate is supposed to be muddy looking, but not the textures and shadows. It's also ridden with jaggies.

You can do a comparisonhttp://www.gamespot.com/features/6202552/index.html?sid=6202552

Dunno about the ps3 version...I have the 360 one but if you can't like this awesome game...Well... Get back to mirror's edge?

lmao. Who said I didn't like the game? In fact, In my first post I said despite the visuals its still worth picking up if your PC can't handle it. The question was on the visuals, and I answered honestly. PC version is superior. Get back to Saints Row. :lol:

I did get back to saints row! It's a good game... And good for you the pc version is good...KUDOS!!! But now saying the game is crap cuz of the " muddy,blablabla" graphics it's stupid...
Avatar image for Jono789
Jono789

2118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#22 Jono789
Member since 2009 • 2118 Posts

I suggest you read his post more carefully he did not say the game was crap no one in this thread at all has called the game crap Raven just said do not let the graphics put you off from buying the game. Dang it!

Avatar image for BaraChat
BaraChat

3144

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#23 BaraChat
Member since 2008 • 3144 Posts
[QUOTE="shhbob"]

[QUOTE="x2926014"] Pretty ignorant post...I'm sorry but Fallout is suposed to be muddy, dull and lifeless seeing that the game is a apocaliptic nuclear wasteland...So it's good it looks like that...It shows that the developers kept what they had in mind!Jono789

+1

+2

+3! But it does look, from those screenshots, a bit better on PC. Just a bit! But if you base your judgement of a game on graphics, I pity you.
Avatar image for raven_squad
raven_squad

78438

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#24 raven_squad
Member since 2007 • 78438 Posts

[QUOTE="raven_squad"]

[QUOTE="x2926014"] Dunno about the ps3 version...I have the 360 one but if you can't like this awesome game...Well... Get back to mirror's edge?x2926014

lmao. Who said I didn't like the game? In fact, In my first post I said despite the visuals its still worth picking up if your PC can't handle it. The question was on the visuals, and I answered honestly. PC version is superior. Get back to Saints Row. :lol:

I did get back to saints row! It's a good game... And good for you the pc version is good...KUDOS!!! But now saying the game is crap cuz of the " muddy,blablabla" graphics it's stupid...

You are really, really slow. Wow. It's remarkable actually. I see where you got your gamertag. Read my post again. Read it Sloooooooowly so you can comprehend it.

Avatar image for raven_squad
raven_squad

78438

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#25 raven_squad
Member since 2007 • 78438 Posts

[QUOTE="Jono789"][QUOTE="shhbob"]

+1

BaraChat

+2

+3! But it does look, from those screenshots, a bit better on PC. Just a bit! But if you base your judgement of a game on graphics, I pity you.

I actually don't see anyone here who did that. :) I said the game was worthy of picking up, but answered his question about the graphics with all honesty. And if you think those graphics are only a little better....whoa. Pay special attention to the grass, water, and trees in the second image. ;)

Avatar image for yoda4ps3
yoda4ps3

678

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 yoda4ps3
Member since 2009 • 678 Posts

They skimped out on graphic quality on the regular version. Maybe if we're lucky the GOTY edition will be up to par with the 360.

Avatar image for H-A-V-O-K
H-A-V-O-K

6975

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#27 H-A-V-O-K
Member since 2008 • 6975 Posts

[QUOTE="Jono789"][QUOTE="shhbob"]

+1

BaraChat

+2

+3! But it does look, from those screenshots, a bit better on PC. Just a bit! But if you base your judgement of a game on graphics, I pity you.

As far as I could tell just about everyone, said the same thing...No one said the game was bad, it was "a good game but it looked washed out on the console versions" simply it was better looking on the PC.