This topic is locked from further discussion.
Vii reamke going multi. Or is it just shocking someting new they have started using. Tacticity
I don't see how is that a problem if you said going exclusive to 360 that would be a problem.
Vii reamke going multi. Or is it just shocking someting new they have started using. Tacticity
-10. Is there a lack of individuality amunst teens? Was a FFVII remake confirmed? Does it matter? Jeez. I'm actually hopiing they do make FFVII and make it a multiplat with Xbox 360 exclusive content so that all the FFVII remake addicted fanboys go over to MS to bother their forums with this FF nonsense. And stop reffering to them as Square. They are Square Enix now. Square died along time ago.
Innof said, it looks like its allready starting. Ill keep this thread open if you guys want to discuss more about this. Tacticitydiscuss more about this? no, we want all these FFVII fanboys to go out and play in the road at this point. If it gets made, it gets made. Square Enix never promised anything. Besides, they could say they remade the game at this point and it's going to be free and all the fanboys would still find something to cry about.
Here is thing they said theY have a big FF VII announcement right, then by that fans of the game come to a conclusion that it will be a remake which is a big possiblity but what if it turns out to be another FF VII movie like FF VII:AC.
I just think you need to take it easy and wait for them to unveil this big announcement.
It would be funny see all the ppl that said it would never happen to see it happen lol
It deserves a remake. you have the people that wish for more FPS and hate to see the attention on FF.
and
The Fanboy'z, what's wrong with being a fan to a game that rival's the one's today?
because as a fan of final fantasy, i would rather see them continue the story they setup with genesis at the end of Dirge.It would be funny see all the ppl that said it would never happen to see it happen lol
It deserves a remake. you have the people that wish for more FPS and hate to see the attention on FF.
and
The Fanboy'z, what's wrong with being a fan to a game that rival's the one's today?
CoreoVII
[QUOTE="CoreoVII"]because as a fan of final fantasy, i would rather see them continue the story they setup with genesis at the end of Dirge.It would be funny see all the ppl that said it would never happen to see it happen lol
It deserves a remake. you have the people that wish for more FPS and hate to see the attention on FF.
and
The Fanboy'z, what's wrong with being a fan to a game that rival's the one's today?
tgschmidt
DUDE, i totally forgot about Genesis, he also played a huge role in crisis core, with that said, maybe they will continue the story........or just make a remake....personally I would be happy for both. But I think they are not done with Genesis just yet.
I'm just hoping that they announce a New Z.O.E 3 for the PS3. dantesergei
I guess you have to wait for Konami to announce that.I read their E3 conference it wasn't that good maybe at TGS.
[QUOTE="Tacticity"]I know but it want be the same. JLF1
what? o.0
I know but it want be the same. Tacticity
Dude...former Sony exclusives going multiplatform don't endanger the PS3.Most of the games that are going multi are from last gen.
This is the way it needs to go
1.Last Remnant coming out world wide on all platforms as promised
2.Both Star Ocean 4 an infinite Undiscovery Multi Platform
3.Kingdom Hearts 3 PS3 Exclusive
4.Z.O.E 3 PS3 Exclusive
5.White Knight dated
An as for whoever talked about the person calling SquareEnix, Square who cares honestly stop avoiding the point.
Now back to Sukoden II on my psp one of real best rpgs ever made sad like cars they don't make em like they used too.
:shock::oThe story broke at 1up interview with mr. Wada.
and at the latest 1up yours podcast, shane confirmed that the news was for the Ps3 users.
The announcement isn't at TGS, it is at DKS3713 [taking place in Tokyo on August 2 and 3]
Krigon
OK TC you can relax now.
Vii reamke going multi. Or is it just shocking someting new they have started using. Tacticity
WTH!!!! Will you guys stop with the FF7 remake crap already?!!!!!!!
Here is thing they said theY have a big FF VII announcement right, then by that fans of the game come to a conclusion that it will be a remake which is a big possiblity but what if it turns out to be another FF VII movie like FF VII:AC.
I just think you need to take it easy and wait for them to unveil this big announcement.
Star650
I read in an article awhile back that they were making a sequel to advent children.
[QUOTE="Tacticity"]Vii reamke going multi. Or is it just shocking someting new they have started using. Star650
I don't see how is that a problem if you said going exclusive to 360 that would be a problem.
Well it was a 3 disc game for the PS so if it's a shot for shot remake, both versions will probably be on 1 disc. And this game wasn't even announced yet.
Seriuolly.....WHY does it bother you so much? The PS3 will have one disc and the 360 will have multiple. So what's the deal?CoreoVII
lol like that is a deal breaker for anybody.
Lmfao there's no FF VII remake, it's probably a KH3 announcement saying it will go multiplat knowing SE now.G-Legend
They said a big FF VII announcement at their special event.
FF7 is a trademark owned by Sony therefore unless Sony is so stupid as to let 360 have FF7, games with FF7 or related to it will stay Sony exclusive (psp, ps3 & ps2). So relax guys, it won't go multiplat.enral
LMAO Sony Owns FF7? They don't own rights to it, they just published the NA version. Square owns every single FF game. Just like Edios Interactive published the PC version of FFVI but they don't own the game. They can release it for any console they want. I can't wait to play FFVI on Xbox 360. You know they are going to go to xbox anyway. SE wants everyone to experience FF thats why it's going to Xbox. Long live MS!!!.
Let me know when you want me to stop and care so fanboys can have a shoulder to cry on. /Sarcasm.
What I got from TC's original statement is that "sentimental value" is at stake if SE begins to release past titles/remakes as multi-plat, which I see as a legitimate argument because it does not deter the concept of the PS3 getting shafted, as we still get to play it. It just makes it feel less special on a personal level, which can change based on the individual gamer - some care, some don't.
SE can do whatever the hell they want, but I am sure they know that some of their announcements were a sting to Sony.
Vii reamke going multi. Or is it just shocking someting new they have started using. Tacticityno one other than sony can publish(unless they give them rights to) VII. because the original was published by Sony. on topic, i think its something about dragon quest.
I think all the FFXIII multi thing is overshadowing how real rpg fans feel an we recodnize that what we actually lost was Star Ocean totally. An that The Last Remnant would be coming on on 360 first an infinite undiscovery would be 360 exculsive. Which to me one of the biggest things said was the whole Last Remnant thing because they said it would come out on all platforms at the same time. Then on top of that star ocean 360 exclusive as well as another ip infinite undiscovery thats what got to me. If it was just infinite undiscovery 360 exclusive an everything else multi I could deal with that but this is a bit over the top. Although Infinite does look better day by day an I wouldn't mind that either.
Just one more thing, the only reason I haven't like pretty much died from the rpg drought is because of my psp god bless that thing. It has brought me coutless hours of fun.
[QUOTE="Tacticity"]Vii reamke going multi. Or is it just shocking someting new they have started using. T3h_M3tal_Biggzno one other than sony can publish(unless they give them rights to) VII. because the original was published by Sony. on topic, i think its something about dragon quest.
then why did they not stop nintendo when they remade tactics for the advance the original was published by sony also? and stop with the Z.O.E and dragonquest or any other its already been said to do with the 7 franchise.
no one other than sony can publish(unless they give them rights to) VII. because the original was published by Sony. on topic, i think its something about dragon quest.[QUOTE="T3h_M3tal_Biggz"][QUOTE="Tacticity"]Vii reamke going multi. Or is it just shocking someting new they have started using. BlackIce2007
then why did they not stop nintendo when they remade tactics for the advance the original was published by sony also? and stop with the Z.O.E and dragonquest or any other its already been said to do with the 7 franchise.
I don't buy into the whole Sony owns the rights thing, but technically your argument is off. Tactics was remade for the PSP. FFTA and FFTA2 are complete different games from FFT, which (to my knowledge) has only been on the PS1 and PSP.
As for the Sony published 7 thing, I think individual contracts have to be looked at. In some cases a publisher owns the IP, in some cases the dev retains all rights to the IP. In some cases a game only gets made because the publisher is providing all the funding up front, and in some cases a game is made, and then the dev seeks out a publisher because they need help with the post production publishing (making discs, packaging, distribution, etc.) and in some cases the dev publishes the game themselves in one region and simply makes partnerships with different publishers in different regions or for different platforms to put the game out in other places. This last one is what happened with some of Square/SE's older games. I highly doubt Sony has any rights whatso-ever to FF7, or any other FF game.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment