i got a new tv for my ps3!!!!!!!

best hdtv right now is the new samsung (ln-t4665f) check it out far, surpasses the xbr (still love xbr though) ( 15,000:1 contrast ration, 3 hdmi 1.3 inputs,1080p, beautiful casing)

They have a 40"- ln-t4065f

46": ln-t4665f

52"- ln-t5265f

Anybody interested in any tv for that matter do some internet shopping you can save a couple hundred online on brand new tv's.

websites: ibuyplasma.com, bestbuyplasma.com (i got the top of the line onkyo reciever off there worth $1000 for $600 so just goes to show u)

stick to bravia xbr if you can afforsd it especially if you can afford the new xbr3! they are still the best LVD's on the market you can check almost all reviews for it and its ranked the highest. if you cant afford that xbr3 go samsung great picture for about1500-1000 dollars less. oh yeah contrast ratio doesn't mean s**t its set by the manufacture.freediro

You are wrong, in order of performance right now:

LN-T5265F

Sharp D92U/D93u (assuming no bands)

XBR2/3

The difference between the 65F and the xbr2 is pretty significant (besides sd content, the XBR2 excells at this).  I have professionally tested all three, and can guarantee you that I am correct. 

[QUOTE="freediro"]stick to bravia xbr if you can afforsd it especially if you can afford the new xbr3! they are still the best LVD's on the market you can check almost all reviews for it and its ranked the highest. if you cant afford that xbr3 go samsung great picture for about1500-1000 dollars less. oh yeah contrast ratio doesn't mean s**t its set by the manufacture.BroweChisox

You are wrong, in order of performance right now:

LN-T5265F

Sharp D92U/D93u (assuming no bands)

XBR2/3

The difference between the 65F and the xbr2 is pretty significant (besides sd content, the XBR2 excells at this).  I have professionally tested all three, and can guarantee you that I am correct. 

ok i wont argue that the samsung and xbr2/3 are almost even but there is no way in hell the sharp can be second you must be crazy the sharp has so much problems with grainy images and pixalation, sharps give the best blacks and that it.

but if i was buying a tv i would buy samsung only because the xbr is way to overpriced because you pay mostly for its style.

[QUOTE="BroweChisox"]

[QUOTE="freediro"]stick to bravia xbr if you can afforsd it especially if you can afford the new xbr3! they are still the best LVD's on the market you can check almost all reviews for it and its ranked the highest. if you cant afford that xbr3 go samsung great picture for about1500-1000 dollars less. oh yeah contrast ratio doesn't mean s**t its set by the manufacture.freediro

You are wrong, in order of performance right now:

LN-T5265F

Sharp D92U/D93u (assuming no bands)

XBR2/3

The difference between the 65F and the xbr2 is pretty significant (besides sd content, the XBR2 excells at this). I have professionally tested all three, and can guarantee you that I am correct.

ok i wont argue that the samsung and xbr2/3 are almost even but there is no way in hell the sharp can be second you must be crazy the sharp has so much problems with grainy images and pixalation, sharps give the best blacks and that it.

but if i was buying a tv i would buy samsung only because the xbr is way to overpriced because you pay mostly for its style.

Are you ISF Certified?  I don't think you have a clue about this.  Stop posting. 

best hdtv right now is the new samsung (ln-t4665f) check it out far, surpasses the xbr (still love xbr though) ( 15,000:1 contrast ration, 3 hdmi 1.3 inputs,1080p, beautiful casing)

They have a 40"- ln-t4065f

46": ln-t4665f

52"- ln-t5265f

Anybody interested in any tv for that matter do some internet shopping you can save a couple hundred online on brand new tv's.

websites: ibuyplasma.com, bestbuyplasma.com (i got the top of the line onkyo reciever off there worth $1000 for $600 so just goes to show u)

 

 

954LatinoThug

I saw the Samsung at my local Magnolia today. This is the panel that may make me upgrade from plasma as the screen was absolutely stunning and was the first LCD panel that impressed me. The dynamic contrast ratio is surely inflated but once taken out of the crappy "in store mode" it was a site to see and far above all other LCDs. I agree with another poster that you should consider taking yours back and waiting for Sonys answer to Samsung. The glass is the same but it will be interesting to see how the Sony engine performs.

I can't see paying over $1000 bucks for a TV. That's insane. JDW_games

I can, the quality between a $500 LCD compared to a $1000 LCD is big.  

I can't see paying over $1000 bucks for a TV. That's insane. JDW_games

$1000 is not that much money at all.  People spend $30k on a car every few years all the time.  Most people will enjoy their tv more hours per day than their car.  People who really want to enjoy their tv should set a base price around $1800.

[QUOTE="JDW_games"]I can't see paying over $1000 bucks for a TV. That's insane. BroweChisox

$1000 is not that much money at all.  People spend $30k on a car every few years all the time.  Most people will enjoy their tv more hours per day than their car.  People who really want to enjoy their tv should set a base price around $1800.

Browie, what do you think of the new Sony KDL-40V3000 and the new Samsung 81 series (with LED backlighting)?SergeantSnitch

I think you are talking to me, maybe.  I am excited to see the new 81 series.  From who I have talked to, some people believe it to be a "super plasma killer".  While that seems to be wishful thinking, local dimming and LED backlighting should be a significant change.  The new 40V3000 is not the same type of huge jump (although is looks much nicer than the model it replaces).  You should be seeing the 81 series possibly by june, they are out in Asia now, but obviously we get them a little bit slower. 

I've been thinking about getting the Bravia or the Samsung 46 inch. The casing for both aren't that appealing for me. I like the casing for the last gen Samsung TVs because it has the cool iPod like circle on the front bottom of the TV. mikeslemonade

It also makes a sound when you turn it off:P I know because my brother has it 

3900 b/c it was reguarlly priced at 4600 but there was a berkshier hashway discount that i got and it was a big discount i also got a bose surround sound and it sounds sweet tojason13253

I find that hard to belive. I had bose and it sounds good at the store but when i brought it home the sound sucks. It was a big let down, after paying $3000 for it.

You have to get Casino Royale. That has the best Blu-Ray picture that I've seenCSI24

Agreed. Stunning in 1080i on my TV. 

[QUOTE="jason13253"]3900 b/c it was reguarlly priced at 4600 but there was a berkshier hashway discount that i got and it was a big discount i also got a bose surround sound and it sounds sweet toMafia17

I find that hard to belive. I had bose and it sounds good at the store but when i brought it home the sound sucks. It was a big let down, after paying $3000 for it.

Bose is well accepted as the worst speaker company in terms of price/performance ratio. 

my dad thinks LCD tv burn...

if i tell him no like i have 10million times all i hear is a speach... so meh  

im still saving up for a 57 inches 1080p lcd i saw in curciut city but im close already got my hdmi cable