9.5
I haven't played the demo but if the ps3 fans don't know this:
Gamespot gave NIJA GAIDEN 9.4
and after a year they gave NINJA GAIDEN BLACK 9.4 ( the same score)
and this games is build from the ground so it should score better.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
9.5
I haven't played the demo but if the ps3 fans don't know this:
Gamespot gave NIJA GAIDEN 9.4
and after a year they gave NINJA GAIDEN BLACK 9.4 ( the same score)
and this games is build from the ground so it should score better.
yeah right .. :roll:
First of all its a remake of a remake.. with only a couple of extra's and some decent new graphics..
And the fact that its on the ps3 ... I'm thinking 8.6 to be the score.
The_Tombo
OK, the same is said about NGB which is not a remake and they only added the hurrican pack, what which you can only play by going online in the original game.
[QUOTE="The_Tombo"]yeah right .. :roll:
First of all its a remake of a remake.. with only a couple of extra's and some decent new graphics..
And the fact that its on the ps3 ... I'm thinking 8.6 to be the score.
SolidSnake2020
OK, the same is said about NGB which is not a remake and they only added the hurrican pack, what which you can only play by going online in the original game.
 schyeah you're right about that.. but the fact it's on the ps3 ...
I'd bet that now that it's on the ps3 it's all of a sudden going to be a big deal that it's a remake ..
9.5
I haven't played the demo but if the ps3 fans don't know this:
Gamespot gave NIJA GAIDEN 9.4
and after a year they gave NINJA GAIDEN BLACK 9.4 ( the same score)
and this games is build from the ground so it should score better.
SolidSnake2020
have you been hiding under a rock???
this is gamespot, They don't like the PS3, NGS will get 8 or below.
you saw what they did to VF5, RFOM, MS, CAC. NGS will suffer the same fate.
im only here for the forums, but i get my reviews from 1up, and IGN, and then average their scores to get a better idea.Â
[QUOTE="SolidSnake2020"]9.5
I haven't played the demo but if the ps3 fans don't know this:
Gamespot gave NIJA GAIDEN 9.4
and after a year they gave NINJA GAIDEN BLACK 9.4 ( the same score)
and this games is build from the ground so it should score better.
PowerCharged
have you been hiding under a rock???
this is gamespot, They don't like the PS3, NGS will get 8 or below.
you saw what they did to VF5, RFOM, MS, CAC. NGS will suffer the same fate.
im only here for the forums, but i get my reviews from 1up, and IGN, and then average their scores to get a better idea.Â
NO, I wasn't and OH what about oblivion they gave it a good score,and gamespot isn't the only gaming site that review matters most of the game you mentioned deserve a higher score , come on now stay positive .
And I like the MGS4 box for the 360. nice one.
[QUOTE="PowerCharged"][QUOTE="Holy_Shadow_God"]5 out of 5, in my view. Also I'm Back :DHoly_Shadow_God
i didn't miss you.Â
Also, good for you. Have you been around few more times to tell me u didnt miss me. No, I come back for the playstation and the fans, Also my peeps. So go sux a fat cow you, sos bs biz.First of all holy shadow .. BURN .. whaha Powercharged nice one :lol:
And to be honest.. i did not miss you either.
[QUOTE="Holy_Shadow_God"][QUOTE="PowerCharged"][QUOTE="Holy_Shadow_God"]5 out of 5, in my view. Also I'm Back :DThe_Tombo
i didn't miss you.Â
Also, good for you. Have you been around few more times to tell me u didnt miss me. No, I come back for the playstation and the fans, Also my peeps. So go sux a fat cow you, sos bs biz.First of all holy shadow .. BURN .. whaha Powercharged nice one :lol:
And to be honest.. i did not miss you either.
if you don't. You haven't been here long enough know me, or like me so yeah..duhh..[QUOTE="SolidSnake2020"]9.5
I haven't played the demo but if the ps3 fans don't know this:
Gamespot gave NIJA GAIDEN 9.4
and after a year they gave NINJA GAIDEN BLACK 9.4 ( the same score)
and this games is build from the ground so it should score better.
PowerCharged
have you been hiding under a rock???
this is gamespot, They don't like the PS3, NGS will get 8 or below.
you saw what they did to VF5, RFOM, MS, CAC. NGS will suffer the same fate.
im only here for the forums, but i get my reviews from 1up, and IGN, and then average their scores to get a better idea.Â
Gamespot scored all the games you listed perfectly.
Virtua Fighter 5- It doesn't have online. Do you really expect a fighter, with nearly no revolutionary features, and no online play to get above a 9?! No. It still got a "great score"
Resistance: Resistance was boring and not as revolutionary as many think. Nothing special. Almost all of those guns have been in previous games. The graphics were washed out and bland and the online play was frustrating. Single player was also frustrating. Still it got a great score because it had good gameplay
MotorStorm- it has no splitscreen first of all. The singleplayer is crap. It still got a good score
None of those games deserved 9's. However, they do deserve the good or great scores they got. Many people talk about how Perfect Dark Zero didn't deserve a 9 but it did for a few reasons- 1) the graphics were the best thing out at the time. sure they were a little shiny but it was the best looking console game out. 2) It had revolutionary features like the cover system, rolling, the guns etc. 3) Multiplayer was good with a huuuuuge amount of weapons and players
[QUOTE="PowerCharged"][QUOTE="SolidSnake2020"]9.5
I haven't played the demo but if the ps3 fans don't know this:
Gamespot gave NIJA GAIDEN 9.4
and after a year they gave NINJA GAIDEN BLACK 9.4 ( the same score)
and this games is build from the ground so it should score better.
sk8ter33157
have you been hiding under a rock???
this is gamespot, They don't like the PS3, NGS will get 8 or below.
you saw what they did to VF5, RFOM, MS, CAC. NGS will suffer the same fate.
im only here for the forums, but i get my reviews from 1up, and IGN, and then average their scores to get a better idea.Â
Gamespot scored all the games you listed perfectly.
Virtua Fighter 5- It doesn't have online. Do you really expect a fighter, with nearly no revolutionary features, and no online play to get above a 9?! No. It still got a "great score"
Resistance: Resistance was boring and not as revolutionary as many think. Nothing special. Almost all of those guns have been in previous games. The graphics were washed out and bland and the online play was frustrating. Single player was also frustrating. Still it got a great score because it had good gameplay
MotorStorm- it has no splitscreen first of all. The singleplayer is crap. It still got a good score
None of those games deserved 9's. However, they do deserve the good or great scores they got. Many people talk about how Perfect Dark Zero didn't deserve a 9 but it did for a few reasons- 1) the graphics were the best thing out at the time. sure they were a little shiny but it was the best looking console game out. 2) It had revolutionary features like the cover system, rolling, the guns etc. 3) Multiplayer was good with a huuuuuge amount of weapons and players
Tell me what guns in rfom were in other games? I really want to know. I don't usually type in this forum but in system wars. But putting pdz as a 9, is just wrong. It did have good graphics, but what about the gameplay, the value, the sound, the tilt? All of those are part of the review and seemed to be overrated.[QUOTE="sk8ter33157"][QUOTE="PowerCharged"][QUOTE="SolidSnake2020"]9.5
I haven't played the demo but if the ps3 fans don't know this:
Gamespot gave NIJA GAIDEN 9.4
and after a year they gave NINJA GAIDEN BLACK 9.4 ( the same score)
and this games is build from the ground so it should score better.
nextgengaming18
have you been hiding under a rock???
this is gamespot, They don't like the PS3, NGS will get 8 or below.
you saw what they did to VF5, RFOM, MS, CAC. NGS will suffer the same fate.
im only here for the forums, but i get my reviews from 1up, and IGN, and then average their scores to get a better idea.Â
Gamespot scored all the games you listed perfectly.
Virtua Fighter 5- It doesn't have online. Do you really expect a fighter, with nearly no revolutionary features, and no online play to get above a 9?! No. It still got a "great score"
Resistance: Resistance was boring and not as revolutionary as many think. Nothing special. Almost all of those guns have been in previous games. The graphics were washed out and bland and the online play was frustrating. Single player was also frustrating. Still it got a great score because it had good gameplay
MotorStorm- it has no splitscreen first of all. The singleplayer is crap. It still got a good score
None of those games deserved 9's. However, they do deserve the good or great scores they got. Many people talk about how Perfect Dark Zero didn't deserve a 9 but it did for a few reasons- 1) the graphics were the best thing out at the time. sure they were a little shiny but it was the best looking console game out. 2) It had revolutionary features like the cover system, rolling, the guns etc. 3) Multiplayer was good with a huuuuuge amount of weapons and players
Tell me what guns in rfom were in other games? I really want to know. I don't usually type in this forum but in system wars. But putting pdz as a 9, is just wrong. It did have good graphics, but what about the gameplay, the value, the sound, the tilt? All of those are part of the review and seemed to be overrated. It's simple, Greg Kasavins reviews were just always questionable. U looked at the guy, and he really thought that he knew what he was talking about. To this day it upsets me what he gave MK Armageddon, when other sites gave it better scores. The voice acting aswell as the tilt 4 PDZ was just awful, despite it's supposed "gorgous graphics" and "great gameplay".8.9-9.1 IMO
I think it'll get an 8 in graphics. 9's everywhere else, IMO. Gameplay could get a 10, however. it'll be borderline.
Sigma will get a score around the 9's, nuff said. If NG, and NGB got the same score, how can sigma possibly score lower?EmanSolid117
it's a new generation, and the game was built off of a lastGen core. It's still essentially an Xbox game with updated visuals, a few new enemie types, a few remixed levels, and some additional features. Do NOT expect a score equivalent to the Xbox score.  Don't do it to yourself.
that demo sucked because I sucked, I'm really nothing special at all, I suck at the combat system, I could do nothing what so ever, I didn't even look good.magrappy
fixed. ;)
9.5
I haven't played the demo but if the ps3 fans don't know this:
Gamespot gave NIJA GAIDEN 9.4
and after a year they gave NINJA GAIDEN BLACK 9.4 ( the same score)
and this games is build from the ground so it should score better.
SolidSnake2020
Â
it will get that at 1up but here at GS it will get an 8.
[QUOTE="The_Tombo"][QUOTE="Holy_Shadow_God"][QUOTE="PowerCharged"][QUOTE="Holy_Shadow_God"]5 out of 5, in my view. Also I'm Back :DHoly_Shadow_God
i didn't miss you.
Also, good for you. Have you been around few more times to tell me u didnt miss me. No, I come back for the playstation and the fans, Also my peeps. So go sux a fat cow you, sos bs biz.First of all holy shadow .. BURN .. whaha Powercharged nice one :lol:
And to be honest.. i did not miss you either.
if you don't. You haven't been here long enough know me, or like me so yeah..duhh..Â
No offence dude, it's just nobody cares. This isn't exactly a small community with a few members who know our personalities, this places if full of people and garbage. So nobody's going to care if you're gone or back for the fact that this community ain't small and full of random people. It's just a logical fact, take it anyway you want...Â
OFFTOPIC
None of those games deserved 9's. However, they do deserve the good or great scores they got. Many people talk about how Perfect Dark Zero didn't deserve a 9 but it did for a few reasons- 1) the graphics were the best thing out at the time. sure they were a little shiny but it was the best looking console game out. 2) It had revolutionary features like the cover system, rolling, the guns etc. 3) Multiplayer was good with a huuuuuge amount of weapons and playerssk8ter33157
Going to adress point 2 and 3.
2: Cover system wasn't revolutionary, it has been used in other games. a game called MGS uses cover system. Rolling? when was rolling revolutionary? The guns. Almost every game (shooter) that comes out has a few weapons that aren't in other games, like R:FOM.
3: Multiplayer is huge on alot of games but that doesn't make them an AAA game in gamespot, once again look at R:FOM.
its a shame when people pay for a console every game gets a bonus 3-4 marks because you need it to be good. some people will play games they don't like just because it has to be good because its a ps3 game and you have a ps3. just admit some games suck. NGS demo just wasn;t up to standards in any way for a next gen game.magrappy
Â
Yeah some games suck
Â
I personally like NGS myself, well cause I've wanted a good ninja game.Â
What we need is someone who played through the original multiple times and tell if the game "feels" right.
Then you look at the changes (completely ignoring updated graphics) to tell if the game is worth a purchase over the original.
Why ignore the graphics? Because if it still looked anything like its xbox counterpart it would be a downright disgrace.
It has to get a 9 no doubt cus that demo wa superb. A better experience than what i had before on xbox. If it doesnt get at least a 9 we know something is seriously upMiguel16
only difference was new more weapons on the first level but yeh game should get a 9 but hey you can walk on water in this one
9.5
I haven't played the demo but if the ps3 fans don't know this:
Gamespot gave NIJA GAIDEN 9.4
and after a year they gave NINJA GAIDEN BLACK 9.4 ( the same score)
and this games is build from the ground so it should score better.
SolidSnake2020
I hope it gets such a score, but Gamespot is pro XBOX 360 these days so I don't know, we shall see in June, no matter the score, the game will own for sure. The demo rocks!Â
What we need is someone who played through the original multiple times and tell if the game "feels" right.
Then you look at the changes (completely ignoring updated graphics) to tell if the game is worth a purchase over the original.
Why ignore the graphics? Because if it still looked anything like its xbox counterpart it would be a downright disgrace.hot114
 Here's the deal, I played the original to the point of having obtained everything in the game, which was no easy task. So, yeah, I played it alot. I have also played the PS3 demo. Graphics, yeah they look real nice, but to say it would be a disgrace if they weren't better than they were on xbox is a bit strong, I see where you are coming from though being you are saying it should have been a leap since it's next gen & all, but you gotta admit, even on xbox, the graphics were sweet. As for if it feels right, I can't really answer that as & now & have always loved xbox controllers & have never, nor do I now like the PS controllers. Therefore, while playing the demo, I can't say it "felt" right because the controller is new to me & I don't care for it. Not to say it's not right, people who are fans of PS will undoubtedly feel right at home with the controller. Basically, what it comes down to, if you are an xbox fan & have played the original, probably worth a rent at best, if you are a PS fan & have not played the original, you are in for a treat. I say, get it regardless of the score cuz no matter what, this game rocks.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment