I just finished B:BC2 and...

... The single player was just another game, but the second i joined a game of rush it was just like " WOW I can't believe how bad MW2 was compared to this". Any one else had this feeling?

Certainly. It is quite refreshing from that noobfest

yeah the multiplayer is way better, this game actually lives up to its name BATTLEFIELD, as it is... it is a battefield. its a whole different fps than cod fps

Well, I've played the beta and I know I would buy this if I was going to buy another FPS game.

I would imagine this game would at least have better network stability than the likes of COD4/MW2

Maybe it was just me but I think they did something to the health.

While I was playing the demo the health felt just right and now in the full game I feel like they lowered it some.

Also I'm noticing a lot of head shots going on. I'm jumping down a mountain side ways and doing all these jumps and some sniper still gets a head shot on me?!? I feel like there giving the head shots away. And I don't notice any difference in the bolt action sniper rifles.

I'm really enjoying the team work and no lag or not as much as Call of duty had anyways.

Maybe it was just me but I think they did something to the health.

While I was playing the demo the health felt just right and now in the full game I feel like they lowered it some.

Also I'm noticing a lot of head shots going on. I'm jumping down a mountain side ways and doing all these jumps and some sniper still gets a head shot on me?!? I feel like there giving the head shots away. And I don't notice any difference in the bolt action sniper rifles.

I'm really enjoying the team work and no lag or not as much as Call of duty had anyways.

HeroKen-ii

Thats the same thing that went through my mind when I played the early Beta and the demo...

ive heard that MW2 had a better single player, i havent touch battle fields single player tho bec BF is all about the online,... soo yeah, i find bfs online to be a fun layedbacktime, were as mw2 is more of a competition(wich is still fun, if your good at FPS)

The health is ridiculously low. I mean, I want to atleast have a battle with someone and not get shot as soon as they see me. I also haven't even touched the singleplayer. I am a 27 and I'm trying to get my 3rd platinum star. zbdyx

[QUOTE="zbdyx"]The health is ridiculously low. I mean, I want to atleast have a battle with someone and not get shot as soon as they see me. I also haven't even touched the singleplayer. I am a 27 and I'm trying to get my 3rd platinum star. Megaman5364

Something like that, the single player is OK, but isn't exactly anything I would consider monolithic.

The online multiplayer however is crazy fun.

Try hardcore mode. In some ways, it's actually easier. People actually die when you shoot them.

Honestly i thought the SP was awesome and totally epic... I just played through it again today, this time on hard! the MP is great too, i already got 15 hours in it and have both the Recon, Engineer, and Vehicle classes maxed!PoisoN_Facecam0

[QUOTE="PoisoN_Facecam0"]Honestly i thought the SP was awesome and totally epic... I just played through it again today, this time on hard! the MP is great too, i already got 15 hours in it and have both the Recon, Engineer, and Vehicle classes maxed!Crystal-Rush

*******SPOILERS********

SPOILERS

Yes, i thought it sucked. Hey! i destroyed the super weapon so the russians arent invading seemed like the last quarter of the game just got sliced off.

*******SPOILERS********

SPOILERS

Yes, i thought it sucked. Hey! i destroyed the super weapon so the russians arent invading seemed like the last quarter of the game just got sliced off.

dared3vil0

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

when you have to kill the main villain as your free falling, and all that happened in the plane before it felt extremely unnatural and short. It didnt have any climax to it. You just shoot once and it's all over

[QUOTE="Megaman5364"][QUOTE="zbdyx"]The health is ridiculously low. I mean, I want to atleast have a battle with someone and not get shot as soon as they see me. I also haven't even touched the singleplayer. I am a 27 and I'm trying to get my 3rd platinum star. rsoxguy12

The single player is great, but the multiplayer is terrible imo, doesn't compare to MW2 what-so-ever.

One thing I hate about the new FPS games is that they put too much time in the MP and neglect the single player campaign. All shooters I've played recently have pretty short campaign and that's the reason I didn't get BFBC 2 and don't plan to.

... The single player was just another game, but the second i joined a game of rush it was just like " WOW I can't believe how bad MW2 was compared to this". Any one else had this feeling?dared3vil0

I think that the single-player isn't as good in BF:BC2 as it was in the first BF:BC.

Don't get me wrong I like the single-player in BF:BC2 and the story is cool, but I like the openness of the levels in the first BF:BC over the closed in linear type levels in BF:BC2.
There was that mission in BF:BC2 where you had to find a ship in the desert which is the only open type level that I have seen, but I do have 2 or 3 more levels to go to finish the single-player.

To me it seems like the developers were going for a Call of Duty system for the levels in BF:BC2 and I think that they had succeeded in that because it is like the first CoD:MW in level design, and I think that Cod:MW2 had alot more openness in its levels then BF:BC2 does.

I am really hoping that if and I hope there is a BF:BC3 that the developers decides to go back to the openness type levels like in the first BF:BC.

this is not a 60$ game and here is why:

• 5 hour campaign
• terrible AI
• generic story with sterotypical charatcters
• wierd ending
• The multiplayer servers have issues