This topic is locked from further discussion.
tell me about it. We better watch it though cause they will suspend us all :roll: lol...punisher2k8true true
i thought a certain website was professional but I guess not. Here is a pic I took on my ps3 hooked up via hdmi to a 720p 30" lcd sony tv compared to theirs. They can't even match what I have at home?
crck
Wow... allot of differences there.
i thought a certain website was professional but I guess not. Here is a pic I took on my ps3 hooked up via hdmi to a 720p 30" lcd sony tv compared to theirs. They can't even match what I have at home?
crck
Nice...they really increase bright to look much worse then ****
GS PWNED
yea...cause comparing a standard tcv to full HD is a real good comparason......u kno 360 whoops ps3....give me a breakneXtgenisis
If PS3 is capable using a full HDTV, why should you use a standard tv to compare it? It's like comparing a ford running on the 5th gear and a ferarri running on the first gear. Gotta use it's fullest capability.
[QUOTE="neXtgenisis"]yea...cause comparing a standard tcv to full HD is a real good comparason......u kno 360 whoops ps3....give me a breaksetyono
If PS3 is capable using a full HDTV, why should you use a standard tv to compare it? It's like comparing a ford running on the 5th gear and a ferarri running on the first gear. Gotta use it's fullest capability.
[QUOTE="neXtgenisis"]yea...cause comparing a standard tcv to full HD is a real good comparason......u kno 360 whoops ps3....give me a breaksetyono
If PS3 is capable using a full HDTV, why should you use a standard tv to compare it? It's like comparing a ford running on the 5th gear and a ferarri running on the first gear. Gotta use it's fullest capability.
I totally agree. The whole thing was a misguided attempt to generate more chatter about which is better. I love my PS3. It keeps me happy. I think Gamespot should have a feature where they go back and review games for the PS2 running on the PS3 with the upscaler and edge smoothing on. That would be a good comparison. Not this crap.
BTW. The Ferarri comment sounds exactly like Jack Trentton from Sony. Hmmm... brothers. lol. :P
[QUOTE="setyono"][QUOTE="neXtgenisis"]yea...cause comparing a standard tcv to full HD is a real good comparason......u kno 360 whoops ps3....give me a break-oG-ShAdY
If PS3 is capable using a full HDTV, why should you use a standard tv to compare it? It's like comparing a ford running on the 5th gear and a ferarri running on the first gear. Gotta use it's fullest capability.
I totally agree. The whole thing was a misguided attempt to generate more chatter about which is better. I love my PS3. It keeps me happy. I think Gamespot should have a feature where they go back and review games for the PS2 running on the PS3 with the upscaler and edge smoothing on. That would be a good comparison. Not this crap.
BTW. The Ferarri comment sounds exactly like Jack Trentton from Sony. Hmmm... brothers. lol. :P
And didn't Bill Gates say the same thing about the 360... something about ferraris and good, non-defective stuff? Hmph, Analogies.
WHY DO WE EVEN CARE WHEN GAME SPOT PUTS UP THESE COMPARISONS..WE ALL KNOW THEY FAVOR 360.ITS JUST 1 SIGHT OUT OF THOUSANDS......AND PEOPLE SWEAR GAMESPOT IS THE GOD OF ALL GAME SIGHTS......
i thought a certain website was professional but I guess not. Here is a pic I took on my ps3 hooked up via hdmi to a 720p 30" lcd sony tv compared to theirs. They can't even match what I have at home?
crck
wow i wasnt even gonna post here till i saw this. this really is crap man. that screen was taken with a camera...not even from the source and it still looks 10 times better than what that unamed site put up...geez..i dont really care either way but man if you wanna be a respectible site then come on....thats just terrible
I thought comparisons were to point out the strengths and weaknesses. It's kind of odd that both sides were "made equal" just to be "fair." If that's the case, then wouldn't a comparison be meaningless?darkagent0019
I agree. If i was a runer racing a one-legged guy, I'd win. So the organizers cut off one of my legs and then race us, and the one legged guy wins. That doesn't mean the one legged guy's better, it just means that the comparison is worthless. using optimum xbox 360 settings (which aren't optimum PS3 settings) and not using HDMI when available is inexcusable. It's misleading and worthless.
i thought a certain website was professional but I guess not. Here is a pic I took on my ps3 hooked up via hdmi to a 720p 30" lcd sony tv compared to theirs. They can't even match what I have at home?
crck
Are you sieroulsy trying to compare 1 pic of a grass court and 1 of what looks to be hard court and say GS is biased????? Maybe you need to actually watch tennis once in a while before you post.
[QUOTE="darkagent0019"]I thought comparisons were to point out the strengths and weaknesses. It's kind of odd that both sides were "made equal" just to be "fair." If that's the case, then wouldn't a comparison be meaningless?osirisomeomi
I agree. If i was a runer racing a one-legged guy, I'd win. So the organizers cut off one of my legs and then race us, and the one legged guy wins. That doesn't mean the one legged guy's better, it just means that the comparison is worthless. using optimum xbox 360 settings (which aren't optimum PS3 settings) and not using HDMI when available is inexcusable. It's misleading and worthless.
What's wrong with you kids???? Can't you understand that when making comparisons you HAVE to make the setups as equal as possible. That is how a real comparison is made. Face facts that the PS3 ISN'T blowing the 360 away in the graphics department like you all thought it would. Some day when you're all grown up you'll understand.
[QUOTE="crck"]i thought a certain website was professional but I guess not. Here is a pic I took on my ps3 hooked up via hdmi to a 720p 30" lcd sony tv compared to theirs. They can't even match what I have at home?
kingtito
Are you sieroulsy trying to compare 1 pic of a grass court and 1 of what looks to be hard court and say GS is biased????? Maybe you need to actually watch tennis once in a while before you post.
he was comparing the colours and contrast between them.....you can see the difference very much...can you??[QUOTE="osirisomeomi"][QUOTE="darkagent0019"]I thought comparisons were to point out the strengths and weaknesses. It's kind of odd that both sides were "made equal" just to be "fair." If that's the case, then wouldn't a comparison be meaningless?kingtito
I agree. If i was a runer racing a one-legged guy, I'd win. So the organizers cut off one of my legs and then race us, and the one legged guy wins. That doesn't mean the one legged guy's better, it just means that the comparison is worthless. using optimum xbox 360 settings (which aren't optimum PS3 settings) and not using HDMI when available is inexcusable. It's misleading and worthless.
What's wrong with you kids???? Can't you understand that when making comparisons you HAVE to make the setups as equal as possible. That is how a real comparison is made. Face facts that the PS3 ISN'T blowing the 360 away in the graphics department like you all thought it would. Some day when you're all grown up you'll understand.
If you want to compare things, but go out your way to make them equal, whats the point, because they are only gonna look as equal as you make them. Taking an identicle screenshot from both, and then letting the processer and the output the dicided by the system (After all, thats what people will be playing with in reality) is how to do it.
[QUOTE="crck"]Are you sieroulsy trying to compare 1 pic of a grass court and 1 of what looks to be hard court and say GS is biased????? Maybe you need to actually watch tennis once in a while before you post.
kingtito
All I can say Is I am most dissapointed.....I mean I am sick for a couple of days, another well intelligence insulting comparison is up..I decide to leave it be after checking it...go to the ps3 forums and there seems to be a giant warning at the top... making me scroll down somemore to reach the info for which I visit the site to find out just how dissapointing this "comparison" is....But in the end Its not my site.
p.s. When you compare something you make the conditions surrounding the objects as equal as can be....you leave the objects in question be and used to their full potential.
yea...cause comparing a standard tcv to full HD is a real good comparason......u kno 360 whoops ps3....give me a breakneXtgenisis
Its not the fact that they may be a lil better than the ps3 its the fact that its being judged unfairly
[QUOTE="osirisomeomi"][QUOTE="darkagent0019"]I thought comparisons were to point out the strengths and weaknesses. It's kind of odd that both sides were "made equal" just to be "fair." If that's the case, then wouldn't a comparison be meaningless?kingtito
I agree. If i was a runer racing a one-legged guy, I'd win. So the organizers cut off one of my legs and then race us, and the one legged guy wins. That doesn't mean the one legged guy's better, it just means that the comparison is worthless. using optimum xbox 360 settings (which aren't optimum PS3 settings) and not using HDMI when available is inexcusable. It's misleading and worthless.
What's wrong with you kids???? Can't you understand that when making comparisons you HAVE to make the setups as equal as possible. That is how a real comparison is made. Face facts that the PS3 ISN'T blowing the 360 away in the graphics department like you all thought it would. Some day when you're all grown up you'll understand.
I understand what you mean kingtaco, but the comparison should've been an Elite against a PS3. You don't neglect a feature like HDMI just to bring it to a pro 360's level. That right there shows that the PS3 had to be gimped. Why not just use the Elite?
[QUOTE="kingtito"][QUOTE="osirisomeomi"][QUOTE="darkagent0019"]I thought comparisons were to point out the strengths and weaknesses. It's kind of odd that both sides were "made equal" just to be "fair." If that's the case, then wouldn't a comparison be meaningless?darkagent0019
I agree. If i was a runer racing a one-legged guy, I'd win. So the organizers cut off one of my legs and then race us, and the one legged guy wins. That doesn't mean the one legged guy's better, it just means that the comparison is worthless. using optimum xbox 360 settings (which aren't optimum PS3 settings) and not using HDMI when available is inexcusable. It's misleading and worthless.
What's wrong with you kids???? Can't you understand that when making comparisons you HAVE to make the setups as equal as possible. That is how a real comparison is made. Face facts that the PS3 ISN'T blowing the 360 away in the graphics department like you all thought it would. Some day when you're all grown up you'll understand.
I understand what you mean kingtaco, but the comparison should've been an Elite against a PS3. You don't neglect a feature like HDMI just to bring it to a pro 360's level. That right there shows that the PS3 had to be gimped. Why not just use the Elite?
How is that gimping the PS3? ALmost all of the games today are native 720p and frankly HDMI isn'g going to make that much a difference at that lvl. The playing field was lvl and with everything being equal the 360 still looks better. I know it hurts your feelings and all but stop thinking like a fanboy. The 360 and PS3 are more equal than you'd ever care to admit. It's not like the modified 7800gtx can actually out perform the modified r600 in the 360.
Stop your crying about GS being biased and how unfair it was not to use the HDMI cables (that Sony doesn't even include). B3 glad they're not comparing the 2 right out of the box. If they did you'd see SD type graphics from the PS3.
[QUOTE="darkagent0019"][QUOTE="kingtito"][QUOTE="osirisomeomi"][QUOTE="darkagent0019"]I thought comparisons were to point out the strengths and weaknesses. It's kind of odd that both sides were "made equal" just to be "fair." If that's the case, then wouldn't a comparison be meaningless?kingtito
I agree. If i was a runer racing a one-legged guy, I'd win. So the organizers cut off one of my legs and then race us, and the one legged guy wins. That doesn't mean the one legged guy's better, it just means that the comparison is worthless. using optimum xbox 360 settings (which aren't optimum PS3 settings) and not using HDMI when available is inexcusable. It's misleading and worthless.
What's wrong with you kids???? Can't you understand that when making comparisons you HAVE to make the setups as equal as possible. That is how a real comparison is made. Face facts that the PS3 ISN'T blowing the 360 away in the graphics department like you all thought it would. Some day when you're all grown up you'll understand.
I understand what you mean kingtaco, but the comparison should've been an Elite against a PS3. You don't neglect a feature like HDMI just to bring it to a pro 360's level. That right there shows that the PS3 had to be gimped. Why not just use the Elite?
How is that gimping the PS3? ALmost all of the games today are native 720p and frankly HDMI isn'g going to make that much a difference at that lvl. The playing field was lvl and with everything being equal the 360 still looks better. I know it hurts your feelings and all but stop thinking like a fanboy. The 360 and PS3 are more equal than you'd ever care to admit. It's not like the modified 7800gtx can actually out perform the modified r600 in the 360.
Stop your crying about GS being biased and how unfair it was not to use the HDMI cables (that Sony doesn't even include). B3 glad they're not comparing the 2 right out of the box. If they did you'd see SD type graphics from the PS3.
did you just spell "be" B3.
[QUOTE="kingtito"][QUOTE="darkagent0019"][QUOTE="kingtito"][QUOTE="osirisomeomi"][QUOTE="darkagent0019"]I thought comparisons were to point out the strengths and weaknesses. It's kind of odd that both sides were "made equal" just to be "fair." If that's the case, then wouldn't a comparison be meaningless?ygohome
I agree. If i was a runer racing a one-legged guy, I'd win. So the organizers cut off one of my legs and then race us, and the one legged guy wins. That doesn't mean the one legged guy's better, it just means that the comparison is worthless. using optimum xbox 360 settings (which aren't optimum PS3 settings) and not using HDMI when available is inexcusable. It's misleading and worthless.
What's wrong with you kids???? Can't you understand that when making comparisons you HAVE to make the setups as equal as possible. That is how a real comparison is made. Face facts that the PS3 ISN'T blowing the 360 away in the graphics department like you all thought it would. Some day when you're all grown up you'll understand.
I understand what you mean kingtaco, but the comparison should've been an Elite against a PS3. You don't neglect a feature like HDMI just to bring it to a pro 360's level. That right there shows that the PS3 had to be gimped. Why not just use the Elite?
How is that gimping the PS3? ALmost all of the games today are native 720p and frankly HDMI isn'g going to make that much a difference at that lvl. The playing field was lvl and with everything being equal the 360 still looks better. I know it hurts your feelings and all but stop thinking like a fanboy. The 360 and PS3 are more equal than you'd ever care to admit. It's not like the modified 7800gtx can actually out perform the modified r600 in the 360.
Stop your crying about GS being biased and how unfair it was not to use the HDMI cables (that Sony doesn't even include). B3 glad they're not comparing the 2 right out of the box. If they did you'd see SD type graphics from the PS3.
did you just spell "be" B3.
Obviously a typo but B3 works
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment