Check it out for yourself at http://ps3.ign.com/articles/815/815721p1.html
Seeing now that this was already posted, Ill just ask, is anyone suprised by this score, or did you see it coming? Are you still gonna buy the game?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Check it out for yourself at http://ps3.ign.com/articles/815/815721p1.html
Seeing now that this was already posted, Ill just ask, is anyone suprised by this score, or did you see it coming? Are you still gonna buy the game?
Well i don't see how NGS, DMC or GoW have more lasting appeal. NGS has a leader-boards but who gives a crap except those that are really good players, but the other two have nothing more then just a harder difficulty or a new way to fight.
but i don't care because i like these type of games and im buying it :P
I saw this coming.
IGN doesn't seem to be very fond of repetitive action games.
Which explains why Godhand recieved 3.0
Not to mention the same person who gave Godhand 3.0 was the one who reviewed Heavenly Sword.
I'd say he isn't the person to trust when it comes to action game.
The OTHER scores for this game were, 10,9,9,8.5. I might be missing one but whatever..heyheydoh
No but people like to post the bad new more then the good news. This game isn't going to appeal to everybody, just like most
action game. And i guess this one didn't appeal to that journalist.
Though the game was really good in terms of graphics and its motion capture,I already knew the game was going to get a low rating. The combat system really needs to be polished. To be honest, when I was playing the demoI felt like I was playing a dynasty warriors game. I am serious. But I can't really judge the game byits demo. Well as long as peoplelike the game for its story and graphics its still um ok right...Flavante
even IGN said the combat system is great.
This is far from button masher like Dynasty Warrior.
Well lets see. Umm other reviews 9.0-9.8,I loved the demo, this is one of the gamesthat got meto buy the PS3, the game looks awesome, and swords are my favorite weapon in video games.
No I think I will never pick this game up.:roll:
^^ Well yeah but alot of those other sites arent as commendable as IGN or gamespot for example. And IMO IGN has been right on when it comes to reviews in the past...Space_Cowboy7
like Godhand? NBA 2k6? Starwars: Starfighter?
[QUOTE="TriangleHard"]I saw this coming.
IGN doesn't seem to be very fond of repetitive action games.
Which explains why Godhand recieved 3.0
Not to mention the same person who gave Godhand 3.0 was the one who reviewed Heavenly Sword.
I'd say he isn't the person to trust when it comes to action game.
Mkavanaugh77
IGN UK gave it a 7/10 as well though
but that's bloody British. What do those pansey know about action?
*note, that's obviously a joke about British. Just in case someone says I'm racist or something.
I am not supprised. The demo put me off the game the second I started playing it. If they had stuck to a GoW style battle system instead of their "ohhh we are trying to be an action movie" crap, it would have fared much better. Not to mention it should have had a jump button. Standing around waiting for 30 seconds for an enemy to attack so I can do some "flashy" counter attack doesn't work for me. I may hire the game when it comes out but it certainly wont be in my collectionaustin_is_god
Ummm... Just attack untill they attack. And I am glad they set themselfs apart from GoW. I dont want every action game to be alike. Though I wouldnt mind a jump button... Eh I'll live.
I couldn't care less what a reviewer says.Chutebox
indeed
i sometimes find a 5.x game fun, and some 9.x game stinks
[QUOTE="HiImUPSMan"]tbh i hated the demo. TriangleHard
I loved the demo.
Btw, is that Utada in your sig?
yes it is actually :D
[QUOTE="TriangleHard"][QUOTE="HiImUPSMan"]tbh i hated the demo. HiImUPSMan
I loved the demo.
Btw, is that Utada in your sig?
yes it is actually :D
awesome :D
one of my fav singer.
^^ Well yeah but alot of those other sites arent as commendable as IGN or gamespot for example. And IMO IGN has been right on when it comes to reviews in the past...Space_Cowboy7
Right? What is right? Some people will enjoy a game that gets 3/10 by a journalist. So please explain yourself what is right?
[QUOTE="TriangleHard"]I saw this coming.
IGN doesn't seem to be very fond of repetitive action games.
Which explains why Godhand recieved 3.0
Not to mention the same person who gave Godhand 3.0 was the one who reviewed Heavenly Sword.
I'd say he isn't the person to trust when it comes to action game.
Mkavanaugh77
IGN UK gave it a 7/10 as well though
Both the IGN/UK and IGN/US gave the game 7.0? Hmmm. That's a surprise! NOT! :P IGN!yeah, i base my purchases on crap IGN.
Check it out for yourself at http://ps3.ign.com/articles/815/815721p1.html
Seeing now that this was already posted, Ill just ask, is anyone suprised by this score, or did you see it coming? Are you still gonna buy the game?
Space_Cowboy7
the review was a matter of opinion and I enjoys the demo so, I buy what I enjoy so I ordered the game. PERIOD
Critics suck anyway they said 300 was bad, Transformers was bad and the Passion but the public loved them.
hiryu3
That's exactly it. reviews SHOULDN'T be matter of opinion.
What it should be is objective analysis of the game and judgement of the quality. Not some random person's opinion. I can get that from my friend or just posting in this forum.
The fact that IGN reviewer even says his reviews are his opinion and everyone should just not take it so seriously (on his blog about Godhand review) that alone makes me unable to trust his review.
Did you guys not watch the review or read it...they said the game IS REPETITIVE and ONLY 6 HOURS...WTF!! I guess you have to see for yourself, then you'll be saying OMG IGN was right all the time...I knew this would be the case from the beggining, I won't be getting this game now..it's garbage. The only thing that really interest me with this game was the serpent lady and the other characters...now I see that it really doesn't go any further than that, I'm very disappointed as I had high hopes for this game.gamer082009
Repetitive? I don't see that as negative. It is action game and combat system should be the focus of the game.
6 hours that is bit of a hit, but that shouldn't hit on gameplay part of the review, but value of the game.
Also you forget to meantion that IGN have stated combat system is great.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment