im a big resident evil fan but sry RE5 **** to bad :(

i dont hate capcom or anything , im a big fan of the game realy big but this game i have to say it sucks , i mean u have to stand still in order to shoot wtf !! u cant shoot while walking ! ? , and whats with heavy character control when u run , here is an advice for all RE fans :

if you have played DEAD SPACE noway you will like RESIDENT EVIL 5 . coz its simple DS >>>>>> RE5

so if u have dead space my advice is just to pass on resident evil coz it will not live up to the standards of dead space

TC.....

You say you are a RE fan, but you complain on RE5's controls. You should know by now that RE4 started with those controls that you are suddenly complaining about..... If you say RE5 is bad, then that would also imply to RE4.

RE fan? nah you sound very suspect.

I agree. Someone like Chris Redfield with his background in experience with this stuff would be a little quicker with his gun. There should be no excuse with not being able to walk and point your gun this day in age. It made sense back in the day with the fixed camera angles but not now. If people really think its because its a survival horror aspect of the game and it adds thrills is just stupid. Its more frustrating then exciting.

When I play as a engineer who gets sent to the Ishamura to fix it and it turns out its infested with people who were turned into creatures that kill you on site from all over. And he uses a lot of engineering tools as weapons... and he is capable of walking and shooting it can still be really scary.

I just feel like the developers were just lazy. After playing the demo I just felt like the AI was just horrible. I'm just going to stop because im ranting now. However I am still going to pick up the game to finish the T-virus story and to find out what happened. Don't get me wrong. Resident Evil is still awesome. I just think its time for a rehaul in the way the game is played. They could seriously do a lot better with the games nowadays.

I agree. Someone like Chris Redfield with his background in experience with this stuff would be a little quicker with his gun. There should be no excuse with not being able to walk and point your gun this day in age. It made sense back in the day with the fixed camera angles but not now. If people really think its because its a survival horror aspect of the game and it adds thrills is just stupid. Its more frustrating then exciting.

When I play as a engineer who gets sent to the Ishamura to fix it and it turns out its infested with people who were turned into creatures that kill you on site from all over. And he uses a lot of engineering tools as weapons... and he is capable of walking and shooting it can still be really scary.

I just feel like the developers were just lazy. After playing the demo I just felt like the AI was just horrible. I'm just going to stop because im ranting now. However I am still going to pick up the game to finish the T-virus story and to find out what happened. Don't get me wrong. Resident Evil is still awesome. I just think its time for a rehaul in the way the game is played. They could seriously do a lot better with the games nowadays.

Childeater10

I understand that you want to find out how the story ends, (or probably just continues because there will inevitably by another RE) but why support a company who is being "lazy" and shipping out an inferior product? Just read up on the story if you're interested, but don't support companies if you think their game is not up to snuff. That's why companies now adays are shipping out yearly installments of the same game or games with a bunch of bugs all the time- they know they can get away with it because people will buy it anyway.

I haven't played the demo yet, so I can't give my own input, but I've had a bad feeling about this game for quite a while.

TC.....

You say you are a RE fan, but you complain on RE5's controls. You should know by now that RE4 started with those controls that you are suddenly complaining about..... If you say RE5 is bad, then that would also imply to RE4.

RE fan? nah you sound very suspect.

WR_Platinum

I was thinking the same thing. For him to be an re fan and yet not like this control scheme is kinda funny. For someone that was never really a huge re fan like me the controls are a bit wonky at first. But you get used to it eventually. I hated teh demo at first but i'm having alot more fun with it after subsequent playthroughs.

TC.....

You say you are a RE fan, but you complain on RE5's controls. You should know by now that RE4 started with those controls that you are suddenly complaining about..... If you say RE5 is bad, then that would also imply to RE4.

RE fan? nah you sound very suspect.

WR_Platinum

[QUOTE="WR_Platinum"]

TC.....

You say you are a RE fan, but you complain on RE5's controls. You should know by now that RE4 started with those controls that you are suddenly complaining about..... If you say RE5 is bad, then that would also imply to RE4.

RE fan? nah you sound very suspect.

sa10kun

I was thinking the same thing. For him to be an re fan and yet not like this control scheme is kinda funny. For someone that was never really a huge re fan like me the controls are a bit wonky at first. But you get used to it eventually. I hated teh demo at first but i'm having alot more fun with it after subsequent playthroughs.

You serve as proof to how weird of a thread this guy made, thank you.

[QUOTE="sa10kun"][QUOTE="WR_Platinum"]

TC.....

You say you are a RE fan, but you complain on RE5's controls. You should know by now that RE4 started with those controls that you are suddenly complaining about..... If you say RE5 is bad, then that would also imply to RE4.

RE fan? nah you sound very suspect.

WR_Platinum

I was thinking the same thing. For him to be an re fan and yet not like this control scheme is kinda funny. For someone that was never really a huge re fan like me the controls are a bit wonky at first. But you get used to it eventually. I hated teh demo at first but i'm having alot more fun with it after subsequent playthroughs.

You serve as proof to how weird of a thread this guy made, thank you.

Your welcome, I mean the re games have always been about running away to a safe distance to have time to line up your shots. It's not supposed to be call of duty. But I think with the ammount of enemies on screen at a time this can be kinda confusing sometimes.

Setting aside the controls and lack of movement while aiming, the demo was dissapointing. I have a feeling we wouldn't be discussing problems if it had stayed exclusive cause it would have been better.

Setting aside the controls and lack of movement while aiming, the demo was dissapointing. I have a feeling we wouldn't be discussing problems if it had stayed exclusive cause it would have been better.

junglist101

how would have it been better? It wasn't really a problem with the graphical nature of the game that people are having.

TC.....

You say you are a RE fan, but you complain on RE5's controls. You should know by now that RE4 started with those controls that you are suddenly complaining about..... If you say RE5 is bad, then that would also imply to RE4.

RE fan? nah you sound very suspect.

WR_Platinum

[QUOTE="junglist101"]

Setting aside the controls and lack of movement while aiming, the demo was dissapointing. I have a feeling we wouldn't be discussing problems if it had stayed exclusive cause it would have been better.

sa10kun

how would have it been better? It wasn't really a problem with the graphical nature of the game that people are having.

I didn't like the overall look of the game. I hate the lighting where everything is bright not to mention that grainy filter they put over the cutscenes. As far as the controls go I didn't like those either as well as the controls from re4. The way you turn around makes me dizzy, literally:?

History has shown exclusives to be better in many ways.

[QUOTE="junglist101"]

Setting aside the controls and lack of movement while aiming, the demo was dissapointing. I have a feeling we wouldn't be discussing problems if it had stayed exclusive cause it would have been better.

sa10kun

how would have it been better? It wasn't really a problem with the graphical nature of the game that people are having.

hahahaha omg the dude sounds like he's just a fanboy, its a demo, nearly both games are identicle, and its not even a port so the game isnt going to be crappier on either system. there both going to be neerly exactly the same. "note that resident evel was going to be a ps3 exclusive, but when it got changes they had to make 2 groups to create the games because u cant port form ps3 to 360 without reconstructing the code alot!!!!! its because its harder to convert from blueray to dvd than vise versa. this is also because blueray can run dvd9, but dvd9 cant run duel layer." but what was crapy lol, great effects, smooth action, and a great animations for the peoplez. why r u people complaining haha

[QUOTE="sa10kun"][QUOTE="junglist101"]

Setting aside the controls and lack of movement while aiming, the demo was dissapointing. I have a feeling we wouldn't be discussing problems if it had stayed exclusive cause it would have been better.

junglist101

how would have it been better? It wasn't really a problem with the graphical nature of the game that people are having.

I didn't like the overall look of the game. I hate the lighting where everything is bright not to mention that grainy filter they put over the cutscenes. As far as the controls go I didn't like those either as well as the controls from re4. The way you turn around makes me dizzy, literally:?

History has shown exclusives to be better in many ways.

Dude, exclusivity would not effect any of the complaints you had about the game.

I agree. Someone like Chris Redfield with his background in experience with this stuff would be a little quicker with his gun. There should be no excuse with not being able to walk and point your gun this day in age. It made sense back in the day with the fixed camera angles but not now. If people really think its because its a survival horror aspect of the game and it adds thrills is just stupid. Its more frustrating then exciting.

When I play as a engineer who gets sent to the Ishamura to fix it and it turns out its infested with people who were turned into creatures that kill you on site from all over. And he uses a lot of engineering tools as weapons... and he is capable of walking and shooting it can still be really scary.

I just feel like the developers were just lazy. After playing the demo I just felt like the AI was just horrible. I'm just going to stop because im ranting now. However I am still going to pick up the game to finish the T-virus story and to find out what happened. Don't get me wrong. Resident Evil is still awesome. I just think its time for a rehaul in the way the game is played. They could seriously do a lot better with the games nowadays.

Childeater10

It's logically true to be able to run or walk while shooting and other games do have that feature. But you have to realise it's equally logical to stand and shoot. If you've ever seen policemen shoot or hunters or whomever, they all stand still to maximise accuracy.

So someone like Chris Redfield might stop and take specific aim to blow out some zombie brains. Also the games like Dead Space that allow you to move don't necessarily record accurately how often you would actually be missing your target in a real life situation.

i dont hate capcom or anything , im a big fan of the game realy big but this game i have to say it sucks , i mean u have to stand still in order to shoot wtf !! u cant shoot while walking ! ? , and whats with heavy character control when u run , here is an advice for all RE fans :

if you have played DEAD SPACE noway you will like RESIDENT EVIL 5 . coz its simple DS >>>>>> RE5

so if u have dead space my advice is just to pass on resident evil coz it will not live up to the standards of dead space

kratos_q80

ur stupid..... u really are. the games wouldnt be hardly difficult at all if you could move while shooting. A. it gives the game a sence of suspence and rushes you to make the shot and actually hit the person before you die. so im assuming you think re4 is gay cause its relativly the same,... and deadspace is amazing because you can move and shoot. well in deadspace,... the game really isnt all that chalenging compared to re4 in the hardest difficulties, and in deadspace you cant move that fast anyways so its not really that big a dif. and in re5 theres things u dont do in deadspace. co-op, realistic guns, etc... the point is, if it really was that important, they would have added it in, dont u think?????? its not that big of a game, and it certainly doesnt kill the game (mabee redfield but not the game haha)truthbetoldalex

i like the controls and gameplay....its just the HORRIBLE AI and sheva that piss me off ...ReaperV7

ur stupid..... u really are. the games wouldnt be hardly difficult at all if you could move while shooting. A. it gives the game a sence of suspence and rushes you to make the shot and actually hit the person before you die. so im assuming you think re4 is gay cause its relativly the same,... and deadspace is amazing because you can move and shoot. well in deadspace,... the game really isnt all that chalenging compared to re4 in the hardest difficulties, and in deadspace you cant move that fast anyways so its not really that big a dif. and in re5 theres things u dont do in deadspace. co-op, realistic guns, etc... the point is, if it really was that important, they would have added it in, dont u think?????? its not that big of a game, and it certainly doesnt kill the game (mabee redfield but not the game haha)truthbetoldalex

Are you seriously trying to argue that there are NO hard games that you have the ability to walk/run and shoot at the same time?

Other companies have figured out a way how to make a game difficult with the ability to move while shooting... I'm not even that upset about not being able to move while shooting, but for tearing into someone the way you did, you better think a little more next time...

TC.....

You say you are a RE fan, but you complain on RE5's controls. You should know by now that RE4 started with those controls that you are suddenly complaining about..... If you say RE5 is bad, then that would also imply to RE4.

RE fan? nah you sound very suspect.

WR_Platinum

[QUOTE="junglist101"][QUOTE="sa10kun"]

how would have it been better? It wasn't really a problem with the graphical nature of the game that people are having.

sa10kun

I didn't like the overall look of the game. I hate the lighting where everything is bright not to mention that grainy filter they put over the cutscenes. As far as the controls go I didn't like those either as well as the controls from re4. The way you turn around makes me dizzy, literally:?

History has shown exclusives to be better in many ways.

Dude, exclusivity would not effect any of the complaints you had about the game.

I guess your right about the exclusivity thing:P

I guess we can judge when we get the whole game to play:)

[QUOTE="sa10kun"][QUOTE="junglist101"]

Setting aside the controls and lack of movement while aiming, the demo was dissapointing. I have a feeling we wouldn't be discussing problems if it had stayed exclusive cause it would have been better.

truthbetoldalex

how would have it been better? It wasn't really a problem with the graphical nature of the game that people are having.

hahahaha omg the dude sounds like he's just a fanboy, its a demo, nearly both games are identicle, and its not even a port so the game isnt going to be crappier on either system. there both going to be neerly exactly the same. "note that resident evel was going to be a ps3 exclusive, but when it got changes they had to make 2 groups to create the games because u cant port form ps3 to 360 without reconstructing the code alot!!!!! its because its harder to convert from blueray to dvd than vise versa. this is also because blueray can run dvd9, but dvd9 cant run duel layer." but what was crapy lol, great effects, smooth action, and a great animations for the peoplez. why r u people complaining haha

Why are you in the ps3 forums calling a ps3 owner a ps3 fanboy:| The benefits of exclusivity may not be a factor for RE5 but if you don't think it makes a difference have a look at mgs4(game of the year) or KZ2.

If you prefer negative talk about the ps3 you can head over to system wars for that.

Yea im not a big fan of RE5.. I bashed it alot, but at least the game is fun in co op.

TC.....

You say you are a RE fan, but you complain on RE5's controls. You should know by now that RE4 started with those controls that you are suddenly complaining about..... If you say RE5 is bad, then that would also imply to RE4.

RE fan? nah you sound very suspect.

WR_Platinum

you guys are crazy, i enjoyed the demo and i'm looking forward to playing it online with my friends. Your loss..Sk8ter_213

I totaly agree. I thought it was a very good demo.

i dont hate capcom or anything , im a big fan of the game realy big but this game i have to say it sucks , i mean u have to stand still in order to shoot wtf !! u cant shoot while walking ! ? , and whats with heavy character control when u run , here is an advice for all RE fans :

if you have played DEAD SPACE noway you will like RESIDENT EVIL 5 . coz its simple DS >>>>>> RE5

so if u have dead space my advice is just to pass on resident evil coz it will not live up to the standards of dead space

kratos_q80

Translation: "Hi I don't have a single clue about the Resident Evil series, I just played a lot of fps and assumed RE5 is like a fps. I'm pretending to be a RE fan to make my post seem credible, even if I didn't know in all RE games you shoot while standing still."

FAIL

These threads are so old now. This is a completely ridiculous complaint, because if you know anything about Resident Evil you'd know that standing and shooting is pretty much part of what makes it a survival game. If ammo fell from the sky and you could run about and shoot everything with ease it wouldn't be a horror game, just a really easy action game with zombies.Tikicobra