there is no comparison, how can u even compare these 2 games they both amazin but totally diferent games, its like comparing toast to a zebra, it dont really work.
Wouldnt now havent played either. But you guys hes just asking which one gives you more fun.ZacherWol19
Â
hes not askin if its more fun , he states " is little big planet BETTER than mgs4 " bettet dont mean more fun jus means better, :S i dont get the question tbh, but oh well, woop woop woop woop!!!!!!
[QUOTE="ZacherWol19"]Wouldnt now havent played either. But you guys hes just asking which one gives you more fun.ENDOT12123
hes not askin if its more fun , he states " is little big planet BETTER than mgs4 " bettet dont mean more fun jus means better, :S i dont get the question tbh, but oh well, woop woop woop woop!!!!!!
i just couldn't have fun with lbp. the jumping is way too floaty for me. the game has a weird feel to it. but, i loved the narrator. he's the only reason i kept playing. mgs4 was way more fun for me. *runs and hides*
It's not easy to say this game or that game is "better" than MGS4. Seriously, first you need to match the genre together and then brake down their aspects and start comparing what each game has to offer from storyline, cutscenes direction, music, sound, graphics, gameplay mechanics, how better it is comparing to its sequel, what changes have they made to make this sequel even better, characters, weapons, boss battles, extras, replayability... MGS4 has the upper hand in almost every aspect I listed and seriously takes some serious work from other developers to top them or surpass them. You see, a game can come out a month after MGS4 and have better graphics, but it takes more than just superior graphics to be a superior game. The question is, does that game itself with superior graphics is overall superior to MGS4? That's the question you need to ask. You need to divide the games' aspects of both games when comparing them(taking in consideration they're both from the same genre and learn the history of both games) and then start comparing. It's not that simple to say "This game is better than MGS4". Kojima Productions put alot of hard work(4 years in the making) to make this a perfect sequel. I have to say they have achieved even more than what I expected.
It's not easy to say this game or that game is "better" than MGS4. Seriously, first you need to match the genre together and then brake down their aspects and start comparing what each game has to offer from storyline, cutscenes direction, music, sound, graphics, gameplay mechanics, how better it is comparing to its sequel, what changes have they made to make this sequel even better, characters, weapons, boss battles, extras, replayability... MGS4 has the upper hand in almost every aspect I listed and seriously takes some serious work from other developers to top them or surpass them. You see, a game can come out a month after MGS4 and have better graphics, but it takes more than just superior graphics to be a superior game. The question is, does that game itself with superior graphics is overall superior to MGS4? That's the question you need to ask. You need to divide the games' aspects of both games when comparing them(taking in consideration they're both from the same genre and learn the history of both games) and then start comparing. It's not that simple to say "This game is better than MGS4". Kojima Productions put alot of hard work(4 years in the making) to make this a perfect sequel. I have to say they have achieved even more than what I expected. null_is_zero
You can't compare them as they're totally different. In terms of length played, for me, it's LBP hands down, I must have put in more than 30 hours over the past week or so. I've put in about.... 5 into Metal Gear before I got bored of it lol. I will finish it eventually, I'm in no real rush.
[QUOTE="null_is_zero"]It's not easy to say this game or that game is "better" than MGS4. Seriously, first you need to match the genre together and then brake down their aspects and start comparing what each game has to offer from storyline, cutscenes direction, music, sound, graphics, gameplay mechanics, how better it is comparing to its sequel, what changes have they made to make this sequel even better, characters, weapons, boss battles, extras, replayability... MGS4 has the upper hand in almost every aspect I listed and seriously takes some serious work from other developers to top them or surpass them. You see, a game can come out a month after MGS4 and have better graphics, but it takes more than just superior graphics to be a superior game. The question is, does that game itself with superior graphics is overall superior to MGS4? That's the question you need to ask. You need to divide the games' aspects of both games when comparing them(taking in consideration they're both from the same genre and learn the history of both games) and then start comparing. It's not that simple to say "This game is better than MGS4". Kojima Productions put alot of hard work(4 years in the making) to make this a perfect sequel. I have to say they have achieved even more than what I expected. toad772
what a stupid bastard
you kidding right? Your avatar isn't welcome here by the way.
[QUOTE="ZacherWol19"]Wouldnt now havent played either. But you guys hes just asking which one gives you more fun.toad772
Â
hes not askin if its more fun , he states " is little big planet BETTER than mgs4 " bettet dont mean more fun jus means better, :S i dont get the question tbh, but oh well, woop woop woop woop!!!!!!
hes not askin if its more fun , he states " is little big planet BETTER than mgs4 " bettet dont mean more fun jus means better, :S i dont get the question tbh, but oh well, woop woop woop woop!!!!!!
Log in to comment