Killzone 2 vs 3

I agree.

The only thing I liked better about Killzone 3 was the different things you got to battle in; tanks, mechs etc.

I prefer Killzone 2 gunplay, maps, sound, online, guns as a matter of fact I prefered this game 100% over Killzone 3. Killzone 2 was a unique FPS while Killzone 3 was just another CoD clone.

I prefer Killzone 2 gunplay, maps, sound, online, guns as a matter of fact I prefered this game 100% over Killzone 3. Killzone 2 was a unique FPS while Killzone 3 was just another CoD clone.

nickz_fpk

yeah i agree. killzone 2 was much better. the campaign in KZ3 was pretty cool but thats it really.

I don't see what is the problem with KZ3 at all !?! Most shooters sequels are more of the same with added bonuses and extras(I'm gonna vomit COD here), while in the case of Killzone 2 and 3, both games are different gameplay, controls and mechanics wise.People are just to lazy to try something new.I still enjoy the KZ3 multiplayer and probably will keep on enjoying till they cutt off the game cmpletelly.

People are just to lazy to try something new.

DISSESHOWEDO

KZ2 was way better. Killzone 3 was a downgraded COD clone.

Yeah GG tried to please the casual crowd a bit with KZ3.

KZ2 took skill to do well, KZ3 is just another attempt to cash in on the COD craze I lasted about 2 weeks before I got bored of the MP and Ebayed the game and went back to KZ2.

I'm sorry, but I'm going to have to disagree with everyone on this. I think that Killzone 3 is a huge improvement over Killzone 2.

The levels are more varied with great vehicle sections that break up the on-foot shooting just enough so it doesn't get monotonous, the visual design is more colorful and thus easier on the eyes, the controls are more fine-tuned while still having a good sense of weight to them, the cover system is much better, making you only have to tap the L2 button rather than keeping it mashed down, that bulls*** one-weapon limit has been dropped for a three-weapon limit, akin to the first Killzone. And while the story is horrible, I can appreciate the attempted effort that Guerrilla Games put into it. At least Rico is less of an insufferable jackass this time around.

I find it funny how a lot of fans were giving Gamespot a hard time for giving Killzone 3 an 8.5 back in February, defending it and saying that it was better than predecessor, and now all of a sudden they hate/dislike Killzone 3 because its "just another Call of Duty clone". Give me a break.

I'm sorry, but I'm going to have to disagree with everyone on this. I think that Killzone 3 is a huge improvement over Killzone 2.

The levels are more varied with great vehicle sections that break up the on-foot shooting just enough so it doesn't get monotonous, the visual design is more colorful and thus easier on the eyes, the controls are more fine-tuned while still having a good sense of weight to them, the cover system is much better, making you only have to tap the L2 button rather than keeping it mashed down, that bulls*** one-weapon limit has been dropped for a three-weapon limit, akin to the first Killzone. And while the story is horrible, I can appreciate the attempted effort that Guerrilla Games put into it. At least Rico is less of an insufferable jackass this time around.

I find it funny how a lot of fans were giving Gamespot a hard time for giving Killzone 3 an 8.5 back in February, defending it and saying that it was better than predecessor, and now all of a sudden they hate/dislike Killzone 3 because its "just another Call of Duty clone". Give me a break.

RocketSauce1408

The only thing I liked about Killzone 3 was how varied the environments were.