Killzone 3 thoughts

hey i recently just got KZ3 and i beat the campaign on veteran yesterday (it was awesome). got some questions. did they reduce the recoil for this game? i remember playing killzone 2 a while back and it was really satisfying gun play because there was recoil and it took a good amount of skill to shoot while managing recoil and aiming at moving targts at the same time. but im not sure cuz i havent played KZ2 in a while. did they reduce the recoil or am i just tripping out?

also, the Killzone games have probably the best graphics i've ever seen in any game. seriously, i was playing the campaign and half the time i was just walking through the levels slowly andjustlooking at stuff and taking in the scenery because it looks so damn amazing. most other games don't even come close. it really feels like a true next gen game.how is it that killzone can make such amazing graphics and gameplay at the same time? why don't other companies do this?

like if you play black ops after playing KZ3 its like playing a ps2 game or something. the only other games that ive playedthat have had comparable graphicsare probably FF13, Uncharted 2, Mass Effect 2and MGS4. if the PS3 is capable of things like this than i seriously dont see any need for PS4 any time soon because it seems like it has barely been used to it's full potential. what do you guys think?

yeah i guess that makes sense. the exclusives are always the better looking games like KZ and Uncharted. and for 360 they have halo and gears of war that have amazing graphics. so was i right about the recoil and stuff? did they reduce it in KZ3? i couldve swore there was more recoil or something in KZ2 like when u shoot the aim goes up and u have to shoot in bursts depending on the range.

I love Killzone 2 and 3, but the things I hate about 3 is the fact that they got rid of the motion controls when using sniper rifles and the custom soundtracks on multiplayer! Also there were some cutscenes that took me out of the action when I was really enjoying it and lastly, co-op is not online for some reason! Great game though!

I think that KZ3 overall was one of mybest gaming experiences this-gen. I actually traded in Crysis 2 for it(I know that's not saying much)....now I'm not saying that KZ3 was revolutionary but for a FPS it did what it was suppose to do....LET ME HAVE FUN.

I really think it's a huge step down from KZ2 IMO.They made the campaign a CoD clone and filled it with cliched "epic" moments, the heavy weapons are completely overpowered, there's no player or weapon weight and it's too short. In MP, the whole thing is unbalanced, there is less customization, run-n-gun gameplay instead of more tactical, less health online (like CoD yet again, less health requires less skill, it depends more on how got the first shot), the MP c****es are extremely unbalanced (I remember when the scout actually required skill, now he has the best AR in the game and is both invisible physically and on the radar), the maps aren't as good, no spawn grenades, etc.

The campaign was alright. The characters/story I felt was worse though. I mean what happened to Natko? He's there for co-op but he doesn't say anything. I also felt that Stahl and Orlock were terrible compared to the awesome villains in KZ2 like Visari and Radec. The ending was probably the worst part of the single-player, I didn't feel satisfied when it was over. At least Rico wasn't that annoying in it though.

Like I've said before, the multiplayer was my main problem with it. It removed many features that were in KZ2. I was also not happy with the unbalanced cl@sses, random weapons distribution, (markman with sta-52 is an example) perks, one hit melee kills, less health, full health regeneration, and so on.

I really think it's a huge step down from KZ2 IMO.They made the campaign a CoD clone and filled it with cliched "epic" moments, the heavy weapons are completely overpowered, there's no player or weapon weight and it's too short. In MP, the whole thing is unbalanced, there is less customization, run-n-gun gameplay instead of more tactical, less health online (like CoD yet again, less health requires less skill, it depends more on how got the first shot), the MP c****es are extremely unbalanced (I remember when the scout actually required skill, now he has the best AR in the game and is both invisible physically and on the radar), the maps aren't as good, no spawn grenades, etc.

StealthMonkey4

[QUOTE="StealthMonkey4"]

I really think it's a huge step down from KZ2 IMO.They made the campaign a CoD clone and filled it with cliched "epic" moments, the heavy weapons are completely overpowered, there's no player or weapon weight and it's too short. In MP, the whole thing is unbalanced, there is less customization, run-n-gun gameplay instead of more tactical, less health online (like CoD yet again, less health requires less skill, it depends more on how got the first shot), the MP c****es are extremely unbalanced (I remember when the scout actually required skill, now he has the best AR in the game and is both invisible physically and on the radar), the maps aren't as good, no spawn grenades, etc.

GreyFoXX4

Those cloaked camping marksman with their sta-52 are pretty difficult to find/kill.