KZ2 vs.WAW vs. COD4 vs. MW2

Ok so here is my opinion on all these games, for some of you wondering what would you like the mose, if you havent played it. Everyone is welcome to share.

Graphics: KZ2 graphics maybe darker and less colorful than the COD games, but everything is near perfect.

Story: uhhh they all arent anything special but i guess I'll go with MW2 or KZ2 or all of them haha, but both seem to be about a dictator/terrorist trying to overthrow the government and or world.

Voice Acting: WAW takes the cake, just for Keifer Sutherland haha

Campaign Mode:

KZ2 has some good intenese missions, along with COD4 and MW2, WAW is just like every other WWII game.

I think MW2 takes the cake, as the game matches the intensity and more of KZ2 and COD4, but what i really like(mind ive done about 5 or 6 campaign missions) would have to be the Locales, you will be in the artic, parts of S. America and N. America, and I love the atmosphere.

EDIT: I would really like to see different terrorists, instead of those gosh darn crazy russians/ Evil Dictators/ Nazis

but what could there be to really differ haha.

Game Play: Its about the same with all CODS, and KZ2 just have less sensitive aiming and no auto aim, so its really wither or.

Mulitplayer:

KZ2 has classes so it kind of hinders much of the weapons lay outs people will like. and if you want to catch up with the Multiplayer theres 3 DLC packs you will have to buy.

COD4/WAW and MW2 are about the same but not quite

but

MW2 offers a whopping 15 maps right out the gate and it has improved on everything wrong with the other games, Balancing issues have been fixed for the most part.

Theres 3 perks now instead of two, and you can use machine pistols, shotguns, launchers and pistols as secondary weapons which is awesome, along with the main weapons, there are a lot a lot of attachements for both primary and secondary weapons.

and the customization is plentiful and there are lots of rewards for everything you do. The game is Noob friendly but it really will grow on everyone, thats use to tougher multiplayer games like KZ2.

I like the additions of titles and emblems kind of like what SFIV had for its multiplayer component.

Another cool addition is for games like death match, it shows the game winning kill, which really is great for bragging rights.

One main hinder of MW2 gameplay that will get fixed, is game invites arent really working, for most people.

Miscelanneous:

WAW had blood and GORE which i loved, and i wish MW2 would show dismemberment

and Nazi Zombies is ok but repetitive, while MW2 offers spec ops mode, which is really quite nice, it will be much better once the game invites start to work :P

Conclusion:

So, I would say MW2 beats out KZ2 by a long shot

as theres customizeable kill streaks, theres hardly any of that I kill you and then 3 seconds later I die from bullet lag a la KZ2

KZ2 does seem to use more team work due to Character Classes but i dont like class based games.

if theres anything im missing, please be free to add!

Jerk buddy old pal I hate to say it but hellz noes foolz!!! lol KZ2 is leaps and bounds better then anyCoD game, the reason being why I dislike MW2 are as follows.

1)Way to much Auto aim ughh!!!

2) horrible short campaign!!! I'm sorry but if we allow this to continue. We will eventually be paying 60 bucks for an interactive 2 and a half hour movie.

3)dumb enemy AI and even dumber squad AI.

4) Glitchie screwed up patches and invite system!!! The same issue from MW makes it's return. Hey guys lets see if we can hack are gamesaves again it seem IW didn't learn their lesson.

5) while the maps are okay IW put way to many spots for campers to hangout at.

6) Killstreaks are a overkill folks!!! Tactical Nuke doesn't seem to hard to obtain if you catch my drift. Instead of working for them some are like in MW they come way to easy this time around.

That about it right now why I do enjoy the game If I was a review I would have scored it an 8.5 because of all its flaws. See you online Jerk :P

Jerk buddy old pal I hate to say it but hellz noes foolz!!! lol KZ2 is leaps and bounds better then anyCoD game, the reason being why I dislike MW2 are as follows.

1)Way to much Auto aim ughh!!!

2) horrible short campaign!!! I'm sorry but if we allow this to continue. We will eventually be paying 60 bucks for an interactive 2 and a half hour movie.

3)dumb enemy AI and even dumber squad AI.

4) Glitchie screwed up patches and invite system!!! The same issue from MW makes it's return. Hey guys lets see if we can hack are gamesaves again it seem IW didn't learn their lesson.

5) while the maps are okay IW put way to many spots for campers to hangout at.

6) Killstreaks are a overkill folks!!! Tactical Nuke doesn't seem to hard to obtain if you catch my drift. Instead of working for them some are like in MW they come way to easy this time around.

That about it right now why I do enjoy the game If I was a review I would have scored it an 8.5 because of all its flaws. See you online Jerk :P

2beers_in_hand

MW2 is the first FPS game i've played since KZ2 and man, i couldn't believe how much of a downgrade MW2 felt like.

MW2 > COD4 > WAW > KZ2

KZ2's story could have been much better, and the multiplayer was boring

The lack of matchmaking made it worse

MW2 is the first FPS game i've played since KZ2 and man, i couldn't believe how much of a downgrade MW2 felt like.

carving_a_giant

. every online game has and will always be campers. theres isnt a game i can think of that i havent played that were spawn campers in it. i do agree about the whole spawn campin thing, but kz is still better then cod games. but if u think otherwise thats cool i respect ur opinion.

I have 'em all... all got their pros and cons... i enjoyed the first 3... and i will enjoy MW2 later tonight... 8)

I've played them all, and I would say it goes in this order:

MW2 , Killzone 2 , COD 4 , WAW

yeah Killzone 2 is quality from start to finish.Gamer_4_Fun

I've played them all, and I would say it goes in this order:

MW2 , Killzone 2 , COD 4 , WAW

M0wen10

They are both good but I liked Cod Waw the best out of all the Cods and Killzone is my fav:P

Hi Jerkface! :oops:

3)dumb enemy AI and even dumber squad AI

2beers_in_hand

That's certainly an issue with Cod5 (Wii) The Japanese just stand there, without any movement when you are 2 feet away from them, really stupid

MW2 > COD4 > WAW > KZ2

KZ2's story could have been much better, and the multiplayer was boring

The lack of matchmaking made it worse

thelastguy

This sums it up right here.

Mw2, Cod4, KZ2, WAW.

Hi Jerkface! :oops:

Furi-Kun

Mulitplayer:

KZ2 has classes so it kind of hinders much of the weapons lay outs people will like. and if you want to catch up with the Multiplayer theres 3 DLC packs you will have to buy.

jerkface96

Have to buy? almost no-one plays those. you'd be lucky to get a game of 7 or more for a DLC map.

[QUOTE="jerkface96"]

Mulitplayer:

KZ2 has classes so it kind of hinders much of the weapons lay outs people will like. and if you want to catch up with the Multiplayer theres 3 DLC packs you will have to buy.

shani_boy101

Have to buy? almost no-one plays those. you'd be lucky to get a game of 7 or more for a DLC map.

[QUOTE="jerkface96"]

Mulitplayer:

KZ2 has classes so it kind of hinders much of the weapons lay outs people will like. and if you want to catch up with the Multiplayer theres 3 DLC packs you will have to buy.

shani_boy101

Have to buy? almost no-one plays those. you'd be lucky to get a game of 7 or more for a DLC map.

I love how people knock KZ2's story but MW2's story makes very little sense and it's over before it even really gets started...

I love how people still knock the aiming and controls to this day even thoughthe aiming hasbeen patched / fixed and you can switch the controls to COD controls if you so choose...

Now the new KZ2 knock is camping spawns, you do realize MW2 multiplayer has the same thing ability / perk you just have to unlock it...

Killzone 2 is a all around good game to me..i havent played MW2 yet still sold out where i live...going by the ratings MW2 is better i just have to play it

[QUOTE="carving_a_giant"]

MW2 is the first FPS game i've played since KZ2 and man, i couldn't believe how much of a downgrade MW2 felt like.

hot114

killzone 2 and modern warfare 2

MW2 is the first FPS game i've played since KZ2 and man, i couldn't believe how much of a downgrade MW2 felt like.

carving_a_giant

I am with you. MW2 has been the worst COD I have played on my ps3. It feels like atari vision compared to KZ2. The death animations and pathetic feel to the weapons, glitches and poor graphics make it last on my list. I enjoyed CoD4 and WOW much much better. Killzone is leaps better than any COD game. Its not even close.

In order to make an informed judgement as to which game is the best, you need to have played them all to the point where you got good at them, not just play it for a day or a week.

Myself, I have played both KZ2 and COD4/MW2 to the point where I'm good at both, and here's what I think:

KZ2 is way better in terms of graphics and gameplay, the weapons have weight and the game takes practice and patience to get good at. The only thing I didn't like about the game were some of the maps, specially ones like Radec where everybody would be scrapping it out in the bathroom. There could have been more weapons and customization features as well. The cover system is good and it's a very team oriented, squad based game.

COD4/MW2 (they're bascially the same game) graphics and gameplay are dated; caters mainly to the casual shooter fan that doesn't like a learning curve to the game. Kills comes way too easy with the aim assist where all kills are cheap and easy. Guns have no wieght, shooting a RPG is the same as firing a pistol. The mechanics are also dated in that movements are twitchy and aracady. The only good thing about the game are the various weapons choices, although it doesn't make much of a difference what gun you use since they all feel the same and all cause the same damage pretty much. No cover system sucks as well.

Overall, the better game is KZ2 imo.

Mw2 no other game has sold 4.7 millon copes in UK and usa on release! avrage 95% review!!!!

KZ2 > MW2 > CoD4 > WaW

Better add "imo" or someone will start flaming me saying I'm trying to state it as fact. :|

In order to make an informed judgement as to which game is the best, you need to have played them all to the point where you got good at them, not just play it for a day or a week.

Myself, I have played both KZ2 and COD4/MW2 to the point where I'm good at both, and here's what I think:

KZ2 is way better in terms of graphics and gameplay, the weapons have weight and the game takes practice and patience to get good at. The only thing I didn't like about the game were some of the maps, specially ones like Radec where everybody would be scrapping it out in the bathroom. There could have been more weapons and customization features as well. The cover system is good and it's a very team oriented, squad based game.

COD4/MW2 (they're bascially the same game) graphics and gameplay are dated; caters mainly to the casual shooter fan that doesn't like a learning curve to the game. Kills comes way too easy with the aim assist where all kills are cheap and easy. Guns have no wieght, shooting a RPG is the same as firing a pistol. The mechanics are also dated in that movements are twitchy and aracady. The only good thing about the game are the various weapons choices, although it doesn't make much of a difference what gun you use since they all feel the same and all cause the same damage pretty much. No cover system sucks as well.

Overall, the better game is KZ2 imo.

p2250

This, this, this, this.

I couldn't agree more.

In order to make an informed judgement as to which game is the best, you need to have played them all to the point where you got good at them, not just play it for a day or a week.

Myself, I have played both KZ2 and COD4/MW2 to the point where I'm good at both, and here's what I think:

KZ2 is way better in terms of graphics and gameplay, the weapons have weight and the game takes practice and patience to get good at. The only thing I didn't like about the game were some of the maps, specially ones like Radec where everybody would be scrapping it out in the bathroom. There could have been more weapons and customization features as well. The cover system is good and it's a very team oriented, squad based game.

COD4/MW2 (they're bascially the same game) graphics and gameplay are dated; caters mainly to the casual shooter fan that doesn't like a learning curve to the game. Kills comes way too easy with the aim assist where all kills are cheap and easy. Guns have no wieght, shooting a RPG is the same as firing a pistol. The mechanics are also dated in that movements are twitchy and aracady. The only good thing about the game are the various weapons choices, although it doesn't make much of a difference what gun you use since they all feel the same and all cause the same damage pretty much. No cover system sucks as well.

Overall, the better game is KZ2 imo.

p2250

yea a cover system is quite nice also. haha

Killzone 2 was a snorefest.

Call of Duty 4 was cocaine.

I never played WaW and MW2 is unplayable at the moment..

Killzone 2 was a snorefest.

Call of Duty 4 was cocaine.

I never played WaW and MW2 is unplayable at the moment..

Scianix-Black

[QUOTE="Scianix-Black"]

Killzone 2 was a snorefest.

Call of Duty 4 was cocaine.

I never played WaW and MW2 is unplayable at the moment..

jerkface96

Well, I was talking about the campaign too. It's really generic.. like a shallow summer action movie that people watch for fun (No, not Transformers.. something like Crank, or Push).

Call of Duty 4 brought new ideas to the table - perk system, online class system, and fluid, addictive multiplayer.

Killzone 2 was.. just another pretty face.

[QUOTE="jerkface96"][QUOTE="Scianix-Black"]

Killzone 2 was a snorefest.

Call of Duty 4 was cocaine.

I never played WaW and MW2 is unplayable at the moment..

Scianix-Black

Well, I was talking about the campaign too. It's really generic.. like a shallow summer action movie that people watch for fun (No, not Transformers.. something like Crank, or Push).

Call of Duty 4 brought new ideas to the table - perk system, online class system, and fluid, addictive multiplayer.

Killzone 2 was.. just another pretty face.

[QUOTE="Scianix-Black"]

[QUOTE="jerkface96"] haha see i thought KZ2 had some great graphics, the shooting was quite nice i liked the weightiness and in campaign mode there was a cover button, i liked the campaign more in KZ2 i think, but i really think the MP in MW2 is better , i dont know what made it boring, it probably was the class based, and once i leveld up all the way there was nothing to do, I played the game alot too and i prolly burned myself out on it. but who knows haha jerkface96

Well, I was talking about the campaign too. It's really generic.. like a shallow summer action movie that people watch for fun (No, not Transformers.. something like Crank, or Push).

Call of Duty 4 brought new ideas to the table - perk system, online class system, and fluid, addictive multiplayer.

Killzone 2 was.. just another pretty face.

Yeah, but at least someone died.

I mean, there was a somewhat interesting plot there. Killzone 2's story was ruined with all the unnecessary cursing. The script was written by a 12 year old.

Call of Duty: World at War . Call of Duty 4 > Killzone 2 (Gameplay)

Call of Duty: World at War / Call of Duty 4 > Killzone 2 (Story/Plot/Campaign)

Killzone 2 > > > > > Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 (Graphics)

really? maybe for u it does and others who might love/like COD, but kz2 beats any COD game for me any day of the yearJoKeR_421

Ok so here is my opinion on all these games, for some of you wondering what would you like the mose, if you havent played it. Everyone is welcome to share.

Graphics: KZ2 graphics maybe darker and less colorful than the COD games, but everything is near perfect.

Story: uhhh they all arent anything special but i guess I'll go with MW2 or KZ2 or all of them haha, but both seem to be about a dictator/terrorist trying to overthrow the government and or world.

Voice Acting: WAW takes the cake, just for Keifer Sutherland haha

Campaign Mode:

KZ2 has some good intenese missions, along with COD4 and MW2, WAW is just like every other WWII game.

I think MW2 takes the cake, as the game matches the intensity and more of KZ2 and COD4, but what i really like(mind ive done about 5 or 6 campaign missions) would have to be the Locales, you will be in the artic, parts of S. America and N. America, and I love the atmosphere.

EDIT: I would really like to see different terrorists, instead of those gosh darn crazy russians/ Evil Dictators/ Nazis

but what could there be to really differ haha.

Game Play: Its about the same with all CODS, and KZ2 just have less sensitive aiming and no auto aim, so its really wither or.

Mulitplayer:

KZ2 has ****s so it kind of hinders much of the weapons lay outs people will like. and if you want to catch up with the Multiplayer theres 3 DLC packs you will have to buy.

COD4/WAW and MW2 are about the same but not quite

but

MW2 offers a whopping 15 maps right out the gate and it has improved on everything wrong with the other games, Balancing issues have been fixed for the most part.

Theres 3 perks now instead of two, and you can use machine pistols, shotguns, launchers and pistols as secondary weapons which is awesome, along with the main weapons, there are a lot a lot of attachements for both primary and secondary weapons.

and the customization is plentiful and there are lots of rewards for everything you do. The game is Noob friendly but it really will grow on everyone, thats use to tougher multiplayer games like KZ2.

I like the additions of titles and emblems kind of like what SFIV had for its multiplayer component.

Another cool addition is for games like death match, it shows the game winning kill, which really is great for bragging rights.

One main hinder of MW2 gameplay that will get fixed, is game invites arent really working, for most people.

Miscelanneous:

WAW had blood and GORE which i loved, and i wish MW2 would show dismemberment

and Nazi Zombies is ok but repetitive, while MW2 offers spec ops mode, which is really quite nice, it will be much better once the game invites start to work :P

Conclusion:

So, I would say MW2 beats out KZ2 by a long shot

as theres customizeable kill streaks, theres hardly any of that I kill you and then 3 seconds later I die from bullet lag a la KZ2

KZ2 does seem to use more team work due to Character ****s but i dont like ****based games.

if theres anything im missing, please be free to add!

jerkface96

You played the Space Battle, Visari Landing or the first mission? Those are prolly one of the most crazy moments in gaming :D (KZ2)

I've played them all, and I would say it goes in this order:

MW2 , Killzone 2 , COD 4 , WAW

M0wen10

I like all 4 games, but I don't really feel any one of the four trumps the others outright.

CoD 4 has the bestcampaign IMO, with numerous unforgetable moments. MW2'scampaign has improved gameplay over CoD 4, but the whole thing feels like it was just thrown together. The whole thing of Russia attacking the U.S. is just kind of silly as well. Also MW2 is even shorter then CoD 4 which is reallysaying something. MW2 would have greatly benefited from a few more missions, especiallyseeing as how you barely fight OpFor at all. Instead MW2 is pretty much you constantlykilling Russians.

World at War has a good campaign, but it's WWII so it's kind of old hat. Although most of the Pacific Campaignwas really good. Killzone 2 had a decent campaign with real intense firefights, but the characters are kind of meh with the exception of Radec and Visari. I really expected more from Killzone 2's campaign, cause in the end it feels like a CoD 4 rip off and I was a big fan of the original Killzone. The lack of secondary weapon fire alsojust kind aggravates me.

As for Multiplayer, MW2 wins hands down. It has everything you could possibly want. Tons of weapons, attachments, and challenges just makes it an extremely deep game with long lasting appeal. While I liked Killzone 2's teamwork focus and the feel of weapons, it just doesn't have the lasting appeal CoD has. Plus there was generally too many chaotic clusterf*cks of rocket/grenade spamming in KZ2. Although CoD 4 has pretty bad grenade spamming as well. MW2 has fixed this though by and large.

World at War has alright Multiplayer, but it's basically CoD 4 set in WWII.

Graphic wise Killzone 2 is reallygood, but so is MW2. It's hard to get nit picky here honestly, as they are about the same level in detail although MW2 runs very smooth. CoD 4is stillgood, but has been eclipsed a bit lately. World at War probably is the least best looking, but I did really like the gore system.

I guess if you had to make me choose...

MW2 > CoD 4 > KZ2 > WaW

MW2>COD4>KZ2>W@W