Good question. I have both. The single player campaign in KZ3 is actually pretty fun, but MP wise I see myself playing much more Socom4. KZ3 MP isnt bad but if you already have COD there really isnt any need. SOCOM SP campaign actually isnt so bad either. Both are obviously great titles but I give the nod to Socom because its apparent MP longevity
I sold my killzone 3 at full price a few weeks after release..I was unimpressed by its lack of teamwork required and simply put off by the weighty controls.I just got socom 4 today and while i didnt do so well i had alot more fun playing with tactics rather just running and gunning.Being able to dive to the ground and take cover in mp feels great versus the heavy feel of kz3 imo.
I a, happy I actually found this thread because I was wondering what game I should order from gamefly out of these two and it seems Socom has many more fans
I a, happy I actually found this thread because I was wondering what game I should order from gamefly out of these two and it seems Socom has many more fanshkymike
Ya man I'm telling you I have both and while I really recommend the KZ3 campaign, MP is way more average than I thought it would be and Socom4 has a lot of stuff going for it in MP.
Neither. Both used to be great franchises but have been dumbed down to make their games more casual. Get Killzone 2 instead of Killzone 3. It's much better.
killzone 3 is terrible, like it may be as bad as mw2 was,
socom 4 is just kinda ehhh, like its not bad but its not realy that good, if your playing for online then yah pick this one cause its more tactical while killzone 3 is like cod where you all go lone wolf, socom has kinda divulged into that but its still got some tactics left
Log in to comment