Which one has the most unique and fun multiplayer in your opinion?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
O man you haven't played R2 online? You are missing out. They really dumbed it down in R3.Resistance 3's multiplayer was pretty unique to me because I haven't played the 2nd, and I had lots of fun playing it and it's easy to get into it. I had a blast playing this game and I regret selling it :(
Qurb
BF3 stands king imo. In terms or innovation, graphics, gameplay, and sound.
KZ3 had a great multiplayer, but it wasnt a great step forward. The knife animation was cool, but over all it died fast, espcially since there is a great collection of guns for each class
Ya. I'm kinda bummed KZ3 doesn't have as much players playing. There are many full lobby's but not as much. The brutal melee's are so cool.BF3 stands king imo. In terms or innovation, graphics, gameplay, and sound.
KZ3 had a great multiplayer, but it wasnt a great step forward. The knife animation was cool, but over all it died fast, espcially since there is a great collection of guns for each class
moej88
[QUOTE="moej88"]
BF3 stands king imo. In terms or innovation, graphics, gameplay, and sound.
KZ3 had a great multiplayer, but it wasnt a great step forward. The knife animation was cool, but over all it died fast, espcially since there is a great collection of guns for each class
Ya. I'm kinda bummed KZ3 doesn't have as much players playing. There are many full lobby's but not as much. The brutal melee's are so cool. its becuz KZ3 its pretty much a toned down fast pace version on KZ2. They are basically the same game, but KZ3 is the lame one that tried to be cool by having jets and mechs. Im still mad they ignore us again and didnt put co-op in KZ3, when everyone was begging for it in KZ2.[QUOTE="moej88"]
BF3 stands king imo. In terms or innovation, graphics, gameplay, and sound.
KZ3 had a great multiplayer, but it wasnt a great step forward. The knife animation was cool, but over all it died fast, espcially since there is a great collection of guns for each class
Ya. I'm kinda bummed KZ3 doesn't have as much players playing. There are many full lobby's but not as much. The brutal melee's are so cool. its becuz KZ3 its pretty much a toned down fast pace version on KZ2. They are basically the same game, but KZ3 is the lame one that tried to be cool by having jets and mechs. Im still mad they ignore us again and didnt put co-op in KZ3, when everyone was begging for it in KZ2. but KZ3 had co-op[QUOTE="Nengo_Flow"][QUOTE="ristactionjakso"]Ya. I'm kinda bummed KZ3 doesn't have as much players playing. There are many full lobby's but not as much. The brutal melee's are so cool.its becuz KZ3 its pretty much a toned down fast pace version on KZ2. They are basically the same game, but KZ3 is the lame one that tried to be cool by having jets and mechs. Im still mad they ignore us again and didnt put co-op in KZ3, when everyone was begging for it in KZ2. but KZ3 had co-ophiryu3
it had 2 player campaing co-op..............
I was talking about, like a separate co-op mode, like a 4 player online co-op mode (survival, U3's alternate story base co-op, R2 mission type or something)
but KZ3 had co-op[QUOTE="hiryu3"][QUOTE="Nengo_Flow"] its becuz KZ3 its pretty much a toned down fast pace version on KZ2. They are basically the same game, but KZ3 is the lame one that tried to be cool by having jets and mechs. Im still mad they ignore us again and didnt put co-op in KZ3, when everyone was begging for it in KZ2.Nengo_Flow
it had 2 player campaing co-op..............
I was talking about, like a separate co-op mode, like a 4 player online co-op mode (survival, U3's alternate story base co-op, R2 mission type or something)
I wanted a Co-op botzone just like killzone 1, but up to 4 players. And with online capabilities. If you havent played KZ1 botzone, you can play splitscreen with 1 other person, but there is a ton of options like choose to play as ISA or Helghast, which game mode, how many bots, how long each match goes, how much points to win in each mode and many more.The devs really disappointed me with botzone only being 1 player in KZ3, and how limited the game settings are in each match. But regardless the online MP os solid. I think it's better being single player online. Games tend to lag more due to splitscreeners because the system has to render 2 players online.
MW3 all the way. KZ2 was way better than KZ3 and theres too much running around in the battlefield series for my liking, takes too long to find someone to kill. and resistance just feels like a poor mans halo.
MW3 all the way. KZ2 was way better than KZ3 and theres too much running around in the battlefield series for my liking, takes too long to find someone to kill. and resistance just feels like a poor mans halo.
idunnodude
how do you guys stay excited for an anual rehash of an outdated game engine?
bf3 if you want tactical gameplay overloaded with idiot "arena-based shooter" players who never play their classes or the objectives, and who would rather vehicle spawn camp or camp in the mountains with a sniper rifle so he can brag about his 2.0 kdr. (3.25)
r3 if you want fast paced fun where campers can't dominate (4.xx)
killzone if you want overpowered classes and cheap kills/deaths everywhere (3.30)
mw3 if you never get tired of buying the same game every year (2.81 mw2/ 2.70 bo). i actually liked black ops for a call of duty game. i only sold it because it felt too familiar and i got $32 for it. that and store credit covered my $40 mk9 back in april, lol.
i know someone is going to say i "suck" b/c of the words i chose in my post, so i put my kdrs in parenthesis. i personally found r3 to be the most fun
[QUOTE="idunnodude"]
MW3 all the way. KZ2 was way better than KZ3 and theres too much running around in the battlefield series for my liking, takes too long to find someone to kill. and resistance just feels like a poor mans halo.
bob__
how do you guys stay excited for an anual rehash of an outdated game engine?
bf3 if you want tactical gameplay overloaded with idiot "arena-based shooter" players who never play their classes or the objectives, and who would rather vehicle spawn camp or camp in the mountains with a sniper rifle so he can brag about his 2.0 kdr. (3.25)
r3 if you want fast paced fun where campers can't dominate (4.xx)
killzone if you want overpowered classes and cheap kills/deaths everywhere (3.30)
mw3 if you never get tired of buying the same game every year (2.81 mw2/ 2.70 bo). i actually liked black ops for a call of duty game. i only sold it because it felt too familiar and i got $32 for it. that and store credit covered my $40 mk9 back in april, lol.
i know someone is going to say i "suck" b/c of the words i chose in my post, so i put my kdrs in parenthesis. i personally found r3 to be the most fun
Nobody is gonna say you suck, everybody has their own opinions on certain games.[QUOTE="bob__"]
[QUOTE="idunnodude"]
MW3 all the way. KZ2 was way better than KZ3 and theres too much running around in the battlefield series for my liking, takes too long to find someone to kill. and resistance just feels like a poor mans halo.
ristactionjakso
how do you guys stay excited for an anual rehash of an outdated game engine?
bf3 if you want tactical gameplay overloaded with idiot "arena-based shooter" players who never play their classes or the objectives, and who would rather vehicle spawn camp or camp in the mountains with a sniper rifle so he can brag about his 2.0 kdr. (3.25)
r3 if you want fast paced fun where campers can't dominate (4.xx)
killzone if you want overpowered classes and cheap kills/deaths everywhere (3.30)
mw3 if you never get tired of buying the same game every year (2.81 mw2/ 2.70 bo). i actually liked black ops for a call of duty game. i only sold it because it felt too familiar and i got $32 for it. that and store credit covered my $40 mk9 back in april, lol.
i know someone is going to say i "suck" b/c of the words i chose in my post, so i put my kdrs in parenthesis. i personally found r3 to be the most fun
Nobody is gonna say you suck, everybody has their own opinions on certain games.excuse me, then. i guess i'm just being overly defensive. on the other forums that i've been to, such as battlelog, gamefaqs, and gametrailers, people tend to name call when they disagree. i rarely come here because the traffic isn't as fast as the others.
Nobody is gonna say you suck, everybody has their own opinions on certain games.[QUOTE="ristactionjakso"]
[QUOTE="bob__"]
how do you guys stay excited for an anual rehash of an outdated game engine?
bf3 if you want tactical gameplay overloaded with idiot "arena-based shooter" players who never play their classes or the objectives, and who would rather vehicle spawn camp or camp in the mountains with a sniper rifle so he can brag about his 2.0 kdr. (3.25)
r3 if you want fast paced fun where campers can't dominate (4.xx)
killzone if you want overpowered classes and cheap kills/deaths everywhere (3.30)
mw3 if you never get tired of buying the same game every year (2.81 mw2/ 2.70 bo). i actually liked black ops for a call of duty game. i only sold it because it felt too familiar and i got $32 for it. that and store credit covered my $40 mk9 back in april, lol.
i know someone is going to say i "suck" b/c of the words i chose in my post, so i put my kdrs in parenthesis. i personally found r3 to be the most fun
bob__
excuse me, then. i guess i'm just being overly defensive. on the other forums that i've been to, such as battlelog, gamefaqs, and gametrailers, people tend to name call when they disagree. i rarely come here because the traffic isn't as fast as the others.
ya, if this was a poliical debate or on system wars then there would be someone creating all sorts of commotion over nothing.I think BF3 > KZ3 > R3 > MW3. MW3 wasn't good in the first place. I only enjoyed MW1 and mainly 2 (even though there were so much problems). Killzone 3 was different and was really fun to play expect i heard its dead now.
Nobody is gonna say you suck, everybody has their own opinions on certain games.[QUOTE="ristactionjakso"]
[QUOTE="bob__"]
how do you guys stay excited for an anual rehash of an outdated game engine?
bf3 if you want tactical gameplay overloaded with idiot "arena-based shooter" players who never play their classes or the objectives, and who would rather vehicle spawn camp or camp in the mountains with a sniper rifle so he can brag about his 2.0 kdr. (3.25)
r3 if you want fast paced fun where campers can't dominate (4.xx)
killzone if you want overpowered classes and cheap kills/deaths everywhere (3.30)
mw3 if you never get tired of buying the same game every year (2.81 mw2/ 2.70 bo). i actually liked black ops for a call of duty game. i only sold it because it felt too familiar and i got $32 for it. that and store credit covered my $40 mk9 back in april, lol.
i know someone is going to say i "suck" b/c of the words i chose in my post, so i put my kdrs in parenthesis. i personally found r3 to be the most fun
bob__
excuse me, then. i guess i'm just being overly defensive. on the other forums that i've been to, such as battlelog, gamefaqs, and gametrailers, people tend to name call when they disagree. i rarely come here because the traffic isn't as fast as the others.
you know..gameFAq is just another section of gamespot...its all 1 site now..
Well it's far from dead. It's just everyone plays warzone game mode.I think BF3 > KZ3 > R3 > MW3. MW3 wasn't good in the first place. I only enjoyed MW1 and mainly 2 (even though there were so much problems). Killzone 3 was different and was really fun to play expect i heard its dead now.
shadow13702
[QUOTE="idunnodude"]
MW3 all the way. KZ2 was way better than KZ3 and theres too much running around in the battlefield series for my liking, takes too long to find someone to kill. and resistance just feels like a poor mans halo.
bob__
how do you guys stay excited for an anual rehash of an outdated game engine?
bf3 if you want tactical gameplay overloaded with idiot "arena-based shooter" players who never play their classes or the objectives, and who would rather vehicle spawn camp or camp in the mountains with a sniper rifle so he can brag about his 2.0 kdr. (3.25)
r3 if you want fast paced fun where campers can't dominate (4.xx)
killzone if you want overpowered classes and cheap kills/deaths everywhere (3.30)
mw3 if you never get tired of buying the same game every year (2.81 mw2/ 2.70 bo). i actually liked black ops for a call of duty game. i only sold it because it felt too familiar and i got $32 for it. that and store credit covered my $40 mk9 back in april, lol.
i know someone is going to say i "suck" b/c of the words i chose in my post, so i put my kdrs in parenthesis. i personally found r3 to be the most fun
jeez its just my opinion. no need to pms about it. and you say all this stuff yet you played all of the CODs like what the hell. yeah i know its the same thing over and over. but its also the game i find most enjoyable and the small changes and different guns/maps are enough to keep my coming back. its pretty obvious their milking it, why wouldnt they? i would do the same thing. they found a system that works and if its not broken then why fix it.
I'm still having fun with KZ3 to this day but I am noticing it getting smaller and smaller. MW3 just looked boring and BF3 was fun but I didn't feel the need to buy it, still need to play R1,2, and 3. XD
I've had a rest from the FPS fora while now. Mostly been playingthird personaction games like Space Marine and Batman and DoW2 on PC butyesterday theurge was creeping back upon me and my comback will bewith Killzone 3. I never likedthe multiplayer style of R3.I'll tryBF3 again if they evercomeup with a fix for the inputlag. I'm starting to think theywon't. I've never owned a CoD game but I've tried enough toknow that I don'tlike it.
I didn't play R3 or MW3. I heard enough about MW3 gameplay from friends to know I wouldn't like it. Contrary to popular belief, the IW COD games are not the same as the Treyarch COD games. Black Ops is far better than MW2 IMO which I heard MW3 is more like MW2. KZ3 was a disappointment for me coming from KZ2. The maps are smaller and major changes to classes killed it for me. Tactician is ruined without spawn grenades, and they turned the Infiltrator and Marksman into front line assault units by buffing their cammo abilities through the roof. BF3 is the best of this lot IMO, although its not a very good sequel to BF2. Its more like a hybrid of BF2 and Bad Company 2. Me saying BF3 wins this is sort of like saying "here is the best of the rest". Not exactly a ringing endorsement.-ArchAngeL-777-What is spawn grenades I never played KZ2.
I do like the Tacticians predator missile drop though.
"Operation Flashpoint".
"Dragon Rising" and "Red River" have some very different options and settings from the other major MP games out there. It's my favorite tactical shooter of the gen.
:)
Side-Note: BLOPs is, indeed, much better than MW3 in many ways. They play much the same, but the maps and such are more fun on BLOPs. Also, a lot of the CoD Walking White Suburban Erections With A Mic have moved to MW3, so the BLOPs crowd is generally more mellow now.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment