Let's talk RPGs. . .

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Abaddon5331
Abaddon5331

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Abaddon5331
Member since 2011 • 25 Posts
First let me preface this discussion by saying I love RPGs. They are the reason I play video games and love them to death. I am a PC gamer as well as PS3 and have played alot of RPGs out there from Baulder's Gate to Final Fantasy to even games like Diablo. I am also 25 yrs old so might have something to do with my opinions. The topic latley of RPGs actually brought me to create a gamespot ID just to post this discussion. I read the forums alot and it is driving me insane with the amount of 'hate' that is flowing from gamers about RPGs that have come out recently like Dragon Age 2, and Final Fantasy 13. In my opnion, there are 3 types of RPGs. Bad, good story bad combat/exploration, bad story and good combat/exploration. Final Fantasy 13 for example, everyone got pissed off and hated it. I don't understand why at all. I think people hate it just because it is different than the previous. What is so wrong about being different? Yah there is no free roam or dialogue options, but the story is not bad and the combat is one of the funnest I have had ever in a FF game. When a new RPG comes out, and it is an entirely new IP, I think people give them way too much credit and think the games are good/decent when they are much worse than other sequels that came out that are different than their previous edition. I cannot think of a single game other than Baulder's Gate 2 where people enjoyed the second edition more than the first. Even Mass Effect people still differ about which was the best of the 2. Dragon Age 2 had a good story, characters you can care about, and still fun combat. The scenery was a little much being overused, but it does not make it a bad game that everyone makes it out to be. I think people are overlooking a sequels good parts and beamlining straight for all the things they hate or got changed from the original and declare it inferior and say it was nothing like the original. If every RPG sequel was just a continuation of an original with nothing changed, you would end up with Call of Dutyism in the RPG world, same sh!t different story. Discuss.
Avatar image for JohnnyWPSP
JohnnyWPSP

1895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 29

User Lists: 0

#2 JohnnyWPSP
Member since 2009 • 1895 Posts

First of all im not into RPGs...at all. Or at least i wasnt until i tried Mass Effect 2: a great game with a great story and great combat. Then i tried Fallout 3 and it was even more awesome! In my opinion it has everything a near-perfect game needs and it was a lot better than Mass Effect. So from the 2 RPGs i played both had great story and great combat/exploration, which means that ill have to disagree with you.

Avatar image for Abaddon5331
Abaddon5331

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Abaddon5331
Member since 2011 • 25 Posts
I see your point, but you have nothing to compare those 2 games you think are great to. If you were raised eating rice cakes your entire life from infant to teenage years you would think rice cakes are pretty good. Until you try a pizza.
Avatar image for ArchoNils2
ArchoNils2

10534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 ArchoNils2
Member since 2005 • 10534 Posts

First of all, FF13s story was horrible, it's about whiny characters that go from A to B crying about their destiny. And there are tons of games sequels get more love than the 1. title, like Suikoden or Final Fantasy (7 and 10 get way more love than 1 ever got)

Avatar image for CBottom7
CBottom7

822

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 CBottom7
Member since 2009 • 822 Posts

Demon's Souls and 3D Dot Game Heroes are the ONLY RPG's I will ever play ... I tried MAss Effect 2 (More of a shooter than RPG) and Dragon Age Origins (Decent story with bad graphics)

Avatar image for Marmotas
Marmotas

2944

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 Marmotas
Member since 2004 • 2944 Posts

Story and gameplay reception are different from people to people.

In my case, i believe that FF13 was horrible in both story and gameplay.

The story was just "meh" and the storytelling was horrible and all over the place, the characters didnt contributed at all to make it more likable, i mean, sometimes a "meh" story can be helped with good characters and make a good game, you dont need an overly complex or deep story if your characters are interesting... this wasnt the case, and in fact, the characters hurted much more the game than the simple story... and the worst offender this time was, again, the storytelling.

The combat was also very repetitive and uninteresting, it was only switch paradigms and spam auto-attack... i see nothing interesting at all about that. Not only that, but a great deal of the combats where unavoidable in all senses. Whats the point on having enemies hanging around for you to avoid... if most of the times the levels where so restrictive that you just couldnt run pass the enemies... not only that, but you couldnt even escape the battles.

Imo, FF13 was a subpar RPG at best, and not even by FF standarts, but as an overall RPG experience.

-------

And i disagree, there is 1 more type of RPG out there than "Bad, good story bad combat/exploration, bad story and good combat/exploration", its one that has both Good story AND good gameplay. There is no reason why one should exclude the other, thats called making a half-half of a game, as simply as that.

If you want to focus on the gameplay, thats fine, but then dont come to me with a poorly excuse of a story and pretend that i take it seriously by giving me hours and hours of cutscenes.

And if you want to focus on Story, then at least have a really good one with good characters to justify the poor gameplay. (and even with this, the gameplay should be competent, and not something that is just painful to use)

Avatar image for Jack_Force
Jack_Force

2693

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#7 Jack_Force
Member since 2007 • 2693 Posts
ff13 was awful bad plot and combat that required little to no thought, it did look pretty tho. Dragon age 2 had an ok story poor combat and overused the same maps and dungeons, voice acting was amazing shame they didn't put the same time into other aspects. The reason people think this is because games that came before them were better, Dragon age had a fan base and dragon age 2 seemed rushed with watered down combat, everyone expected a more polished game. Also for you same **** different story comment FF has so many games that fit that exact mould... also look at the elder scrolls games, just because the gameplay is similar doesn't mean you can't have a good game. Call of dutiysm? you mean a successful series? Different approaches that work in my opinion = demon souls, borderlands, resonance of fate, Valkyrie chronicles, dragon age, mass effect 2, fallout 3. I enjoyed these games from start to finish, da2 and ff13 felt like a chore.
Avatar image for funsohng
funsohng

29976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 funsohng
Member since 2005 • 29976 Posts
I haven't finished FF10 or FF13, but both looked very linear to me. If anything, FF13's combat was better. FF13 had more whiny and annoying characters though. That is the reason I just can't continue the game. There should be an option to kill Hope and Snow. And no one, virtually no one, is saying anything against The Witcher 2 even though it's a sequel to a cult classic with relatively massive fan-base. The reason DA2 was bashed like hell was, compared to DAO, it's just rushed work. If DA2 had 2 years of dev cycle like ME series, I'm sure BioWare would have made the scope far bigger than it was now (it's applicable, you could be a Champion of Free marches instead of Kirkwall, and nothing really would change much. Or even, make more distinct places in Kirkwall itself). DA2 had the potential: just like you said, it has great combat, the story was far less cliched and personal than DAO, the characters like Varric, Isabela, and Merrill were great, I would even say they rival Alistair and Zevran to certain extent. But the scope of the game is far too small compared to DAO, and that is the reason why DA2 is bashed mostly. Like I said, if they had more dev time and just made everything bigger, it would have been great.
Avatar image for blueboxdoctor
blueboxdoctor

2549

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#9 blueboxdoctor
Member since 2010 • 2549 Posts

Well, I'm a western rpg type of person, so I've been into the Elder Scrolls games, ME2, and Demon's Souls (yes, not western, but has a very western feel to it). I find these games often have better characters and stories along with good combat. I've tried to get into JRPGs but they really can't hold my attention. I've tried with Rogue Galaxy, Star Ocean: Till the End of Time, Valkyria Chronicles 2, and a few others. After playing for around 7 hours everything just begins to feel really repetetive. Whereas, when I play something like ME2, I always want to know what is going to happen next, though that may be because of my love for sci-fi, or because it wasn't really an rpg. Elder Scrolls Oblivion really kept me hooked for a while, and I still go back to it. Everything from the locations to the missions were just fun. Sadly, I can't say the same about Fallout 3, which did next to nothing for me, leaving me not wanting to finish it. I do think the ps3 should get some more western rpg's, which it seems to be doing. Sure, this may get some people annoyed, but how many jrpg's can you play, just like how many COD and COD knockoffs can you play?

Avatar image for funsohng
funsohng

29976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 funsohng
Member since 2005 • 29976 Posts
Are you comparing Valkyria Chronicles to COD? Besides, playing WRPGs on anything other than PC just doesn't appeal to me really. I always wonder how people play BioWare games on consoles
Avatar image for blueboxdoctor
blueboxdoctor

2549

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#11 blueboxdoctor
Member since 2010 • 2549 Posts

Are you comparing Valkyria Chronicles to COD? Besides, playing WRPGs on anything other than PC just doesn't appeal to me really. I always wonder how people play BioWare games on consolesfunsohng

ME2 isn't bad on consoles, but that's why I didn't get DA for the ps3, it just looks awkward to play with a controller. And no, I wasn't saying Valkyria Chronicles is like COD, it's just that the ps2 had a ton of JRPG's, which eventually just became overwhelming and tiring, sort of like COD. In terms of game quality, I'd probably rather go through a JRPG than COD.

Avatar image for good_sk8er7
good_sk8er7

4327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#12 good_sk8er7
Member since 2009 • 4327 Posts

RPGs are my favorite, I just can't get into FPS games anymore at all. And I don't like any TPS I can think of besides Uncharted.

I take the bad with the good and just be happy that RPGs are still being made. At least its not going out like side scrollers. I feel sorry for people who's favorite genre is side-scrollers.

Avatar image for scouttrooperbob
scouttrooperbob

2439

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#13 scouttrooperbob
Member since 2008 • 2439 Posts

Only RPG I really got into was oblivion, so i will be playing Skyrim!

Avatar image for blahsalt48
blahsalt48

208

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 blahsalt48
Member since 2010 • 208 Posts

I hate when people Bash FF13 for stupid reasons. They intentionally made the characters the way they did so that there would be character development. If they were charactors made of stone, that would be even worse in my opinion. Hope for example. He is very whiny at first, but when he slowly came to grips with his mothers death, he became a relate-able charactor with feelings and depth. How would you feel if your mother was killed in front of you and your world unraveled right in front of your eyes, at twelve? The story was the redeeming quality for me. I really think that the only way to truly beat the game is to beat it a second time. There were so many OOOOHHH moments in my second play through. If you are going to bash that game, do so about it`s linearity, save/shop system, leveling at the end of the game (it takes FOREVER). Don`t bash one of the most in depth and engaging stories in a recent RPG.

Avatar image for elbert_b_23
elbert_b_23

8247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#15 elbert_b_23
Member since 2003 • 8247 Posts
i have been playing rpgs before it became the cool thing back in days of wizardy, might and magic ,dragon warrior/quest i am not a big fan of western rpgs with that said there are a lot of good rpgs on the ps3 and a few that i have bought but i haven't played yet ff13 and hyperdemsion neptunia, i heard so many mixed reviews of ff13 but one of good friends that played every ff game says its there second favorite ff game so i am excited to get around to it