Where is the motion blur? If you look at 360 games then you will see that most have motion blur but there are like only 2 or 3 games on the ps3 that have motion blur. Why isn't there any motion blur in our games? I think it makes the games look much more realistic. I hope they will start adding this in future games.
:? Most games below 60fps use motion blur, they just usually do it more tastful instead of exageration. I bet you prefer you bump-mapping shiny, lighting with tons of blooms and screaming colours. :P
I have seen the f1 demo. I mean there are just a few with this feature. I don't really mind. I think the ps3 games look great. It's just that motion blur is really cool and makes it feal more real. Just look at lost planet.
There are a lot f PS3 games with motion blur. MGS4 Motorstorm F1 Army of Two Dark Sector Genji Colin Mcrae DIRT Here's a picture of MGS4 with motion blur
That pic isn't gameplay. Is it? The other video where you see snake's outfit turn didn't have motion blur. Did it? I havent noticed it.lazeaai
Name it and MGS got it, Motion blur, out of focus blur, depth blur... MGS4 got it all, but it's done very subtle and often when some silly goof yelllow res texture it's because there's a blur.
[QUOTE="lazeaai"]That pic isn't gameplay. Is it? The other video where you see snake's outfit turn didn't have motion blur. Did it? I havent noticed it.TE_Lawrence
Name it and MGS got it, Motion blur, out of focus blur, depth blur... MGS4 got it all, but it's done very subtle and often when some silly goof yelllow res texture it's because there's a blur.
lol... I think MGS 4 can really show off the ps3's proper quality.
[QUOTE="TE_Lawrence"]:? Most games below 60fps use motion blur, they just usually do it more tastful instead of exageration. I bet you prefer you bump-mapping shiny, lighting with tons of blooms and screaming colours. :P In Gears of War, it was clear the motion blur was used to hide framerate problems. In the PS3 version of Fight Night R3, it's my personal belief that motion blur was removed, judging from developer comments, to accentuate enhanced visual features on the character models, such as specific muscles, tendons, and veins rippling/popping that would be dampened by motion blur. It looks good on both consoles, but FNR3 almost acts as a tech demo, and does so respectably. I say, those games that need motion blur should need it. It was excessive in Gears of War. I've seen far better applications for it. Without a doubt, Killzone 2 should have lots of it.
MGS4 Motorstorm F1 Army of Two Dark Sector Genji Colin Mcrae DIRT
-sushiboyyyy
Well, the thing is that 3 of those 7 games are on both consoles, so if we're talking absense of motion blur in PS3 games, shouldn't we just use PS3 only titles?
Motion blur is crap anyways. It gets me sick because of how "fake" it is. When i turn my head around to look at something, my vision doesn't get blurry or anything. When i drive a car down a track going 110 mph, theres no blur. If you played perfect dark zero or gears, you'd see why motion blur sucks so bad.
[QUOTE="TE_Lawrence"]:? Most games below 60fps use motion blur, they just usually do it more tastful instead of exageration. I bet you prefer you bump-mapping shiny, lighting with tons of blooms and screaming colours. :P Are you suggesting the ps3 plays games at 60 fps? lol
Motion blur doesn't always indicate that the hardware needed some help...usually its added as an effect to add to the experience. ;)
Of course PS3 can do a lot of motion-blur. I remember in the beginning of the PS2 a lot games use motin-blur, because it was suddenly possible on a console (PS2).
Some developers are saying PS3 can do more framebuffer-effects than the competition. I am not a tech-guy, but motion-blur as a post-processing-effect is also a framebuffer-effects.
Developers are know playing with 'shallow-deph-of-field-blur'. Motion-blur is so last gen, lol.
Log in to comment