Motorstorm deserves a better score. SERIOUSLY

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for bizzy_bone16
bizzy_bone16

44

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 bizzy_bone16
Member since 2006 • 44 Posts
Common...what racing game out there has all these special affects when you crash in motorstorm...um what else...Maybe that you can see dust building up on your screen as you play. if you have more please list.  and give me your opinion. thanks  
Avatar image for GloverD
GloverD

1555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 GloverD
Member since 2004 • 1555 Posts
It didnt get a better score because the Sotry mode is bland and theres no offline multiplayer... See Gamespot shouldnt compare a Racing game sotry to something like Resistance becausr thats just dumb... No other racers have good stories but there 8.8+
Avatar image for SHOEGOO
SHOEGOO

2752

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 SHOEGOO
Member since 2004 • 2752 Posts
ive it does deserve  a better score as well.but the crashes in bunout serious still hold up to motorstorms .dont get me wrong the lighting and other effects kill alot of other games ,i just think ive seen just as good if not better crashes.ps i do love motorstorm.
Common...what racing game out there has all these special affects when you crash in motorstorm...um what else...Maybe that you can see dust building up on your screen as you play. if you have more please list. and give me your opinion. thanks bizzy_bone16
Avatar image for BioShockOwnz
BioShockOwnz

52901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#4 BioShockOwnz
Member since 2006 • 52901 Posts

I think the score was fair. It lacks modes, and tracks. It's a fun game, but not an outstanding game.

Avatar image for cofn42
cofn42

525

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 cofn42
Member since 2003 • 525 Posts

I would suggest you watch the video review at gametrailers.com. The scored pretty much the same as GS. It is justifiable the score it got I think.

There is very little offerings in the single player mode, no split screen (yet) Very few courses (8 if I recall) So I am not surprised it scored what it did.

If they had more tracks available, a better fleshed out single player mode it would have done a lot better than it did. Sure Motorstorm had the best graphics of any racer yet, but Great graphics alone are not enough to make a game a 9 - 10 title.

Avatar image for Giddieon
Giddieon

7522

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#6 Giddieon
Member since 2004 • 7522 Posts
The game got gyped on the score for sure... it was pretty lame to give it such a low score...
Avatar image for Radiozo
Radiozo

2413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Radiozo
Member since 2006 • 2413 Posts

I think the score was fair. It lacks modes, and tracks. It's a fun game, but not an outstanding game.

BioShockOwnz
Avatar image for mfarris2006
mfarris2006

335

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 mfarris2006
Member since 2005 • 335 Posts
Why do you care what a game gets for a review score. Do you like the game? If so then good. Don't let other people make a choice for you. If you like something then so be it. Shouldn't you be playing the game instead of griping about the score it got?
Avatar image for whiteshadow55
whiteshadow55

425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 whiteshadow55
Member since 2003 • 425 Posts
I agree i does deserver a much better score even though there is a lack a multi and modes its still leaps and bounds better than 9outta10 racers i mean they gave ridge racer (pos) a better score...............
Avatar image for joslop500
joslop500

1215

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#10 joslop500
Member since 2005 • 1215 Posts
i think the score it got was fair. yes the explosions and graphics of the game are awesome, and the driving is super fun, but the lack of modes really makes the game fell somewhat empty, single players and online multiplayer and thats it. and if you have no internet connection you only have one.
Avatar image for Coldplay07
Coldplay07

4513

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Coldplay07
Member since 2002 • 4513 Posts
Having cool special effects and dirt/dust build up on your screen doesn't mean a game should score higher or even score high at all. Don't pretend to know a single thing about game reviews in general when spewing vomit such as that out onto message boards. Graphics is one aspect of a game and a small portion of a review.
Avatar image for deactivated-600fd0017f1ba
deactivated-600fd0017f1ba

808

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#12 deactivated-600fd0017f1ba
Member since 2005 • 808 Posts
It was fun for me, maybe about the first 30 minutes, but after that I just got bored with it, it doesn't have the staying power of a GT, Forza, or Mario Kart.
Avatar image for Coldplay07
Coldplay07

4513

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Coldplay07
Member since 2002 • 4513 Posts
It didnt get a better score because the Sotry mode is bland and theres no offline multiplayer... See Gamespot shouldnt compare a Racing game sotry to something like Resistance becausr thats just dumb... No other racers have good stories but there 8.8+GloverD


Gamespot doesn't compare stories of racing games to stories of shooters. What in the world are you talking about? Gamespot compares a new racing game to other racing games on the console and the standard that has been set. The standard is different for every console and every genre.
Avatar image for Nightflash28
Nightflash28

2351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#14 Nightflash28
Member since 2004 • 2351 Posts
Having cool special effects and dirt/dust build up on your screen doesn't mean a game should score higher or even score high at all. Don't pretend to know a single thing about game reviews in general when spewing vomit such as that out onto message boards. Graphics is one aspect of a game and a small portion of a review.Coldplay07
I don't think he meant that the game should get a higher raiting because of the nice graphics, but beause it's more fun in his opinion than some reviews might let you think it is. I haven't played the game yet, but although I'm sure that the racing both on and offline is great fun and most probably deserves a high score it is just fair to deduct a few points for the lack of content.
Avatar image for treelog187
treelog187

2111

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 treelog187
Member since 2005 • 2111 Posts

Motorstorm deserves a better score. SERIOUSLY

Welcome to GS.

Seriously though im not saying they are biased, but it seems hard for a game to get a deserving score on this site. I think games should be compared to other games in their genre

LOZ got an 8.8 but in comparison to what other action adventure at the time? Nothing compares right now.

MGS3 got an 8.7. Everything about that game was amazing, and its still better than most games out today.

FFXII got a  9.0 which isn't bad at all. But anyone who plays RPGs regularly will tell you its a behemoth of a game.

So then ask what is it that they compared Motorstorm to, to come up with its score?

Then you get games on the "other console" like a short 3rd person shooter that is in no way innovative, or impressive that could have easily been done on an older system w/out the flashy graphics and its OMG!!!!! 9.6 GOTY OMG!!!

Im sorry but when I can beat a game on a weekend rental, that doesn't do anything new but technically pretty graphics(artistically puke graphics), and isn't even worth a replay. I don't think it deserves OMG!!!!! 9.6 GOTY OMG!!!

Just my honest opinion so dont mod me.

Avatar image for munu9
munu9

11109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#16 munu9
Member since 2004 • 11109 Posts

It should have gotten at least an 7 or 8 in value. I mean take for example GRAW, another game with a supposedly short single player and an impressive mulitplayer got a 9 in value!!! Medal of honor, which seriously had a 3 hour short single player and a somewhat good multiplayer got an 8 in value... And motorstorm should have gotten at least a 9 in tilt, it's a really fun game regardless of how short/shallow it kind of is...

Avatar image for Funkyhamster
Funkyhamster

17366

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 Funkyhamster
Member since 2005 • 17366 Posts
If Motorstorm had the depth and more stuff to do, it could have gotten a 9 or above in my opinion... hopefully the eventual sequel will have more depth and improve on what made Motorstorm so good in the first place (and then it'll probably get above a 9).
Avatar image for The_Great_Samu
The_Great_Samu

458

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 The_Great_Samu
Member since 2006 • 458 Posts
Nah, not really coz 7.9 out of 10 points is still good. Although don't all Games when compared to xbox1.5 games. If Gamespot wasn't corrupted PC, Playstation and Nintendo games would all get higher scores. And thus would the scores of xbox1.5 games decrease. We all know that 360 games aren't that good. You shouldn't compare the scores of xbox1.5 games to the scores of PC, Nintendo nor Playstation games, not unless u remove at least 1 point.
You Americans are just so stupid and patriotic. How was Oblivion able to get higher scores on xbox than on PC? No, I ain't no fanboy, although I prefer the Big-N and Sony over microsoft and Linux over windows. And I am not jealous or anything 'cause xbox1.5 is doing better than PS3 and Wii at the moment coz I know that both Wii and PS3 will beat xbox1.5. Well that's something even those few microsoft fans do know.
Avatar image for syedahmeds
syedahmeds

293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 syedahmeds
Member since 2005 • 293 Posts
gears of war is 8 hours long and wht modes does it have , yeah its fun so is MOTORSTORM 7.9 doesnt do justice to this game, anywayz i picked it up and lovin it.
Avatar image for HuhJustaBox
HuhJustaBox

1585

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#20 HuhJustaBox
Member since 2006 • 1585 Posts

Common...what racing game out there has all these special affects when you crash in motorstorm...um what else...Maybe that you can see dust building up on your screen as you play. if you have more please list.  and give me your opinion. thanks  bizzy_bone16

Here is the bottom line... What is the fun factor like?  To me the fun factor is cranked up to 11!  Sure the game lacks some content that other racers have, but which is more fun, Need for Speed, Ridge Racer, Project Gotham racing, or Motorstorm?

To me Motorstorm beats all!  I have had more laugh out loud moments and just pure hydranaline rushes of joy with this game over any other. 

Bottom line is...Motorstorm is one of the funnest, if not THE funnest racing game out there to date.  I have played mostly all of them, and this one paints a smile on your face every 5 seconds of every race.

GO MOTORSTORM!!!!  Don't give into the reviews, pick this game up and play it!  It is a must have for any PS3 owner.

Avatar image for Bgrngod
Bgrngod

5766

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#21 Bgrngod
Member since 2002 • 5766 Posts
Common...what racing game out there has all these special affects when you crash in motorstorm...um what else...Maybe that you can see dust building up on your screen as you play. if you have more please list.  and give me your opinion. thanks  bizzy_bone16
Well why don't you ask them to re-review it after the patch... Uh I mean "downloadable content" is released in a month or so.
Avatar image for SimpsonFan0505
SimpsonFan0505

1533

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#22 SimpsonFan0505
Member since 2006 • 1533 Posts
I totally Agree with you. I own the game and love it. I think it's better then Burnout even.
Avatar image for jdt532
jdt532

4236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#23 jdt532
Member since 2003 • 4236 Posts
It was fun for me, maybe about the first 30 minutes, but after that I just got bored with it, it doesn't have the staying power of a GT, Forza, or Mario Kart.acekicka


That's exactly why GS gave it a 7.9, this isn't bias or some conspiracy. The game is very shallow with no offline multi-player, not a very deep career mode, etc. The game is fun with the spectacular crashes and pretty graphics and online play but eventually the game gets old and starts collecting dust on a shelf. I think 7.9 is very fair and I also think IGN over rated this game but they over rate allot of games.
Avatar image for turgore
turgore

7859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#24 turgore
Member since 2006 • 7859 Posts
The score was fair. I played it at a friends .
Avatar image for BeNOwNz
BeNOwNz

2942

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 BeNOwNz
Member since 2006 • 2942 Posts
It deserved a 8.0 at least
Avatar image for metalhead1966
metalhead1966

33

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 metalhead1966
Member since 2007 • 33 Posts
AGREED!!!! How could RidgeRacer score higher? Motorstorm online needs refinement and more participation, however. Otherwise, its the only of my 8 ps3 games that gets any play other than Resistance online ranked games...
Avatar image for treelog187
treelog187

2111

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 treelog187
Member since 2005 • 2111 Posts
HA! Ridge Racer scored higher! *pukes* Thats horrible!
Avatar image for chubear700
chubear700

1945

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#28 chubear700
Member since 2003 • 1945 Posts

Now this is where the beauty of HOME comes in. We can now have PS3 user reviews. Reviews done by solely PS3 gamers world wide and should give a better view of how good/bad a game is for people who just prefer PlayStation games. :D

Avatar image for metalhead1966
metalhead1966

33

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 metalhead1966
Member since 2007 • 33 Posts

Why do you care what a game gets for a review score. Do you like the game? If so then good. Don't let other people make a choice for you. If you like something then so be it. Shouldn't you be playing the game instead of griping about the score it got?mfarris2006

This is the most insightment and mature comment I have seen. It is all about what is fun for the individual! There are so many ridiculuous comments by zit-faced immature fanboys on many forums that a comment like this is overdue and refreshing. It points out what drives my methodology in assessing games... what do I like? I utilize web reviews like gamespot as a general guide, not the gospel. NO ONE, not even a professional, can tell me what "pushes my buttons".

I play on a high-end 50" HDTV with excellent surround sound setup. Wonder how many fanboys even know what hdmi is or have set up their own wireless network. Our own personal opinions are the only thing that REALLY matters, no matter how founded in fact they may or may not be. Others' opinions are of little concern when I pick up the controller.

Avatar image for troy_mw
troy_mw

139

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 troy_mw
Member since 2007 • 139 Posts
Well I really think we need to do 2 things.
1) Stop worrying about game review scores. 
2.) go online and play and enjoy the games.

Avatar image for ajthelegend
ajthelegend

418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#31 ajthelegend
Member since 2003 • 418 Posts
Exactly, play the games and make your own educated decisions on if a game deserves a 1 or 10. Its just like a review I read from the New York Times on the movie 300, the reviewer wrote and I quote "about as violent as ''Apocalypto'' and twice as stupid." Now if I had trusted this guys opinion I would have missed what I thought was a great movie. Gamespot is entitled however how biased, to their own opinions but it becomes clearer each day their agendas to hate on the PS3....
Avatar image for GamersNightmare
GamersNightmare

621

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 GamersNightmare
Member since 2006 • 621 Posts
I've lost all hope on Gamespots ratings and the monkeys they got that rate them. They give solid all-round games low scores and I find they give crappy games or at least crappier games better scores all because they like the game. They don't judge a game for the game but more for there taste of game. That's why I could care less what they or anybuddy else thinks.
Avatar image for Heavenly_King
Heavenly_King

492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#33 Heavenly_King
Member since 2003 • 492 Posts
Why do you care what a game gets for a review score. Do you like the game? If so then good. Don't let other people make a choice for you. If you like something then so be it. Shouldn't you be playing the game instead of griping about the score it got?mfarris2006


You have to think in long term. Right now it doesn't matter; if you like it, you buy it, you play and enjoy it; that´s it. The thing here is that people is trying to redeem the game from the CRAPPY REVIEW FROM GAMESPOT (AS IT ALWAYS DOES TO PS3 GAMES). There are always people thats takes heed from reviews in order to buy a game. If those people see this review they are not gonna buy the game, leading that the game wont sell. And if the game doesn't sell as expected, SONY will not develop a sequel, making this; that all of us who bought, enjoyed and are enjoying the game; become very sad :cry: .

So to make this a not possible scenario people is trying via this forum to explain to the PS3 community why the games deserves higher than 7.9 (in my humble opinion it deserves a 9.2 or at least 9.0 like it´s review on UK ign).

And if you think in LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONG term. If the PS3 doesn't has any AAA title, it wont sell well; if the system doesn't sell well no games will come for it and the $600 investment will be for nothing. People is trying to protect their money. The most probable scenario is that you own a PS3 and a X360, so you really don't matter these kind of things. :roll:



LIVE IN YOUR WORLD, CREATE NEW ONES IN OURS
Avatar image for CFFAguy
CFFAguy

943

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 CFFAguy
Member since 2005 • 943 Posts
Common...what racing game out there has all these special affects when you crash in motorstorm...um what else...Maybe that you can see dust building up on your screen as you play. if you have more please list. and give me your opinion. thanks bizzy_bone16


ARE YOU CRAZY!!!You know how much M$ had to pay G$ so they would give ps3 games bad review?M$ had to give their hard earned money and you want that to go to wast ?You're crazy man,just crazy.
Avatar image for X_CAPCOM_X
X_CAPCOM_X

9625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#35 X_CAPCOM_X
Member since 2004 • 9625 Posts
Maybe an 8.2
Avatar image for DaRockWilder
DaRockWilder

5451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#36 DaRockWilder
Member since 2002 • 5451 Posts

Now this is where the beauty of HOME comes in. We can now have PS3 user reviews. Reviews done by solely PS3 gamers world wide and should give a better view of how good/bad a game is for people who just prefer PlayStation games. :D

chubear700
then again could turn in obviously biased reviews just because it's on the PS3...we've seen how many people cant say anything negative about a ps3 game without being called a troll on these ps3 forums... i would rate motorstorm around the 8 mark, not too high either..it's something like a Burnout on the mud...with really good graphics but lack of tracks
Avatar image for onemic
onemic

5616

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 onemic
Member since 2003 • 5616 Posts
[QUOTE="chubear700"]

Now this is where the beauty of HOME comes in. We can now have PS3 user reviews. Reviews done by solely PS3 gamers world wide and should give a better view of how good/bad a game is for people who just prefer PlayStation games. :D

DaRockWilder
then again could turn in obviously biased reviews just because it's on the PS3...we've seen how many people cant say anything negative about a ps3 game without being called a troll on these ps3 forums... i would rate motorstorm around the 8 mark, not too high either..it's something like a Burnout on the mud...with really good graphics but lack of tracks

Yeah I wouldn't give it a 9 either. Although I still don't exactly agree with the review score, the rating GS gives it really doesn't matter that much to me. And yes there have been some crazy fanboys labeling every little concern as trolling, but for the most part its more or less died down considerably, mainly because the amount of real trolls coming in and making topics or posts has also died down considerably as well.