My Killzone 2 doubts

I've always had my doubts of the Killzone 2 demo at E3 and whether it was possible on the PS3, but now that I'm hearing about another demo at E3 I just can't help but being led to believe that it definitely isn't possible.
Every time I think about it I'm reminded of the upcoming DirectX 10 game Crysis - A DIRECTX 10 GAME! - and none of us can deny that the CGI demonstration of what Guerilla Games expect to achieve out of the PS3 with Killzone 2 is much graphically better looking than Crysis. Oh and did I forget to mention that Crysis is a DX10 game!

So how on mother nature's almighty Earth is Killzone 2 going to look as good as that CGI demo?

Just a point I thought I'd share with everyone before you all get ahead of yourselves from excitement.

I've always had my doubts of the Killzone 2 demo at E3 and whether it was possible on the PS3, but now that I'm hearing about another demo at E3 I just can't help but being led to believe that it definitely isn't possible.
Every time I think about it I'm reminded of the upcoming DirectX 10 game Crysis - A DIRECTX 10 GAME! - and none of us can deny that the CGI demonstration of what Guerilla Games expect to achieve out of the PS3 with Killzone 2 is much graphically better looking than Crysis. Oh and did I forget to mention that Crysis is a DX10 game!

So how on mother nature's almighty Earth is Killzone 2 going to look as good as that CGI demo?

Just a point I thought I'd share with everyone before you all get ahead of yourselves from excitement.

Robotrix

just so you know, OpenGL runs laps around DirectX. LAPS! DirectX has just been the standard set by Suckosoft

and since the PS3 runs on OpenGL, then it doesnt matter how crysis looks, because it can look better

[QUOTE="Robotrix"]

I've always had my doubts of the Killzone 2 demo at E3 and whether it was possible on the PS3, but now that I'm hearing about another demo at E3 I just can't help but being led to believe that it definitely isn't possible.
Every time I think about it I'm reminded of the upcoming DirectX 10 game Crysis - A DIRECTX 10 GAME! - and none of us can deny that the CGI demonstration of what Guerilla Games expect to achieve out of the PS3 with Killzone 2 is much graphically better looking than Crysis. Oh and did I forget to mention that Crysis is a DX10 game!

So how on mother nature's almighty Earth is Killzone 2 going to look as good as that CGI demo?

Just a point I thought I'd share with everyone before you all get ahead of yourselves from excitement.

vip3r666

hmm i dont know what video you talking about, but i wouldnt say that the killzone e3 05 vid looked better than crisis. the vid looked good, but i think it was the animations and fluid movement that really got people, along with the good look, but it didnt look like crisis. its not supposed to , crisis looks like very real jungle stuff, KZ is a wore torn environment, not really the same.foxbait95

I prefer OpenGL. I've seen some screens done with DX10 that have looked better than OpenGL2.1, but I haven't seen anything to say OpenGL couldn't go beyond what I saw.

[QUOTE="teebeenz"]OpenGL is faster because its a clean pathway, in directx is bogged down by MS's crap. Still however those who have seen KZ2 running have said it was far from impressive.Robotrix

What were you payed by CrapSoft to come here and post this? Go and do a comparison on a GL complient vid card vs. dx, and you'll see that OpenGL is capable of faster fps. Infact, go look up some of other people's comparisons as well.

Go on ahead and continue to supply MS with more money, just like all of the other hopeless losers out there. I'll stick to my stuff, knowing that yours is garbage.

[QUOTE="Robotrix"][QUOTE="teebeenz"]OpenGL is faster because its a clean pathway, in directx is bogged down by MS's crap. Still however those who have seen KZ2 running have said it was far from impressive.ugz602

Go on ahead and continue to supply MS with more money, just like all of the other hopeless idiots out there. I'll stick to my stuff, knowing that yours is garbage.

It's already been stated that 360 and PS3 can both run Crysis graphics. Yet I've heard the PC has more buttons than the standard controller and there will just be alot of buttonsswade

[QUOTE="swade"]It's already been stated that 360 and PS3 can both run Crysis graphics. Yet I've heard the PC has more buttons than the standard controller and there will just be alot of buttonsRobotrix

what are u talking about.....

I've always had my doubts of the Killzone 2 demo at E3 and whether it was possible on the PS3, but now that I'm hearing about another demo at E3 I just can't help but being led to believe that it definitely isn't possible.
Every time I think about it I'm reminded of the upcoming DirectX 10 game Crysis - A DIRECTX 10 GAME! - and none of us can deny that the CGI demonstration of what Guerilla Games expect to achieve out of the PS3 with Killzone 2 is much graphically better looking than Crysis. Oh and did I forget to mention that Crysis is a DX10 game!

So how on mother nature's almighty Earth is Killzone 2 going to look as good as that CGI demo?

Just a point I thought I'd share with everyone before you all get ahead of yourselves from excitement.

Robotrix

ill keep this short a sweat OPENGL IS WAY better than directX and i saw ur post saying "
You certainly sound very informed..." man why say that when ur clearly the one now informed this isnt intended as a flame but geez man Have you seen COD4? Looks better than crysis in many aspects

[QUOTE="Robotrix"][QUOTE="swade"]It's already been stated that 360 and PS3 can both run Crysis graphics. Yet I've heard the PC has more buttons than the standard controller and there will just be alot of buttonsEcho13791

what are u talking about.....

thats what im tryin to figure out

[QUOTE="teebeenz"]OpenGL is faster because its a clean pathway, in directx is bogged down by MS's crap. Still however those who have seen KZ2 running have said it was far from impressive.Robotrix

Actually, he is right. Killzone 2 was shown at an early conference and the press and industry were talking about how it was no where near the CGI trailer that was originally shown. Unfortunately, he either didn't mention or failed to notice that during this showing of KZ2 the developers specifically said that they were NOT showing off the graphics but were using it to demonstrate AI or some such. they were using an old graphical build.

[QUOTE="Echo13791"]

[QUOTE="Robotrix"][QUOTE="swade"]It's already been stated that 360 and PS3 can both run Crysis graphics. Yet I've heard the PC has more buttons than the standard controller and there will just be alot of buttons9thwardice

what are u talking about.....

thats what im tryin to figure out

[QUOTE="vip3r666"][QUOTE="Robotrix"]

I've always had my doubts of the Killzone 2 demo at E3 and whether it was possible on the PS3, but now that I'm hearing about another demo at E3 I just can't help but being led to believe that it definitely isn't possible.
Every time I think about it I'm reminded of the upcoming DirectX 10 game Crysis - A DIRECTX 10 GAME! - and none of us can deny that the CGI demonstration of what Guerilla Games expect to achieve out of the PS3 with Killzone 2 is much graphically better looking than Crysis. Oh and did I forget to mention that Crysis is a DX10 game!

So how on mother nature's almighty Earth is Killzone 2 going to look as good as that CGI demo?

Just a point I thought I'd share with everyone before you all get ahead of yourselves from excitement.

Robotrix

thing about DX is that its a library, bunch of pre-made objects, used for PCs mostly. openGL is programmed, sso you MAKE the library. thats how it was once explained to me...by my guitar instructor whoes now a website designer lol. but openGL is better than DX, more flexibilty, though i know not how to use and dont intend to ever know, i just wanna play games, not make them.