Nba 2k11 player ratings

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for realistic44
realistic44

8458

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 realistic44
Member since 2008 • 8458 Posts

http://thereal2kinsider.blogspot.com/2010/09/nba-2k11-player-ratings-final-w-jordan.html

:| @ Darren Collison having an 80 player rating. what you guys think about the player ratings though?

Avatar image for sh1vers
sh1vers

230

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 sh1vers
Member since 2007 • 230 Posts

ummmmm absolutely atrocious ratings...

and 2k10 sucked - i will never buy another 2k game ever

Avatar image for realistic44
realistic44

8458

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 realistic44
Member since 2008 • 8458 Posts

ummmmm absolutely atrocious ratings...

and 2k10 sucked - i will never buy another 2k game ever

sh1vers

Yeah, i liked 2k's graphics and gameplay as much as the other person, but the ratings in this game is very inaccurate :lol:

Avatar image for xGho5tx
xGho5tx

768

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 xGho5tx
Member since 2008 • 768 Posts

I agree it's very inaccurate. John Wall a 81 while Tony Parker is 77...wtF :?

Avatar image for andyboiii
andyboiii

13628

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#5 andyboiii
Member since 2006 • 13628 Posts
I agree it's very inaccurate. John Wall a 81 while Tony Parker is 77...wtF :?xGho5tx
Tony Parker is slowing down, look at his numbers dude. He averaged 16 points last year and 5 assists last year and he's past his prime. John Wall is predicted to score around 18 ppg his first year and he's quicker, has better athleticism and is a theft on defense. The rating is correct.. This isn't 2004 Tony Parker anymore

http://thereal2kinsider.blogspot.com/2010/09/nba-2k11-player-ratings-final-w-jordan.html

:| @ Darren Collison having an 80 player rating. what you guys think about the player ratings though?

realistic44
I see nothing wrong with Darren Collison having an 80 player rating. Did you see the numbers he put up while CP3 went out with an injury? he's going to continue to be a beast this year There's a few ratings I see that should be higher but nothing that's going to stop me from buying this game
Avatar image for Lostboy1224
Lostboy1224

3425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#6 Lostboy1224
Member since 2007 • 3425 Posts
There are some that could go up a few and some that should be down a few numbers, but overall there isn't any major mistakes. I mean its not like they have Shaq as a 94, or Steve Nash as a 97 or anything major like that. Besides, in 2K as long as your player is rated in the 80's you usually can do pretty well with him. There are even a couple players in the 70's that can do some major damage on different occasions. You can always tweak their ratings if you disagree anyways so why get all upset?
Avatar image for winner-ps3
winner-ps3

2364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 winner-ps3
Member since 2007 • 2364 Posts
u guys c JORDAN! hes a 99 almost every year on the bulls : ) except only 85-86 bulls lol
Avatar image for machod_19
machod_19

523

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#8 machod_19
Member since 2007 • 523 Posts

I agree it's very inaccurate. John Wall a 81 while Tony Parker is 77...wtF :?

xGho5tx

yea andyboiii has a point, he was injured most of the year and played behind whats his face when he came back. John Wall played great basketball last season and was the #1 pick, while Tony Parker did what again?

But why is Kobe the same rating as LeBron and DWade? Kobe is old and slow, maybe like 5 years ago he was a 97 but now hes not that good

Avatar image for sh1vers
sh1vers

230

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 sh1vers
Member since 2007 • 230 Posts

and carmelo is a 93 - which obviously isnt bad - but hes a better shooter than lebron!

Avatar image for bluezclue
bluezclue

1865

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 bluezclue
Member since 2005 • 1865 Posts

[QUOTE="xGho5tx"]

Kobe is old and slow, maybe like 5 years ago he was a 97 but now hes not that good

machod_19

Seriously? I mean I know people hate on him but... Really? old and slow and now he's not that good? lol....

Avatar image for xGho5tx
xGho5tx

768

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 xGho5tx
Member since 2008 • 768 Posts

[QUOTE="xGho5tx"]I agree it's very inaccurate. John Wall a 81 while Tony Parker is 77...wtF :?andyboiii
Tony Parker is slowing down, look at his numbers dude. He averaged 16 points last year and 5 assists last year and he's past his prime. John Wall is predicted to score around 18 ppg his first year and he's quicker, has better athleticism and is a theft on defense. The rating is correct.. This isn't 2004 Tony Parker anymore

True, I understand where you're comin from. I guess I never thought about it like that.

Avatar image for 40_GLOCC
40_GLOCC

560

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 40_GLOCC
Member since 2006 • 560 Posts
This Tony Parker talk is making me laugh, Can i remind you he came off an allstar season before being injured.....so of course he is slowing down its an injury. We will see what happens this season!! and remember a top pick doesn't guarantee anything!!