New Generation = New Disc Format?

  • 77 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Telekill
Telekill

12061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#1 Telekill
Member since 2003 • 12061 Posts
Hey there all! I'm not sure if everyone has noticed this, but I have... Every generation of Playstation console has a new disc drive format as the main drive. Look and be amazed! Playstation (1995 - 2005) - CD [700MB] Drive capabilities: Play PS1 games and audio CD's. Playstation 2 (2000 - Current) - DVD [4.7GB - 8 GB] Drive capabilities: Play PS1 and PS2 games. Play audio CD's and DVD movies. Playstation 3 (2006 - Current) - Blu-ray [25GB - 50GB] Drive capabilities: Play PS1, PS2, and PS3 games. Play audio CD's, DVD movies, and Blu-ray movies. Basically plays everything but other system discs and HD-DVD movies. So, with this in mind, can we conclude that Playstation 4 will have a new disc format? I forget where, but there is a disc in the works that uses an ultra-violet laser and with such a laser, a disc could hold upwards of 1000GB's or more. I cant even imagine using up 1 Terabyte of information on anything, let alone having a Terabyte of information on a single disc! My computer has an 80GB harddrive! So the disc in the works would be able to hold more than 10x the amount that my home computer can! What would happan if I mis-place the disc!? :o What are your thoughts, worries or encouragements?
Avatar image for GARRYTH
GARRYTH

6870

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 GARRYTH
Member since 2005 • 6870 Posts
i think next gen the blu-ray will be cheaper and there will be a 200g blu-ray dics. we don't need a new format yet just a bigger blu-ray. the games will be 70 dollors because by then the graphics will be so expesive to create. it will be like funding for a pixar movie.
Avatar image for Baller91
Baller91

437

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Baller91
Member since 2007 • 437 Posts
yeah Maybe there wont even be a PS4 It will just be an Updated PS3 that would be Great
Avatar image for cero10
cero10

887

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4 cero10
Member since 2005 • 887 Posts

Hey there all! I'm not sure if everyone has noticed this, but I have... Every generation of Playstation console has a new disc drive format as the main drive. Look and be amazed! Playstation (1995 - 2005) - CD [700MB] Drive capabilities: Play PS1 games and audio CD's. Playstation 2 (2000 - Current) - DVD [4.7GB - 8 GB] Drive capabilities: Play PS1 and PS2 games. Play audio CD's and DVD movies. Playstation 3 (2006 - Current) - Blu-ray [25GB - 50GB] Drive capabilities: Play PS1, PS2, and PS3 games. Play audio CD's, DVD movies, and Blu-ray movies. Basically plays everything but other system discs and HD-DVD movies. So, with this in mind, can we conclude that Playstation 4 will have a new disc format? I forget where, but there is a disc in the works that uses an ultra-violet laser and with such a laser, a disc could hold upwards of 1000GB's or more. I cant even imagine using up 1 Terabyte of information on anything, let alone having a Terabyte of information on a single disc! My computer has an 80GB harddrive! So the disc in the works would be able to hold more than 10x the amount that my home computer can! What would happan if I mis-place the disc!? :o What are your thoughts, worries or encouragements? Telekill

Thats what i also had in mind. All these years Sony had introduced new disk formats into their systems and they all have been successful. Hope blu-ray follows the same directions as CD, DVD. The problem was that during that time the CD and DVD didnt have any competition, they were the only disc formats (the only ones i can think of ) but for blu-ray they have to compete against hd-dvds. But in my opinion i think that ps3 and blu-ray is doing pretty well, actually blu-ray is doing great, its just matter of time before we think about the same way on the ps3 and anyway there still is the european launch in march :D

Avatar image for eclipsed4utoo
eclipsed4utoo

10578

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 eclipsed4utoo
Member since 2006 • 10578 Posts
there will be another Playstation. but it won't be named PS4. the number 4, in japanese, means death. Sony will not release a console named "Playstation Death".
Avatar image for -DirtySanchez-
-DirtySanchez-

32760

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#6 -DirtySanchez-
Member since 2003 • 32760 Posts
i think next gen the blu-ray will be cheaper and there will be a 200g blu-ray dics. we don't need a new format yet just a bigger blu-ray. the games will be 70 dollors because by then the graphics will be so expesive to create. it will be like funding for a pixar movie.GARRYTH
of course we dont need a new format but that isnt gonna stop people from forcin it on us like always
Avatar image for jwat4
jwat4

1934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 jwat4
Member since 2003 • 1934 Posts

Well I think it depends on how this generation ends...If Blu-Ray does take off and become the new format of choice...then DVD will become the new VHS and Blu-Ray will be the new DVD and so on...(I think that makes sense)

So if Blu-Ray sells that will be the format for video games for the next I dont know 4-5 years would be my guess...atleast through PS4 or whatever it may be called...

This time around is very different we have two formats competing....I think we will see larger disc capacities as opposed to an entirely new format....maybe a faster disc reader...multi 8 core CPUs...and a lot more video memory and physical memory before we see a new disc format

Avatar image for mjarantilla
mjarantilla

15721

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 mjarantilla
Member since 2002 • 15721 Posts
Please, God, no more disc formats! The only reason CDs were included on the PS1 and DVDs were included on the PS2 was because they were already established formats with several years of proven success. BluRay is the first "experimental" disc format to be included in a home console. The PS4, whatever they decide to call it, will not have a new disc format, especially since Sony plans to milk BluRay for at least a decade or so.
Avatar image for DreamworkS12
DreamworkS12

768

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 DreamworkS12
Member since 2003 • 768 Posts
I'm predicting that Sony will team with Panasonic and their ultraviolet laser disc and call it Ultra Bluray for PS4!
Avatar image for chembro84
chembro84

829

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 chembro84
Member since 2004 • 829 Posts
PS4 will most likely have no discs, discs are gonna be dead in 5 years that's what irritates me about people getting all wrapped up in a next-gen disc war.  how long did it take for the iPod to murder the CD industry?  2-3 years?  With Fiber Optic and fast cable/DSL in most people's houses in the next 5 years or so, you will not buy discs, look at the 360, Apple's iTV, TiVo's set-top box, NetFlix is getting into, Amazon, they are delivering HD content directly to the TV/Hard Drive.

We are seeing the industry in it's infant stages, but mark my words, HD content will be distrbuted over the internet, not discs.  It's not hard to think ahead and see that with video games.  You'll get the system, it'll ship with a 1-2TB hard disc (essentially unlimited game storage), and you'll download the games directly to the system (either rent or buy).  It'll take 20 minutes to download it, and bam you have the game on your system.
Avatar image for BenderUnit22
BenderUnit22

9597

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#11 BenderUnit22
Member since 2006 • 9597 Posts
there will be another Playstation. but it won't be named PS4. the number 4, in japanese, means death. Sony will not release a console named "Playstation Death".eclipsed4utoo
Maybe, but then again, they could call it PlayStation Four and force the English pronunciation (since PlayStation is English already) As for the next format, many people have said that BD vs HD-DVD might be the last format war and digital distribution might take over. Almost impossible to see how the internet will develope, it's such a fast changing platform.
Avatar image for zero9167
zero9167

14554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 zero9167
Member since 2005 • 14554 Posts
well if sony used blu ray for the PS4 then it would be cheaper
Avatar image for mjarantilla
mjarantilla

15721

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 mjarantilla
Member since 2002 • 15721 Posts
PS4 will most likely have no discs, discs are gonna be dead in 5 years that's what irritates me about people getting all wrapped up in a next-gen disc war. how long did it take for the iPod to murder the CD industry? 2-3 years? With Fiber Optic and fast cable/DSL in most people's houses in the next 5 years or so, you will not buy discs, look at the 360, Apple's iTV, TiVo's set-top box, NetFlix is getting into, Amazon, they are delivering HD content directly to the TV/Hard Drive.

We are seeing the industry in it's infant stages, but mark my words, HD content will be distrbuted over the internet, not discs. It's not hard to think ahead and see that with video games. You'll get the system, it'll ship with a 1-2TB hard disc (essentially unlimited game storage), and you'll download the games directly to the system (either rent or buy). It'll take 20 minutes to download it, and bam you have the game on your system.
chembro84
The iPod hasn't killed the CD industry. CDs still make up the vast majority of total music sales. However, iTunes is the biggest music retailer. But they're also the only notable digital music retailer; they're outnumbered by the music CD retailers.
Avatar image for chembro84
chembro84

829

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 chembro84
Member since 2004 • 829 Posts
[QUOTE="chembro84"]PS4 will most likely have no discs, discs are gonna be dead in 5 years that's what irritates me about people getting all wrapped up in a next-gen disc war. how long did it take for the iPod to murder the CD industry? 2-3 years? With Fiber Optic and fast cable/DSL in most people's houses in the next 5 years or so, you will not buy discs, look at the 360, Apple's iTV, TiVo's set-top box, NetFlix is getting into, Amazon, they are delivering HD content directly to the TV/Hard Drive.

We are seeing the industry in it's infant stages, but mark my words, HD content will be distrbuted over the internet, not discs. It's not hard to think ahead and see that with video games. You'll get the system, it'll ship with a 1-2TB hard disc (essentially unlimited game storage), and you'll download the games directly to the system (either rent or buy). It'll take 20 minutes to download it, and bam you have the game on your system.
mjarantilla
The iPod hasn't killed the CD industry. CDs still make up the vast majority of total music sales. However, iTunes is the biggest music retailer. But they're also the only notable digital music retailer; they're outnumbered by the music CD retailers.

Look around you, are there any CD stores anymore? There used to be tons of them, now there are a couple small ones in the mall, and Target/WalMart, Tower Records is out of business, Warehouse, out of business. Yeah people still buy CDs but it will go away real soon. basically the sales have decreased enough to not support any nation-wide record stores any longer. My point about the iPod is that it shows that digital distribution is viable in the US. Look at this article http://music.guardian.co.uk/news/story/0,,1940513,00.html they are planning a 50% decline in 3 years, if that isn't a slaughter I don't know what is.
Avatar image for jwat4
jwat4

1934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 jwat4
Member since 2003 • 1934 Posts
[QUOTE="mjarantilla"][QUOTE="chembro84"]PS4 will most likely have no discs, discs are gonna be dead in 5 years that's what irritates me about people getting all wrapped up in a next-gen disc war. how long did it take for the iPod to murder the CD industry? 2-3 years? With Fiber Optic and fast cable/DSL in most people's houses in the next 5 years or so, you will not buy discs, look at the 360, Apple's iTV, TiVo's set-top box, NetFlix is getting into, Amazon, they are delivering HD content directly to the TV/Hard Drive.

We are seeing the industry in it's infant stages, but mark my words, HD content will be distrbuted over the internet, not discs. It's not hard to think ahead and see that with video games. You'll get the system, it'll ship with a 1-2TB hard disc (essentially unlimited game storage), and you'll download the games directly to the system (either rent or buy). It'll take 20 minutes to download it, and bam you have the game on your system.
chembro84
The iPod hasn't killed the CD industry. CDs still make up the vast majority of total music sales. However, iTunes is the biggest music retailer. But they're also the only notable digital music retailer; they're outnumbered by the music CD retailers.

Look around you, are there any CD stores anymore? There used to be tons of them, now there are a couple small ones in the mall, and Target/WalMart, Tower Records is out of business, Warehouse, out of business. Yeah people still buy CDs but it will go away real soon. basically the sales have decreased enough to not support any nation-wide record stores any longer. My point about the iPod is that it shows that digital distribution is viable in the US. Look at this article http://music.guardian.co.uk/news/story/0,,1940513,00.html they are planning a 50% decline in 3 years, if that isn't a slaughter I don't know what is.

I think its going to be different with internet TV and so on...The interenet is accessed through such a large variety of service providers that it will be a failrly long time before we see disc-less consoles...iTunes can be installed on almost any computer and despite connection speed a consumer can access the information fairly easily because it is not very large... With games however...how far can compression methods take them? I mean look at c urrent games...they use what 7-15GB depending on how they compress the information? Imagine trying to compress a game into a size that is small enough that anyone with a reasonable connection speed could download it... Even something like 4GB would take a while...especially if they were using older connection methods instead of DSL or FIber optics... I think we will have to wait for better compression methods and cheaper high speed internet before we stop going to Gamestop or other retailers to pick up a game....
Avatar image for eclipsed4utoo
eclipsed4utoo

10578

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 eclipsed4utoo
Member since 2006 • 10578 Posts
[QUOTE="mjarantilla"]Please, God, no more disc formats! The only reason CDs were included on the PS1 and DVDs were included on the PS2 was because they were already established formats with several years of proven success. BluRay is the first "experimental" disc format to be included in a home console. The PS4, whatever they decide to call it, will not have a new disc format, especially since Sony plans to milk BluRay for at least a decade or so.

DVD was not an established format in 2000. DVD sales did not top $1 billion in sales for the entire year of 2000. Compare that to now, for the year of 2005, the sales were over $16 billion. in DVD hardware sales, for the year 2000, it was under 10 million hardware units sold. for the year 2005, it was 36.7 million hardware units sold. for software shipments, for year 2000, there was only 311 million software units shipped. in 2005, there were 5.5 billion software units shipped. as you can see, back in 2000, DVD was not an established format yet. It was still just getting started.
Avatar image for chembro84
chembro84

829

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 chembro84
Member since 2004 • 829 Posts
[QUOTE="eclipsed4utoo"][QUOTE="mjarantilla"]Please, God, no more disc formats! The only reason CDs were included on the PS1 and DVDs were included on the PS2 was because they were already established formats with several years of proven success. BluRay is the first "experimental" disc format to be included in a home console. The PS4, whatever they decide to call it, will not have a new disc format, especially since Sony plans to milk BluRay for at least a decade or so.

DVD was not an established format in 2000. DVD sales did not top $1 billion in sales for the entire year of 2000. Compare that to now, for the year of 2005, the sales were over $16 billion. in DVD hardware sales, for the year 2000, it was under 10 million hardware units sold. for the year 2005, it was 36.7 million hardware units sold. for software shipments, for year 2000, there was only 311 million software units shipped. in 2005, there were 5.5 billion software units shipped. as you can see, back in 2000, DVD was not an established format yet. It was still just getting started.

Who exactly was DVD competing with? when DVD came out there was absolutely no doubt in anyones mind that it would become the standard format within a couple of years and ESPECIALLY in 2000 when the PS2 came out, we all knew DVD was going to kill VHS.
Avatar image for GARRYTH
GARRYTH

6870

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 GARRYTH
Member since 2005 • 6870 Posts
[QUOTE="mjarantilla"][QUOTE="chembro84"]PS4 will most likely have no discs, discs are gonna be dead in 5 years that's what irritates me about people getting all wrapped up in a next-gen disc war. how long did it take for the iPod to murder the CD industry? 2-3 years? With Fiber Optic and fast cable/DSL in most people's houses in the next 5 years or so, you will not buy discs, look at the 360, Apple's iTV, TiVo's set-top box, NetFlix is getting into, Amazon, they are delivering HD content directly to the TV/Hard Drive.

We are seeing the industry in it's infant stages, but mark my words, HD content will be distrbuted over the internet, not discs. It's not hard to think ahead and see that with video games. You'll get the system, it'll ship with a 1-2TB hard disc (essentially unlimited game storage), and you'll download the games directly to the system (either rent or buy). It'll take 20 minutes to download it, and bam you have the game on your system.
chembro84
The iPod hasn't killed the CD industry. CDs still make up the vast majority of total music sales. However, iTunes is the biggest music retailer. But they're also the only notable digital music retailer; they're outnumbered by the music CD retailers.

Look around you, are there any CD stores anymore? There used to be tons of them, now there are a couple small ones in the mall, and Target/WalMart, Tower Records is out of business, Warehouse, out of business. Yeah people still buy CDs but it will go away real soon. basically the sales have decreased enough to not support any nation-wide record stores any longer. My point about the iPod is that it shows that digital distribution is viable in the US. Look at this article http://music.guardian.co.uk/news/story/0,,1940513,00.html they are planning a 50% decline in 3 years, if that isn't a slaughter I don't know what is.

they better not i will not buy a stupid ipod. i ahve a cd player at work, car, home. i not going to have a ipod were ever i go.
Avatar image for chembro84
chembro84

829

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 chembro84
Member since 2004 • 829 Posts
[QUOTE="chembro84"][QUOTE="mjarantilla"][QUOTE="chembro84"]PS4 will most likely have no discs, discs are gonna be dead in 5 years that's what irritates me about people getting all wrapped up in a next-gen disc war. how long did it take for the iPod to murder the CD industry? 2-3 years? With Fiber Optic and fast cable/DSL in most people's houses in the next 5 years or so, you will not buy discs, look at the 360, Apple's iTV, TiVo's set-top box, NetFlix is getting into, Amazon, they are delivering HD content directly to the TV/Hard Drive.

We are seeing the industry in it's infant stages, but mark my words, HD content will be distrbuted over the internet, not discs. It's not hard to think ahead and see that with video games. You'll get the system, it'll ship with a 1-2TB hard disc (essentially unlimited game storage), and you'll download the games directly to the system (either rent or buy). It'll take 20 minutes to download it, and bam you have the game on your system.
GARRYTH
The iPod hasn't killed the CD industry. CDs still make up the vast majority of total music sales. However, iTunes is the biggest music retailer. But they're also the only notable digital music retailer; they're outnumbered by the music CD retailers.

Look around you, are there any CD stores anymore? There used to be tons of them, now there are a couple small ones in the mall, and Target/WalMart, Tower Records is out of business, Warehouse, out of business. Yeah people still buy CDs but it will go away real soon. basically the sales have decreased enough to not support any nation-wide record stores any longer. My point about the iPod is that it shows that digital distribution is viable in the US. Look at this article http://music.guardian.co.uk/news/story/0,,1940513,00.html they are planning a 50% decline in 3 years, if that isn't a slaughter I don't know what is.

they better not i will not buy a stupid ipod. i ahve a cd player at work, car, home. i not going to have a ipod were ever i go.

Yeah they should make a portable MP3 player, where like you could keep every single one of your songs in this small little device that has like 20 hours of battery life. Naw I'd rather carry a bunch of dics which can be scratched with me, that makes more sense.
Avatar image for pb1285n
pb1285n

229

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 pb1285n
Member since 2006 • 229 Posts

Look around you, are there any CD stores anymore? There used to be tons of them, now there are a couple small ones in the mall, and Target/WalMart, Tower Records is out of business, Warehouse, out of business. Yeah people still buy CDs but it will go away real soon. basically the sales have decreased enough to not support any nation-wide record stores any longer. My point about the iPod is that it shows that digital distribution is viable in the US. Look at this article http://music.guardian.co.uk/news/story/0,,1940513,00.html they are planning a 50% decline in 3 years, if that isn't a slaughter I don't know what is.chembro84

You've answered your own question. Target and Walmart are the cause of stores like Tower Record going out of business, not iTunes. Tower Record was expensive and had little to offer by the way of selection. Plus why would you want to make 5 or 6 stops while out shopping when it can all be done in the comfort of one store? Speciality stores are a thing of the passed. I don't think digital distribution will ever be the norm (if it does happen it won't be for a while) for at least 2 reasons.

1. It requires people to keep up with the technology and for most people this is not possible.

2. When people purchase a product they want something tangible to give it a feeling of worth. Data is not tangible.

I think MP3 player companies are playing us all for fools anyway not providing some sort of expandable memory slot. If they did this music companies could change over to a memory stick type format and not only could the consumer transfer music directly from the stick to the mp3 player they wouldn't even need a computer to do it. It would be so damn convienent I am amazed it hasn't be done already.

Avatar image for chembro84
chembro84

829

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 chembro84
Member since 2004 • 829 Posts

[QUOTE="chembro84"] Look around you, are there any CD stores anymore? There used to be tons of them, now there are a couple small ones in the mall, and Target/WalMart, Tower Records is out of business, Warehouse, out of business. Yeah people still buy CDs but it will go away real soon. basically the sales have decreased enough to not support any nation-wide record stores any longer. My point about the iPod is that it shows that digital distribution is viable in the US. Look at this article http://music.guardian.co.uk/news/story/0,,1940513,00.html they are planning a 50% decline in 3 years, if that isn't a slaughter I don't know what is.pb1285n

You've answered your own question. Target and Walmart are the cause of stores like Tower Record going out of business, not iTunes. Tower Record was expensive and had little to offer by the way of selection. Plus why would you want to make 5 or 6 stops while out shopping when it can all be done in the comfort of one store? Speciality stores are a thing of the passed. I don't think digital distribution will ever be the norm (if it does happen it won't be for a while) for at least 2 reasons.

1. It requires people to keep up with the technology and for most people this is not possible.

2. When people purchase a product they want something tangible to give it a feeling of worth. Data is not tangible.

I think MP3 player companies are playing us all for fools anyway not providing some sort of expandable memory slot. If they did this music companies could change over to a memory stick type format and not only could the consumer transfer music directly from the stick to the mp3 player they wouldn't even need a computer to do it. It would be so damn convienent I am amazed it hasn't be done already.

I'm a futurist, people tell me I'm wrong all the time, the only thing I'm wrong about usually is that it happens faster than I said it would. Digitial distribution will overtake physcial distribution there is absolutely no question about that, the only question is the time frame.
Avatar image for jwat4
jwat4

1934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 jwat4
Member since 2003 • 1934 Posts
[QUOTE="pb1285n"]

[QUOTE="chembro84"] Look around you, are there any CD stores anymore? There used to be tons of them, now there are a couple small ones in the mall, and Target/WalMart, Tower Records is out of business, Warehouse, out of business. Yeah people still buy CDs but it will go away real soon. basically the sales have decreased enough to not support any nation-wide record stores any longer. My point about the iPod is that it shows that digital distribution is viable in the US. Look at this article http://music.guardian.co.uk/news/story/0,,1940513,00.html they are planning a 50% decline in 3 years, if that isn't a slaughter I don't know what is.chembro84

You've answered your own question. Target and Walmart are the cause of stores like Tower Record going out of business, not iTunes. Tower Record was expensive and had little to offer by the way of selection. Plus why would you want to make 5 or 6 stops while out shopping when it can all be done in the comfort of one store? Speciality stores are a thing of the passed. I don't think digital distribution will ever be the norm (if it does happen it won't be for a while) for at least 2 reasons.

1. It requires people to keep up with the technology and for most people this is not possible.

2. When people purchase a product they want something tangible to give it a feeling of worth. Data is not tangible.

I think MP3 player companies are playing us all for fools anyway not providing some sort of expandable memory slot. If they did this music companies could change over to a memory stick type format and not only could the consumer transfer music directly from the stick to the mp3 player they wouldn't even need a computer to do it. It would be so damn convienent I am amazed it hasn't be done already.

I'm a futurist, people tell me I'm wrong all the time, the only thing I'm wrong about usually is that it happens faster than I said it would. Digitial distribution will overtake physcial distribution there is absolutely no question about that, the only question is the time frame.

A "futurist"...? I think the issue would be the loss of jobs...think about how many people are employed at a store like Best Buy or Circuit City...if you eliminate 3/4 of what they sell you eliminate 3/4 of the available jobs....Retail stores selling products creates jobs...I think thats the biggest problem with your digital distribution theory... Digital distribution could never take over physical distribution to the point at which there were zero physicals copies sold...the reason being...we are not communist nor socialist...everyone does not have the internet....everyone does not have a computer...everyone does not have high speed internet..There is no way to force that upon people either...there are still individuals buying VHS tapes because they dont want a DVD player... Until computers and high speed internet become incredibly, cheap such that everyone can afford one, we will have actual discs...
Avatar image for pb1285n
pb1285n

229

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 pb1285n
Member since 2006 • 229 Posts
[QUOTE="pb1285n"]

[QUOTE="chembro84"] Look around you, are there any CD stores anymore? There used to be tons of them, now there are a couple small ones in the mall, and Target/WalMart, Tower Records is out of business, Warehouse, out of business. Yeah people still buy CDs but it will go away real soon. basically the sales have decreased enough to not support any nation-wide record stores any longer. My point about the iPod is that it shows that digital distribution is viable in the US. Look at this article http://music.guardian.co.uk/news/story/0,,1940513,00.html they are planning a 50% decline in 3 years, if that isn't a slaughter I don't know what is.chembro84

You've answered your own question. Target and Walmart are the cause of stores like Tower Record going out of business, not iTunes. Tower Record was expensive and had little to offer by the way of selection. Plus why would you want to make 5 or 6 stops while out shopping when it can all be done in the comfort of one store? Speciality stores are a thing of the passed. I don't think digital distribution will ever be the norm (if it does happen it won't be for a while) for at least 2 reasons.

1. It requires people to keep up with the technology and for most people this is not possible.

2. When people purchase a product they want something tangible to give it a feeling of worth. Data is not tangible.

I think MP3 player companies are playing us all for fools anyway not providing some sort of expandable memory slot. If they did this music companies could change over to a memory stick type format and not only could the consumer transfer music directly from the stick to the mp3 player they wouldn't even need a computer to do it. It would be so damn convienent I am amazed it hasn't be done already.

I'm a futurist, people tell me I'm wrong all the time, the only thing I'm wrong about usually is that it happens faster than I said it would. Digitial distribution will overtake physcial distribution there is absolutely no question about that, the only question is the time frame.

Wow someone is a little full of themself.

I disagree with you. Keeping up with evolving technology is too expensive for digital distribution to be the norm. Yes digital distribution will grow but it will not overtake the physical distribution of media.

Avatar image for NextGenNow
NextGenNow

2622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 NextGenNow
Member since 2007 • 2622 Posts
[QUOTE="eclipsed4utoo"][QUOTE="mjarantilla"]Please, God, no more disc formats! The only reason CDs were included on the PS1 and DVDs were included on the PS2 was because they were already established formats with several years of proven success. BluRay is the first "experimental" disc format to be included in a home console. The PS4, whatever they decide to call it, will not have a new disc format, especially since Sony plans to milk BluRay for at least a decade or so.chembro84
DVD was not an established format in 2000. DVD sales did not top $1 billion in sales for the entire year of 2000. Compare that to now, for the year of 2005, the sales were over $16 billion. in DVD hardware sales, for the year 2000, it was under 10 million hardware units sold. for the year 2005, it was 36.7 million hardware units sold. for software shipments, for year 2000, there was only 311 million software units shipped. in 2005, there were 5.5 billion software units shipped. as you can see, back in 2000, DVD was not an established format yet. It was still just getting started.

Who exactly was DVD competing with? when DVD came out there was absolutely no doubt in anyones mind that it would become the standard format within a couple of years and ESPECIALLY in 2000 when the PS2 came out, we all knew DVD was going to kill VHS.

WRONG. I can't even begin to list off all the nay sayers of DVD...it would make this console war look like childs play. Thats partly the reason I laugh at people attacking Blu-ray. Eventually Blu-ray will win because of the untapped space abilities ranginging into the hundreds of gigs!
Avatar image for chembro84
chembro84

829

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 chembro84
Member since 2004 • 829 Posts
[QUOTE="chembro84"][QUOTE="pb1285n"]

[QUOTE="chembro84"] Look around you, are there any CD stores anymore? There used to be tons of them, now there are a couple small ones in the mall, and Target/WalMart, Tower Records is out of business, Warehouse, out of business. Yeah people still buy CDs but it will go away real soon. basically the sales have decreased enough to not support any nation-wide record stores any longer. My point about the iPod is that it shows that digital distribution is viable in the US. Look at this article http://music.guardian.co.uk/news/story/0,,1940513,00.html they are planning a 50% decline in 3 years, if that isn't a slaughter I don't know what is.jwat4

You've answered your own question. Target and Walmart are the cause of stores like Tower Record going out of business, not iTunes. Tower Record was expensive and had little to offer by the way of selection. Plus why would you want to make 5 or 6 stops while out shopping when it can all be done in the comfort of one store? Speciality stores are a thing of the passed. I don't think digital distribution will ever be the norm (if it does happen it won't be for a while) for at least 2 reasons.

1. It requires people to keep up with the technology and for most people this is not possible.

2. When people purchase a product they want something tangible to give it a feeling of worth. Data is not tangible.

I think MP3 player companies are playing us all for fools anyway not providing some sort of expandable memory slot. If they did this music companies could change over to a memory stick type format and not only could the consumer transfer music directly from the stick to the mp3 player they wouldn't even need a computer to do it. It would be so damn convienent I am amazed it hasn't be done already.

I'm a futurist, people tell me I'm wrong all the time, the only thing I'm wrong about usually is that it happens faster than I said it would. Digitial distribution will overtake physcial distribution there is absolutely no question about that, the only question is the time frame.

A "futurist"...? I think the issue would be the loss of jobs...think about how many people are employed at a store like Best Buy or Circuit City...if you eliminate 3/4 of what they sell you eliminate 3/4 of the available jobs....Retail stores selling products creates jobs...I think thats the biggest problem with your digital distribution theory... Digital distribution could never take over physical distribution to the point at which there were zero physicals copies sold...the reason being...we are not communist nor socialist...everyone does not have the internet....everyone does not have a computer...everyone does not have high speed internet..There is no way to force that upon people either...there are still individuals buying VHS tapes because they dont want a DVD player... Until computers and high speed internet become incredibly, cheap such that everyone can afford one, we will have actual discs...

The loss of jobs has never stopped progress before,
[QUOTE="chembro84"][QUOTE="pb1285n"]

[QUOTE="chembro84"] Look around you, are there any CD stores anymore? There used to be tons of them, now there are a couple small ones in the mall, and Target/WalMart, Tower Records is out of business, Warehouse, out of business. Yeah people still buy CDs but it will go away real soon. basically the sales have decreased enough to not support any nation-wide record stores any longer. My point about the iPod is that it shows that digital distribution is viable in the US. Look at this article http://music.guardian.co.uk/news/story/0,,1940513,00.html they are planning a 50% decline in 3 years, if that isn't a slaughter I don't know what is.pb1285n

You've answered your own question. Target and Walmart are the cause of stores like Tower Record going out of business, not iTunes. Tower Record was expensive and had little to offer by the way of selection. Plus why would you want to make 5 or 6 stops while out shopping when it can all be done in the comfort of one store? Speciality stores are a thing of the passed. I don't think digital distribution will ever be the norm (if it does happen it won't be for a while) for at least 2 reasons.

1. It requires people to keep up with the technology and for most people this is not possible.

2. When people purchase a product they want something tangible to give it a feeling of worth. Data is not tangible.

I think MP3 player companies are playing us all for fools anyway not providing some sort of expandable memory slot. If they did this music companies could change over to a memory stick type format and not only could the consumer transfer music directly from the stick to the mp3 player they wouldn't even need a computer to do it. It would be so damn convienent I am amazed it hasn't be done already.

I'm a futurist, people tell me I'm wrong all the time, the only thing I'm wrong about usually is that it happens faster than I said it would. Digitial distribution will overtake physcial distribution there is absolutely no question about that, the only question is the time frame.

Wow someone is a little full of themself.

I disagree with you. Keeping up with evolving technology is too expensive for digital distribution to be the norm. Yes digital distribution will grow but it will not overtake the physical distribution of media.

You should go work for the RIAA and MPAA, you have exactly the mindset they are looking for. You have got to be kidding me if you think that physical distribution will be here forever.
Avatar image for mjarantilla
mjarantilla

15721

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27 mjarantilla
Member since 2002 • 15721 Posts
[QUOTE="eclipsed4utoo"][QUOTE="mjarantilla"]Please, God, no more disc formats! The only reason CDs were included on the PS1 and DVDs were included on the PS2 was because they were already established formats with several years of proven success. BluRay is the first "experimental" disc format to be included in a home console. The PS4, whatever they decide to call it, will not have a new disc format, especially since Sony plans to milk BluRay for at least a decade or so.

DVD was not an established format in 2000. DVD sales did not top $1 billion in sales for the entire year of 2000. Compare that to now, for the year of 2005, the sales were over $16 billion. in DVD hardware sales, for the year 2000, it was under 10 million hardware units sold. for the year 2005, it was 36.7 million hardware units sold. for software shipments, for year 2000, there was only 311 million software units shipped. in 2005, there were 5.5 billion software units shipped. as you can see, back in 2000, DVD was not an established format yet. It was still just getting started.

By 2000, there were already 46 million DVD players in homes worldwide. To me, that qualifies as "established." True, yearly sales did not break 10 million yet in 2000, but 8.5 million is pretty close. By 2000, it WAS an established format with over 10,000 available DVD titles in the U.S. alone, and the obvious successor to both VHS and CD, formats which had been around for twenty years and thus had MUCH higher installed bases. You CANNOT compare the state of DVD in 2000 to the state of BluRay now. That's my only point.
Avatar image for chembro84
chembro84

829

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 chembro84
Member since 2004 • 829 Posts
[QUOTE="chembro84"][QUOTE="eclipsed4utoo"][QUOTE="mjarantilla"]Please, God, no more disc formats! The only reason CDs were included on the PS1 and DVDs were included on the PS2 was because they were already established formats with several years of proven success. BluRay is the first "experimental" disc format to be included in a home console. The PS4, whatever they decide to call it, will not have a new disc format, especially since Sony plans to milk BluRay for at least a decade or so.NextGenNow
DVD was not an established format in 2000. DVD sales did not top $1 billion in sales for the entire year of 2000. Compare that to now, for the year of 2005, the sales were over $16 billion. in DVD hardware sales, for the year 2000, it was under 10 million hardware units sold. for the year 2005, it was 36.7 million hardware units sold. for software shipments, for year 2000, there was only 311 million software units shipped. in 2005, there were 5.5 billion software units shipped. as you can see, back in 2000, DVD was not an established format yet. It was still just getting started.

Who exactly was DVD competing with? when DVD came out there was absolutely no doubt in anyones mind that it would become the standard format within a couple of years and ESPECIALLY in 2000 when the PS2 came out, we all knew DVD was going to kill VHS.

WRONG. I can't even begin to list off all the nay sayers of DVD...it would make this console war look like childs play. Thats partly the reason I laugh at people attacking Blu-ray. Eventually Blu-ray will win because of the untapped space abilities ranginging into the hundreds of gigs!

Tell me one competing format to DVD that had a real chance when the PS2 came out in 2000.
Avatar image for chembro84
chembro84

829

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 chembro84
Member since 2004 • 829 Posts
[QUOTE="chembro84"][QUOTE="pb1285n"]

[QUOTE="chembro84"] Look around you, are there any CD stores anymore? There used to be tons of them, now there are a couple small ones in the mall, and Target/WalMart, Tower Records is out of business, Warehouse, out of business. Yeah people still buy CDs but it will go away real soon. basically the sales have decreased enough to not support any nation-wide record stores any longer. My point about the iPod is that it shows that digital distribution is viable in the US. Look at this article http://music.guardian.co.uk/news/story/0,,1940513,00.html they are planning a 50% decline in 3 years, if that isn't a slaughter I don't know what is.jwat4

You've answered your own question. Target and Walmart are the cause of stores like Tower Record going out of business, not iTunes. Tower Record was expensive and had little to offer by the way of selection. Plus why would you want to make 5 or 6 stops while out shopping when it can all be done in the comfort of one store? Speciality stores are a thing of the passed. I don't think digital distribution will ever be the norm (if it does happen it won't be for a while) for at least 2 reasons.

1. It requires people to keep up with the technology and for most people this is not possible.

2. When people purchase a product they want something tangible to give it a feeling of worth. Data is not tangible.

I think MP3 player companies are playing us all for fools anyway not providing some sort of expandable memory slot. If they did this music companies could change over to a memory stick type format and not only could the consumer transfer music directly from the stick to the mp3 player they wouldn't even need a computer to do it. It would be so damn convienent I am amazed it hasn't be done already.

I'm a futurist, people tell me I'm wrong all the time, the only thing I'm wrong about usually is that it happens faster than I said it would. Digitial distribution will overtake physcial distribution there is absolutely no question about that, the only question is the time frame.

A "futurist"...? I think the issue would be the loss of jobs...think about how many people are employed at a store like Best Buy or Circuit City...if you eliminate 3/4 of what they sell you eliminate 3/4 of the available jobs....Retail stores selling products creates jobs...I think thats the biggest problem with your digital distribution theory... Digital distribution could never take over physical distribution to the point at which there were zero physicals copies sold...the reason being...we are not communist nor socialist...everyone does not have the internet....everyone does not have a computer...everyone does not have high speed internet..There is no way to force that upon people either...there are still individuals buying VHS tapes because they dont want a DVD player... Until computers and high speed internet become incredibly, cheap such that everyone can afford one, we will have actual discs...

Go talk to the auto industry, steel industry, record player making industry, textile industry, and ask them if progress stops because people may loose their jobs. People who buy movies, games and music and DON'T have an internet connection is such a small market that that isn't even an issue.
Avatar image for mjarantilla
mjarantilla

15721

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#30 mjarantilla
Member since 2002 • 15721 Posts
[QUOTE="chembro84"][QUOTE="eclipsed4utoo"][QUOTE="mjarantilla"]Please, God, no more disc formats! The only reason CDs were included on the PS1 and DVDs were included on the PS2 was because they were already established formats with several years of proven success. BluRay is the first "experimental" disc format to be included in a home console. The PS4, whatever they decide to call it, will not have a new disc format, especially since Sony plans to milk BluRay for at least a decade or so.NextGenNow
DVD was not an established format in 2000. DVD sales did not top $1 billion in sales for the entire year of 2000. Compare that to now, for the year of 2005, the sales were over $16 billion. in DVD hardware sales, for the year 2000, it was under 10 million hardware units sold. for the year 2005, it was 36.7 million hardware units sold. for software shipments, for year 2000, there was only 311 million software units shipped. in 2005, there were 5.5 billion software units shipped. as you can see, back in 2000, DVD was not an established format yet. It was still just getting started.

Who exactly was DVD competing with? when DVD came out there was absolutely no doubt in anyones mind that it would become the standard format within a couple of years and ESPECIALLY in 2000 when the PS2 came out, we all knew DVD was going to kill VHS.

WRONG. I can't even begin to list off all the nay sayers of DVD...it would make this console war look like childs play. Thats partly the reason I laugh at people attacking Blu-ray. Eventually Blu-ray will win because of the untapped space abilities ranginging into the hundreds of gigs!

Therein was the problem: many naysayers, but none of them willing to unite against DVD. Hence, there was no war, and no question that DVD would succeed VHS.
Avatar image for jwat4
jwat4

1934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 jwat4
Member since 2003 • 1934 Posts

The loss of jobs has never stopped progress before chembro84

But where has the loss of jobs ever impeeded progress?...Usually technology helps create jobs...

 Take Best Buy for example...an entire chain of stores practically goes out of business...Circuit City...gone...EBGames gone...Gamestop gone... And the economy with it...

Avatar image for chembro84
chembro84

829

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 chembro84
Member since 2004 • 829 Posts
[QUOTE="NextGenNow"][QUOTE="chembro84"][QUOTE="eclipsed4utoo"][QUOTE="mjarantilla"]Please, God, no more disc formats! The only reason CDs were included on the PS1 and DVDs were included on the PS2 was because they were already established formats with several years of proven success. BluRay is the first "experimental" disc format to be included in a home console. The PS4, whatever they decide to call it, will not have a new disc format, especially since Sony plans to milk BluRay for at least a decade or so.mjarantilla
DVD was not an established format in 2000. DVD sales did not top $1 billion in sales for the entire year of 2000. Compare that to now, for the year of 2005, the sales were over $16 billion. in DVD hardware sales, for the year 2000, it was under 10 million hardware units sold. for the year 2005, it was 36.7 million hardware units sold. for software shipments, for year 2000, there was only 311 million software units shipped. in 2005, there were 5.5 billion software units shipped. as you can see, back in 2000, DVD was not an established format yet. It was still just getting started.

Who exactly was DVD competing with? when DVD came out there was absolutely no doubt in anyones mind that it would become the standard format within a couple of years and ESPECIALLY in 2000 when the PS2 came out, we all knew DVD was going to kill VHS.

WRONG. I can't even begin to list off all the nay sayers of DVD...it would make this console war look like childs play. Thats partly the reason I laugh at people attacking Blu-ray. Eventually Blu-ray will win because of the untapped space abilities ranginging into the hundreds of gigs!

Therein was the problem: many naysayers, but none of them willing to unite against DVD. Hence, there was no war, and no question that DVD would succeed VHS.

Exactly, the only people who though VHS had a chance was your Grandparents, which seems to be the mindset of many of the people on this board.
Avatar image for chembro84
chembro84

829

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 chembro84
Member since 2004 • 829 Posts
[QUOTE="chembro84"] The loss of jobs has never stopped progress before jwat4
But where has the loss of jobs ever impeeded progress?... Take Best Buy for example...an entire chain of stores practically goes out of business...Circuit City...gone...EBGames gone...Gamestop gone... And the economy with it...

Best Buy and Circuit City will evolve and sell the devices which rely on the digital distribtuion model. EBGames and Gamestop will go the way of Tower Records and Wharehouse Music. The economy will survive, trust me.
Avatar image for jwat4
jwat4

1934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 jwat4
Member since 2003 • 1934 Posts
[QUOTE="jwat4"][QUOTE="chembro84"] The loss of jobs has never stopped progress before chembro84
But where has the loss of jobs ever impeeded progress?... Take Best Buy for example...an entire chain of stores practically goes out of business...Circuit City...gone...EBGames gone...Gamestop gone... And the economy with it...

Best Buy and Circuit City will evolve and sell the devices which rely on the digital distribtuion model. EBGames and Gamestop will go the way of Tower Records and Wharehouse Music. The economy will survive, trust me.

Okay Allen Greenspan... Tell me how the loss of atleast 2-3 hundred thousand jobs would improve or help maintain the stability of the economy?
Avatar image for chembro84
chembro84

829

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 chembro84
Member since 2004 • 829 Posts
[QUOTE="chembro84"][QUOTE="jwat4"][QUOTE="chembro84"] The loss of jobs has never stopped progress before jwat4
But where has the loss of jobs ever impeeded progress?... Take Best Buy for example...an entire chain of stores practically goes out of business...Circuit City...gone...EBGames gone...Gamestop gone... And the economy with it...

Best Buy and Circuit City will evolve and sell the devices which rely on the digital distribtuion model. EBGames and Gamestop will go the way of Tower Records and Wharehouse Music. The economy will survive, trust me.

Okay Allen Greenspan... Tell me how the loss of atleast 2-3 hundred thousand jobs would improve or help maintain the stability of the economy?

It's not going to happen overnight, Best Buy may have to lay off the people who worked in the "media" section of their store, but they will also have to expand their hardware selling sections, the economy will evolve, just as it is now from the transition from a manufacturing based economy to an information/service based economy. Do you know how many more programmers there are today vs 40 years ago? How abnout millions, how many more IT professionals? Millions. How many people work in the steel industry now? Not too many. They work in other places now.
Avatar image for eclipsed4utoo
eclipsed4utoo

10578

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 eclipsed4utoo
Member since 2006 • 10578 Posts
[QUOTE="mjarantilla"][QUOTE="eclipsed4utoo"][QUOTE="mjarantilla"]Please, God, no more disc formats! The only reason CDs were included on the PS1 and DVDs were included on the PS2 was because they were already established formats with several years of proven success. BluRay is the first "experimental" disc format to be included in a home console. The PS4, whatever they decide to call it, will not have a new disc format, especially since Sony plans to milk BluRay for at least a decade or so.

DVD was not an established format in 2000. DVD sales did not top $1 billion in sales for the entire year of 2000. Compare that to now, for the year of 2005, the sales were over $16 billion. in DVD hardware sales, for the year 2000, it was under 10 million hardware units sold. for the year 2005, it was 36.7 million hardware units sold. for software shipments, for year 2000, there was only 311 million software units shipped. in 2005, there were 5.5 billion software units shipped. as you can see, back in 2000, DVD was not an established format yet. It was still just getting started.

By 2000, there were already 46 million DVD players in homes worldwide. To me, that qualifies as "established." True, yearly sales did not break 10 million yet in 2000, but 8.5 million is pretty close. By 2000, it WAS an established format with over 10,000 available DVD titles in the U.S. alone, and the obvious successor to both VHS and CD, formats which had been around for twenty years and thus had MUCH higher installed bases. You CANNOT compare the state of DVD in 2000 to the state of BluRay now. That's my only point.

DVD had been out for 3 years by the time the PS2 was launched. Why would anybody want to compare the sales of DVD after 3 years to blu-ray after 8 months?
Avatar image for chembro84
chembro84

829

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 chembro84
Member since 2004 • 829 Posts
[QUOTE="eclipsed4utoo"][QUOTE="mjarantilla"][QUOTE="eclipsed4utoo"][QUOTE="mjarantilla"]Please, God, no more disc formats! The only reason CDs were included on the PS1 and DVDs were included on the PS2 was because they were already established formats with several years of proven success. BluRay is the first "experimental" disc format to be included in a home console. The PS4, whatever they decide to call it, will not have a new disc format, especially since Sony plans to milk BluRay for at least a decade or so.

DVD was not an established format in 2000. DVD sales did not top $1 billion in sales for the entire year of 2000. Compare that to now, for the year of 2005, the sales were over $16 billion. in DVD hardware sales, for the year 2000, it was under 10 million hardware units sold. for the year 2005, it was 36.7 million hardware units sold. for software shipments, for year 2000, there was only 311 million software units shipped. in 2005, there were 5.5 billion software units shipped. as you can see, back in 2000, DVD was not an established format yet. It was still just getting started.

By 2000, there were already 46 million DVD players in homes worldwide. To me, that qualifies as "established." True, yearly sales did not break 10 million yet in 2000, but 8.5 million is pretty close. By 2000, it WAS an established format with over 10,000 available DVD titles in the U.S. alone, and the obvious successor to both VHS and CD, formats which had been around for twenty years and thus had MUCH higher installed bases. You CANNOT compare the state of DVD in 2000 to the state of BluRay now. That's my only point.

DVD had been out for 3 years by the time the PS2 was launched. Why would anybody want to compare the sales of DVD after 3 years to blu-ray after 8 months?

because they obviously don't get it, I have never seen so many backwards people. For the rest of out lives, we'll all be driving Gas burning cars to Best Buy to buy the hottest new CD album! Our internet connections will only be for surfing the internet and checking email. Cable TV will remain exactly as it does today. Electricity will continue to come from Coal because the coal mining industry provides too many jobs to switch to solar/wind/nuclear.
Avatar image for jwat4
jwat4

1934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 jwat4
Member since 2003 • 1934 Posts
[QUOTE="jwat4"][QUOTE="chembro84"][QUOTE="jwat4"][QUOTE="chembro84"] The loss of jobs has never stopped progress before chembro84
But where has the loss of jobs ever impeeded progress?... Take Best Buy for example...an entire chain of stores practically goes out of business...Circuit City...gone...EBGames gone...Gamestop gone... And the economy with it...

Best Buy and Circuit City will evolve and sell the devices which rely on the digital distribtuion model. EBGames and Gamestop will go the way of Tower Records and Wharehouse Music. The economy will survive, trust me.

Okay Allen Greenspan... Tell me how the loss of atleast 2-3 hundred thousand jobs would improve or help maintain the stability of the economy?

It's not going to happen overnight, Best Buy may have to lay off the people who worked in the "media" section of their store, but they will also have to expand their hardware selling sections, the economy will evolve, just as it is now from the transition from a manufacturing based economy to an information/service based economy. Do you know how many more programmers there are today vs 40 years ago? How abnout millions, how many more IT professionals? Millions. How many people work in the steel industry now? Not too many. They work in other places now.

And the distribuiters that ship products to retail stores...the truckers that haul the items...many of those individuals will not be able to work in an IT environment...and really how many IT professionals do we need...the reason there are so many is because its the easiest 2 year degree to get... And the steel industry? There are atleast 1 million individuals still working in the steel industry...atleast...the United Steelworkers Union is one of the strongest in the country.... If what you assume is going to occur does infact occur I dont think it will be in my lifetime...I can see advances towards it but I cannot see it overtaking physical distribution completely...
Avatar image for jwat4
jwat4

1934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 jwat4
Member since 2003 • 1934 Posts
[QUOTE="chembro84"][QUOTE="eclipsed4utoo"][QUOTE="mjarantilla"][QUOTE="eclipsed4utoo"][QUOTE="mjarantilla"]Please, God, no more disc formats! The only reason CDs were included on the PS1 and DVDs were included on the PS2 was because they were already established formats with several years of proven success. BluRay is the first "experimental" disc format to be included in a home console. The PS4, whatever they decide to call it, will not have a new disc format, especially since Sony plans to milk BluRay for at least a decade or so.

DVD was not an established format in 2000. DVD sales did not top $1 billion in sales for the entire year of 2000. Compare that to now, for the year of 2005, the sales were over $16 billion. in DVD hardware sales, for the year 2000, it was under 10 million hardware units sold. for the year 2005, it was 36.7 million hardware units sold. for software shipments, for year 2000, there was only 311 million software units shipped. in 2005, there were 5.5 billion software units shipped. as you can see, back in 2000, DVD was not an established format yet. It was still just getting started.

By 2000, there were already 46 million DVD players in homes worldwide. To me, that qualifies as "established." True, yearly sales did not break 10 million yet in 2000, but 8.5 million is pretty close. By 2000, it WAS an established format with over 10,000 available DVD titles in the U.S. alone, and the obvious successor to both VHS and CD, formats which had been around for twenty years and thus had MUCH higher installed bases. You CANNOT compare the state of DVD in 2000 to the state of BluRay now. That's my only point.

DVD had been out for 3 years by the time the PS2 was launched. Why would anybody want to compare the sales of DVD after 3 years to blu-ray after 8 months?

because they obviously don't get it, I have never seen so many backwards people. For the rest of out lives, we'll all be driving Gas burning cars to Best Buy to buy the hottest new CD album! Our internet connections will only be for surfing the internet and checking email. Cable TV will remain exactly as it does today. Electricity will continue to come from Coal because the coal mining industry provides too many jobs to switch to solar/wind/nuclear.

Well heres the problem with you theory...it just doesnt allow for the creation of jobs...it takes them away, technology has to be widely accepted for it to become a reasonable replacement of current technology...if digital distribution cannot provide as many if not more jobs than physical distribution it cannot take over as the new way of doing things... Both could certainly coexist...but I dont think digital distribution will be the only way...atleast not in my lifetime
Avatar image for chembro84
chembro84

829

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 chembro84
Member since 2004 • 829 Posts
[QUOTE="jwat4"][QUOTE="chembro84"][QUOTE="eclipsed4utoo"][QUOTE="mjarantilla"][QUOTE="eclipsed4utoo"][QUOTE="mjarantilla"]Please, God, no more disc formats! The only reason CDs were included on the PS1 and DVDs were included on the PS2 was because they were already established formats with several years of proven success. BluRay is the first "experimental" disc format to be included in a home console. The PS4, whatever they decide to call it, will not have a new disc format, especially since Sony plans to milk BluRay for at least a decade or so.

DVD was not an established format in 2000. DVD sales did not top $1 billion in sales for the entire year of 2000. Compare that to now, for the year of 2005, the sales were over $16 billion. in DVD hardware sales, for the year 2000, it was under 10 million hardware units sold. for the year 2005, it was 36.7 million hardware units sold. for software shipments, for year 2000, there was only 311 million software units shipped. in 2005, there were 5.5 billion software units shipped. as you can see, back in 2000, DVD was not an established format yet. It was still just getting started.

By 2000, there were already 46 million DVD players in homes worldwide. To me, that qualifies as "established." True, yearly sales did not break 10 million yet in 2000, but 8.5 million is pretty close. By 2000, it WAS an established format with over 10,000 available DVD titles in the U.S. alone, and the obvious successor to both VHS and CD, formats which had been around for twenty years and thus had MUCH higher installed bases. You CANNOT compare the state of DVD in 2000 to the state of BluRay now. That's my only point.

DVD had been out for 3 years by the time the PS2 was launched. Why would anybody want to compare the sales of DVD after 3 years to blu-ray after 8 months?

because they obviously don't get it, I have never seen so many backwards people. For the rest of out lives, we'll all be driving Gas burning cars to Best Buy to buy the hottest new CD album! Our internet connections will only be for surfing the internet and checking email. Cable TV will remain exactly as it does today. Electricity will continue to come from Coal because the coal mining industry provides too many jobs to switch to solar/wind/nuclear.

Well heres the problem with you theory...it just doesnt allow for the creation of jobs...it takes them away, technology has to be widely accepted for it to become a reasonable replacement of current technology...if digital distribution cannot provide as many if not more jobs than physical distribution it cannot take over as the new way of doing things... Both could certainly coexist...but I dont think digital distribution will be the only way...atleast not in my lifetime

here's the problem with your theory. You assume companies want to create jobs. If best buy could lay off 20,000 people if it stopped selling CDs, and make MORE money with online distribution and a team of a couple hundred employees, which one are they going to do?
Avatar image for LoboSolo
LoboSolo

1136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#41 LoboSolo
Member since 2002 • 1136 Posts
I hope so. I don't want old tech 10 years from now.
Avatar image for chembro84
chembro84

829

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 chembro84
Member since 2004 • 829 Posts
[QUOTE="chembro84"][QUOTE="jwat4"][QUOTE="chembro84"][QUOTE="jwat4"][QUOTE="chembro84"] The loss of jobs has never stopped progress before jwat4
But where has the loss of jobs ever impeeded progress?... Take Best Buy for example...an entire chain of stores practically goes out of business...Circuit City...gone...EBGames gone...Gamestop gone... And the economy with it...

Best Buy and Circuit City will evolve and sell the devices which rely on the digital distribtuion model. EBGames and Gamestop will go the way of Tower Records and Wharehouse Music. The economy will survive, trust me.

Okay Allen Greenspan... Tell me how the loss of atleast 2-3 hundred thousand jobs would improve or help maintain the stability of the economy?

It's not going to happen overnight, Best Buy may have to lay off the people who worked in the "media" section of their store, but they will also have to expand their hardware selling sections, the economy will evolve, just as it is now from the transition from a manufacturing based economy to an information/service based economy. Do you know how many more programmers there are today vs 40 years ago? How abnout millions, how many more IT professionals? Millions. How many people work in the steel industry now? Not too many. They work in other places now.

And the distribuiters that ship products to retail stores...the truckers that haul the items...many of those individuals will not be able to work in an IT environment...and really how many IT professionals do we need...the reason there are so many is because its the easiest 2 year degree to get... And the steel industry? There are atleast 1 million individuals still working in the steel industry...atleast...the United Steelworkers Union is one of the strongest in the country.... If what you assume is going to occur does infact occur I dont think it will be in my lifetime...I can see advances towards it but I cannot see it overtaking physical distribution completely...

Truckers will still have plenty of things to ship without CDs, like said technolgoy for digital distribution model, truckers are needed more today than ever because most manufactured goods come from ports on the East or the West coast and not from local manufacturers. The steel industry today is not nearly as big as it was 10 years ago. The end of physical distribution will happen faster than you'll ever imagine.
Avatar image for chembro84
chembro84

829

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 chembro84
Member since 2004 • 829 Posts
[QUOTE="chembro84"][QUOTE="jwat4"][QUOTE="chembro84"][QUOTE="jwat4"][QUOTE="chembro84"] The loss of jobs has never stopped progress before jwat4
But where has the loss of jobs ever impeeded progress?... Take Best Buy for example...an entire chain of stores practically goes out of business...Circuit City...gone...EBGames gone...Gamestop gone... And the economy with it...

Best Buy and Circuit City will evolve and sell the devices which rely on the digital distribtuion model. EBGames and Gamestop will go the way of Tower Records and Wharehouse Music. The economy will survive, trust me.

Okay Allen Greenspan... Tell me how the loss of atleast 2-3 hundred thousand jobs would improve or help maintain the stability of the economy?

It's not going to happen overnight, Best Buy may have to lay off the people who worked in the "media" section of their store, but they will also have to expand their hardware selling sections, the economy will evolve, just as it is now from the transition from a manufacturing based economy to an information/service based economy. Do you know how many more programmers there are today vs 40 years ago? How abnout millions, how many more IT professionals? Millions. How many people work in the steel industry now? Not too many. They work in other places now.

And the distribuiters that ship products to retail stores...the truckers that haul the items...many of those individuals will not be able to work in an IT environment...and really how many IT professionals do we need...the reason there are so many is because its the easiest 2 year degree to get... And the steel industry? There are atleast 1 million individuals still working in the steel industry...atleast...the United Steelworkers Union is one of the strongest in the country.... If what you assume is going to occur does infact occur I dont think it will be in my lifetime...I can see advances towards it but I cannot see it overtaking physical distribution completely...

Truckers will still have plenty of things to ship without CDs, like said technolgoy for digital distribution model, truckers are needed more today than ever because most manufactured goods come from ports on the East or the West coast and not from local manufacturers. The steel industry today is not nearly as big as it was 10 years ago. The end of physical distribution will happen faster than you'll ever imagine.
Avatar image for jwat4
jwat4

1934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 jwat4
Member since 2003 • 1934 Posts
[QUOTE="chembro84"][QUOTE="jwat4"][QUOTE="chembro84"][QUOTE="eclipsed4utoo"][QUOTE="mjarantilla"][QUOTE="eclipsed4utoo"][QUOTE="mjarantilla"]Please, God, no more disc formats! The only reason CDs were included on the PS1 and DVDs were included on the PS2 was because they were already established formats with several years of proven success. BluRay is the first "experimental" disc format to be included in a home console. The PS4, whatever they decide to call it, will not have a new disc format, especially since Sony plans to milk BluRay for at least a decade or so.

DVD was not an established format in 2000. DVD sales did not top $1 billion in sales for the entire year of 2000. Compare that to now, for the year of 2005, the sales were over $16 billion. in DVD hardware sales, for the year 2000, it was under 10 million hardware units sold. for the year 2005, it was 36.7 million hardware units sold. for software shipments, for year 2000, there was only 311 million software units shipped. in 2005, there were 5.5 billion software units shipped. as you can see, back in 2000, DVD was not an established format yet. It was still just getting started.

By 2000, there were already 46 million DVD players in homes worldwide. To me, that qualifies as "established." True, yearly sales did not break 10 million yet in 2000, but 8.5 million is pretty close. By 2000, it WAS an established format with over 10,000 available DVD titles in the U.S. alone, and the obvious successor to both VHS and CD, formats which had been around for twenty years and thus had MUCH higher installed bases. You CANNOT compare the state of DVD in 2000 to the state of BluRay now. That's my only point.

DVD had been out for 3 years by the time the PS2 was launched. Why would anybody want to compare the sales of DVD after 3 years to blu-ray after 8 months?

because they obviously don't get it, I have never seen so many backwards people. For the rest of out lives, we'll all be driving Gas burning cars to Best Buy to buy the hottest new CD album! Our internet connections will only be for surfing the internet and checking email. Cable TV will remain exactly as it does today. Electricity will continue to come from Coal because the coal mining industry provides too many jobs to switch to solar/wind/nuclear.

Well heres the problem with you theory...it just doesnt allow for the creation of jobs...it takes them away, technology has to be widely accepted for it to become a reasonable replacement of current technology...if digital distribution cannot provide as many if not more jobs than physical distribution it cannot take over as the new way of doing things... Both could certainly coexist...but I dont think digital distribution will be the only way...atleast not in my lifetime

here's the problem with your theory. You assume companies want to create jobs. If best buy could lay off 20,000 people if it stopped selling CDs, and make MORE money with online distribution and a team of a couple hundred employees, which one are they going to do?

Well the only problem with laying people off is that you take money away from the consumer...that employee is a consumer...they pruchase CDs and DVDs just like everyone else, but without that job they have no funds to purchase items that may be available... People need money to buy things...Money comes from working...more available jobs = more money for consumers = more spending = more profit for retail stores....
Avatar image for TimothyB
TimothyB

6564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 TimothyB
Member since 2003 • 6564 Posts
i think next gen the blu-ray will be cheaper and there will be a 200g blu-ray dics. we don't need a new format yet just a bigger blu-ray. the games will be 70 dollors because by then the graphics will be so expesive to create. it will be like funding for a pixar movie.GARRYTH


200gb discs will only be computers, blu-ray movie players and the PS3 cannot read more than 2 layers, so no one is going to release media on anything more than that since no one will want to buy a new PS3 or player. We are stuck at 50gb discs forever unless some miracle happens that all players can be updated to read more.

It's like saying DVDs can do 4 layers in the future, but do you see everyone in the world buying a new dvd player that supports that? It's like switching to a whole new format again despite the name being the same, so if we need more than 50gigs in the future most likely it will be a whole new format, like holodiscs, not an upgraded blu-ray.
Avatar image for chembro84
chembro84

829

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 chembro84
Member since 2004 • 829 Posts
[QUOTE="jwat4"][QUOTE="chembro84"][QUOTE="jwat4"][QUOTE="chembro84"][QUOTE="eclipsed4utoo"][QUOTE="mjarantilla"][QUOTE="eclipsed4utoo"][QUOTE="mjarantilla"]Please, God, no more disc formats! The only reason CDs were included on the PS1 and DVDs were included on the PS2 was because they were already established formats with several years of proven success. BluRay is the first "experimental" disc format to be included in a home console. The PS4, whatever they decide to call it, will not have a new disc format, especially since Sony plans to milk BluRay for at least a decade or so.

DVD was not an established format in 2000. DVD sales did not top $1 billion in sales for the entire year of 2000. Compare that to now, for the year of 2005, the sales were over $16 billion. in DVD hardware sales, for the year 2000, it was under 10 million hardware units sold. for the year 2005, it was 36.7 million hardware units sold. for software shipments, for year 2000, there was only 311 million software units shipped. in 2005, there were 5.5 billion software units shipped. as you can see, back in 2000, DVD was not an established format yet. It was still just getting started.

By 2000, there were already 46 million DVD players in homes worldwide. To me, that qualifies as "established." True, yearly sales did not break 10 million yet in 2000, but 8.5 million is pretty close. By 2000, it WAS an established format with over 10,000 available DVD titles in the U.S. alone, and the obvious successor to both VHS and CD, formats which had been around for twenty years and thus had MUCH higher installed bases. You CANNOT compare the state of DVD in 2000 to the state of BluRay now. That's my only point.

DVD had been out for 3 years by the time the PS2 was launched. Why would anybody want to compare the sales of DVD after 3 years to blu-ray after 8 months?

because they obviously don't get it, I have never seen so many backwards people. For the rest of out lives, we'll all be driving Gas burning cars to Best Buy to buy the hottest new CD album! Our internet connections will only be for surfing the internet and checking email. Cable TV will remain exactly as it does today. Electricity will continue to come from Coal because the coal mining industry provides too many jobs to switch to solar/wind/nuclear.

Well heres the problem with you theory...it just doesnt allow for the creation of jobs...it takes them away, technology has to be widely accepted for it to become a reasonable replacement of current technology...if digital distribution cannot provide as many if not more jobs than physical distribution it cannot take over as the new way of doing things... Both could certainly coexist...but I dont think digital distribution will be the only way...atleast not in my lifetime

here's the problem with your theory. You assume companies want to create jobs. If best buy could lay off 20,000 people if it stopped selling CDs, and make MORE money with online distribution and a team of a couple hundred employees, which one are they going to do?

Well the only problem with laying people off is that you take money away from the consumer...that employee is a consumer...they pruchase CDs and DVDs just like everyone else, but without that job they have no funds to purchase items that may be available... People need money to buy things...Money comes from working...more available jobs = more money for consumers = more spending = more profit for retail stores....

Name one instance where a company decided to turn down additional profit for it's self, to benefit the economy as a whole.
Avatar image for eclipsed4utoo
eclipsed4utoo

10578

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 eclipsed4utoo
Member since 2006 • 10578 Posts
[QUOTE="GARRYTH"]i think next gen the blu-ray will be cheaper and there will be a 200g blu-ray dics. we don't need a new format yet just a bigger blu-ray. the games will be 70 dollors because by then the graphics will be so expesive to create. it will be like funding for a pixar movie.TimothyB


200gb discs will only be computers, blu-ray movie players and the PS3 cannot read more than 2 layers, so no one is going to release media on anything more than that since no one will want to buy a new PS3 or player. We are stuck at 50gb discs forever unless some miracle happens that all players can be updated to read more.

It's like saying DVDs can do 4 layers in the future, but do you see everyone in the world buying a new dvd player that supports that? It's like switching to a whole new format again despite the name being the same, so if we need more than 50gigs in the future most likely it will be a whole new format, like holodiscs, not an upgraded blu-ray.

you ever heard of a firmware update? obviously not.
Avatar image for jwat4
jwat4

1934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 jwat4
Member since 2003 • 1934 Posts
[QUOTE="chembro84"][QUOTE="jwat4"][QUOTE="chembro84"][QUOTE="jwat4"][QUOTE="chembro84"][QUOTE="eclipsed4utoo"][QUOTE="mjarantilla"][QUOTE="eclipsed4utoo"][QUOTE="mjarantilla"]Please, God, no more disc formats! The only reason CDs were included on the PS1 and DVDs were included on the PS2 was because they were already established formats with several years of proven success. BluRay is the first "experimental" disc format to be included in a home console. The PS4, whatever they decide to call it, will not have a new disc format, especially since Sony plans to milk BluRay for at least a decade or so.

DVD was not an established format in 2000. DVD sales did not top $1 billion in sales for the entire year of 2000. Compare that to now, for the year of 2005, the sales were over $16 billion. in DVD hardware sales, for the year 2000, it was under 10 million hardware units sold. for the year 2005, it was 36.7 million hardware units sold. for software shipments, for year 2000, there was only 311 million software units shipped. in 2005, there were 5.5 billion software units shipped. as you can see, back in 2000, DVD was not an established format yet. It was still just getting started.

By 2000, there were already 46 million DVD players in homes worldwide. To me, that qualifies as "established." True, yearly sales did not break 10 million yet in 2000, but 8.5 million is pretty close. By 2000, it WAS an established format with over 10,000 available DVD titles in the U.S. alone, and the obvious successor to both VHS and CD, formats which had been around for twenty years and thus had MUCH higher installed bases. You CANNOT compare the state of DVD in 2000 to the state of BluRay now. That's my only point.

DVD had been out for 3 years by the time the PS2 was launched. Why would anybody want to compare the sales of DVD after 3 years to blu-ray after 8 months?

because they obviously don't get it, I have never seen so many backwards people. For the rest of out lives, we'll all be driving Gas burning cars to Best Buy to buy the hottest new CD album! Our internet connections will only be for surfing the internet and checking email. Cable TV will remain exactly as it does today. Electricity will continue to come from Coal because the coal mining industry provides too many jobs to switch to solar/wind/nuclear.

Well heres the problem with you theory...it just doesnt allow for the creation of jobs...it takes them away, technology has to be widely accepted for it to become a reasonable replacement of current technology...if digital distribution cannot provide as many if not more jobs than physical distribution it cannot take over as the new way of doing things... Both could certainly coexist...but I dont think digital distribution will be the only way...atleast not in my lifetime

here's the problem with your theory. You assume companies want to create jobs. If best buy could lay off 20,000 people if it stopped selling CDs, and make MORE money with online distribution and a team of a couple hundred employees, which one are they going to do?

Well the only problem with laying people off is that you take money away from the consumer...that employee is a consumer...they pruchase CDs and DVDs just like everyone else, but without that job they have no funds to purchase items that may be available... People need money to buy things...Money comes from working...more available jobs = more money for consumers = more spending = more profit for retail stores....

Name one instance where a company decided to turn down additional profit for it's self, to benefit the economy as a whole.

Its not a manner of gaining profit...you loose 20,000 customers the minute you take their job away.... The fact remains that there would be less jobs available...sure there might be a boost in intitial profit gains but in the overall scheme of t.hings the company would begin to loose money...If a company that employs over 100,000 people fires 90,000 of them they loose 90,000 customers because they no longer have the free cash flow to spend on retail goods like DVDs or CDs...or digitally distrubted media... And if this industrial / technological revolution of sorts that your predicting does occur...I dont for see it within the next 10 - 20 years...according to most we should be flying cars around running on hydrogen...HDTV should be in every household, Highspeed internet should be every where...technology is created very quickly but it doesnt become available to the consumer until its a viable substitute to the current technology...
Avatar image for SirRaven
SirRaven

934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 SirRaven
Member since 2005 • 934 Posts
how long did it take for the iPod to murder the CD industry?>chembro84
The iPod didn't ruin the CD industry, Napster did. The only reason the iPod was such a success was because it was the first mp3 player that came out w/ an onboard storage-medium that was bundled with software to easily access what songs you want to purchase and download. Saying it ruined CDs is extremely false and CDs are still a valid force. otherwise, you wouldn't see a single one in best buy or any other electronics store.
Avatar image for jdt532
jdt532

4236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#50 jdt532
Member since 2003 • 4236 Posts
I agree that digital distribution is the future the only question is when. Nothing will stop progress look what happened to the record industry, 8-track, cassette tapes, black and white tvs, etc. Eventually media will be a thing of the past but it wont be for a long while. Before digital distribution takes over everything PCs with an Internet connection would have to reach an installed base on the same level as tvs and today we are a far cry from that, PCs are still too complicated and expensive for for the average Joe/Jane. However if anyone thinks digital distribution wont become the norm because Joe Smoe might lose a job at Wal-mart think again. A business's #1 goal is to make money if they could fire everyone and buy intelligent human like androids to do their job they would do that in a split second. Think about it if you could save all that money you paid on salaries and benefits and still be able to run your business it would be a no brainer.