Ninja Gaiden Sigma vs Ninja Gaiden Sigma 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Egroegnihc
Egroegnihc

43

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#1 Egroegnihc
Member since 2007 • 43 Posts

I played and used to own the original Ninja Gaiden for the Xbox(which I loved) and I found Sigma to be more of the overtop action I enjoyed. I only played the demo for Sigma 2 which I found awesome as well but tended to be a bit more button mashy compared to the original. I'm having a hard time conlcuding which one is the superior version. The first one has great pacing while the second one had better weapons. What do you guys think?

Avatar image for juden41
juden41

4447

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 juden41
Member since 2010 • 4447 Posts
It's not they are two different versions, they are two different games. The adventure feel is better in Sigma 1, but the gameplay is faster and more intense in Sigma 2, although Sigma 1's story flows much better. There are things I like about both games. They're two different games.
Avatar image for GrandJury
GrandJury

15396

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 GrandJury
Member since 2009 • 15396 Posts

Well first off Sigma and Sigma 2 are two different games. Sigma 1 has the better story and gameplay but Sigma 2 has more content. Sigma 2 has..

  • Co-op
  • More characters
  • More weapons
  • Trophies

Both games are good and worth owning.

Avatar image for Chaos_Bladez
Chaos_Bladez

5801

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#4 Chaos_Bladez
Member since 2007 • 5801 Posts
Good question. :) I beat NGS2 about a couple weeks ago and I am now going through NGS1 and NGS2 is WAY superior in every single way. From control, bosses, weapons, gore, graphics, combos, combat, and pathfinding. NGS2 makes NSG1 obsolete in my opnion (even though NGS1 is still good).
Avatar image for Bangerman15
Bangerman15

1978

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Bangerman15
Member since 2010 • 1978 Posts

well i had ninja gaiden for xbox and ninja gaiden 2 for the 360 but i have to say ninja gaiden 2,

i plan on getting sigma 2 because all that bonus stuff just sounds too good.. :P and i never got around to beating ninja gaiden 2 on the 360 either

Avatar image for juden41
juden41

4447

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 juden41
Member since 2010 • 4447 Posts

Well first off Sigma and Sigma 2 are two different games. Sigma 1 has the better story and gameplay but Sigma 2 has more content. Sigma 2 has..

  • Co-op
  • More characters
  • More weapons
  • Trophies

Both games are good and worth owning.

GrandJury

I don't know about better, maybe better, but I thought Sigma 2's gameplay was definitely faster, and what sets it apart from Sigma 1 is that you have to slash the enemies much more to get them, with Simga 1, you could do maybe 3, sometimes 4 good hits and they'd go down, but with Sigma 2, it seems like so many of the enemies take about 7 or 8 good hits before they're done, and the action is more frenzied too, the speed of Sigma 2 dwarfs that of Sigma 1, even though Simga 1 is still really fast, Sigma 2 is nuts.

I will say that Sigma 1 is a better wrapped-up package though. The story flows much better, the levels (gamemap) is more cohesively designed as one "be all end all" environment. Sigma 2 is just more "arcadey" where the levels are just random places that don't relate that you just run into and fight. The story is also scattered, and the levels are just "do this," "now do this," "perform this" and set up 1, 2, 3, 4 wheras Sigma 1's levelled flowed so well into eachother. They were more united in that fashion, wheras Sigma 2's levels seem to be separate and not so interdependant. The music and just overall feel of Sigma 1 is superior, although I can't help but love the faster gameplay of Sigma 2.

Avatar image for raven_squad
raven_squad

78438

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#7 raven_squad
Member since 2007 • 78438 Posts
I prefer the first to the second. The gameplay is improved in the second, and there is more equipment and such, but the overall experience of the first game is superior in my opinion. The story, especially. I also think it provided more of a challenge.
Avatar image for M0wen10
M0wen10

7555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 55

User Lists: 0

#8 M0wen10
Member since 2009 • 7555 Posts

First one was a lot better

Avatar image for da_chub
da_chub

3140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#9 da_chub
Member since 2007 • 3140 Posts
i was exicted to play these when i got my PS3, so after renting, i would not suggest either. Very boring button mashing with cluncky controls compared to other similar games ive played. Ive only played Sigma 2.
Avatar image for Gue1
Gue1

12171

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#10 Gue1
Member since 2004 • 12171 Posts

I played and used to own the original Ninja Gaiden for the Xbox(which I loved) and I found Sigma to be more of the overtop action I enjoyed. I only played the demo for Sigma 2 which I found awesome as well but tended to be a bit more button mashy compared to the original. I'm having a hard time conlcuding which one is the superior version. The first one has great pacing while the second one had better weapons. What do you guys think?

Egroegnihc

you're correct on that. Sigma 2 is yet another button masher like Devil May Cry, Bayonetta, God of War, Heavenly Sword, you name it. Sigma 2 is more noob friendly and the combos don't require that much precision. Another thing is that Sigma has intelligent enemy AI, Sigma 2 AI is very stupid but it has more enemies on screen like in GOW.

If I had to chose it is obvious that the first Sigma is the superior game. Sigma 2 is a game made to appeal to all those fans of GOW and button mashers in general that don't want to waste time sharpening their skills. Ninja Gaiden is all about the action while GOW has puzzles and better story anyway.

Avatar image for email2003
email2003

3529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#11 email2003
Member since 2004 • 3529 Posts
Was NGS2 bosses easier this time around compared to NGS1? I had a hard time with the bosses in NGS1 but in 2 they seem to be too easy.
Avatar image for Gue1
Gue1

12171

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#12 Gue1
Member since 2004 • 12171 Posts

i was exicted to play these when i got my PS3, so after renting, i would not suggest either. Very boring button mashing with cluncky controls compared to other similar games ive played. Ive only played Sigma 2.da_chub

Sigma 2 could be anything from boring to button masher but clunky is not... Cluncky is something like Heavenly Sword that is not even 60fps and the constrolls lag a lot.

Avatar image for da_chub
da_chub

3140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#13 da_chub
Member since 2007 • 3140 Posts

[QUOTE="da_chub"]i was exicted to play these when i got my PS3, so after renting, i would not suggest either. Very boring button mashing with cluncky controls compared to other similar games ive played. Ive only played Sigma 2.Gue1

Sigma 2 could be anything from boring to button masher but clunky is not... Cluncky is something like Heavenly Sword that is not even 60fps and the constrolls lag a lot.

Compared to playing Prince of Persia, Muramasa(Wii), GOW3demo...(just a few similar games) it feels clunky. I've only played heavenly sword demo and that was def worse....Even Bayonetta is much better.