Oblivion Trouble

In gamespot news, the develper said that they'll be cacheing gbs of hard drive to lower loading times. how will 20 gb owners get through this though?

In gamespot news, the develper said that they'll be cacheing gbs of hard drive to lower loading times. how will 20 gb owners get through this though?

masterchef1000

20gs is a lot of space if you delete videos and stuff after watching them.

I rarely keep vids or music on my 360 harddrive.

Also if your not into rpgs then rent oblivion before buying. I regretted buying this game on 360 because I found it very boring. Great graphics tho. It will likely have the best graphics on ps3 when it is released

OMG.. troll post .. also i think 20 gb > 3-4 gb wouldnt u think... rr7 uses 4 gb.. gundam uses 4 gb..

stop the damage control.. oblivion for ps3 is just better
davez82

it was done for the 360 alsokjenkins24

[QUOTE="davez82"]OMG.. troll post .. also i think 20 gb > 3-4 gb wouldnt u think... rr7 uses 4 gb.. gundam uses 4 gb..

stop the damage control.. oblivion for ps3 is just better
masterchef1000

OMG.. troll post .. also i think 20 gb > 3-4 gb wouldnt u think... rr7 uses 4 gb.. gundam uses 4 gb..

stop the damage control.. oblivion for ps3 is just better
davez82

It's funny that you said that because the game isn't even gold on ps3 yet so how do you know it is better.

Dont give me gbs this and mbs that just wait until the game is released and see for yourself. Even though I can see you are clearly biased alread.

[QUOTE="davez82"]OMG.. troll post .. also i think 20 gb > 3-4 gb wouldnt u think... rr7 uses 4 gb.. gundam uses 4 gb..

stop the damage control.. oblivion for ps3 is just better
masterchef1000

OMG.. troll post .. also i think 20 gb > 3-4 gb wouldnt u think... rr7 uses 4 gb.. gundam uses 4 gb..

stop the damage control.. oblivion for ps3 is just better
davez82

[QUOTE="davez82"]OMG.. troll post .. also i think 20 gb > 3-4 gb wouldnt u think... rr7 uses 4 gb.. gundam uses 4 gb..

stop the damage control.. oblivion for ps3 is just better
perfect-dank-0

It's funny that you said that because the game isn't even gold on ps3 yet so how do you know it is better.

Dont give me gbs this and mbs that just wait until the game is released and see for yourself. Even though I can see you are clearly biased alread.

[QUOTE="masterchef1000"][QUOTE="davez82"]OMG.. troll post .. also i think 20 gb > 3-4 gb wouldnt u think... rr7 uses 4 gb.. gundam uses 4 gb..

stop the damage control.. oblivion for ps3 is just better
washimul

I doubt any game for ps3 will be 100xs better than a game for 360. I doubt ps4 games will even be 100x better. You will see graphical improvments on all systems over the next few years. But nothing that is 100x better than what we are seeing now. maybe 2x as good within the next four years would be a more realistic statement.

[QUOTE="washimul"][QUOTE="masterchef1000"][QUOTE="davez82"]OMG.. troll post .. also i think 20 gb > 3-4 gb wouldnt u think... rr7 uses 4 gb.. gundam uses 4 gb..

stop the damage control.. oblivion for ps3 is just better
perfect-dank-0

I doubt any game for ps3 will be 100xs better than a game for 360. I doubt ps4 games will even be 100x better. You will see graphical improvments on all systems over the next few years. But nothing that is 100x better than what we are seeing now. maybe 2x as good within the next four years would be a more realistic statement.

[QUOTE="washimul"][QUOTE="masterchef1000"][QUOTE="davez82"]OMG.. troll post .. also i think 20 gb > 3-4 gb wouldnt u think... rr7 uses 4 gb.. gundam uses 4 gb..

stop the damage control.. oblivion for ps3 is just better
perfect-dank-0

I doubt any game for ps3 will be 100xs better than a game for 360. I doubt ps4 games will even be 100x better. You will see graphical improvments on all systems over the next few years. But nothing that is 100x better than what we are seeing now. maybe 2x as good within the next four years would be a more realistic statement.

[QUOTE="washimul"][QUOTE="masterchef1000"][QUOTE="davez82"]OMG.. troll post .. also i think 20 gb > 3-4 gb wouldnt u think... rr7 uses 4 gb.. gundam uses 4 gb..

stop the damage control.. oblivion for ps3 is just better
perfect-dank-0

I doubt any game for ps3 will be 100xs better than a game for 360. I doubt ps4 games will even be 100x better. You will see graphical improvments on all systems over the next few years. But nothing that is 100x better than what we are seeing now. maybe 2x as good within the next four years would be a more realistic statement.

[QUOTE="davez82"]OMG.. troll post .. also i think 20 gb > 3-4 gb wouldnt u think... rr7 uses 4 gb.. gundam uses 4 gb..

stop the damage control.. oblivion for ps3 is just better
perfect-dank-0

It's funny that you said that because the game isn't even gold on ps3 yet so how do you know it is better.

Dont give me gbs this and mbs that just wait until the game is released and see for yourself. Even though I can see you are clearly biased alread.

If its cached data it doesn't stay on your HDD. Correct me if I'm wrong...I might be.SpYdEr124

[QUOTE="SpYdEr124"]If its cached data it doesn't stay on your HDD. Correct me if I'm wrong...I might be.demonik_360

[QUOTE="perfect-dank-0"]

[QUOTE="washimul"][QUOTE="masterchef1000"][QUOTE="davez82"]OMG.. troll post .. also i think 20 gb > 3-4 gb wouldnt u think... rr7 uses 4 gb.. gundam uses 4 gb..

stop the damage control.. oblivion for ps3 is just better
jdang307

I doubt any game for ps3 will be 100xs better than a game for 360. I doubt ps4 games will even be 100x better. You will see graphical improvments on all systems over the next few years. But nothing that is 100x better than what we are seeing now. maybe 2x as good within the next four years would be a more realistic statement.

[QUOTE="SpYdEr124"]If its cached data it doesn't stay on your HDD. Correct me if I'm wrong...I might be.demonik_360

[QUOTE="perfect-dank-0"]

[QUOTE="washimul"][QUOTE="masterchef1000"][QUOTE="davez82"]OMG.. troll post .. also i think 20 gb > 3-4 gb wouldnt u think... rr7 uses 4 gb.. gundam uses 4 gb..

stop the damage control.. oblivion for ps3 is just better
SpYdEr124

I doubt any game for ps3 will be 100xs better than a game for 360. I doubt ps4 games will even be 100x better. You will see graphical improvments on all systems over the next few years. But nothing that is 100x better than what we are seeing now. maybe 2x as good within the next four years would be a more realistic statement.

it might be just a small cache. who knows what's the size of the cache.zhuojloh

ps3 has an LI cache of 512 k + 256k for each SPE
agregate cache==2+ mb

x360 has 1mb cache.

more cache == memory buffering/ more direct mapping /more indirect mapping /less slot collission /less latency penalty...

+ XDR === extreme data loading and unloading in ps3=== better resolution/better framerates .......finer textures, more polygons per screen
washimul

ps3 has an LI cache of 512 k + 256k for each SPE
agregate cache==2+ mb

x360 has 1mb cache.

more cache == memory buffering/ more direct mapping /more indirect mapping /less slot collission /less latency penalty...

+ XDR === extreme data loading and unloading in ps3=== better resolution/better framerates .......finer textures, more polygons per screen
washimul

OMG.. troll post .. also i think 20 gb > 3-4 gb wouldnt u think... rr7 uses 4 gb.. gundam uses 4 gb..

stop the damage control.. oblivion for ps3 is just better
davez82

OMG.. troll post .. also i think 20 gb > 3-4 gb wouldnt u think... rr7 uses 4 gb.. gundam uses 4 gb..

stop the damage control.. oblivion for ps3 is just better
davez82

dude hes so not a troll...i love how that anyone has anythign negative at all, even in the slightest bit, be it it honest or even irrelevant, someone has to spout out troll...its becoming a useless term.

[QUOTE="davez82"]OMG.. troll post .. also i think 20 gb > 3-4 gb wouldnt u think... rr7 uses 4 gb.. gundam uses 4 gb..

stop the damage control.. oblivion for ps3 is just better
-DirtySanchez-

Whether it is stored or not, why could you not just delete the files after the game? Isn't the game save data different?

Cached data is not needed when the game is not being played, but you save location is needed, that file would be very small.

OMG.. troll post .. also i think 20 gb > 3-4 gb wouldnt u think... rr7 uses 4 gb.. gundam uses 4 gb..

stop the damage control.. oblivion for ps3 is just better
davez82

lol

If you wanna pack rat enough non-essential stuff on your 60GB to have concerns about space then you're going to have to consider obtaining more space, be it in the form of an internal HDD, external HDD, or some memory sticks/cards. From the sounds of things you're going to hit the limit wether the games are cached or not. Excercise discretion with downloads and you'll have no problem making the most of your 60GB.emitsu97

[QUOTE="emitsu97"]If you wanna pack rat enough non-essential stuff on your 60GB to have concerns about space then you're going to have to consider obtaining more space, be it in the form of an internal HDD, external HDD, or some memory sticks/cards. From the sounds of things you're going to hit the limit wether the games are cached or not. Excercise discretion with downloads and you'll have no problem making the most of your 60GB.masterchef1000

i foudn teh load times very informative and helpful.

and they werent frequent

OMG.. troll post .. also i think 20 gb > 3-4 gb wouldnt u think... rr7 uses 4 gb.. gundam uses 4 gb..

stop the damage control.. oblivion for ps3 is just better
davez82

wow... acuses of troll because of the Master Chief thing methinks.

What has the world come to?

wow, this is an old topic lolscja25

Why would you bump a thread that hasn't been touched in 14 months?