i just recently watched x-play and on the bottomline it says that sony has a strong chance that world of warcraft might come out on ps3!!
can you believe this?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
i just recently watched x-play and on the bottomline it says that sony has a strong chance that world of warcraft might come out on ps3!!
can you believe this?
i just recently watched x-play and on the bottomline it says that sony has a strong chance that world of warcraft might come out on ps3!!
can you believe this?
sethman410
Naw man .. never will ..
Suck my monkey it will. Blizzard won't want the game on aplatform with a free online sevice. Plus the game is severly showing it's age and there's a swath of more evolved games coming out that are eventually going to put Warcraft to bed. If anything, Sony will release a modern version of Ever Quest.Snaptrap
Developers can charge for MMO's :|
lol. your stupid, earlier today, they said a game to RIVAL world of warcraft. you already cna play wow on your ps3 if you really wanted to
streammygame.com
besides.... WHY would you want to. wow is for failures
shroom76
No one is stupid. If anyone is stupid it's those people who constantly use the word "your" in place of the proper contraction "you're".
I dont see why we need World of Warcraft on the PS3 when you can run it just fine on the PC. It doesnt take a big budget PC to play WOW. I played WOW for about a year and I was using a 850XT graphics card and it ran beautifully with 2GB of memory. Other than that, I dont see a good reason why it should be adapted to the PS3, or any console for that matter. And we all know WOW has 10 million subscribers and growing.Elann2008
You can run it easily with 512MB RAM and an ATI 9800 series card. Damn, you can probably run it on a Dreamcast.
wow is for people who have no lifeFendersONLY
WOW is for people who are too cool to have just one life /sarcasm
[QUOTE="shroom76"]lol. your stupid, earlier today, they said a game to RIVAL world of warcraft. you already cna play wow on your ps3 if you really wanted to
streammygame.com
besides.... WHY would you want to. wow is for failures
Snaptrap
No one is stupid. If anyone is stupid it's those people who constantly use the word "your" in place of the proper contraction "you're".
I know right? ...sweet irony
Suck my monkey it will. Blizzard won't want the game on a platform with a free online sevice. Plus the game is severly showing it's age and there's a swath of more evolved games coming out that are eventually going to put Warcraft to bed. If anything, Sony will release a modern version of Ever Quest.Snaptrap
I wouldnt called WoW graphics outdated.. its not next gen, but its still good graphics
World of Warcraft sucks Koala nuts. Saying Haze, MGS4, and Killzone 2 all release tomorrow would be something worth clicking on. WoW is crapSteel_Rain777
Koala nuts?? you an Aussie?? :lol:
I figured it'd be some awesome news like "Kojima was lying MGS4 is out tomorrowz." Darn you...Canvas_Of_Flesh
same here..:(
Suck my monkey it will. Blizzard won't want the game on a platform with a free online sevice. Plus the game is severly showing it's age and there's a swath of more evolved games coming out that are eventually going to put Warcraft to bed. If anything, Sony will release a modern version of Ever Quest.Snaptrap
now that i would pay for! a modern Ever Quest would rock.
I wouldnt called WoW graphics outdated.. its not next gen, but its still good graphics
u8muhrice
They're outdated. Guild Wars was released a few months later and it has superior visuals by comparison. Some games that have been around years before it even look better. Looking at Conan makes WoW look like something from the 80's.
Suck my monkey it will. Blizzard won't want the game on a platform with a free online sevice. Snaptrap
You pay the same amount for playing your PC or your PS3 online. It's Blizzard who charges subscription fees.
Suck my monkey it will. Blizzard won't want the game on a platform with a free online sevice. Plus the game is severly showing it's age and there's a swath of more evolved games coming out that are eventually going to put Warcraft to bed. If anything, Sony will release a modern version of Ever Quest.SnaptrapLOL! Nothing can Top WoW! Its more Powerfull than Scientology XD But people who play it arnt brainwashed Retards ALA Tom Cruise
You pay the same amount for playing your PC or your PS3 online. It's Blizzard who charges subscription fees.
2headedhawaiian
Yes, I know. It's unlikely though since Sony makes Ever Quest and will probably put something like that on their console without charging a fee. WoW wouldn't be able to compete.
LOL! Nothing can Top WoW! Its more Powerfull than Scientology XD But people who play it arnt brainwashed Retards ALA Tom Cruise
KingStoph
Guild Wars has over 4 million active users. Unlike WoW, Guild Wars can't be used on a private server, and therefor ArenaNet can obtain a more accurate number of the amount of people who have subscriptions rather than go by those who bought the game off the shelves and are using private server to avoid subscription fees.
More and more MMO's that are being released are developed by higher profile companies with the funds to promote their products. It's only a matter of time.
[QUOTE="KingStoph"]LOL! Nothing can Top WoW! Its more Powerfull than Scientology XD But people who play it arnt brainwashed Retards ALA Tom Cruise
Snaptrap
Guild Wars has over 4 million active users. Unlike WoW, Guild Wars can't be used on a private server, and therefor ArenaNet can obtain a more accurate number of the amount of people who have subscriptions rather than go by those who bought the game off the shelves and are using private server to avoid subscription fees.
More and more MMO's that are being released are developed by higher profile companies with the funds to promote their products. It's only a matter of time.
Ever thought they based it off Subscribed players?No?
That explains it then XD
Anyway, WoW Pwns Guildwars. got GW First of all and lost instrest in it. as apose to WoW which i play Non-Stop
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment