There's two sides of every story.
People must not forget that they were both candidates to the same post as head of Sony, Howard because he made Sony Pictures the biggest movie studio in North America (financially) and increased BGM's growth rate while Ken was the man behind Sony's most successful product (even bigger than Walkman).
The investors have said a lot bad about Howard lately and called him a bad choice, so it was a rather smart move of him to get rid of his biggest competitor. We should keep in mind that though Sony is doing better financially it's not only because of him, Ken was the man behind re-conquering the TV market with BRAVIA and the the mobile phone sales got nothing to do with Horward either.
People should look into things before opening their mouths.
Kutaragi was the one who made the system $599, that is PS3s main concern right now, so yes, Kutaragi was a little out of touch with reality, Stringer knows what he is doing.chembro84
Ken was the one who called for a price cut in Japan.
iunnoo....look at all the good thats come to the ps3 since his removalMiguel16
Nothing, all initiatives were started by Ken.It's also Ken who gathered all game studios under SCE-WW and made Phil the head CEO.
All Howard has done is to make Kaz the head of SCEI (Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiidge Raaaaaaaacer).
Im not the CEO of Sony, and I dont know any of the individuals involved with this...nor do I really know whats going on aside from what you can read in the news...
I dont think its fair to judge his actions as we dont and never will know the whole story.
jwat4
Well said.
Log in to comment