This topic is locked from further discussion.
Well I'm excited for Bioshock because it let's me be like The Pain.:P
And for Eternal Sonata. It's a musical RPG what's not to love?:P
Well I'm excited for Bioshock because it let's me be like The Pain.:P
And for Eternal Sonata. It's a musical RPG what's not to love?:P
Vyse_Legends
My thoughts on the matter word for word.
I think our synchronization proccess is complete. Time to rule the world?
[QUOTE="Vyse_Legends"]Well I'm excited for Bioshock because it let's me be like The Pain.:P
And for Eternal Sonata. It's a musical RPG what's not to love?:P
hazelnutman
My thoughts on the matter word for word.
I think our synchronization proccess is complete. Time to rule the world?
Give me a couple seconds.*drinks molotov cocktail*Ahhh.:D Okay let's go.:P
[QUOTE="hazelnutman"][QUOTE="Vyse_Legends"]Well I'm excited for Bioshock because it let's me be like The Pain.:P
And for Eternal Sonata. It's a musical RPG what's not to love?:P
Vyse_Legends
My thoughts on the matter word for word.
I think our synchronization proccess is complete. Time to rule the world?
Give me a couple seconds.*drinks molotov cocktail*Ahhh.:D Okay let's go.:P
Sweet! Which country shall we target first?
[QUOTE="Vyse_Legends"][QUOTE="hazelnutman"][QUOTE="Vyse_Legends"]Well I'm excited for Bioshock because it let's me be like The Pain.:P
And for Eternal Sonata. It's a musical RPG what's not to love?:P
hazelnutman
My thoughts on the matter word for word.
I think our synchronization proccess is complete. Time to rule the world?
Give me a couple seconds.*drinks molotov cocktail*Ahhh.:D Okay let's go.:P
Sweet! Which country shall we target first?
How about Japan?:To the Land of the Rising Sun hai?:D
as far as i know, no. i cant say i am excited.. but i hope they turn out to be good games and i might get them x) (besides bioshock wich i'll get for my PC). i'd like to have that cute gears of war 2 in my ps3 tho.. why doesnt Sony pay for it?! :P (if MS owns part of it i didnt know.. so dont shotgun me in the eyeball :))SollidSnake_MS owns the IP for it, just like it owns Halo. So no way that would go to the PS3, just like LBP would never go to the Xbox.
How about Japan?:
To the Land of the Rising Sun hai?:D
Vyse_Legends
Yay! I was hoping you'd say that! Think of all of the awesome stuff we'll own.
Well, I never really went past this stage in world domination. What do we exactly do now?
[QUOTE="Vyse_Legends"]How about Japan?:
To the Land of the Rising Sun hai?:D
hazelnutman
Yay! I was hoping you'd say that! Think of all of the awesome stuff we'll own.
Well, I never really went past this stage in world domination. What do we exactly do now?
Well either we have enough power to take over Japan with just ourselves.Or we need to build an army.
[QUOTE="hazelnutman"][QUOTE="Vyse_Legends"]How about Japan?:
To the Land of the Rising Sun hai?:D
Vyse_Legends
Yay! I was hoping you'd say that! Think of all of the awesome stuff we'll own.
Well, I never really went past this stage in world domination. What do we exactly do now?
Well either we have enough power to take over Japan with just ourselves.Or we need to build an army.
Oooh! Let's give our personal army a funny name. :D
[QUOTE="Vyse_Legends"][QUOTE="hazelnutman"][QUOTE="Vyse_Legends"]How about Japan?:
To the Land of the Rising Sun hai?:D
hazelnutman
Yay! I was hoping you'd say that! Think of all of the awesome stuff we'll own.
Well, I never really went past this stage in world domination. What do we exactly do now?
Well either we have enough power to take over Japan with just ourselves.Or we need to build an army.
Oooh! Let's give our personal army a funny name. :D
So when we invade we'll make their army die laughing...and from gunfire?:?Dear god...thread hijacked.pyromaniac223Yes that has a tendancy to happen when you put me and hazel in the same thread.:P
"madsnakehhh"So my second console was going to be 360, because of its exclusives, like DOA, Bioshock and Eternal Sonata, on the last second i went for the PS3, mostly because MGS4, but knowing now that Eternal and Bioshock are coming too, i'm pretty excited, so my question is, does anybody is excited about this games or just a few guys? also, are any other former exclusives coming to the PS3?"
im excited about Bioshock , i've beat the game on 360 and loved it but the 360 controller is annoying as hell whenever it comes to playing FPS, i always get 30+ kills in CoD4 on PS3 while on 360 i only get 14, the playstation controller just feels small and very easy to master games with while the 360 challenges you to move your thumbs from the huge trigger buttons to the very small ones RB and whatever the other is called, on the other hand Dead Rising have been hinted to come to PS3 on the PlayStation blog by teasing us with " you haven't seen the last of dead rising yet..." i would have assumed he meant the Wii version but he said it on a official PS blog so yea, also Mass Effect is roumered to hit PS3 as well but it isn't confirmed nor denied by the dev, if it got ported it would suck anyway since floppy EA has the publishing rights.
[QUOTE="hazelnutman"][QUOTE="Vyse_Legends"][QUOTE="hazelnutman"][QUOTE="Vyse_Legends"]How about Japan?:
To the Land of the Rising Sun hai?:D
Vyse_Legends
Yay! I was hoping you'd say that! Think of all of the awesome stuff we'll own.
Well, I never really went past this stage in world domination. What do we exactly do now?
Well either we have enough power to take over Japan with just ourselves.Or we need to build an army.
Oooh! Let's give our personal army a funny name. :D
So when we invade we'll make their army die laughing...and from gunfire?:?Japan makes your army turn against you by threatening to cut their Anime/Manga/Games. You are defeated and this thread goes back to the miain topic.
I'm happy about Bioshock, but Eternal Sonata is something I'm going to look through thoroughly first. Then I might get it.
m$ only owns gears 1n2 not 3 three so keep ur fingers crossedhalfbreed11111No...they own the IP to the Gears of War franchise. And what is the point of putting the $ in MS? Is it supposed to be derogatory?
[QUOTE="SollidSnake_"]as far as i know, no. i cant say i am excited.. but i hope they turn out to be good games and i might get them x) (besides bioshock wich i'll get for my PC). i'd like to have that cute gears of war 2 in my ps3 tho.. why doesnt Sony pay for it?! :P (if MS owns part of it i didnt know.. so dont shotgun me in the eyeball :))pyromaniac223MS owns the IP for it, just like it owns Halo. So no way that would go to the PS3, just like LBP would never go to the Xbox.
Nope Epic owns the GeOW IP. M$ owns the publishing rights to 2 GeOW games (GeOW and GeOW2). After Gears 2 Epic can find another publisher is they want ...
Back to the thread --> Im quite excited for Bioshock PS3 and Eternal Sonata! Not to mention other games such as Resistance 2, LBP, R&CF:Q4B, etc...
Huh. I actually prefer the 360 controller for shooters, but I like the PS3 controller for most everything else. I just don't really like the two analog sticks for shooting."madsnakehhh"So my second console was going to be 360, because of its exclusives, like DOA, Bioshock and Eternal Sonata, on the last second i went for the PS3, mostly because MGS4, but knowing now that Eternal and Bioshock are coming too, i'm pretty excited, so my question is, does anybody is excited about this games or just a few guys? also, are any other former exclusives coming to the PS3?"
im excited about Bioshock , i've beat the game on 360 and loved it but the 360 controller is annoying as hell whenever it comes to playing FPS, i always get 30+ kills in CoD4 on PS3 while on 360 i only get 14, the playstation controller just feels small and very easy to master games with while the 360 challenges you to move your thumbs from the huge trigger buttons to the very small ones RB and whatever the other is called, on the other hand Dead Rising have been hinted to come to PS3 on the PlayStation blog by teasing us with " you haven't seen the last of dead rising yet..." i would have assumed he meant the Wii version but he said it on a official PS blog so yea, also Mass Effect is roumered to hit PS3 as well but it isn't confirmed nor denied by the dev, if it got ported it would suck anyway since floppy EA has the publishing rights.
king-micky207
MS owns the IP for it, just like it owns Halo. So no way that would go to the PS3, just like LBP would never go to the Xbox.[QUOTE="pyromaniac223"][QUOTE="SollidSnake_"]as far as i know, no. i cant say i am excited.. but i hope they turn out to be good games and i might get them x) (besides bioshock wich i'll get for my PC). i'd like to have that cute gears of war 2 in my ps3 tho.. why doesnt Sony pay for it?! :P (if MS owns part of it i didnt know.. so dont shotgun me in the eyeball :))choasgod
Nope Epic owns the GeOW IP. M$ owns the publishing rights to 2 GeOW games (GeOW and GeOW2). After Gears 2 Epic can find another publisher is they want ...
Back to the thread --> Im quite excited for Bioshock PS3 and Eternal Sonata! Not to mention other games such as Resistance 2, LBP, R&CF:Q4B, etc...
Huh. I guess I was wrong. Although MS would probably just secure the license for GeoW3 also.Well I'm excited for Bioshock because it let's me be like The Pain.:P
And for Eternal Sonata. It's a musical RPG what's not to love?:P
Vyse_Legends
a music themed game i dont know about?
This music major must look into this one =P
[QUOTE="halfbreed11111"]m$ only owns gears 1n2 not 3 three so keep ur fingers crossedpyromaniac223No...they own the IP to the Gears of War franchise. And what is the point of putting the $ in MS? Is it supposed to be derogatory?
it's because everything they do is involved with money , 99% of their exclusives are all bought out, or at least that's what i think it is.
No...they own the IP to the Gears of War franchise. And what is the point of putting the $ in MS? Is it supposed to be derogatory?[QUOTE="pyromaniac223"][QUOTE="halfbreed11111"]m$ only owns gears 1n2 not 3 three so keep ur fingers crossedking-micky207
it's because everything they do is involved with money , 99% of their exclusives are all bought out, or at least that's what i think it is.
Wow...uh....MS is a company. Everything Sony does is involved with money also. And if you seriously believe that 99% of their exclusives are bought out, you need to stop getting statistics from random people off the internet. I bet you believe that the RROD also affects 50% of consoles too?[QUOTE="king-micky207"]No...they own the IP to the Gears of War franchise. And what is the point of putting the $ in MS? Is it supposed to be derogatory?[QUOTE="pyromaniac223"][QUOTE="halfbreed11111"]m$ only owns gears 1n2 not 3 three so keep ur fingers crossedpyromaniac223
it's because everything they do is involved with money , 99% of their exclusives are all bought out, or at least that's what i think it is.
Wow...uh....MS is a company. Everything Sony does is involved with money also. And if you seriously believe that 99% of their exclusives are bought out, you need to stop getting statistics from random people off the internet. I bet you believe that the RROD also affects 50% of consoles too?Its around 33% isn't it?
[QUOTE="pyromaniac223"][QUOTE="king-micky207"]No...they own the IP to the Gears of War franchise. And what is the point of putting the $ in MS? Is it supposed to be derogatory?[QUOTE="pyromaniac223"][QUOTE="halfbreed11111"]m$ only owns gears 1n2 not 3 three so keep ur fingers crossedZidaneski
it's because everything they do is involved with money , 99% of their exclusives are all bought out, or at least that's what i think it is.
Wow...uh....MS is a company. Everything Sony does is involved with money also. And if you seriously believe that 99% of their exclusives are bought out, you need to stop getting statistics from random people off the internet. I bet you believe that the RROD also affects 50% of consoles too?Its around 33% isn't it?
I believe the Falcon model is around 10%. 33% was a year ago or something.[QUOTE="king-micky207"]No...they own the IP to the Gears of War franchise. And what is the point of putting the $ in MS? Is it supposed to be derogatory?[QUOTE="pyromaniac223"][QUOTE="halfbreed11111"]m$ only owns gears 1n2 not 3 three so keep ur fingers crossedpyromaniac223
it's because everything they do is involved with money , 99% of their exclusives are all bought out, or at least that's what i think it is.
Wow...uh....MS is a company. Everything Sony does is involved with money also. And if you seriously believe that 99% of their exclusives are bought out, you need to stop getting statistics from random people off the internet. I bet you believe that the RROD also affects 50% of consoles too?when i say 99% i also include the original xbox and PCs as well and im not getting statistics from anyone, i've seen enough games to support my claim, and when i said that everything they do is involved with money i mean getting devs on their side, Rockstar is a perfect example of what i mean.
[QUOTE="pyromaniac223"][QUOTE="king-micky207"]No...they own the IP to the Gears of War franchise. And what is the point of putting the $ in MS? Is it supposed to be derogatory?[QUOTE="pyromaniac223"][QUOTE="halfbreed11111"]m$ only owns gears 1n2 not 3 three so keep ur fingers crossedking-micky207
it's because everything they do is involved with money , 99% of their exclusives are all bought out, or at least that's what i think it is.
Wow...uh....MS is a company. Everything Sony does is involved with money also. And if you seriously believe that 99% of their exclusives are bought out, you need to stop getting statistics from random people off the internet. I bet you believe that the RROD also affects 50% of consoles too?when i say 99% i also include the original xbox and PCs as well and im not getting statistics from anyone, i've seen enough games to support my claim, and when i said that everything they do is involved with money i mean getting devs on their side, Rockstar is a perfect example of what i mean.
The incident with Rockstar is the only documented instance of MS paying for exclusive content, even though it is probable that this has happened in other cases. But really, you can't just say "I've seen enough games to support my claim" when your claim is 99% of ALL GAMES on the Xbox, 360, and PC have been paid for. Really, if they did pay for that many games, they wouldn't be posting profits, which is what they are about. Most devs make games for the 360 because it is easier to work for than the PS3, and for the PC because PC games sell the most.[QUOTE="pyromaniac223"]Dear god...thread hijacked.Vyse_LegendsYes that has a tendancy to happen when you put me and hazel in the same thread.:P
We can't help ourselves :cry:
I mean, you think that's bad, we have an almost 400 letter chain thing going on somewhere else.
The incident with Rockstar is the only documented instance of MS paying for exclusive content, even though it is probable that this has happened in other cases. But really, you can't just say "I've seen enough games to support my claim" when your claim is 99% of ALL GAMES on the Xbox, 360, and PC have been paid for. Really, if they did pay for that many games, they wouldn't be posting profits, which is what they are about. Most devs make games for the 360 because it is easier to work for than the PS3, and for the PC because PC games sell the most.pyromaniac223
ok you know bill gates right? yeah he has been named the richest person alive so he can buy a billion exclusives without worrying about profits, neither of us can really present a prove that would prove or disapprove my statement, do you really think that microsoft would tell everyone about every exclusive they ever bought out? they don't want to get laughed at by Nintendo or Sony where they draw in devs to their side without $$ being involved , will that's the case of Sony at least, but i do admit that 99% is exatrating, 74% is my best bet.
[QUOTE="pyromaniac223"] The incident with Rockstar is the only documented instance of MS paying for exclusive content, even though it is probable that this has happened in other cases. But really, you can't just say "I've seen enough games to support my claim" when your claim is 99% of ALL GAMES on the Xbox, 360, and PC have been paid for. Really, if they did pay for that many games, they wouldn't be posting profits, which is what they are about. Most devs make games for the 360 because it is easier to work for than the PS3, and for the PC because PC games sell the most.king-micky207
ok you know bill gates right? yeah he has been named the richest person alive so he can buy a billion exclusives without worrying about profits, neither of us can really present a prove that would prove or disapprove my statement, do you really think that microsoft would tell everyone about every exclusive they ever bought out? they don't want to get laughed at by Nintendo or Sony where they draw in devs to their side without $$ being involved , will that's the case of Sony at least, but i do admit that 99% is exatrating, 74% is my best bet.
Wow I should sig this....I think I will.This is one of THE most naive things I have ever read. This isn't about Bill Gates, it's about MS, which has STOCKHOLDERS it needs to please. If MS had to buy that many exclusives, it would have left the game industry years ago. Devs choose freely to make games for MS. It just isn't economically sound to buy every exclusive on your console.
[QUOTE="king-micky207"][QUOTE="pyromaniac223"] The incident with Rockstar is the only documented instance of MS paying for exclusive content, even though it is probable that this has happened in other cases. But really, you can't just say "I've seen enough games to support my claim" when your claim is 99% of ALL GAMES on the Xbox, 360, and PC have been paid for. Really, if they did pay for that many games, they wouldn't be posting profits, which is what they are about. Most devs make games for the 360 because it is easier to work for than the PS3, and for the PC because PC games sell the most.pyromaniac223
ok you know bill gates right? yeah he has been named the richest person alive so he can buy a billion exclusives without worrying about profits, neither of us can really present a prove that would prove or disapprove my statement, do you really think that microsoft would tell everyone about every exclusive they ever bought out? they don't want to get laughed at by Nintendo or Sony where they draw in devs to their side without $$ being involved , will that's the case of Sony at least, but i do admit that 99% is exatrating, 74% is my best bet.
Wow I should sig this....I think I will.This is one of THE most naive things I have ever read. This isn't about Bill Gates, it's about MS, which has STOCKHOLDERS it needs to please. If MS had to buy that many exclusives, it would have left the game industry years ago. Devs choose freely to make games for MS. It just isn't economically sound to buy every exclusive on your console.
i feel sorry that i've wasted my time with you, and to the thread creator i apologize for going off-topic, people like him tend to get on my nerve.
[QUOTE="pyromaniac223"][QUOTE="king-micky207"][QUOTE="pyromaniac223"] The incident with Rockstar is the only documented instance of MS paying for exclusive content, even though it is probable that this has happened in other cases. But really, you can't just say "I've seen enough games to support my claim" when your claim is 99% of ALL GAMES on the Xbox, 360, and PC have been paid for. Really, if they did pay for that many games, they wouldn't be posting profits, which is what they are about. Most devs make games for the 360 because it is easier to work for than the PS3, and for the PC because PC games sell the most.king-micky207
ok you know bill gates right? yeah he has been named the richest person alive so he can buy a billion exclusives without worrying about profits, neither of us can really present a prove that would prove or disapprove my statement, do you really think that microsoft would tell everyone about every exclusive they ever bought out? they don't want to get laughed at by Nintendo or Sony where they draw in devs to their side without $$ being involved , will that's the case of Sony at least, but i do admit that 99% is exatrating, 74% is my best bet.
Wow I should sig this....I think I will.This is one of THE most naive things I have ever read. This isn't about Bill Gates, it's about MS, which has STOCKHOLDERS it needs to please. If MS had to buy that many exclusives, it would have left the game industry years ago. Devs choose freely to make games for MS. It just isn't economically sound to buy every exclusive on your console.
i feel sorry that i've wasted my time with you, and to the thread creator i apologize for going off-topic, people like him tend to get on my nerve.
You spew a bunch of BS accusations with no facts or proof, and I wasted YOUR time? Wow, just wow...Fanboys get on MY nerves.
[QUOTE="king-micky207"][QUOTE="pyromaniac223"][QUOTE="king-micky207"][QUOTE="pyromaniac223"] The incident with Rockstar is the only documented instance of MS paying for exclusive content, even though it is probable that this has happened in other cases. But really, you can't just say "I've seen enough games to support my claim" when your claim is 99% of ALL GAMES on the Xbox, 360, and PC have been paid for. Really, if they did pay for that many games, they wouldn't be posting profits, which is what they are about. Most devs make games for the 360 because it is easier to work for than the PS3, and for the PC because PC games sell the most.pyromaniac223
ok you know bill gates right? yeah he has been named the richest person alive so he can buy a billion exclusives without worrying about profits, neither of us can really present a prove that would prove or disapprove my statement, do you really think that microsoft would tell everyone about every exclusive they ever bought out? they don't want to get laughed at by Nintendo or Sony where they draw in devs to their side without $$ being involved , will that's the case of Sony at least, but i do admit that 99% is exatrating, 74% is my best bet.
Wow I should sig this....I think I will.This is one of THE most naive things I have ever read. This isn't about Bill Gates, it's about MS, which has STOCKHOLDERS it needs to please. If MS had to buy that many exclusives, it would have left the game industry years ago. Devs choose freely to make games for MS. It just isn't economically sound to buy every exclusive on your console.
i feel sorry that i've wasted my time with you, and to the thread creator i apologize for going off-topic, people like him tend to get on my nerve.
You spew a bunch of BS accusations with no facts or proof, and I wasted YOUR time? Wow, just wow...Fanboys get on MY nerves.
Someone needs a hug :D
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment