This topic is locked from further discussion.
will 360 players be able to face ps3 owners? cause that would be awesome!o0George0o
I wish. You know, that's not a bad idea. It would be fun to face 360 owners.
[QUOTE="o0George0o"]will 360 players be able to face ps3 owners? cause that would be awesome!kingalphagold
I wish. You know, that's not a bad idea. It would be fun to face 360 owners.
yeah i hope they do it with at least the half-life 2 orange box cause that rok!will 360 players be able to face ps3 owners? cause that would be awesome!o0George0o
While it may initially seem like a huge bummer that this game got delayed again, you should actually be happy about it. The delays probably mean that they are doing their best to make a great port & not just push out some crap with substandard graphics/framerates. I would rather have the game delayed until it's great than another inferior port.ColoradoKindBud
I agree, at first i was pretty pissed too, but if these delays mean a much better game then I'm all for it, however if it sucks like splinter cell DA and FEAR, Ill be pissed off even more, im pretty sure GRAWÂ 2 will not be coming out in June.
I'm tellin' ya...I wouldn't trade the PS3 for any other system, but it's freakin' bonkers for delays. F.E.A.R., Vegas, MLB, MotorStorm, Splinter Cell, Lair, Gran Turismo, GRAW...and any others I forgot to mention. Oh well I guess.jlabadie88
4 of the 8 games you listed are Ubi games.
I thought I read in GI that ps3 games are already out and developers are just waiting to release it until more poeple buy the system. They had a pic of this game in the background with the story, so if this is true I think Ubi just holding out to make more money, and the crappy port is already made. It would be nice if they would get off there lazy @ss and do a good port though.QwkGT
Â
LOL we can all dream can't we.Â
It is true, i believe ubisoft is one of the companies holding out until theres more ps3 owners.
I read in game informer that they confirmed that companies are holding out until more people own ps3's. i believe ubisoft released splinter cell as a buffer and r6vegas has been done for a while now-
I'd rather them delay the game then release something that is inferior to the 360 version. Example: SC Double Agent.Â
I'm sure it can be related to the recent "new" development kit that Sony released a month or so ago. It supposedly makes it a lot easier to work with the PS3 architecture. Of course this is just a guess. But it makes sense nonetheless.
It is true, i believe ubisoft is one of the companies holding out until theres more ps3 owners.
I read in game informer that they confirmed that companies are holding out until more people own ps3's. i believe ubisoft released splinter cell as a buffer and r6vegas has been done for a while now-
peter360
There is no company out there that would intentionally delay making money.
What's the difference if they wait until the PS3 gains more users?
They'll get to make money now and when more users come on later, they'll make money then.Â
UBISOFT !!!!
When will they learn how to port a game?
tmac2gooden
When people realise that porting is stupidly hard.
It might even mean re-optimising the game to get it right. Due to data bandwidth, changing draw distance.
ect...its not exactly an easy process..Â
While it may initially seem like a huge bummer that this game got delayed again, you should actually be happy about it. The delays probably mean that they are doing their best to make a great port & not just push out some crap with substandard graphics/framerates. I would rather have the game delayed until it's great than another inferior port.ColoradoKindBud
my thoughts exactly
ive been waiting for this game since it was announced, when april cam and it was delayed to june i just got it for the 360, couldnt wait any longer, btw the game is great but it has so many glitches that it makes gears look complete, all these delays better mean no more glitches
Â
[QUOTE="kingalphagold"][QUOTE="o0George0o"]will 360 players be able to face ps3 owners? cause that would be awesome!o0George0o
I wish. You know, that's not a bad idea. It would be fun to face 360 owners.
yeah i hope they do it with at least the half-life 2 orange box cause that rok!or with the UT 3 game :)Â
[QUOTE="peter360"]There is no company out there that would intentionally delay making money.It is true, i believe ubisoft is one of the companies holding out until theres more ps3 owners.
I read in game informer that they confirmed that companies are holding out until more people own ps3's. i believe ubisoft released splinter cell as a buffer and r6vegas has been done for a while now-
rothman713
What's the difference if they wait until the PS3 gains more users?
They'll get to make money now and when more users come on later, they'll make money then.Â
Hype. If they release it now, the initial buzz on release is lower with a lower installed base. If they wait, there should be more buzz on it's first week sales. Especially true if it is a crappy game, which historically with Ubi seems to be the case.Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment