Rear Projection TV

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for deactivated-5ac3ec80bc470
deactivated-5ac3ec80bc470

185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 deactivated-5ac3ec80bc470
Member since 2005 • 185 Posts

Are Rear Projection TVs good for playing PS3 or should i stick to LCD or Plasma.

Avatar image for deactivated-5ac3ec80bc470
deactivated-5ac3ec80bc470

185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 deactivated-5ac3ec80bc470
Member since 2005 • 185 Posts
BUMP
Avatar image for arabi_89
arabi_89

1299

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 arabi_89
Member since 2006 • 1299 Posts
ok as i heard Plasmas r the best but are most expensive, Check this Guide http://gear.ign.com/hdtv/ i hope its helpful.
Avatar image for The_G00se
The_G00se

760

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 The_G00se
Member since 2006 • 760 Posts

Are Rear Projection TVs good for playing PS3 or should i stick to LCD or Plasma.

jackellis1
I've been playing on a rear projection but I warn you, while the picture looks amazing, it sucks in sun light. Mine is in the living room and when it's bright out, I just won't play it. If I'm really hard up for a game I'll throw a blanket over the windows. HAHA It's ugly, but it works.
Avatar image for RingosLastFight
RingosLastFight

54

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 RingosLastFight
Member since 2006 • 54 Posts
Rear projection's are the way to go. With most plasma or LCD screens, you have to break in the screen before you can play video games on them, typically 100 hours of use prior to gaming, due to the fast refresh rates (around 30 fps vs. 60 fps). Also, they are cheaper, not too much thicker, and are just a great buy. I have two Sony SXRD 60" TV's in my home, and they are very high quality and come with loads of features. So personally, I would go with rear projection.
Avatar image for deactivated-5ac3ec80bc470
deactivated-5ac3ec80bc470

185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 deactivated-5ac3ec80bc470
Member since 2005 • 185 Posts
There is a sony LCD I might get when the price goes down a bit, so i think ill stay safe and get that. Thanks Anyway
Avatar image for mjarantilla
mjarantilla

15721

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 mjarantilla
Member since 2002 • 15721 Posts
[QUOTE="jackellis1"]There is a sony LCD I might get when the price goes down a bit, so i think ill stay safe and get that. Thanks Anyway

Get a plasma.
Avatar image for deactivated-5ac3ec80bc470
deactivated-5ac3ec80bc470

185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 deactivated-5ac3ec80bc470
Member since 2005 • 185 Posts
are they much better for the extra price?
Avatar image for BroweChisox
BroweChisox

1104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 BroweChisox
Member since 2003 • 1104 Posts
If you search back a page or two for a thread called 'recommend me a tv' or something, you can see my calibration results for the newest Sammy LCD LN-T-4666F. Best LCD out there right now.
Avatar image for mjarantilla
mjarantilla

15721

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 mjarantilla
Member since 2002 • 15721 Posts
are they much better for the extra price?jackellis1
Picture quality is 10x more important than the difference between 1080p and 720p, and 720p plasmas are cheap as **** now.
Avatar image for BroweChisox
BroweChisox

1104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 BroweChisox
Member since 2003 • 1104 Posts
[QUOTE="mjarantilla"][QUOTE="jackellis1"]There is a sony LCD I might get when the price goes down a bit, so i think ill stay safe and get that. Thanks Anyway

Get a plasma.

Every Sony LCD out right now has clouding issues. They are not worth buying until this is fixed... that is why the prices are dropping so quickly. The new Sony sets should be out within a month or two.
Avatar image for slyydevil
slyydevil

494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 slyydevil
Member since 2004 • 494 Posts

Rear projection's are the way to go. With most plasma or LCD screens, you have to break in the screen before you can play video games on them, typically 100 hours of use prior to gaming, due to the fast refresh rates (around 30 fps vs. 60 fps). Also, they are cheaper, not too much thicker, and are just a great buy. I have two Sony SXRD 60" TV's in my home, and they are very high quality and come with loads of features. So personally, I would go with rear projection.RingosLastFight

 

I totally agree with you. I don't own the SXRD but I do have a HD-ILA rear projection and the PQ is the doo doo! The problem I have with IGN's article about the rear projections were their cons and I don't have any of the issues due to the fact that my TV has 3 chips in it so there's no sweet spot that they spoke of or the rainbow effect, etc. Plus it's the 5th or 6th generation of its kind and it only weighs 60lbs. so the cons are a moot point in my book. The only gripe I have with my TV has to do with the remote and that's because I have to cycle through the video input channels one by one but I'm beginning to be unfazed by it now.  

Avatar image for ZnLRyDa
ZnLRyDa

623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 ZnLRyDa
Member since 2006 • 623 Posts
If you search back a page or two for a thread called 'recommend me a tv' or something, you can see my calibration results for the newest Sammy LCD LN-T-4666F. Best LCD out there right now.BroweChisox
UMM...wat the heck is a Sammy LCD LN-T-4666F?? link?? are u talking about samsung?
Avatar image for Radiozo
Radiozo

2413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Radiozo
Member since 2006 • 2413 Posts

[QUOTE="mjarantilla"][QUOTE="jackellis1"]There is a sony LCD I might get when the price goes down a bit, so i think ill stay safe and get that.

Thanks AnywayBroweChisox

Get a plasma.


Every Sony LCD out right now has clouding issues. They are not worth buying until this is fixed... that is why the prices are dropping so quickly. The new Sony sets should be out within a month or two.

 

Well there is no clouding on my Sony. I think its the X-series that have problems with clouding. 

Avatar image for gullytolwyn
gullytolwyn

362

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 gullytolwyn
Member since 2003 • 362 Posts

PLEASE ignore anyone saying to get a rear projection TV. Infact, ignore any TV you see that has "projection" in the description. These TVs worse quality than non projection by far, and though they may be cheaper, you get what you pay for.

Also, ignore anyone who recommends plasma. There is a reason major electronics companies are no longer supporting plasma televisions and making LCDs. Sure they're "technically" brighter, but have fun with a dead lamp in 5 years when you use it as consistantly as most gamers. 

Read this and you'll understand: http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=2246575&highlight=hdtv 

Avatar image for dubbleduecer
dubbleduecer

498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 dubbleduecer
Member since 2007 • 498 Posts

PLEASE ignore anyone saying to get a rear projection TV. Infact, ignore any TV you see that has "projection" in the description. These TVs worse quality than non projection by far, and though they may be cheaper, you get what you pay for.

Also, ignore anyone who recommends plasma. There is a reason major electronics companies are no longer supporting plasma televisions and making LCDs. Sure they're "technically" brighter, but have fun with a dead lamp in 5 years when you use it as consistantly as most gamers.

Read this and you'll understand: http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=2246575&highlight=hdtv

gullytolwyn
THANK YOU.... After reading all the above posts I was gonna kill myself... The public is so missinformed about these technologies. Nobody hear knows what they are talking about. Mind you Im not saying I do. But RearProjection Tvs are deffinetly not the way to go, and someone said Plasmas are the best but most expensive.... WRONG!!!!! DLP or any other Projection has SERIOUS logevity and upkeep issues, along with awfull viewing angles, poor refresh rates, and things like screen door effects... Plasmas are bigger and CHEAPER than LCD's but lack the fire Power. I challenge you to find a reasonably priced 1080p Plasma. LCD (imo) is the way to go. If you want anything less than 46inches, then get a LCD.. Also, the newest and just released LCD;s have the same contrast ratios as plasmas... FYI... The thing that makes these technologies better than the other is dependant on the situation.. If you only have a thousand or so buck and want something bigger than 50inches well than go with DLP. If you want a TV that you can mount on your wall and you want a big one for not much money, get a plasma.. If you have some money and wnat the best PQ and Price get LCD.. Plus. you can get a 32 inch 1080p LCD for 1200$. Sharp Aqous
Avatar image for Paintballfelty
Paintballfelty

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Paintballfelty
Member since 2005 • 25 Posts

OK let me explain the strengths and weaknesses of each tv set.

Projection- they come in crt, dlp, lcd projection, and lcos... with projection you get the most inches per price that you pay, dlp is the most popular format in todays market, i personally prefer lcos which has the lowest chance in my opinion of burn in, you have to replace a lamp in projection tvs about every 2000 hours and lcd projection at this time is only capable of 720p

LCD Flat Panel- it will be the highest price per inch but has the least chance of burn-in and is wall mountable as is plasma, it will have lower contrast though and wont achieve the blacks of projection, it also has a chance of losing pixels and the brightness will fade over time

Plasma- It is a popular format due to the fact that it is wall mountable and cheaper than lcd on the price per inch almost as cheap as projection, the problem with plasma is it is not recommended for gaming because of hot spots and burns in easily

Avatar image for mjarantilla
mjarantilla

15721

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 mjarantilla
Member since 2002 • 15721 Posts
[QUOTE="gullytolwyn"]

PLEASE ignore anyone saying to get a rear projection TV. Infact, ignore any TV you see that has "projection" in the description. These TVs worse quality than non projection by far, and though they may be cheaper, you get what you pay for.

Also, ignore anyone who recommends plasma. There is a reason major electronics companies are no longer supporting plasma televisions and making LCDs. Sure they're "technically" brighter, but have fun with a dead lamp in 5 years when you use it as consistantly as most gamers.

Read this and you'll understand: http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=2246575&highlight=hdtv

dubbleduecer
THANK YOU.... After reading all the above posts I was gonna kill myself... The public is so missinformed about these technologies. Nobody hear knows what they are talking about. Mind you Im not saying I do. But RearProjection Tvs are deffinetly not the way to go, and someone said Plasmas are the best but most expensive.... WRONG!!!!! DLP or any other Projection has SERIOUS logevity and upkeep issues, along with awfull viewing angles, poor refresh rates, and things like screen door effects... Plasmas are bigger and CHEAPER than LCD's but lack the fire Power. I challenge you to find a reasonably priced 1080p Plasma. LCD (imo) is the way to go. If you want anything less than 46inches, then get a LCD.. Also, the newest and just released LCD;s have the same contrast ratios as plasmas... FYI... The thing that makes these technologies better than the other is dependant on the situation.. If you only have a thousand or so buck and want something bigger than 50inches well than go with DLP. If you want a TV that you can mount on your wall and you want a big one for not much money, get a plasma.. If you have some money and wnat the best PQ and Price get LCD.. Plus. you can get a 32 inch 1080p LCD for 1200$. Sharp Aqous

Regarding RPTVs: a) DLP and other projection technologies are better in black level and color reproduction than any LCD. b) Screen door effects no longer exist with the newest projection TVs c) Viewing angle is still a problem, THIS I agree with, but often enough the TVs are big enough that it doesn't bloody matter. d) NO other TV technology except CRT has faster refresh rates than DLP. The fact that you think otherwise proves you know nothing. e) Lamps are becoming more durable, and future DLPs will rely on LED lamps that last for hundreds of thousands of hours. Regarding plasmas: a) Plasmas have superior picture and color reproduction than LCDs, which FAR, FAR outweighs 1080p. b) 1080p plasmas are priced similarly to 1080p LCDs. Perhaps a little more expensive, but not exorbitantly so. Regarding LCDs: a) LCDs CAN NEVER HAVE the same contrast ratios as plasmas. You're thinking of DYNAMIC contrast ratio, which was so distracting on my LCD TV that I turned it off. b) If you want anything less than 37 inches, get an LCD. Otherwise, get a plasma, because above 37 inches, plasmas are far better. LCDs have the WORST picture quality. What you gain in resolution, you LOSE in color and picture reproduction, in refresh rate, in viewing angle (compared to plasma), etc., and that isn't worth the trade off. The ONLY time I would buy an LCD over an equivalently sized plasma is if I had to view it in a room with a lot of glare.
Avatar image for Paintballfelty
Paintballfelty

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Paintballfelty
Member since 2005 • 25 Posts

PLEASE ignore anyone saying to get a rear projection TV. Infact, ignore any TV you see that has "projection" in the description. These TVs worse quality than non projection by far, and though they may be cheaper, you get what you pay for.

Also, ignore anyone who recommends plasma. There is a reason major electronics companies are no longer supporting plasma televisions and making LCDs. Sure they're "technically" brighter, but have fun with a dead lamp in 5 years when you use it as consistantly as most gamers.

Read this and you'll understand: http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=2246575&highlight=hdtv

gullytolwyn
Plasmas do not have lamps but instead a gas and will go out in about 10 yrs, also you are thinking of the older crt projection tvs, they are virtually none existent these days projection tvs such as dlp are capable of 1080p and they have lamps you must replace about every 1.5 to 2yrs
Avatar image for mjarantilla
mjarantilla

15721

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#20 mjarantilla
Member since 2002 • 15721 Posts

OK let me explain the strengths and weaknesses of each tv set.

Projection- they come in crt, dlp, lcd projection, and lcos... with projection you get the most inches per price that you pay, dlp is the most popular format in todays market, i personally prefer lcos which has the lowest chance in my opinion of burn in, you have to replace a lamp in projection tvs about every 2000 hours and lcd projection at this time is only capable of 720p

LCD Flat Panel- it will be the highest price per inch but has the least chance of burn-in and is wall mountable as is plasma, it will have lower contrast though and wont achieve the blacks of projection, it also has a chance of losing pixels and the brightness will fade over time

Plasma- It is a popular format due to the fact that it is wall mountable and cheaper than lcd on the price per inch almost as cheap as projection, the problem with plasma is it is not recommended for gaming because of hot spots and burns in easily

Paintballfelty
Plasmas don't (or VERY RARELY) burn in after the first 100 hours of use.
Avatar image for mjarantilla
mjarantilla

15721

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#21 mjarantilla
Member since 2002 • 15721 Posts

PLEASE ignore anyone saying to get a rear projection TV. Infact, ignore any TV you see that has "projection" in the description. These TVs worse quality than non projection by far, and though they may be cheaper, you get what you pay for.

Also, ignore anyone who recommends plasma. There is a reason major electronics companies are no longer supporting plasma televisions and making LCDs. Sure they're "technically" brighter, but have fun with a dead lamp in 5 years when you use it as consistantly as most gamers.

Read this and you'll understand: http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=2246575&highlight=hdtv

gullytolwyn
Companies are pulling back on plasma because of internal reasons, not because LCDs are better. LCDs are easier to manufacture at high resolutions, and that magic "1080p" makes for a much better and more quantifiable bullet point than plasma's superior picture quality, thus making it easier to charge higher prices, even though picture accuracy is FAR more important. And LCDs are the ones that have dead lamps, not plasmas. And AFAIK, only a few manufacturers make their TVs' LED backlights replaceable.
Avatar image for Paintballfelty
Paintballfelty

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Paintballfelty
Member since 2005 • 25 Posts
In the end you arent going to choose a tv due to these threads most likely........ the best thing to do is to go to the store and look at what they have to offer you find something you like ask a store associate and see what their opinion is on gaming with this tv.
Avatar image for Paintballfelty
Paintballfelty

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Paintballfelty
Member since 2005 • 25 Posts
[QUOTE="gullytolwyn"]

PLEASE ignore anyone saying to get a rear projection TV. Infact, ignore any TV you see that has "projection" in the description. These TVs worse quality than non projection by far, and though they may be cheaper, you get what you pay for.

Also, ignore anyone who recommends plasma. There is a reason major electronics companies are no longer supporting plasma televisions and making LCDs. Sure they're "technically" brighter, but have fun with a dead lamp in 5 years when you use it as consistantly as most gamers.

Read this and you'll understand: http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=2246575&highlight=hdtv

mjarantilla
Companies are pulling back on plasma because of internal reasons, not because LCDs are better. LCDs are easier to manufacture at high resolutions, and that magic "1080p" makes for a much better and more quantifiable bullet point than plasma's superior picture quality, thus making it easier to charge higher prices, even though picture accuracy is FAR more important. And LCDs are the ones that have dead lamps, not plasmas. And AFAIK, only a few manufacturers make their TVs' LED backlights replaceable.

LOL lcds do not have lamps, only projection.......
Avatar image for mjarantilla
mjarantilla

15721

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 mjarantilla
Member since 2002 • 15721 Posts
[QUOTE="mjarantilla"][QUOTE="gullytolwyn"]

PLEASE ignore anyone saying to get a rear projection TV. Infact, ignore any TV you see that has "projection" in the description. These TVs worse quality than non projection by far, and though they may be cheaper, you get what you pay for.

Also, ignore anyone who recommends plasma. There is a reason major electronics companies are no longer supporting plasma televisions and making LCDs. Sure they're "technically" brighter, but have fun with a dead lamp in 5 years when you use it as consistantly as most gamers.

Read this and you'll understand: http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=2246575&highlight=hdtv

Paintballfelty
Companies are pulling back on plasma because of internal reasons, not because LCDs are better. LCDs are easier to manufacture at high resolutions, and that magic "1080p" makes for a much better and more quantifiable bullet point than plasma's superior picture quality, thus making it easier to charge higher prices, even though picture accuracy is FAR more important. And LCDs are the ones that have dead lamps, not plasmas. And AFAIK, only a few manufacturers make their TVs' LED backlights replaceable.

LOL lcds do not have lamps, only projection.......

They have LED backlights, which serve the same function and DO wear out over time. Keep those backlights on their brightest setting and they'll run out in about 5 years.
Avatar image for dubbleduecer
dubbleduecer

498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#25 dubbleduecer
Member since 2007 • 498 Posts
[QUOTE="dubbleduecer"][QUOTE="gullytolwyn"]

PLEASE ignore anyone saying to get a rear projection TV. Infact, ignore any TV you see that has "projection" in the description. These TVs worse quality than non projection by far, and though they may be cheaper, you get what you pay for.

Also, ignore anyone who recommends plasma. There is a reason major electronics companies are no longer supporting plasma televisions and making LCDs. Sure they're "technically" brighter, but have fun with a dead lamp in 5 years when you use it as consistantly as most gamers.

Read this and you'll understand: http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=2246575&highlight=hdtv

mjarantilla
THANK YOU.... After reading all the above posts I was gonna kill myself... The public is so missinformed about these technologies. Nobody hear knows what they are talking about. Mind you Im not saying I do. But RearProjection Tvs are deffinetly not the way to go, and someone said Plasmas are the best but most expensive.... WRONG!!!!! DLP or any other Projection has SERIOUS logevity and upkeep issues, along with awfull viewing angles, poor refresh rates, and things like screen door effects... Plasmas are bigger and CHEAPER than LCD's but lack the fire Power. I challenge you to find a reasonably priced 1080p Plasma. LCD (imo) is the way to go. If you want anything less than 46inches, then get a LCD.. Also, the newest and just released LCD;s have the same contrast ratios as plasmas... FYI... The thing that makes these technologies better than the other is dependant on the situation.. If you only have a thousand or so buck and want something bigger than 50inches well than go with DLP. If you want a TV that you can mount on your wall and you want a big one for not much money, get a plasma.. If you have some money and wnat the best PQ and Price get LCD.. Plus. you can get a 32 inch 1080p LCD for 1200$. Sharp Aqous

Regarding RPTVs: a) DLP and other projection technologies are better in black level and color reproduction than any LCD. b) Screen door effects no longer exist with the newest projection TVs c) Viewing angle is still a problem, THIS I agree with, but often enough the TVs are big enough that it doesn't bloody matter. d) NO other TV technology except CRT has faster refresh rates than DLP. The fact that you think otherwise proves you know nothing. e) Lamps are becoming more durable, and future DLPs will rely on LED lamps that last for hundreds of thousands of hours. Regarding plasmas: a) Plasmas have superior picture and color reproduction than LCDs, which FAR, FAR outweighs 1080p. b) 1080p plasmas are priced similarly to 1080p LCDs. Perhaps a little more expensive, but not exorbitantly so. Regarding LCDs: a) LCDs CAN NEVER HAVE the same contrast ratios as plasmas. You're thinking of DYNAMIC contrast ratio, which was so distracting on my LCD TV that I turned it off. b) If you want anything less than 37 inches, get an LCD. Otherwise, get a plasma, because above 37 inches, plasmas are far better. LCDs have the WORST picture quality. What you gain in resolution, you LOSE in color and picture reproduction, in refresh rate, in viewing angle (compared to plasma), etc., and that isn't worth the trade off. The ONLY time I would buy an LCD over an equivalently sized plasma is if I had to view it in a room with a lot of glare.

You cant take you opinion and call it true... 1080p plasmas are only a little bit more expensive?? Have you actually looked at any? priced any? The fact that you think DLP has fast refresh rates shows your ignorance. Screen door effect and ghosting are Huge on DLP's. In my home I have HD DLP, LCD, and CRT. Unlike you I am speaking from actually experience, not what I read on the HG GUID section of BestBuys webpage. ALso. True Contrast ratio is like wattage ratings on Stereos. Example. Book shelf stereo that has claimed 1000 watts, vs. a receiver that has 100 watts.. who wins? the reveiver.. exactly.. Also which has brighter whites? PLASMA.. EXACTLY!! Contrast ratio is the seperation between the Brightest white and darkest black. So the brighter the white, the lighter the dark can be while still keeping a deceptively high contrast ratio. So the contrast ratio doesnt always relate to better darks, though I will agree LCD's dont get AS dark as a good Plasma, but a Plasma doesnt get as dark as a good CRT, and we all know CRT's suck a big one(keep in mind i can touch one as I type this) Thus, proving the point becuase your plasma can get dark doesnt mean it is superior television. If Tvs where ranked based on how dark they could get everyone would have CRT's. Good Day to you Sir.
Avatar image for dubbleduecer
dubbleduecer

498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 dubbleduecer
Member since 2007 • 498 Posts
[QUOTE="Paintballfelty"][QUOTE="mjarantilla"][QUOTE="gullytolwyn"]

PLEASE ignore anyone saying to get a rear projection TV. Infact, ignore any TV you see that has "projection" in the description. These TVs worse quality than non projection by far, and though they may be cheaper, you get what you pay for.

Also, ignore anyone who recommends plasma. There is a reason major electronics companies are no longer supporting plasma televisions and making LCDs. Sure they're "technically" brighter, but have fun with a dead lamp in 5 years when you use it as consistantly as most gamers.

Read this and you'll understand: http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=2246575&highlight=hdtv

mjarantilla
Companies are pulling back on plasma because of internal reasons, not because LCDs are better. LCDs are easier to manufacture at high resolutions, and that magic "1080p" makes for a much better and more quantifiable bullet point than plasma's superior picture quality, thus making it easier to charge higher prices, even though picture accuracy is FAR more important. And LCDs are the ones that have dead lamps, not plasmas. And AFAIK, only a few manufacturers make their TVs' LED backlights replaceable.

LOL lcds do not have lamps, only projection.......

They have LED backlights, which serve the same function and DO wear out over time. Keep those backlights on their brightest setting and they'll run out in about 5 years.

DO you know that for sure? Did you do it and then yours burnt out?? Stop force feeding everyone your opinion on a spoon you are calling the Truth.
Avatar image for mjarantilla
mjarantilla

15721

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27 mjarantilla
Member since 2002 • 15721 Posts
[QUOTE="mjarantilla"][QUOTE="Paintballfelty"][QUOTE="mjarantilla"][QUOTE="gullytolwyn"]

PLEASE ignore anyone saying to get a rear projection TV. Infact, ignore any TV you see that has "projection" in the description. These TVs worse quality than non projection by far, and though they may be cheaper, you get what you pay for.

Also, ignore anyone who recommends plasma. There is a reason major electronics companies are no longer supporting plasma televisions and making LCDs. Sure they're "technically" brighter, but have fun with a dead lamp in 5 years when you use it as consistantly as most gamers.

Read this and you'll understand: http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=2246575&highlight=hdtv

dubbleduecer
Companies are pulling back on plasma because of internal reasons, not because LCDs are better. LCDs are easier to manufacture at high resolutions, and that magic "1080p" makes for a much better and more quantifiable bullet point than plasma's superior picture quality, thus making it easier to charge higher prices, even though picture accuracy is FAR more important. And LCDs are the ones that have dead lamps, not plasmas. And AFAIK, only a few manufacturers make their TVs' LED backlights replaceable.

LOL lcds do not have lamps, only projection.......

They have LED backlights, which serve the same function and DO wear out over time. Keep those backlights on their brightest setting and they'll run out in about 5 years.

DO you know that for sure? Did you do it and then yours burnt out?? Stop force feeding everyone your opinion on a spoon you are calling the Truth.

Got o AVS Forum, they'll confirm it. Also, it doesn't burn out; it just dims. Like my laptop screen that's now impossible to see in daylight.
Avatar image for Paintballfelty
Paintballfelty

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Paintballfelty
Member since 2005 • 25 Posts
[QUOTE="dubbleduecer"][QUOTE="mjarantilla"][QUOTE="Paintballfelty"][QUOTE="mjarantilla"][QUOTE="gullytolwyn"]

PLEASE ignore anyone saying to get a rear projection TV. Infact, ignore any TV you see that has "projection" in the description. These TVs worse quality than non projection by far, and though they may be cheaper, you get what you pay for.

Also, ignore anyone who recommends plasma. There is a reason major electronics companies are no longer supporting plasma televisions and making LCDs. Sure they're "technically" brighter, but have fun with a dead lamp in 5 years when you use it as consistantly as most gamers.

Read this and you'll understand: http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=2246575&highlight=hdtv

mjarantilla
Companies are pulling back on plasma because of internal reasons, not because LCDs are better. LCDs are easier to manufacture at high resolutions, and that magic "1080p" makes for a much better and more quantifiable bullet point than plasma's superior picture quality, thus making it easier to charge higher prices, even though picture accuracy is FAR more important. And LCDs are the ones that have dead lamps, not plasmas. And AFAIK, only a few manufacturers make their TVs' LED backlights replaceable.

LOL lcds do not have lamps, only projection.......

They have LED backlights, which serve the same function and DO wear out over time. Keep those backlights on their brightest setting and they'll run out in about 5 years.

DO you know that for sure? Did you do it and then yours burnt out?? Stop force feeding everyone your opinion on a spoon you are calling the Truth.

Got o AVS Forum, they'll confirm it. Also, it doesn't burn out; it just dims. Like my laptop screen that's now impossible to see in daylight.

hes right dimming is all an lcd does such as your computer monitor if it is lcd which you will notice over years of time but i never have heard of anyone replacing leds but anything is possible
Avatar image for mjarantilla
mjarantilla

15721

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#29 mjarantilla
Member since 2002 • 15721 Posts
You cant take you opinion and call it true...dubbleduecer
It's not opinion, it's fact.
1080p plasmas are only a little bit more expensive?? Have you actually looked at any? priced any?dubbleduecer
Yes. Hitachi 42" 1080p plasma: $1700 BTW, did you miss the part where I said 1080p is not as important as picture accuracy?
The fact that you think DLP has fast refresh rates shows your ignorance. Screen door effect and ghosting are Huge on DLP's. In my home I have HD DLP, LCD, and CRT. Unlike you I am speaking from actually experience, not what I read on the HG GUID section of BestBuys webpage.dubbleduecer
You think I'M not speaking from experience? How old are your TVs? Because I've been doing a year of research of HDTV shopping for myself, my cousin, AND my friends. Screen door effect is not an issue with newer DLPs, and ghosting is FAR worse on LCDs than on DLPs.
ALso. True Contrast ratio is like wattage ratings on Stereos. Example. Book shelf stereo that has claimed 1000 watts, vs. a receiver that has 100 watts.. who wins? the reveiver.. exactly.. Also which has brighter whites? PLASMA.. EXACTLY!! Contrast ratio is the seperation between the Brightest white and darkest black. So the brighter the white, the lighter the dark can be while still keeping a deceptively high contrast ratio. So the contrast ratio doesnt always relate to better darks, though I will agree LCD's dont get AS dark as a good Plasma, but a Plasma doesnt get as dark as a good CRT, and we all know CRT's suck a big one(keep in mind i can touch one as I type this)dubbleduecer
Of course I know what contrast ratio is. What's your point? You just agreed with me that plasma had better black/white levels than LCDs.
Thus, proving the point becuase your plasma can get dark doesnt mean it is superior television. If Tvs where ranked based on how dark they could get everyone would have CRT's.dubbleduecer
CRTs don't suck. They are by far the best TV technology in terms of overall picture quality. Color, brightness/darkness, refresh rate, etc. are all best on a CRT. And, of course, they are the cheapest HDTVs available. BUT, because they are so goddang big and heavy, they are impractical for most situations. Of all the big screen technologies, plasma comes closest to CRT's picture quality.
Avatar image for andrewwg94
andrewwg94

1107

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 andrewwg94
Member since 2006 • 1107 Posts

Are Rear Projection TVs good for playing PS3 or should i stick to LCD or Plasma.

jackellis1
i play my ps3 on a 1080i Sony hdtv rear projection. it looks great, it doesn't matter what the type is, resoulution is what matters.
Avatar image for Paintballfelty
Paintballfelty

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Paintballfelty
Member since 2005 • 25 Posts
[QUOTE="jackellis1"]

Are Rear Projection TVs good for playing PS3 or should i stick to LCD or Plasma.

andrewwg94
i play my ps3 on a 1080i Sony hdtv rear projection. it looks great, it doesn't matter what the type is, resoulution is what matters.

LOL resolution does matter also does picture quality, also sony is a great brand for tvs they are mostly known for them, if you want a tv recommendation go for the 60a2020 its picture is awesome and its the newest lcos technology (sony calls this sxrd i just want to clarify this before i get a whole bunch of comments of how its not lcos, which that is what it truly is its just some people dont do enough research)
Avatar image for m3Boarder32
m3Boarder32

9526

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 m3Boarder32
Member since 2002 • 9526 Posts
[QUOTE="andrewwg94"][QUOTE="jackellis1"]

Are Rear Projection TVs good for playing PS3 or should i stick to LCD or Plasma.

Paintballfelty


i play my ps3 on a 1080i Sony hdtv rear projection. it looks great, it doesn't matter what the type is, resoulution is what matters.


LOL resolution does matter also does picture quality, also sony is a great brand for tvs they are mostly known for them, if you want a tv recommendation go for the 60a2020 its picture is awesome and its the newest lcos technology (sony calls this sxrd i just want to clarify this before i get a whole bunch of comments of how its not lcos, which that is what it truly is its just some people dont do enough research)

Beware of the green blob effect

Avatar image for KurupSoldr
KurupSoldr

4094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#33 KurupSoldr
Member since 2006 • 4094 Posts
[QUOTE="jackellis1"]

Are Rear Projection TVs good for playing PS3 or should i stick to LCD or Plasma.

The_G00se
I've been playing on a rear projection but I warn you, while the picture looks amazing, it sucks in sun light. Mine is in the living room and when it's bright out, I just won't play it. If I'm really hard up for a game I'll throw a blanket over the windows. HAHA It's ugly, but it works.

this is only true depending on where your window is compared to your tv i have rear projectiion lcd tv and its just fine
Avatar image for thedarkomen
thedarkomen

859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 thedarkomen
Member since 2007 • 859 Posts
Ok... but what kind of TV is best for gaming on the PS3?
Avatar image for vince7669
vince7669

191

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 vince7669
Member since 2005 • 191 Posts
I tell you what i have a sony 50" lycos(sxrd) television and its prime.  I have zero problems what so ever playing games they look great. 
Avatar image for genfuyung
genfuyung

2189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#36 genfuyung
Member since 2005 • 2189 Posts
[QUOTE="jackellis1"]

Are Rear Projection TVs good for playing PS3 or should i stick to LCD or Plasma.

The_G00se
I've been playing on a rear projection but I warn you, while the picture looks amazing, it sucks in sun light. Mine is in the living room and when it's bright out, I just won't play it. If I'm really hard up for a game I'll throw a blanket over the windows. HAHA It's ugly, but it works.

SAME HERE LOL
Avatar image for genfuyung
genfuyung

2189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#37 genfuyung
Member since 2005 • 2189 Posts
plasmas burn in, lcds get hot, and rear projectors are huge and heavy. those are th only idfference. LCD tends to be very cheap with great quality. that is the way to go