Resident Evil 5 - Port?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Silent_Bullet
Silent_Bullet

92

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 Silent_Bullet
Member since 2007 • 92 Posts

I'm really hoping Resident Evil 5 doesn't become some water down Xbox 360 port onto the PS3. I've been following this game for awhile now and I'm not sure if I'm wrong but I believe Resident Evil 5 first started on the PS3 and is being ported to the Xbox 360. If this is true and the Xbox 360 game is visually better I'm going to be pissed, I hope more developers learn the true power of the PS3.

EDIT: Forgot a sentence! :|

Avatar image for Prince_Denspion
Prince_Denspion

2748

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#2 Prince_Denspion
Member since 2004 • 2748 Posts
I hear you, I don't know why they put greater effort into the 360 for, the PS3 is just as powerful if not more with potential. I'm not a fanboy and thing teh 360 is great to but dev's insult the PS3 with crappier ports.
Avatar image for JAMES_L_BROOKS
JAMES_L_BROOKS

1463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 JAMES_L_BROOKS
Member since 2005 • 1463 Posts

I'm really hoping Resident Evil 5 doesn't become some water down Xbox 360 port onto the PS3. I've been following this game for awhile now and I'm not sure if I'm wrong but I believe Resident Evil 5 first started on the PS3 and is being ported to the Xbox 360. If this is true and the Xbox 360 game is visually better I'm going to be pissed, I hope more developers learn the true power of the PS3.

EDIT: Forgot a sentence! :|

Silent_Bullet

im hoping that Resident Evil 5 is not a port, but i do remeber hearing that it was starting on the PS3.

Avatar image for Prince_Denspion
Prince_Denspion

2748

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4 Prince_Denspion
Member since 2004 • 2748 Posts
^^^ look what happended with Assasins Creed, it was "exclusive" and now appearantly its the worst version of the 2.
Avatar image for leon106
leon106

594

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 leon106
Member since 2005 • 594 Posts
re5 did start on the ps3...and assassins creed actually has a BETTER framerate on the ps3
Avatar image for Prince_Denspion
Prince_Denspion

2748

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#6 Prince_Denspion
Member since 2004 • 2748 Posts

re5 did start on the ps3...and assassins creed actually has a BETTER framerate on the ps3leon106

its weird cause IGN and gamespot say the opposite of eachother, so how do you know for sure the PS3 is the better?

Avatar image for wooooode
wooooode

16666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 wooooode
Member since 2002 • 16666 Posts
Its Capcom with there star franchise I am sure you will be happy.
Avatar image for avataraang1
avataraang1

5436

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#8 avataraang1
Member since 2006 • 5436 Posts

This is how i feel

Avatar image for Nolan16
Nolan16

4022

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#9 Nolan16
Member since 2006 • 4022 Posts

Stats stated here the PS3 is not just a powerful as the 360 it's even more powerful then the 360, compare the specs the PS3 is clearly the victor in hardware faster processer better graphics engine blu ray technology. And its funny how games continue to look better on the 360 where the PS3 has the superior hardware, someone needs to find the true formula to make a great Playstaion 3 game, if they don't we will suffer like this. For instance you saw kill zone 2 that's the true power of the PS3 the 360 cant get anything even near as good graphically as that, and yet multiplatform games look better on the 360 then on the PS3, now ask yourself a question why? Because most American game producers know for a fact that the 360 sales in the US are huge so they work harder on the 360 version then the PS3 version, it's all about the $$$ and the only great looking games we will get that will show the true power of the PS3 are exclusive.

Avatar image for Bry7777777
Bry7777777

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Bry7777777
Member since 2003 • 25 Posts
Its called MGS4
Avatar image for matchpenalty11
matchpenalty11

541

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#11 matchpenalty11
Member since 2006 • 541 Posts

I was thinking the same thing.

Avatar image for WR_Platinum
WR_Platinum

4685

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 WR_Platinum
Member since 2003 • 4685 Posts
i know for a act that RE5 started on the PS3, then after awhile when it got announced for the 360, I would assume that they watered it down, though RE5 looks incredibly nice.
Avatar image for vayaconmiamigo
vayaconmiamigo

499

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 vayaconmiamigo
Member since 2003 • 499 Posts

Because most American game producers know for a fact that the 360 sales in the US are huge so they work harder on the 360 version then the PS3 version, it's all about the $$$ and the only great looking games we will get that will show the true power of the PS3 are exclusive.

Nolan16

It is not only that but it is EASIER to make games on the 360 than it is to make games on the PS3.

Avatar image for parvie
parvie

2168

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 parvie
Member since 2008 • 2168 Posts
Its called MGS4Bry7777777
YEAH BOI!!!!!!!!!! and HAZE!!!!
Avatar image for StealthKnife
StealthKnife

2104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 StealthKnife
Member since 2008 • 2104 Posts
I hear you, I don't know why they put greater effort into the 360 for, the PS3 is just as powerful if not more with potential. I'm not a fanboy and thing teh 360 is great to but dev's insult the PS3 with crappier ports. Prince_Denspion
microsoft pays compaines, its the same reason they are getting the demo 1 week early, MS pay them too
Avatar image for StealthKnife
StealthKnife

2104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 StealthKnife
Member since 2008 • 2104 Posts

[QUOTE="leon106"]re5 did start on the ps3...and assassins creed actually has a BETTER framerate on the ps3Prince_Denspion

its weird cause IGN and gamespot say the opposite of eachother, so how do you know for sure the PS3 is the better?

i realize we are on GS fourms but, GS is a little bias, MS pays them, think about it.... Halo 3 came out... They was a apot (next to the top were gamefaqs, cnet is at) Have you ever seen a link for a ps3 game up there??
Avatar image for StealthKnife
StealthKnife

2104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 StealthKnife
Member since 2008 • 2104 Posts
[QUOTE="Nolan16"]

Because most American game producers know for a fact that the 360 sales in the US are huge so they work harder on the 360 version then the PS3 version, it's all about the $$$ and the only great looking games we will get that will show the true power of the PS3 are exclusive.

vayaconmiamigo

It is not only that but it is EASIER to make games on the 360 than it is to make games on the PS3.

true, games created by EA has shortcuts, so the full potential of the ps3 will not be shown that why 90% of the games i buy on ps3 are exclusives
Avatar image for StealthKnife
StealthKnife

2104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 StealthKnife
Member since 2008 • 2104 Posts
^^^ look what happended with Assasins Creed, it was "exclusive" and now appearantly its the worst version of the 2. Prince_Denspion
well i think ubisoft got close, its just that ps3 just started, and developers had to learn how to mess with settingss Look at the first 360 gammes, they were horrible graphics wise!!1
Avatar image for Kleeyook
Kleeyook

5213

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 1

#19 Kleeyook
Member since 2008 • 5213 Posts
No one cares about MS stealing exclusive titles from SONY. Worse they even become fanboys and insult PS3. :(
Avatar image for Nightmare799
Nightmare799

123

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#20 Nightmare799
Member since 2011 • 123 Posts

I hear you, I don't know why they put greater effort into the 360 for, the PS3 is just as powerful if not more with potential. I'm not a fanboy and thing teh 360 is great to but dev's insult the PS3 with crappier ports. Prince_Denspion

this is the reason why they port from 360, ps 3 is more powerful. they make game for 360, because it surefire on ps 3. if they made it for ps 3 first, they would have to change models and textures and lots of ther things to fit weaker 360. its easier that way.

Avatar image for StrongBlackVine
StrongBlackVine

13262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 StrongBlackVine
Member since 2012 • 13262 Posts

[QUOTE="Prince_Denspion"]I hear you, I don't know why they put greater effort into the 360 for, the PS3 is just as powerful if not more with potential. I'm not a fanboy and thing teh 360 is great to but dev's insult the PS3 with crappier ports. Nightmare799

this is the reason why they port from 360, ps 3 is more powerful. they make game for 360, because it surefire on ps 3. if they made it for ps 3 first, they would have to change models and textures and lots of ther things to fit weaker 360. its easier that way.

Why are you reviving a 4 year old thread?