This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for jakster_91
jakster_91

100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#1 jakster_91
Member since 2004 • 100 Posts

Well it looks as if they change the name form L.A. Noire to Agent...at least I hope that is correct; and it is a PS3 exclusive woot! Anyway this game looked pretty cool when they released the very first trailer for it, anyone know of any new media?

Avatar image for rodney130
rodney130

1139

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 rodney130
Member since 2004 • 1139 Posts

I'm glad they finally gave us some news about it! Great news for the PS3!

I wonder if it'll end up going to the 360 a year or two down the road after it's released on the PS3. It seems like alot of "exclusive" games these days go mulitplatform eventually...

Avatar image for jakster_91
jakster_91

100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#3 jakster_91
Member since 2004 • 100 Posts

I hope not, I was so pissed off when I saw Kojima on the Microsoft stage :( Also FFXIV better STAY exclusive.

Avatar image for rodney130
rodney130

1139

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 rodney130
Member since 2004 • 1139 Posts

I hope not, I was so pissed off when I saw Kojima on the Microsoft stage :( Also FFXIV better STAY exclusive.

jakster_91

No kiddin man! Btw, I'm kinda confused about that. Is the MGS that's going to the 360 just MGS4 with new content, or is it a completely new game?

Avatar image for deactivated-5a22550b94008
deactivated-5a22550b94008

426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 deactivated-5a22550b94008
Member since 2009 • 426 Posts
I have high hopes for Agent, but there's not much out there to look at just yet. Kojima on the Microsoft stage felt like a knife in the heart. I'm under the impression that the Microsoft game is a whole new thing, but I'd be a lot happier if it was just MGS4+. That's happier, not happy.
Avatar image for konradak
konradak

1769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#6 konradak
Member since 2005 • 1769 Posts

[QUOTE="jakster_91"]

I hope not, I was so pissed off when I saw Kojima on the Microsoft stage :( Also FFXIV better STAY exclusive.

rodney130

No kiddin man! Btw, I'm kinda confused about that. Is the MGS that's going to the 360 just MGS4 with new content, or is it a completely new game?

It's a whole new game starring Raiden. I'm just going to ask you guys this. So please don't get offended or mad, I'm not trying to flame. Why would you be angry that MGS went to the 360? MGS4, and the whole MGS series, is a masterpiece. I don't understand why people want all these amazing games on only their system. Like... We are all gamers, are we not? Why would you want to limit the people who can play these amazing games? Don't get me wrong, exclusives are fine. They help sell systems and certain exclusives really show off the power and features of a console (Killzone 2, GeOW2, etc etc) but I don't see why you would get upset about more people playing the games you love. I own all these next gen systems, so I understand the benefits of each. I love them all (The Wii les though, because it just doesn't appeal to me) So I'm just curious. I'm not trying to flame. I'm just coming at this with this angle, I've always been a MGS fan (not MG because I never played them) from PSX. I just got a PS3 a few months ago just so I could play MGS4 (Original 360 owner) and I LOVED it. But I had to buy a PS3, which isn't bad because it's an amazing console also, but I had to spend a lot of money. I wouldn't be mad of GeOW went to PS3, or Mario to the other two. It just means more people can play amazing games. Iuno.
Avatar image for AtticusFinch88
AtticusFinch88

1388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 AtticusFinch88
Member since 2008 • 1388 Posts

Well it looks as if they change the name form L.A. Noire to Agent...at least I hope that is correct; and it is a PS3 exclusive woot! Anyway this game looked pretty cool when they released the very first trailer for it, anyone know of any new media?

jakster_91

L.A Noire is a different game developed by Team Bondi.

Agent is about a spy set in the 1970's. L.A Noire is about a detective in the 40's. So we get 2 exclusives (speculation of L.A Noire going multiplat has not been confirmed) And I'm super hyped for both games

Avatar image for rodney130
rodney130

1139

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 rodney130
Member since 2004 • 1139 Posts

[QUOTE="rodney130"]

[QUOTE="jakster_91"]

I hope not, I was so pissed off when I saw Kojima on the Microsoft stage :( Also FFXIV better STAY exclusive.

konradak

No kiddin man! Btw, I'm kinda confused about that. Is the MGS that's going to the 360 just MGS4 with new content, or is it a completely new game?

It's a whole new game starring Raiden. I'm just going to ask you guys this. So please don't get offended or mad, I'm not trying to flame. Why would you be angry that MGS went to the 360? MGS4, and the whole MGS series, is a masterpiece. I don't understand why people want all these amazing games on only their system. Like... We are all gamers, are we not? Why would you want to limit the people who can play these amazing games? Don't get me wrong, exclusives are fine. They help sell systems and certain exclusives really show off the power and features of a console (Killzone 2, GeOW2, etc etc) but I don't see why you would get upset about more people playing the games you love. I own all these next gen systems, so I understand the benefits of each. I love them all (The Wii les though, because it just doesn't appeal to me) So I'm just curious. I'm not trying to flame. I'm just coming at this with this angle, I've always been a MGS fan (not MG because I never played them) from PSX. I just got a PS3 a few months ago just so I could play MGS4 (Original 360 owner) and I LOVED it. But I had to buy a PS3, which isn't bad because it's an amazing console also, but I had to spend a lot of money. I wouldn't be mad of GeOW went to PS3, or Mario to the other two. It just means more people can play amazing games. Iuno.

The only thing I've really got against it is the fact that it can hurt console sales for one system or the other. Some games (like MGS) are console sellers, and if they go multiplat., there really isn't a reason to still go out and buy a PS3 as in MGS's case. It's the same with the 360. If a game like Gears of War went to the PS3, there really wouldn't be any reason for PS3 gamers to go out and buy a 360 anymore, which some people would have done, just so they could play that game.

Avatar image for BrettB7400
BrettB7400

3401

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 BrettB7400
Member since 2007 • 3401 Posts

[QUOTE="jakster_91"]

Well it looks as if they change the name form L.A. Noire to Agent...at least I hope that is correct; and it is a PS3 exclusive woot! Anyway this game looked pretty cool when they released the very first trailer for it, anyone know of any new media?

AtticusFinch88

L.A Noire is a different game developed by Team Bondi.

Agent is about a spy set in the 1970's. L.A Noire is about a detective in the 40's. So we get 2 exclusives (speculation of L.A Noire going multiplat has not been confirmed) And I'm super hyped for both games

I dont know where jakster got the idea that they changed the name from L.A. Noire to Agent. AtticusFinch88 is correct except for the fact that L.A. Noire is coming out for the 360 and PC too.

Avatar image for AtticusFinch88
AtticusFinch88

1388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 AtticusFinch88
Member since 2008 • 1388 Posts

[QUOTE="AtticusFinch88"]

[QUOTE="jakster_91"]

Well it looks as if they change the name form L.A. Noire to Agent...at least I hope that is correct; and it is a PS3 exclusive woot! Anyway this game looked pretty cool when they released the very first trailer for it, anyone know of any new media?

BrettB7400

L.A Noire is a different game developed by Team Bondi.

Agent is about a spy set in the 1970's. L.A Noire is about a detective in the 40's. So we get 2 exclusives (speculation of L.A Noire going multiplat has not been confirmed) And I'm super hyped for both games

I dont know where jakster got the idea that they changed the name from L.A. Noire to Agent. AtticusFinch88 is correct except for the fact that L.A. Noire is coming out for the 360 and PC too.

I didn't realise a multiplat release for L.A Noire was announced. well I guess that might be another reason why it's taking so long

Avatar image for Generic_Dude
Generic_Dude

11707

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#11 Generic_Dude
Member since 2006 • 11707 Posts

[QUOTE="jakster_91"]

Well it looks as if they change the name form L.A. Noire to Agent...at least I hope that is correct; and it is a PS3 exclusive woot! Anyway this game looked pretty cool when they released the very first trailer for it, anyone know of any new media?

AtticusFinch88

L.A Noire is a different game developed by Team Bondi.

Agent is about a spy set in the 1970's. L.A Noire is about a detective in the 40's. So we get 2 exclusives (speculation of L.A Noire going multiplat has not been confirmed) And I'm super hyped for both games

QFT, but I wouldn't get too crazy about them being exclusive because they probably won't. Games are too expensive to develop without opening them up to the largest consumer base possible. Even all of Microsoft's money has only bought them TIMED exclusivity on their games (Bioshock, Fallout 3's DLC, etc).

Avatar image for smithster118
smithster118

3910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 smithster118
Member since 2008 • 3910 Posts

Haven't really had enough information to get excited about this yet.

Avatar image for ralphfurley
ralphfurley

54

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 ralphfurley
Member since 2009 • 54 Posts

i dont think ffxiv is exclusive

Avatar image for JoKeR_421
JoKeR_421

8920

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 JoKeR_421
Member since 2006 • 8920 Posts

[QUOTE="konradak"][QUOTE="rodney130"]

No kiddin man! Btw, I'm kinda confused about that. Is the MGS that's going to the 360 just MGS4 with new content, or is it a completely new game?

rodney130

It's a whole new game starring Raiden. I'm just going to ask you guys this. So please don't get offended or mad, I'm not trying to flame. Why would you be angry that MGS went to the 360? MGS4, and the whole MGS series, is a masterpiece. I don't understand why people want all these amazing games on only their system. Like... We are all gamers, are we not? Why would you want to limit the people who can play these amazing games? Don't get me wrong, exclusives are fine. They help sell systems and certain exclusives really show off the power and features of a console (Killzone 2, GeOW2, etc etc) but I don't see why you would get upset about more people playing the games you love. I own all these next gen systems, so I understand the benefits of each. I love them all (The Wii les though, because it just doesn't appeal to me) So I'm just curious. I'm not trying to flame. I'm just coming at this with this angle, I've always been a MGS fan (not MG because I never played them) from PSX. I just got a PS3 a few months ago just so I could play MGS4 (Original 360 owner) and I LOVED it. But I had to buy a PS3, which isn't bad because it's an amazing console also, but I had to spend a lot of money. I wouldn't be mad of GeOW went to PS3, or Mario to the other two. It just means more people can play amazing games. Iuno.

The only thing I've really got against it is the fact that it can hurt console sales for one system or the other. Some games (like MGS) are console sellers, and if they go multiplat., there really isn't a reason to still go out and buy a PS3 as in MGS's case. It's the same with the 360. If a game like Gears of War went to the PS3, there really wouldn't be any reason for PS3 gamers to go out and buy a 360 anymore, which some people would have done, just so they could play that game.

yea, exactly, i have all 3 next gen systems, wii, xbox and ps3. while i game on all of them, the ps3 is the most i use. my is i barely even notice i have it lol, my xbox is kinda collectin dust, cuz i dont want to play online on it cuz well it charges. anyways i dontmind if any game is multiplatform or goes on other systems, im actually glad others get to experience it. BUT some games or others NEED to be exclusive so when ppl go out and see wat system to buy since they can afford only one, they know wat system offers wat. i mean if say mgs or warhawk or somethin like that was on xbox, why would anyone like rodney said go and buy a ps3, or the other way around, if gears or halo was on ps3 why would ppl buy a xbox.

certain tittles need to me exclusive on either system they all need their share of exclusives. but these days everythin is going to every system which is kinda bad and good at the same time, i just wish sony would actually put their hands in their pockets alil, i know they losing money and cuttin back jobs at sony, but once in a while they need to do it, for their own sakes. i love sony, i aint no fan boy but i do prefer the ps3 more than any other system, it offers wat i need, free online, blu ray, wb browser, free stuff on the psn store lol, and games like god of war 3 which i cant wait!!!!! for!!!! lol

Avatar image for jakster_91
jakster_91

100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#15 jakster_91
Member since 2004 • 100 Posts

I thought that they had changed the name because I always thought L.A. Noire was being developped by Rockstar and I hadnt heard anything about it for ages. Then this came out and i assumed they just changed it. Besidea that, I guess others have explained most of it, but theres still a sense of attachement to games and their platforms on behalf of the fans. I mean if they were to remake Crash Bandicoot and it would go to the 360 that would be a real backstab in my opinion. Sony practically made Naughty Dog what it is today so something like that would be like treason. Same goes for FFXIII and MGS. Its just annoying when publishers that once were "alligned" with a console leave. It kinda defines the console, but then that semi source of identity is lost.

Oh and btw FFXIV is PS3 exclusive and its online, like FFXIII think.

Avatar image for MissLibrarian
MissLibrarian

9589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#17 MissLibrarian
Member since 2008 • 9589 Posts

Agent is about a spy set in the 1970's. L.A Noire is about a detective in the 40's. So we get 2 exclusives (speculation of L.A Noire going multiplat has not been confirmed) And I'm super hyped for both games

AtticusFinch88

Even if L.A. Noire is not exclusive I am looking forward to both these game as well, very much so.

Avatar image for konradak
konradak

1769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#18 konradak
Member since 2005 • 1769 Posts

I thought that they had changed the name because I always thought L.A. Noire was being developped by Rockstar and I hadnt heard anything about it for ages. Then this came out and i assumed they just changed it. Besidea that, I guess others have explained most of it, but theres still a sense of attachement to games and their platforms on behalf of the fans. I mean if they were to remake Crash Bandicoot and it would go to the 360 that would be a real backstab in my opinion. Sony practically made Naughty Dog what it is today so something like that would be like treason. Same goes for FFXIII and MGS. Its just annoying when publishers that once were "alligned" with a console leave. It kinda defines the console, but then that semi source of identity is lost.

Oh and btw FFXIV is PS3 exclusive and its online, like FFXIII think.

jakster_91
Mm. Iuno. I mean I understand the benefits and stuff of exclusives, but I wouldn't be ANGRY if we lost one. Maybe a little disappointed, but I'd be glad all those people can play an amazing game. Iuno. Must just be me. Also, I thought Crash Bandicoot was on the 360 and Xbox? And FFXIII is on the 360. And FFXIV they said they are looking into bringing it to the 360. So who knows.
Avatar image for Scianix-Black
Scianix-Black

19297

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#19 Scianix-Black
Member since 2008 • 19297 Posts

FFXIV multi-plat: count on it.

Avatar image for jakster_91
jakster_91

100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#20 jakster_91
Member since 2004 • 100 Posts

Im pretty sure they said in the press conferance that FFXIV was PS3 exclusive but dunno. For a while everyone thought Oblivion was.

Avatar image for oreojones18
oreojones18

112

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#21 oreojones18
Member since 2009 • 112 Posts

i think la norie anagent are two different exclusives, i could be wrong, but agent is supposed to be like a spy game while la noire was like a 30's detective or something

Avatar image for G-Legend
G-Legend

7387

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#22 G-Legend
Member since 2005 • 7387 Posts

I hope it's good and if it is I really hope PS3 owners support it because were the ones who always want exclusives but yet when the good ones come, the sales aren't that high when they first come out. Xbox owners seem to buy more exclusives and you guys wonder why companies make games multiplat.

Avatar image for Diddies
Diddies

2415

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#23 Diddies
Member since 2007 • 2415 Posts

I'm glad they finally gave us some news about it! Great news for the PS3!

I wonder if it'll end up going to the 360 a year or two down the road after it's released on the PS3. It seems like alot of "exclusive" games these days go mulitplatform eventually...

rodney130

MGS isn't exclusive. It is a third part title and they have their choice or not whether they want to put it on different platforms or not. But I personally think that Kojima was pressured by Konami to put it multiplatform.

Avatar image for Diddies
Diddies

2415

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#24 Diddies
Member since 2007 • 2415 Posts

I hope it's good and if it is I really hope PS3 owners support it because were the ones who always want exclusives but yet when the good ones come, the sales aren't that high when they first come out. Xbox owners seem to buy more exclusives and you guys wonder why companies make games multiplat.

G-Legend

Because there are a lot more MS owners that Sony owners.

Avatar image for Eazy1891
Eazy1891

3089

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#25 Eazy1891
Member since 2009 • 3089 Posts

[QUOTE="rodney130"]

[QUOTE="jakster_91"]

I hope not, I was so pissed off when I saw Kojima on the Microsoft stage :( Also FFXIV better STAY exclusive.

konradak

No kiddin man! Btw, I'm kinda confused about that. Is the MGS that's going to the 360 just MGS4 with new content, or is it a completely new game?

It's a whole new game starring Raiden. I'm just going to ask you guys this. So please don't get offended or mad, I'm not trying to flame. Why would you be angry that MGS went to the 360? MGS4, and the whole MGS series, is a masterpiece. I don't understand why people want all these amazing games on only their system. Like... We are all gamers, are we not? Why would you want to limit the people who can play these amazing games? Don't get me wrong, exclusives are fine. They help sell systems and certain exclusives really show off the power and features of a console (Killzone 2, GeOW2, etc etc) but I don't see why you would get upset about more people playing the games you love. I own all these next gen systems, so I understand the benefits of each. I love them all (The Wii les though, because it just doesn't appeal to me) So I'm just curious. I'm not trying to flame. I'm just coming at this with this angle, I've always been a MGS fan (not MG because I never played them) from PSX. I just got a PS3 a few months ago just so I could play MGS4 (Original 360 owner) and I LOVED it. But I had to buy a PS3, which isn't bad because it's an amazing console also, but I had to spend a lot of money. I wouldn't be mad of GeOW went to PS3, or Mario to the other two. It just means more people can play amazing games. Iuno.

i hear what you're saying...but its all about competition thats why...all in all Kojima with MGS has never really been an exclusive to anyone truthfully...and MGS4 is stilla PS3 exclusive...RISING is just on another level....i would be a little eh about it but as long asit isnt first party games i dont care what games go multiplatform...Uncharted stay on PS3 along with InFAMOUS and Killzone and GOd of War 3 and so on....and Halo stay on 360 along with Gears of War with Fable and games like that.....one thing i definitely dont support though is exclusive dlc...the DLC should be enjoyed by everyone that has the game not just half...

Avatar image for mattyperkins
mattyperkins

357

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 mattyperkins
Member since 2008 • 357 Posts

Hey man, personally... i like some of the higher ed games to stay on the ps3. Because from PERSONAL experience, the games that are designed specifically FOR the ps3, are far beyond any multiplat game, or xbox 360 exclusive. Look at killzone 2, Uncharted and MGS4, all made ON ps3. FOR ps3, all amazing. If they start develloping games for 360, im afraid the quality will lack a little.

In saying that, if the quality doesnt change, then im more than happy to have more gamers playing these amazing games :)