Should inFAMOUS 2 have multiplayer???

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for 3dfd
3dfd

767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#1 3dfd
Member since 2008 • 767 Posts

I think it shouldn't

Avatar image for jiggaloj
jiggaloj

4345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#2 jiggaloj
Member since 2006 • 4345 Posts

I think it should stay single player. I do like the custom map feature though.

Avatar image for 3dfd
3dfd

767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#3 3dfd
Member since 2008 • 767 Posts

I think it should stay single player. I do like the custom map feature though.

jiggaloj

Totes agreee about everything you just said

Avatar image for Jbller3
Jbller3

824

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Jbller3
Member since 2009 • 824 Posts
I agree, it should stay single player. But suggesting it now won't make a difference for inFamous 2.
Avatar image for blankd8ta
blankd8ta

87

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 blankd8ta
Member since 2010 • 87 Posts

No some games aren't ment to be multiplayer. Look at Bioshock 2 if you don't believe me.

Avatar image for 3dfd
3dfd

767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#6 3dfd
Member since 2008 • 767 Posts

No some games aren't ment to be multiplayer. Look at Bioshock 2 if you don't believe me.

blankd8ta

Yeah I agree. I thought Uncharted should've stayed single player also.

Avatar image for c_rakestraw
c_rakestraw

14627

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 64

User Lists: 0

#7 c_rakestraw  Moderator
Member since 2007 • 14627 Posts

Not really necessary. The mission creator is more than enough to extend the game's longevity. Multiplayer would be a bit much (and likely tacked-on).

Avatar image for Pankratous
Pankratous

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Pankratous
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts
No. The user-generated content is cool, but competitive multiplayer would be too far.
Avatar image for xGho5tx
xGho5tx

768

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 xGho5tx
Member since 2008 • 768 Posts
No. The UGC is a great addition and will provide a longer lasting appeal. Looking forward to trying some crazy things with it.
Avatar image for arsenal1111
arsenal1111

168

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 arsenal1111
Member since 2004 • 168 Posts
How would multiplayer even work in inFamous? :L
Avatar image for 3dfd
3dfd

767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#11 3dfd
Member since 2008 • 767 Posts

How would multiplayer even work in inFamous? :Larsenal1111

Maybe like a cops and robbers mode or something... They could probably pull it off but I still wouldn't

Avatar image for Rakuho
Rakuho

7008

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#12 Rakuho
Member since 2007 • 7008 Posts

I don't think it should--especially not in a PvP sense. But considering I've yet to play a non-shooter, SP-driven game that was truly held-back by its MP component, I wouldn't mind if MP is included--even if it is completely unnecessary.

Avatar image for GamerChick2083
GamerChick2083

481

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 GamerChick2083
Member since 2010 • 481 Posts

I hope there's no multiplayer. Some games just don't need multiplayer.

Avatar image for T_REX305
T_REX305

11304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 T_REX305
Member since 2010 • 11304 Posts

Yeah it should stay has single player.

[QUOTE="blankd8ta"]

No some games aren't ment to be multiplayer. Look at Bioshock 2 if you don't believe me.

3dfd

Yeah I agree. I thought Uncharted should've stayed single player also.

Uncharted 2 online was fine because it was different from the other online shooters. It was fun and simple. I think it's great they added it in. But all the costomization options shown in the new MP look like it was turning into COD. Which I am having mixed feelings about this. Something also tells me the SP wont be as good.

Avatar image for Arnarmar0
Arnarmar0

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 Arnarmar0
Member since 2011 • 25 Posts
It couldn't hurt having multiplayer.
Avatar image for Console_Gamer93
Console_Gamer93

2712

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#16 Console_Gamer93
Member since 2007 • 2712 Posts

Pointless. The game doesn't need it and any community it gains will be almost non-existent in a couple of months.

The LBP style creation option they have planned is a much better use of their time.

Avatar image for Batang_X990
Batang_X990

939

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Batang_X990
Member since 2010 • 939 Posts
i like to keep an open mind so sure why not. i thought u2 multiplayer was going to suck, but it turned out to be one of the best on the ps3.
Avatar image for AJC3317
AJC3317

2546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#18 AJC3317
Member since 2003 • 2546 Posts
no. no no no. no no. no. no. no no no no. nonononono. no. no. no. no no no no. no nono. no no. no no. and no
Avatar image for Jbller3
Jbller3

824

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Jbller3
Member since 2009 • 824 Posts

Yeah it should stay has single player.

[QUOTE="3dfd"]

[QUOTE="blankd8ta"]

No some games aren't ment to be multiplayer. Look at Bioshock 2 if you don't believe me.

T_REX305

Yeah I agree. I thought Uncharted should've stayed single player also.

Uncharted 2 online was fine because it was different from the other online shooters. It was fun and simple. I think it's great they added it in. But all the costomization options shown in the new MP look like it was turning into COD. Which I am having mixed feelings about this. Something also tells me the SP wont be as good.

I don't know. NaughtyDog is really great, and I trust them completely. Their first shot at multiplayer was also pretty good in my opinion!
Avatar image for destinhpark
destinhpark

4831

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#20 destinhpark
Member since 2006 • 4831 Posts

Noooope.

Love inFAMOUS, plenty of greatness without trash multiplayer... so sick of it these days. Since the PSN has been down, I've really been enjoying completing the single player games that I never completed before. Working on Assassin's Creed Brotherhood finally right now, which is amazing! And also goin' through Portal 2 and loving it. Almost done completing it unfortunately :( Maybe when the PSN comes back though I'll get on some co-op, haha

Avatar image for MR-COOL18
MR-COOL18

62

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 MR-COOL18
Member since 2010 • 62 Posts

Noooo,please Sucker Punch keep it single player only.

Coop would be the only kind of multiplayer i will welcome.

Imagine running around the city with your bud completing missions and stuff.

Would be cool I think.Don't just tack on the multi for thelabel on the back of the box.

Avatar image for Pikminmaniac
Pikminmaniac

11514

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#22 Pikminmaniac
Member since 2006 • 11514 Posts

I never want to see multiplayer in inFAMOUS! It's my favourite new IP this gen and that would just mess with the series. Especially if they attempted co-op in the single player. UGGG *shudders*

Avatar image for PSP107
PSP107

18977

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 PSP107
Member since 2007 • 18977 Posts
i would of rather had multiplayer then user generated content. they should of added multiplayer in the user generated mode. people dissed uncharted 2 for attempting multiplayer and probably be mad if uncharted 3 didn't have it. i can imagine 16 players throwing electric balls at each other in infamous multiplayer or co op missions. isnt that what DCUO is about?
Avatar image for big_boss1988
big_boss1988

1241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#24 big_boss1988
Member since 2008 • 1241 Posts

I think it shouldn't

3dfd

agreed.

Avatar image for 3dfd
3dfd

767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#25 3dfd
Member since 2008 • 767 Posts

Coop would be the only kind of multiplayer i will welcome.

Imagine running around the city with your bud completing missions and stuff.

MR-COOL18

Yeah. That and I was also thinking a mode where you got to be a Reaper/Dustman or Cop

Avatar image for JohnnyWPSP
JohnnyWPSP

1895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 29

User Lists: 0

#26 JohnnyWPSP
Member since 2009 • 1895 Posts

No, that would be a horrible idea.

Avatar image for UnchartedZone
UnchartedZone

219

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 UnchartedZone
Member since 2011 • 219 Posts

I think co-op would work better than competitive modes in Infamous, if there was to be a multiplayer feature. You could each have a different set of powers or something. If there was to be a competitive feature, they would have to adjust some powers to balance it out and improve the cover system.

Avatar image for Mawy_Golomb
Mawy_Golomb

1047

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#29 Mawy_Golomb
Member since 2008 • 1047 Posts

Yes, co-op probably would work better than multiplayer. However, I say that no game developer (regardless of the genre and target audience) should be afraid to include more than just single-player. And even if that doesn't come out very good, its game designers can always make further changes, until everything feels just right. It's probably inevitable that co-op and multiplayer will be found in more games, even ones that are primarily SP-only like RPGs, adventure games, etc. And excluding other game modes only hinders innovation. So, I definitely think that we need more Sony-owned game franchises to tackle the co-op and multiplayer path, if we are going to see the PS3/PS4 dominate with its popularity and sales. Also, it'll be more likely to draw in new people, which is a good thing.

A lot of SP-only gamers here will probably complain and say otherwise. Yet, game developers' misdirection and/or mismanagement is the biggest factor in a game failing to deliver up to its hype than including additional modes of play. It's a myth to say that SP will die or that a game's overall value will go down after it includes co-op and/or MP.

Avatar image for MANIAC-PSYCHO
MANIAC-PSYCHO

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 MANIAC-PSYCHO
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts
Ummm, NO
Avatar image for TomTom557
TomTom557

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 TomTom557
Member since 2011 • 25 Posts
I personaly think it should because it would be pretty cool to have a co-op camapain to cause mayhem to the police and gangs
Avatar image for deactivated-58df4522915cb
deactivated-58df4522915cb

5527

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#32 deactivated-58df4522915cb
Member since 2007 • 5527 Posts

if they did it right then sure.

im thinking they could do something like what GTA 4 did with multiplayer were it has players working together to do missions.

either that or they could heavily balance out the powers and do a deathmatch multiplayer based thing.

Avatar image for MusashiSensi
MusashiSensi

9584

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 56

User Lists: 0

#33 MusashiSensi
Member since 2004 • 9584 Posts

No! NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! Multiplayer should be implemented in EVERY game.

Avatar image for LazyMushroom
LazyMushroom

914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 LazyMushroom
Member since 2011 • 914 Posts

It should stay as a single player only series. Not every game needs multiplayer.