Sony: Kutaragi was right

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for PSP107
PSP107

18981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 PSP107
Member since 2007 • 18981 Posts
http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=250605 Do ppl owe him an apology? Should Sony bring him back for PS4?
Avatar image for emitsu97
emitsu97

10720

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 emitsu97
Member since 2003 • 10720 Posts
I don't recall there being anything more than speculation as to why he left.
Avatar image for PSP107
PSP107

18981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 PSP107
Member since 2007 • 18981 Posts
I don't recall there being anything more than speculation as to why he left.emitsu97
PS3 was a flop at the time.
Avatar image for Floppy_Jim
Floppy_Jim

25933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#6 Floppy_Jim
Member since 2007 • 25933 Posts
[QUOTE="PSP107"][QUOTE="emitsu97"]I don't recall there being anything more than speculation as to why he left.Fightingfan
PS3 was a flop at the time.

Is it still kinda? Its not ps1 or ps2. *no flaming intended because I know half of the Gamespot community gets butt hurt when something negative is said about there prized piece of plastic.

It is actually doing better than the PS1 at the same point in time. PS2, obviously not.
Avatar image for Fightingfan
Fightingfan

38011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Fightingfan
Member since 2010 • 38011 Posts
[QUOTE="Floppy_Jim"][QUOTE="Fightingfan"][QUOTE="PSP107"] PS3 was a flop at the time.

Is it still kinda? Its not ps1 or ps2. *no flaming intended because I know half of the Gamespot community gets butt hurt when something negative is said about there prized piece of plastic.

It is actually doing better than the PS1 at the same point in time. PS2, obviously not.

I just think Sony needs to just pay for exclusives like they did in the past, Modern warfare 3 and GTA5 would make millions of people buy the PS3.
Avatar image for PSP107
PSP107

18981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 PSP107
Member since 2007 • 18981 Posts
SOny paid for GTA 3/Vice City exclusive? I surely dont think GTA3 was considering nobody knew how will it turn out but i want a link that said Sony paid for GTA Vice City/San Andreas
Avatar image for mushi799
mushi799

1163

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 mushi799
Member since 2006 • 1163 Posts
[QUOTE="PSP107"]http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=250605 Do ppl owe him an apology? Should Sony bring him back for PS4?

We shall see if he's right. As far as we're concern, the 360 seems it will last as long as the ps3 ~10years.
Avatar image for gamenerd15
gamenerd15

4529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#10 gamenerd15
Member since 2007 • 4529 Posts

[QUOTE="Floppy_Jim"][QUOTE="Fightingfan"] Is it still kinda? Its not ps1 or ps2. *no flaming intended because I know half of the Gamespot community gets butt hurt when something negative is said about there prized piece of plastic.Fightingfan
It is actually doing better than the PS1 at the same point in time. PS2, obviously not.

I just think Sony needs to just pay for exclusives like they did in the past, Modern warfare 3 and GTA5 would make millions of people buy the PS3.

No they shouldn't do that. and become like MS with almost no exclusives now because all they have is 3rd parties? A lot of "only 360" went multiplat with bonus content later on. So much for the 50 million MS paid for GTA 4 content. Look at Bioshock, Star Ocean, Lost Planet, Eternal Sonata. Tales of Vesperia JP, Section 8, Ninja Gaiden 2, and so on. They all went multiplat eventually, Sony did the smart thing by investing in themselves. They saw what 3rd parties were doing and weren't going to pay for it. Why share money with 3rd parties, when you can make games yourself and get more money.

The exclusive deals between 3rd parties and console makers are becoming less and less. Look at the call of duty map packs, MS has gotten a month advantage instead of 5 months to year or something. PS3 is almost on par with 360 in terms of sales. Think about it, the 360 came out a year ahead of PS3 and had a lot of games at the start but it's only 5 million units ahead in global sales. It seems all that exclusivity didn't really pay off as much as it is touted. GTA 4 failed to move hardware on both consoles, FF 13 failed to move hardware on both consoles except for Japan.

games like FF 13, Devil May Cry 4, Tekken 6 sold better on the PS3 than the 360. If big games aren't moving hardware and games that while aren't exclusive anymore still sell better on your system, why pay for the other company not to get it?

Sony already has Japan in it's pocket, 360 sales are so poor it's unbelieveable that MS has not romoved itself from the territory altogether. The PS3 version of a multiplat game will sell many times over what the 360 will. It's funny that even with Eternal Sonata and star Ocean being exclusive for a long time and with Tales of Vesperia as well, that Japan still prefers PS3 even though the 360 had all the RPG's at the time. Sony just needs to keep Yakuza and GT 5 exclusive and it will always have Japan. Prolyphony is a developer for Sony so GT5 will always be exclusive. Europe loves GT and racing games and The PS3 is no stranger to that category, so Sony has Europe.

Sony needs to do something with America. America plays shooters and Sony still has failed to capitalize on this. They tried with Killzone 2, and Resistance but it hasn't made hardware fly off shelves.

Paying for exclusives won't work this generation and hasn't worked as a whole. If it were that importnat than MS would be well ahead of Sony and they aren't, they lose steam with each year.

I am trying to bash any console maker, but GTA 5 and Modern Warfare 3 as exclusives would not help in the long run.

Avatar image for Jackc8
Jackc8

8515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#11 Jackc8
Member since 2007 • 8515 Posts

I have mixed feelings about it. On the one hand, now that the price is finally at a reasonable level, it's fantastic that the PS3 has all the features that it does. On the other hand, I couldn't afford to buy one until 2 1/2 years after it was launched. Not really sure if I think the guy was right or wrong.

Avatar image for The_Enfamous_B
The_Enfamous_B

68

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 The_Enfamous_B
Member since 2010 • 68 Posts

I think Kutaragi was a little greedy on his price point. A system for six hundred dollars is basically a laptop. If it sold for maybe 450 or so a lot more sales would have been attributed. Now Sony has lost some consumers to the 360 market because of the price. I agree 3rd party exclusives are overrated because the increasing costs to make video games. But Investing in 1st n 2nd developers was a wise move indeed. I have both system but Microsoft does not have a broad selection of exclusives anymore or one that doesn't offer a variety of gameplay like the ps3.

Avatar image for PSP107
PSP107

18981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 PSP107
Member since 2007 • 18981 Posts
[QUOTE="PSP107"]http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=250605 Do ppl owe him an apology? Should Sony bring him back for PS4?mushi799
We shall see if he's right. As far as we're concern, the 360 seems it will last as long as the ps3 ~10years.

good point.
Avatar image for Pesci1
Pesci1

31

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Pesci1
Member since 2010 • 31 Posts
@gamenerd15... nice reply man. Well thought out! Would read again.