[QUOTE="Acenso"]Yes. I am so cheap. I do not want to buy a system that is overly priced and has no games that interest me. I am sorry you do not get my monies.How about call me when you actually get games...for a gaming system^^ BluRay is pointless to me. I want quality online. I want about a handful of good exculsive games. I want your PS1 downloads to actually work on the PS3 and how about games I want? How about tell me when you have ZOE3, FFXIII, Atlus Games, Online Dynasty Warriors, and many more games exculsive.
But what would I know...I am just a cheap American. Why would I want to play games on a gaming system?Pariah_001
You make me sick. And I don't usually say that either. Your inability to understand the intracacies(sp) of the complaints you're listing is what makes your consumer philosophy so erroneous.
Consumer support is what churns out progressive produce, it's only with a stable consumption of products that a company actually stands a chance of meeting your particular demands. It can't operate on sporatic sales that are made only by people who wait till the price goes down.
Also, Sony already has a "handful of good exclusive games" even if it's lost quite a few. This isn't even counting the fact that it still retains all the other cool titles.
You also need a lesson in patience; the firmware that's going to be the system emulator will not only allow you to play your old games, but also upscale them. So it's technically better than the presence of an emotion ship.
And yes, you are indeed a cheap American. The PS3 is a sales bundle for crying out loud. You're asking for a price-drop on a $650 product that costs twice that amount to make! Do you realize how insane it is to just pass that up?
And if ZOE3 is going to come out on any machine, it's going to be on the PS3. So true. Something i've also noticed is the trend to say the PS3 is far more expensive in Europe, wich is not quiet true. The price tag in Europe is according to the Euro corrency. Everyone should know it's not accurate to compare prices of different countrys (in this case, continents) with different currencys. If PS3 in the UK were $600 it would be far more cheaper to the UK consumers than it would be to the Americans, since the UK has a better economy and the consumers certainly have more buying power (or however you spell that). It would not be equal to all countrys if sony had put the price tag of $600 in the whole world. I don't really see what's so wrong by calling americans "cheap". Is it that offensive ? P.S. Sorry about any grammatical error since my main language is no english, and no, i'm not british. 
Log in to comment