i read on N4G that SE and sony are making a game coming for PS3 exclusive ( not FF13) which sony is going to fund them. So this could be the first game that sony is gonna pay for an exclusive.
Ladies and gentleman ...
http://n4g.com/News-68559.aspx
Sony's 1st paid exclusive game?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
... They payed aprox. 1 million for them to release UT3 in 2007 rather then 2008Hitamaru-homia
Yeh but its not exclusivly for PS3.
[QUOTE="el-tope-pr"]about time they pay for exclusivity,hope its FF7 remakeMGSFan27285
oh my god..............whats so great about FF7?! it SUCKED, yeah i said it. it SUCKED. i wish they would've payed someone like Epicfor exclusives. besides you see what happened when MS payed SE for blue dragon? it came out like crap, all laggy, chidish, and very boring. yes i played it.
ur apart of the 1 in 10 poeple who thinks so.
Its sad when sony has to stoop low like microsoft and pay for exclusives. Not saying its sonys fault. MS has brought this amongst the gaming community. its horrible. cf2012
Well, when you're in a precarious position you have to do what's necessary to get back on top. Microsoft had to buy exclusives because no smart developer will want to make a game exclusive for a platform with so few players compared to other platforms (Xbox 1 for example). Now that PS3 is faced with stiff competition, I'm glad that Sony decided to change their game and pay for exclusives.
[QUOTE="MGSFan27285"][QUOTE="el-tope-pr"]about time they pay for exclusivity,hope its FF7 remakeff7isnumbaone
oh my god..............whats so great about FF7?! it SUCKED, yeah i said it. it SUCKED. i wish they would've payed someone like Epicfor exclusives. besides you see what happened when MS payed SE for blue dragon? it came out like crap, all laggy, chidish, and very boring. yes i played it.
ur apart of the 1 in 10 poeple who thinks so.
theres more than that. im just not a fan of a game that has just the standards and plays off the same thing voer and over again. i kind of wish SE never made FF, then theyd be out of buisness. but ive never understood why people love FF so bad. same plot basics, and really nothing too grand, if you powerlevel in the begining you can have ALL the abilites at the end and beat the boss with no trouble. really sucks.
[QUOTE="el-tope-pr"]about time they pay for exclusivity,hope its FF7 remakeMGSFan27285
oh my god..............whats so great about FF7?! it SUCKED, yeah i said it. it SUCKED. i wish they would've payed someone like Epicfor exclusives. besides you see what happened when MS payed SE for blue dragon? it came out like crap, all laggy, chidish, and very boring. yes i played it.
HA!!!! joke post? cause u made my day :lol:
[QUOTE="MGSFan27285"][QUOTE="el-tope-pr"]about time they pay for exclusivity,hope its FF7 remakeoutbreak201
oh my god..............whats so great about FF7?! it SUCKED, yeah i said it. it SUCKED. i wish they would've payed someone like Epicfor exclusives. besides you see what happened when MS payed SE for blue dragon? it came out like crap, all laggy, chidish, and very boring. yes i played it.
HA!!!! joke post? cause u made my day :lol:
no joke, i hate SE and final fantasy. only one i have ever liked is FF12. i liked it, but it had a bit of downfalls, like there was no point in training your whole party.i got away with just having 3 characters, never used the others and beat the final boss in one easy try. same thing (except without the 3 person thing) in FF10. the others i thought were boring. you can qoute me on this crap too if you please.
[QUOTE="el-tope-pr"]about time they pay for exclusivity,hope its FF7 remakeMGSFan27285
oh my god..............whats so great about FF7?! it SUCKED, yeah i said it. it SUCKED. i wish they would've payed someone like Epicfor exclusives. besides you see what happened when MS payed SE for blue dragon? it came out like crap, all laggy, chidish, and very boring. yes i played it.
Yeah, your knowledge knows no bounds, the fact that you think Blue Dragon had anything to do with Square Enix shows that...[QUOTE="MGSFan27285"][QUOTE="el-tope-pr"]about time they pay for exclusivity,hope its FF7 remakeff7isnumbaone
oh my god..............whats so great about FF7?! it SUCKED, yeah i said it. it SUCKED. i wish they would've payed someone like Epicfor exclusives. besides you see what happened when MS payed SE for blue dragon? it came out like crap, all laggy, chidish, and very boring. yes i played it.
ur apart of the 1 in 10 poeple who thinks so.
well this is sonys 1st PS3 paid exclusive.
[QUOTE="MGSFan27285"][QUOTE="el-tope-pr"]about time they pay for exclusivity,hope its FF7 remakeBenderUnit22
oh my god..............whats so great about FF7?! it SUCKED, yeah i said it. it SUCKED. i wish they would've payed someone like Epicfor exclusives. besides you see what happened when MS payed SE for blue dragon? it came out like crap, all laggy, chidish, and very boring. yes i played it.
Yeah, your knowledge knows no bounds, the fact that you think Blue Dragon had anything to do with Square Enix shows that...it had a few of the SE people. some of the "masterminds" as my SE fanboy of a pal put it.
i would think its KH3, or the new FF online?americahellyeah
either one of those would be great. but no FF7 remake. i did like the first FF online, good depth. better than guild wars. more favored than WoW. although wow was good, just liked FF11's style more.
Sony have been paying for exclusives for years since the psone days.
Just because some exec say's "we dont pay for exclusives we earn them" doesnt mean thats what they have done forever.
Since they dominated with ps/ps2 they didnt have to pay for exclusives they had a massive install base and publishers would see more sense in spending money to only develop for the leading platform then spending extra money to develop the game again for a platform that has a fraction of the install base of ps2(xbox).
But at the start of ps and ps2 sony paid money for exclusives, even when they made that statement they were funding the development of heavenly sword and lair and they would have spent marjeting money on those games, ninja theory and factor 5 are independent companys, so sony paid for development and marketing and basicly would have paid there wages.
It's the excat same thing as when MS pays for gears development and marketing.
This has been going on for years.
They a paid 2k for years for an exclusive deal for gta, they paid capcom for exclusive rights to dmc games.
They were supposed to pay ubisoft for exclusive rights to ass creed but as reported they were too slow, or more like krazy kens arrogance lost them that exclusive along with many more.
It's very naive to think sony have never paid for an exclusive game.
Sony were very aggressive in the early years of ps/ps2 at buying exclusives and i loved them for it, and im pleased they are back to believing they are not un-touchable and have to work and spend to win the console war.
There not going to win for free never have.
[QUOTE="americahellyeah"]i would think its KH3, or the new FF online?MGSFan27285
either one of those would be great. but no FF7 remake. i did like the first FF online, good depth. better than guild wars. more favored than WoW. although wow was good, just liked FF11's style more.
sadly i never got to play FFXI, i've never been able to find it. (I think its been out of production for quite a while) so i'm super psyched for a new FF online, next gen MMO's will rock!
So all EA Sports games are now done by Microsoft since Peter Moore is now working for EA?it had a few of the SE people. some of the "masterminds" as my SE fanboy of a pal put it.
MGSFan27285
Its sad when sony has to stoop low like microsoft and pay for exclusives. Not saying its sonys fault. MS has brought this amongst the gaming community. its horrible. cf2012
Oh god some gamers are very funny.
You think because ken k said we dont buy exclusives its true, it may have been true for about a year, the year sony lost big exclusives.
Sony stooping to the levels of ms, sony used to pay developers to make sure multi-platform games looked better on ps/ps2, check an episode of the hotspot fom a few months ago(i forget which one) jeff talks in detail about this.
Sony paid for an exclusive deal with 2k/rockstar for gta they have spent millions ad millions before microsoft where even in the market.
To think ms brought "buying exclusves to the gaming industry" is very naive.
MS are doing what sony did very well aggresivly buying exclusive games for there platform.
[QUOTE="cf2012"]Its sad when sony has to stoop low like microsoft and pay for exclusives. Not saying its sonys fault. MS has brought this amongst the gaming community. its horrible. shadystxxx
Oh god some gamers are very funny.
You think because ken k said we dont buy exclusives its true, it may have been true for about a year, the year sony lost big exclusives.
Sony stooping to the levels of ms, sony used to pay developers to make sure multi-platform games looked better on ps/ps2, check an episode of the hotspot fom a few months ago(i forget which one) jeff talks in detail about this.
Sony paid for an exclusive deal with 2k/rockstar for gta they have spent millions ad millions before microsoft where even in the market.
To think ms brought "buying exclusves to the gaming industry" is very naive.
MS are doing what sony did very well aggresivly buying exclusive games for there platform.
lol, yeah that whole "M$ courrupted the gaming industy by buying exlcusives" thing is silly. Companies have been buying exclusives since there were more than 1 systems availible, M$ is just more public about it.
Do you guys really think that Sony never payed for exclusive during PS1 or PS2 era?
Reading the article it seems that Sony is the publisher for that game, and Sony has funded (published) other 3rd party games before.
Recently released Lair is a third party developed game, funded (published) by Sony.
[QUOTE="BenderUnit22"][QUOTE="MGSFan27285"][QUOTE="el-tope-pr"]about time they pay for exclusivity,hope its FF7 remakeMGSFan27285
oh my god..............whats so great about FF7?! it SUCKED, yeah i said it. it SUCKED. i wish they would've payed someone like Epicfor exclusives. besides you see what happened when MS payed SE for blue dragon? it came out like crap, all laggy, chidish, and very boring. yes i played it.
Yeah, your knowledge knows no bounds, the fact that you think Blue Dragon had anything to do with Square Enix shows that...it had a few of the SE people. some of the "masterminds" as my SE fanboy of a pal put it.
Blue dragon has nothing to do with square enix, Hironobu Sakaguchi worked for square enix and was one of the creator's of final fantasy, i think his last one was 9, Akira Toriyama built fam from dragon ball, and Nobuo Uematsu was a music composer on several final fantasys, they all work for mistwalker now which is headed by Sakaguchi.
And beside's you implied ms paid square enix for blue dragon not that 2 former employee's of square enix was making the game.
Some of the knowledge of gamers nowadays is outstanding, they come into threads and make comments like this one and the topic headline is just laughable.
[QUOTE="shadystxxx"][QUOTE="cf2012"]Its sad when sony has to stoop low like microsoft and pay for exclusives. Not saying its sonys fault. MS has brought this amongst the gaming community. its horrible. americahellyeah
Oh god some gamers are very funny.
You think because ken k said we dont buy exclusives its true, it may have been true for about a year, the year sony lost big exclusives.
Sony stooping to the levels of ms, sony used to pay developers to make sure multi-platform games looked better on ps/ps2, check an episode of the hotspot fom a few months ago(i forget which one) jeff talks in detail about this.
Sony paid for an exclusive deal with 2k/rockstar for gta they have spent millions ad millions before microsoft where even in the market.
To think ms brought "buying exclusves to the gaming industry" is very naive.
MS are doing what sony did very well aggresivly buying exclusive games for there platform.
lol, yeah that whole "M$ courrupted the gaming industy by buying exlcusives" thing is silly. Companies have been buying exclusives since there were more than 1 systems availible, M$ is just more public about it.
Thank god somebody knows something.
MS never really explain there exclusive deals, unless when its something as big as gears, 90% of the time its developers or publishers that announce exclusivity details ie length, and rarely price.
MS and sony only ever say check out this exclusive game then show a preview, then after the preview they will say only available on 360/ps3.
I do not consider buying exclusives as a dirty tactic, its like movie publishers have bidding wars over scripts, its basicly the same thing.
It's good buisness, and sony have been doing it since the very start of playstation.
[QUOTE="americahellyeah"][QUOTE="shadystxxx"][QUOTE="cf2012"]Its sad when sony has to stoop low like microsoft and pay for exclusives. Not saying its sonys fault. MS has brought this amongst the gaming community. its horrible. shadystxxx
Oh god some gamers are very funny.
You think because ken k said we dont buy exclusives its true, it may have been true for about a year, the year sony lost big exclusives.
Sony stooping to the levels of ms, sony used to pay developers to make sure multi-platform games looked better on ps/ps2, check an episode of the hotspot fom a few months ago(i forget which one) jeff talks in detail about this.
Sony paid for an exclusive deal with 2k/rockstar for gta they have spent millions ad millions before microsoft where even in the market.
To think ms brought "buying exclusves to the gaming industry" is very naive.
MS are doing what sony did very well aggresivly buying exclusive games for there platform.
lol, yeah that whole "M$ courrupted the gaming industy by buying exlcusives" thing is silly. Companies have been buying exclusives since there were more than 1 systems availible, M$ is just more public about it.
Thank god somebody knows something.
MS never really explain there exclusive deals, unless when its something as big as gears, 90% of the time its developers or publishers that announce exclusivity details ie length, and rarely price.
MS and sony only ever say check out this exclusive game then show a preview, then after the preview they will say only available on 360/ps3.
I do not consider buying exclusives as a dirty tactic, its like movie publishers have bidding wars over scripts, its basicly the same thing.
It's good buisness, and sony have been doing it since the very start of playstation.
so your saying that sony has been just as bad as M$ even though recently all sonys exclusives has now been multi. This is the 1st third party game for the PS3 which sony is gonna buy/publish.
[QUOTE="el-tope-pr"]about time they pay for exclusivity,hope its FF7 remakeMGSFan27285
oh my god..............whats so great about FF7?! it SUCKED, yeah i said it. it SUCKED. i wish they would've payed someone like Epicfor exclusives. besides you see what happened when MS payed SE for blue dragon? it came out like crap, all laggy, chidish, and very boring. yes i played it.
EDIT: HAHA! i got raped by fanboys. either way im leaving it up to annoy people and let them know its not the best RPG out there. honestly prefer oblivion.
buying exclusive is a very good start
[QUOTE="shadystxxx"][QUOTE="americahellyeah"][QUOTE="shadystxxx"][QUOTE="cf2012"]Its sad when sony has to stoop low like microsoft and pay for exclusives. Not saying its sonys fault. MS has brought this amongst the gaming community. its horrible. sim_dude_uk
Oh god some gamers are very funny.
You think because ken k said we dont buy exclusives its true, it may have been true for about a year, the year sony lost big exclusives.
Sony stooping to the levels of ms, sony used to pay developers to make sure multi-platform games looked better on ps/ps2, check an episode of the hotspot fom a few months ago(i forget which one) jeff talks in detail about this.
Sony paid for an exclusive deal with 2k/rockstar for gta they have spent millions ad millions before microsoft where even in the market.
To think ms brought "buying exclusves to the gaming industry" is very naive.
MS are doing what sony did very well aggresivly buying exclusive games for there platform.
lol, yeah that whole "M$ courrupted the gaming industy by buying exlcusives" thing is silly. Companies have been buying exclusives since there were more than 1 systems availible, M$ is just more public about it.
Thank god somebody knows something.
MS never really explain there exclusive deals, unless when its something as big as gears, 90% of the time its developers or publishers that announce exclusivity details ie length, and rarely price.
MS and sony only ever say check out this exclusive game then show a preview, then after the preview they will say only available on 360/ps3.
I do not consider buying exclusives as a dirty tactic, its like movie publishers have bidding wars over scripts, its basicly the same thing.
It's good buisness, and sony have been doing it since the very start of playstation.
so your saying that sony has been just as bad as M$ even though recently all sonys exclusives has now been multi. This is the 1st third party game for the PS3 which sony is gonna buy/publish.
If you want to call buying exclusives bad then yes, but in my book buying exclusives is good.
All together through the years of ps/ps2/ps3 sony have paid for allot more exclusives than microsoft has over its gaming years.During this new generation yes MS have been more aggresive than sony at buying exclusives but does that mean ms are ruining the industry, not at all, sony were doing what ms are doing now way before ms even made a console.
If sony are publishing the game its not 3rd party its first.
They basicly bought heavenly sword exclusivity by publishing it(paying for development and marketing, they snapped that up before a third party publsiher could, same thing with lair).
They announced at e3 they made a deal with rockstar for the next rockstar franchise, would that not be classed as buying an exclusive.
They paid epic/midway for timed exclusive rights to ut3, they paid ubisoft for timed maybe full rights to haze.
Do you think ms paid publishers to make games multiplatform, no publishers choose to go multi-platform, and sony lost "exclusives" because they didnt make there exclusive deals, they could have had ass creed exclusive and it was reported the reason they didnt was because of ken k's slowness.
Time crisis 4 an exclusive 3rd party game, no doubt money exchanged hands for that exclusivity.
Theres plenty of games sony have paid for, l.a noire a 3rd party exclusive game. what incentive would a publisher have to put there game exclusivly on ps3 at them moment without a payment, none.
In your earlier posts you were suggesting its sony's first ever paid for exclusive, and even if your just talking bout the ps3 this is definitly not the first game sony have paid for exclusve rights to.
I no way did i imply this is a bad thing, infact i said its good, i like exclusive games for my systems i own both 360 and ps3 so i could care less which system gets whic exclusive, its save me making a decision on which platform to get a multiplat game for.
[QUOTE="el-tope-pr"]about time they pay for exclusivity,hope its FF7 remakeMGSFan27285
oh my god..............whats so great about FF7?! it SUCKED, yeah i said it. it SUCKED. i wish they would've payed someone like Epicfor exclusives. besides you see what happened when MS payed SE for blue dragon? it came out like crap, all laggy, chidish, and very boring. yes i played it.
EDIT: HAHA! i got raped by fanboys. either way im leaving it up to annoy people and let them know its not the best RPG out there. honestly prefer oblivion.
You have my agreement IF and I mean IF you loved Final Fantasy X.
That, and Blue Dragon was made by a SE/Sony hater that's dragging a great composer down with him. Not by Square.
Anywhose, IF they make the remake, I may buy it just to give it another chance since I didn't like the storyline compared to X's.
[QUOTE="sim_dude_uk"][QUOTE="shadystxxx"][QUOTE="americahellyeah"][QUOTE="shadystxxx"][QUOTE="cf2012"]Its sad when sony has to stoop low like microsoft and pay for exclusives. Not saying its sonys fault. MS has brought this amongst the gaming community. its horrible. shadystxxx
Oh god some gamers are very funny.
You think because ken k said we dont buy exclusives its true, it may have been true for about a year, the year sony lost big exclusives.
Sony stooping to the levels of ms, sony used to pay developers to make sure multi-platform games looked better on ps/ps2, check an episode of the hotspot fom a few months ago(i forget which one) jeff talks in detail about this.
Sony paid for an exclusive deal with 2k/rockstar for gta they have spent millions ad millions before microsoft where even in the market.
To think ms brought "buying exclusves to the gaming industry" is very naive.
MS are doing what sony did very well aggresivly buying exclusive games for there platform.
lol, yeah that whole "M$ courrupted the gaming industy by buying exlcusives" thing is silly. Companies have been buying exclusives since there were more than 1 systems availible, M$ is just more public about it.
Thank god somebody knows something.
MS never really explain there exclusive deals, unless when its something as big as gears, 90% of the time its developers or publishers that announce exclusivity details ie length, and rarely price.
MS and sony only ever say check out this exclusive game then show a preview, then after the preview they will say only available on 360/ps3.
I do not consider buying exclusives as a dirty tactic, its like movie publishers have bidding wars over scripts, its basicly the same thing.
It's good buisness, and sony have been doing it since the very start of playstation.
so your saying that sony has been just as bad as M$ even though recently all sonys exclusives has now been multi. This is the 1st third party game for the PS3 which sony is gonna buy/publish.
If you want to call buying exclusives bad then yes, but in my book buying exclusives is good.
If sony are publishing the game its not 3rd party its first.
They basicly bought heavenly sword exclusivity by publishing it(paying for development and marketing, they snapped that up before a third party publsiher could, same thing with lair).
They announced at e3 they made a deal with rockstar for the next rockstar franchise, would that not be classed as buying an exclusive.
They paid epic/midway for timed exclusive rights to ut3, they paid ubisoft for timed maybe full rights to haze.
Do you think ms paid publishers to make games multiplatform, no publishers choose to go multi-platform, and sony lost "exclusives" because they didnt make there exclusive deals, they could have had ass creed exclusive and it was reported the reason they didnt was because of ken k's slowness.
Time crisis 4 an exclusive 3rd party game, no doubt money exchanged hands for that exclusivity.
Theres plenty of games sony have paid for, l.a noire a 3rd party exclusive game. what incentive would a publisher have to put there game exclusivly on ps3 at them moment without a payment, none.
In your earlier posts you were suggesting its sony's first ever paid for exclusive, and even if your just talking bout the ps3 this is definitly not the first game sony have paid for exclusve rights to.
I no way did i imply this is a bad thing, infact i said its good, i like exclusive games for my systems i own both 360 and ps3 so i could care less which system gets whic exclusive, its save me making a decision on which platform to get a multiplat game for.
It's all in theory!!!!:P:P
But seriously, I don't know since I wasn't there........
[QUOTE="sim_dude_uk"][QUOTE="shadystxxx"][QUOTE="americahellyeah"][QUOTE="shadystxxx"][QUOTE="cf2012"]Its sad when sony has to stoop low like microsoft and pay for exclusives. Not saying its sonys fault. MS has brought this amongst the gaming community. its horrible. shadystxxx
Oh god some gamers are very funny.
You think because ken k said we dont buy exclusives its true, it may have been true for about a year, the year sony lost big exclusives.
Sony stooping to the levels of ms, sony used to pay developers to make sure multi-platform games looked better on ps/ps2, check an episode of the hotspot fom a few months ago(i forget which one) jeff talks in detail about this.
Sony paid for an exclusive deal with 2k/rockstar for gta they have spent millions ad millions before microsoft where even in the market.
To think ms brought "buying exclusves to the gaming industry" is very naive.
MS are doing what sony did very well aggresivly buying exclusive games for there platform.
lol, yeah that whole "M$ courrupted the gaming industy by buying exlcusives" thing is silly. Companies have been buying exclusives since there were more than 1 systems availible, M$ is just more public about it.
Thank god somebody knows something.
MS never really explain there exclusive deals, unless when its something as big as gears, 90% of the time its developers or publishers that announce exclusivity details ie length, and rarely price.
MS and sony only ever say check out this exclusive game then show a preview, then after the preview they will say only available on 360/ps3.
I do not consider buying exclusives as a dirty tactic, its like movie publishers have bidding wars over scripts, its basicly the same thing.
It's good buisness, and sony have been doing it since the very start of playstation.
so your saying that sony has been just as bad as M$ even though recently all sonys exclusives has now been multi. This is the 1st third party game for the PS3 which sony is gonna buy/publish.
If you want to call buying exclusives bad then yes, but in my book buying exclusives is good.
If sony are publishing the game its not 3rd party its first.
They basicly bought heavenly sword exclusivity by publishing it(paying for development and marketing, they snapped that up before a third party publsiher could, same thing with lair).
They announced at e3 they made a deal with rockstar for the next rockstar franchise, would that not be classed as buying an exclusive.
They paid epic/midway for timed exclusive rights to ut3, they paid ubisoft for timed maybe full rights to haze.
Do you think ms paid publishers to make games multiplatform, no publishers choose to go multi-platform, and sony lost "exclusives" because they didnt make there exclusive deals, they could have had ass creed exclusive and it was reported the reason they didnt was because of ken k's slowness.
Time crisis 4 an exclusive 3rd party game, no doubt money exchanged hands for that exclusivity.
Theres plenty of games sony have paid for, l.a noire a 3rd party exclusive game. what incentive would a publisher have to put there game exclusivly on ps3 at them moment without a payment, none.
In your earlier posts you were suggesting its sony's first ever paid for exclusive, and even if your just talking bout the ps3 this is definitly not the first game sony have paid for exclusve rights to.
I no way did i imply this is a bad thing, infact i said its good, i like exclusive games for my systems i own both 360 and ps3 so i could care less which system gets whic exclusive, its save me making a decision on which platform to get a multiplat game for.
fair comment but if they did make a ff7 remake, it is of course a sony exclusive cause sony will publish it but its still a 3rd pt game. Even though it might not be sonys 1st paid exclusive, at least ff7 had the slight chance it could have been on the 360 but its not. heavenly sword and lair never had a slight chance it was going to the 360. But I do see your point.
[QUOTE="el-tope-pr"]about time they pay for exclusivity,hope its FF7 remakeMGSFan27285
oh my god..............whats so great about FF7?! it SUCKED, yeah i said it. it SUCKED. i wish they would've payed someone like Epicfor exclusives. besides you see what happened when MS payed SE for blue dragon? it came out like crap, all laggy, chidish, and very boring. yes i played it.
EDIT: HAHA! i got raped by fanboys. either way im leaving it up to annoy people and let them know its not the best RPG out there. honestly prefer oblivion.
FF 7 is good, a remake would suck
BD is an amazing game...also it wasn't done by SE.
[QUOTE="shadystxxx"][QUOTE="sim_dude_uk"][QUOTE="shadystxxx"][QUOTE="americahellyeah"][QUOTE="shadystxxx"][QUOTE="cf2012"]Its sad when sony has to stoop low like microsoft and pay for exclusives. Not saying its sonys fault. MS has brought this amongst the gaming community. its horrible. sim_dude_uk
Oh god some gamers are very funny.
You think because ken k said we dont buy exclusives its true, it may have been true for about a year, the year sony lost big exclusives.
Sony stooping to the levels of ms, sony used to pay developers to make sure multi-platform games looked better on ps/ps2, check an episode of the hotspot fom a few months ago(i forget which one) jeff talks in detail about this.
Sony paid for an exclusive deal with 2k/rockstar for gta they have spent millions ad millions before microsoft where even in the market.
To think ms brought "buying exclusves to the gaming industry" is very naive.
MS are doing what sony did very well aggresivly buying exclusive games for there platform.
lol, yeah that whole "M$ courrupted the gaming industy by buying exlcusives" thing is silly. Companies have been buying exclusives since there were more than 1 systems availible, M$ is just more public about it.
Thank god somebody knows something.
MS never really explain there exclusive deals, unless when its something as big as gears, 90% of the time its developers or publishers that announce exclusivity details ie length, and rarely price.
MS and sony only ever say check out this exclusive game then show a preview, then after the preview they will say only available on 360/ps3.
I do not consider buying exclusives as a dirty tactic, its like movie publishers have bidding wars over scripts, its basicly the same thing.
It's good buisness, and sony have been doing it since the very start of playstation.
so your saying that sony has been just as bad as M$ even though recently all sonys exclusives has now been multi. This is the 1st third party game for the PS3 which sony is gonna buy/publish.
If you want to call buying exclusives bad then yes, but in my book buying exclusives is good.
If sony are publishing the game its not 3rd party its first.
They basicly bought heavenly sword exclusivity by publishing it(paying for development and marketing, they snapped that up before a third party publsiher could, same thing with lair).
They announced at e3 they made a deal with rockstar for the next rockstar franchise, would that not be classed as buying an exclusive.
They paid epic/midway for timed exclusive rights to ut3, they paid ubisoft for timed maybe full rights to haze.
Do you think ms paid publishers to make games multiplatform, no publishers choose to go multi-platform, and sony lost "exclusives" because they didnt make there exclusive deals, they could have had ass creed exclusive and it was reported the reason they didnt was because of ken k's slowness.
Time crisis 4 an exclusive 3rd party game, no doubt money exchanged hands for that exclusivity.
Theres plenty of games sony have paid for, l.a noire a 3rd party exclusive game. what incentive would a publisher have to put there game exclusivly on ps3 at them moment without a payment, none.
In your earlier posts you were suggesting its sony's first ever paid for exclusive, and even if your just talking bout the ps3 this is definitly not the first game sony have paid for exclusve rights to.
I no way did i imply this is a bad thing, infact i said its good, i like exclusive games for my systems i own both 360 and ps3 so i could care less which system gets whic exclusive, its save me making a decision on which platform to get a multiplat game for.
fair comment but if they did make a ff7 remake, it is of course a sony exclusive cause sony will publish it but its still a 3rd pt game. Even though it might not be sonys 1st paid exclusive, at least ff7 had the slight chance it could have been on the 360 but its not. heavenly sword and lair never had a slight chance it was going to the 360. But I do see your point.
Im not sure sony will publish an ff7 remake i assume square would, correct me if am wrong but i thought square publish all there games made by in house studios, squares like capcom dev/publisher.
Because of 360 small install base in japan i doubt they would even make an ff7 remake for 360, although the franchise is big over her in the u.s.
But its good buisness for sony to snap up exclusive rights to ff7, i hope they do i would buy all ff games for ps3 anyway, i dont know why but i just assciate that console with games like ff,mgs and dmc and associate games like halo,gears,pgr with 360(although there all 1st partys, well you get the picture).
And also heavenly sword had a great chance to to be on 360 as a 1st party game, ninja theory ptiched the game to ms first as MS published the last game by ninja theory but it was a bad game so ms turned heavenly sword down, they must be kicking themselfs ive been playing hs today its a great game.
I thinks its really good news sony are going back to there old ways, thats what made them a huge force in gaming great exclusives, i think krazy ken leaving was a god-send he became to arrogant, ever since he left sony have been doing everything right.
Hopefully we will get some nice announcements in the sony tgs press event(which is happening about right now).
Its started check here http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?article_id=83570 for the live blog we will soon find out what this new exclusive is.
It's funding. NOT paying for the exclusive. two different things..... Sony had has been funding lots of game studios before, it's nothin' new.Dogswithguns
Well really it is buying an exculusive, they pay to have a game exclusive to their system as a first party game. its funding but its very similar to paying a third party publisher to make that game exclusive to your platform.
I know what your saying but either way it's paying to have an exclusive game just different ways of distrubuting the money.
Well all I know is I like video games. I hate turn based FF like games and prefer Oblivian to them any day. And ther are no rules in a fight. So Ms bought exclusives, so has Sony,and Nin.... wait what do they do in regards to the rest of the gaming world?cainetao11
thats ur opinion, final fantasy games are based on thinking while oblivion is a RPG based on action.
The story for final fantasy is very epic while oblivion can be too but not as epic as FF.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment