Take a look at this : Crysis Related

Look at this Crysis requirements for Pc:

Minimum:

• Windows XP o Windows Vista
• 2,8 GHz (XP) o 3.2 GHz (Vista)
• 1,0 GB RAM (XP) o 1.5 GB RAM (Vista)
• Grafic card: 256 MB
• 12GB free on hard drive

Recomend:

• Windows XP o Windows Vista
• Intel Core 2 DUO @ 2.2GHz o AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+
• 2,0 GB RAM
• Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTS/640 or something along those terms

NOW take a look at Creed for pc requirements! :

Minimum!:

• Windows XP or Vista
• 2 GB RAM
• Dual core processor (Intel Pentium D or better)
• 256MB Direct3D 10 compatible video card, or Direct3D 9 card compatible with Shader Model 3.0 or higher
• DirectX compatible driver
• DVD-ROM dual-layer drive
• 16 GB free hard disk space
• DirectX libraries (included)
• Vista compatible sound card
• Keyboard, Mouse
• Microsoft Xbox 360 Controller (optional), #$%& that you can get sixaxis driver on web

Maximus! or recomend:

• Intel Pentium Core 2 Duo, or better processor
• 3 GB System RAM
• ATI HD2900 series, Nvidia GeForce 8800 series, or better video card
• 5.1 sound card
• Microsoft Xbox 360 controller, $%&# that again

the graphic cards that support the game are :

• DirectX10 compatible cards, recommended ATI HD2900 series, Nvidia GeForce 8800 series
• Direct3D 9 card compatible with Shader Model 3.0 or higher.

There you go. NOW TELL ME, why Crysis can´t be on a console you jerks! HA! YOU CAN´T SAY ANYTHING NOW DO YOU? DO YOU?

Crysis will obviously come to consoles

All that shows is that Crytek is a LOT better at creating a game that runs well on lower spec machines.

Crytek is MUCH better at optimizing to run on lower scale machines in other words so therefore this thread proves nothing.

All that shows is that Crytek is a LOT better at creating a game that runs well on lower spec machines.

Crytek is MUCH better at optimizing to run on lower scale machines in other words so therefore this thread proves nothing.

dooguesgoober4

i thought it was obvius, but let me tell you.

that shows that if consoles can move Creed, it can obviously move Crysis.there you go

[QUOTE="dooguesgoober4"]

All that shows is that Crytek is a LOT better at creating a game that runs well on lower spec machines.

Crytek is MUCH better at optimizing to run on lower scale machines in other words so therefore this thread proves nothing.

Fitipali

i thought it was obvius, but let me tell you.

that shows that if consoles can move Creed, it can obviously move Crysis.there you go

What this shows is your lack of technical knowledge. Creed is horribly optimised. Do you even KNOW what that means?

The hell is Creed?

Anyways. It has already been revealed that Assassin's Creed on PC has higher requirements than Crysis.

I believe Crysis can be done on the PS3, but it would be limited on the 360. Which is reason enough not to do it.

Edit: Then again, Ubisoft really sucks at PC optimization

[QUOTE="Fitipali"][QUOTE="dooguesgoober4"]

All that shows is that Crytek is a LOT better at creating a game that runs well on lower spec machines.

Crytek is MUCH better at optimizing to run on lower scale machines in other words so therefore this thread proves nothing.

Dynafrom

i thought it was obvius, but let me tell you.

that shows that if consoles can move Creed, it can obviously move Crysis.there you go

What this shows is your lack of technical knowledge. Creed is horribly optimised. Do you even KNOW what that means?

yes, but then again if Creed´s would be better optimised it would come close to Crysis requirements, and Creed´s is not using all PS3 potential. you tech master

NOW TELL ME, why Crysis can´t be on a console you jerks! HA! YOU CAN´T SAY ANYTHING NOW DO YOU? DO YOU?

Fitipali

Because I say so. HA! YOU CAN´T SAY ANYTHING NOW CAN YOU? CAN YOU?

1st. Crysis was a great game. If you can't run it, shame on you for blaming it.

2nd. Crytek has already said that it could be done, so why beat a dead horse again?

The hell is Creed?

Anyways. It has already been revealed that Assassin's Creed on PC has higher requirements than Crysis.

I believe Crysis can be done on the PS3, but it would be limited on the 360. Which is reason enough not to do it.

Edit: Then again, Ubisoft really sucks at PC optimization

Zergvasion89

Ubisoft sucks in general!

[QUOTE="Zergvasion89"]

The hell is Creed?

Anyways. It has already been revealed that Assassin's Creed on PC has higher requirements than Crysis.

I believe Crysis can be done on the PS3, but it would be limited on the 360. Which is reason enough not to do it.

Edit: Then again, Ubisoft really sucks at PC optimization

AgentH

Ubisoft sucks in general!

YES they DO! I'm just really pissed about HAZE.

Crysis is actually a really good game once you get into it. It is very possible on the PS3. If you have a good PC like me then it doesn't really matter.

[QUOTE="Fitipali"][QUOTE="dooguesgoober4"]

All that shows is that Crytek is a LOT better at creating a game that runs well on lower spec machines.

Crytek is MUCH better at optimizing to run on lower scale machines in other words so therefore this thread proves nothing.

Dynafrom

i thought it was obvius, but let me tell you.

that shows that if consoles can move Creed, it can obviously move Crysis.there you go

What this shows is your lack of technical knowledge. Creed is horribly optimised. Do you even KNOW what that means?

FanBoi denial yet again. It can be done on the console, might not run on max, but it can be done. Crysis could be horribly optimized and Creed absoulutley terrible. YOU my friend lack technical knowledge. If you where technically smart you would realize that the consoles RAM is MUCH MUCH MUCH more effiecent.

Im a Ubisoft hater! suckers creed just concreate that further. It burns me to see it in the Ps3 top 10 and not a mention of Drake on this site. Burningyonnex

Drake got FULL support from PS3 owners! **** GS and their rating system! and Mario Galaxy GOTY??? what are you kidding me??

[QUOTE="Zergvasion89"]

The hell is Creed?

Anyways. It has already been revealed that Assassin's Creed on PC has higher requirements than Crysis.

I believe Crysis can be done on the PS3, but it would be limited on the 360. Which is reason enough not to do it.

Edit: Then again, Ubisoft really sucks at PC optimization

AgentH

Ubisoft sucks in general!

*gasp* oh no he didn't!

listen guys , if you wanna run Crysis with adeauate gfx on a pc you gotta get a $300 card at least and its just the graphic card... so please be realistic and dont try to think it could run on a $300 ONE YAR OLD peace of hardware like the 360 or even the PS3. the only way to make it run is to down grad it dramatically. unfortunatly crysis is not supposed to look bad, otherwise its gonna be just another crapy FPS...

The hell is Creed?

Anyways. It has already been revealed that Assassin's Creed on PC has higher requirements than Crysis.

I believe Crysis can be done on the PS3, but it would be limited on the 360. Which is reason enough not to do it.

Edit: Then again, Ubisoft really sucks at PC optimization

Zergvasion89

Its already been proven whatever the PS3 can do the Xbox can.Infact it would be alot easyer to port it Xbox as PC and Xbox are so alike

[QUOTE="Fitipali"][QUOTE="dooguesgoober4"]

All that shows is that Crytek is a LOT better at creating a game that runs well on lower spec machines.

Crytek is MUCH better at optimizing to run on lower scale machines in other words so therefore this thread proves nothing.

Dynafrom

i thought it was obvius, but let me tell you.

that shows that if consoles can move Creed, it can obviously move Crysis.there you go

What this shows is your lack of technical knowledge. Creed is horribly optimised. Do you even KNOW what that means?

listen guys , if you wanna run Crysis with adeauate gfx on a pc you gotta get a $300 card at least and its just the graphic card... so please be realistic and dont try to think it could run on a $300 ONE YAR OLD peace of hardware like the 360 or even the PS3. the only way to make it run is to down grad it dramatically. unfortunatly crysis is not supposed to look bad, otherwise its gonna be just another crapy FPS...\

samiup

Lies, I paly it on my 8600Gt on medium with some tweak to the config and i play it fine.

[QUOTE="Fitipali"]

NOW TELL ME, why Crysis can´t be on a console you jerks! HA! YOU CAN´T SAY ANYTHING NOW DO YOU? DO YOU?

AnFangs_Endes

Because I say so. HA! YOU CAN´T SAY ANYTHING NOW CAN YOU? CAN YOU?

OH FACK! ok i can´t say anything :( ...

and anyways, Killzone 2 will kick Crysis ass so hard that it won´t be still an ass

[QUOTE="Dynafrom"][QUOTE="Fitipali"][QUOTE="dooguesgoober4"]

All that shows is that Crytek is a LOT better at creating a game that runs well on lower spec machines.

Crytek is MUCH better at optimizing to run on lower scale machines in other words so therefore this thread proves nothing.

Liquid-Prince

i thought it was obvius, but let me tell you.

that shows that if consoles can move Creed, it can obviously move Crysis.there you go

What this shows is your lack of technical knowledge. Creed is horribly optimised. Do you even KNOW what that means?

Here comes liquid looks like he is wearing his assasins crud cape again

[QUOTE="Liquid-Prince"][QUOTE="Dynafrom"][QUOTE="Fitipali"][QUOTE="dooguesgoober4"]

All that shows is that Crytek is a LOT better at creating a game that runs well on lower spec machines.

Crytek is MUCH better at optimizing to run on lower scale machines in other words so therefore this thread proves nothing.

yonnex

i thought it was obvius, but let me tell you.

that shows that if consoles can move Creed, it can obviously move Crysis.there you go

What this shows is your lack of technical knowledge. Creed is horribly optimised. Do you even KNOW what that means?

Here comes liquid looks like he is wearing his assasins crud cape again

Dude, Put this on a system wars board.

Dude, Put this on a system wars board.

Flaming_Smoke

why the fack? i´m not battling system at all, i´m just saying that the nerds who said that Crysis wouldn´t run on PS3 because their daddies pc was 7.000 dollars and they played it at maximus on it, are wrong

All that shows is that Crytek is a LOT better at creating a game that runs well on lower spec machines.

Crytek is MUCH better at optimizing to run on lower scale machines in other words so therefore this thread proves nothing.

dooguesgoober4

Yes! Enlightenment!

Look at this Crysis requirements for Pc:

Minimum:

• Windows XP o Windows Vista duh
• 2,8 GHz (XP) o 3.2 GHz (Vista)
• 1,0 GB RAM (XP) o 1.5 GB RAM (Vista)
• Grafic card: 256 MB
• 12GB free on hard drive you need divx 9

Recomend:

• Windows XP o Windows Vista
• Intel Core 2 DUO @ 2.2GHz o AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+
• 2,0 GB RAM
• Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTS/640 or something along those terms you also need divx 10

NOW take a look at Creed for pc requirements! :

Minimum!:

• Windows XP or Vista duh
• 2 GB RAM
• Dual core processor (Intel Pentium D or better)
• 256MB Direct3D 10 compatible video card, or Direct3D 9 card compatible with Shader Model 3.0 or higher
• DirectX compatible driver
• DVD-ROM dual-layer drive LOL
• 16 GB free hard disk space
• DirectX libraries (included)
• Vista compatible sound card lol
• Keyboard, Mouse what did you use to play crisis?
• Microsoft Xbox 360 Controller (optional), #$%& that you can get sixaxis driver on web

Maximus! or recomend:

• Intel Pentium Core 2 Duo, or better processor
• 3 GB System RAM
• ATI HD2900 series, Nvidia GeForce 8800 series, or better video card
• 5.1 sound card
• Microsoft Xbox 360 controller, $%&# that again

the graphic cards that support the game are :

• DirectX10 compatible cards, recommended ATI HD2900 series, Nvidia GeForce 8800 series
• Direct3D 9 card compatible with Shader Model 3.0 or higher.

There you go. NOW TELL ME, why Crysis can´t be on a console you jerks! HA! YOU CAN´T SAY ANYTHING NOW DO YOU? DO YOU?

Crysis will obviously come to consoles

Fitipali

what the hell is this topic about? There is no link of wathever... What can't we say?

ps: Crysis would do WAY more money on consoles (harder to hack), but I don't think they'll do it. Maybe, who knows! :S

Crysis= 90,000 Sold

Assassins Creed= 5,000,000 Sold

Yes, Crysis is so well optimized and shouldnt come to consoles because it cant run even on the lowest setting and will make plenty of money on the PC. Anyway, if you run it on anything but Maximus its just not worth playing.

Thats what you get if you take the Hermits opinions and put it into one. If it comes to consoles "it just sucks and isnt worth playing" because you cant play on 100% maximus.

what the hell is this topic about? There is no link of wathever... What can't we say?

ps: Crysis would do WAY more money on consoles (harder to hack), but I don't think they'll do it. Maybe, who knows! :S

senjutsu

Google 1 second : http://www.dcemu.co.uk/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=87290

now that there is a link, you should know of what is the topic