Tales from Space: Mutant Blobs Attack IGN 9.0, Gamespot 7.5.

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Blake135
Blake135

3994

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Blake135
Member since 2008 • 3994 Posts

Old News, Is Gamespot rating games harder these days or are they just rating *certain* games harder ? Not saying Gamespot are Sony haters just I see alot of their reviews alittle lower on Vita games then most other sites.

Avatar image for damann22
damann22

7655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 damann22
Member since 2004 • 7655 Posts

Ive notice that also. But, as a frequenter of IGN more than GS, their employees are definitely fanboys/fangirls of whatever platform they cover. If you are bias in favor for sony then I would go with IGN's rating. If you want a more objective view then go with GS. IMHO I go with IGN cuz I am a fanboy. However when Im on the fence I tend to go with GS so that I know if its worth 60 dollars or not.

Avatar image for JustPlainLucas
JustPlainLucas

80441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 226

User Lists: 0

#3 JustPlainLucas
Member since 2002 • 80441 Posts
Think of it in terms of is IGN rating too high...
Avatar image for Randolph
Randolph

10542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 Randolph
Member since 2002 • 10542 Posts
GS did in fact say earlier this year that they were going to try harder to use the full ten point scale, and that we would "be seeing a lot more 7's". Keep in mind, 7 means "Good" on their scale, and a 7.5 is on the high end of good.
Avatar image for Granpire
Granpire

2749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 139

User Lists: 0

#5 Granpire
Member since 2008 • 2749 Posts
I've always found Gamespot staff to be more critical reviewers than the average lot. It's something I appreciate, since I think a lot of reviewers allow themselves to get carried away with all the hype for a game instead of taking an objective point of view and reviewing a game for what it is. Tales from Space: Mutant Blobs Attack seems like a good, charming downloadable title. It doesn't offer a whole lot replayability, but it's cheap. Keep in mind that I haven't played it, I'm just advocating that users read the review instead of just reading the score. It sounds like a good game that could have done better with some more content.
Avatar image for Blake135
Blake135

3994

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Blake135
Member since 2008 • 3994 Posts

GS did in fact say earlier this year that they were going to try harder to use the full ten point scale, and that we would "be seeing a lot more 7's". Keep in mind, 7 means "Good" on their scale, and a 7.5 is on the high end of good.Randolph

Thats fair, I just hope they rate everything evenly (not say bag on the Vita yet give 3DS insane scores) if their trying to be harder on games thats fine with me.

Avatar image for Phoenix534
Phoenix534

17774

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Phoenix534
Member since 2008 • 17774 Posts

Good. More respect earned for GS for continuing to go against point inflation.

Avatar image for Randolph
Randolph

10542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 Randolph
Member since 2002 • 10542 Posts

[QUOTE="Randolph"]GS did in fact say earlier this year that they were going to try harder to use the full ten point scale, and that we would "be seeing a lot more 7's". Keep in mind, 7 means "Good" on their scale, and a 7.5 is on the high end of good.Blake135

Thats fair, I just hope they rate everything evenly (not say bag on the Vita yet give 3DS insane scores) if their trying to be harder on games thats fine with me.

The 3DS games have been scoring mostly in the 7 and 8 range. Even Mario 3D Land got an 8.0 score. I admit, at first I thought "ONLY an eight?". Then I realized that an 8 meant "great", and that was just fine.
Avatar image for kallyq
kallyq

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 kallyq
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts

For what it is worth, the Mutant Blob game is my favorite one so far. It is pretty fun and somewhat challenging to make sure you get all the stuff.

Avatar image for digimonkey12
digimonkey12

1851

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 digimonkey12
Member since 2009 • 1851 Posts
Said it before, saying it again "gamespot reviews are not trustworthy" they underrate every single game, for every single console.
Avatar image for Granpire
Granpire

2749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 139

User Lists: 0

#11 Granpire
Member since 2008 • 2749 Posts
Said it before, saying it again "gamespot reviews are not trustworthy" they underrate every single game, for every single console. digimonkey12
That depends on your definition of "underrated". Just because almost every game site rates a certain game at the 8-9 level, and a different group decide not to rate those games as highly, doesn't mean that the game is being underrated by the second group. You need to ask yourself whether we should be setting higher standards for our games, instead of rating every 'good' game or Call of Duty clone a 9 or 10. I'd give certain games as examples, but I'd rather not start a war.
Avatar image for campzor
campzor

34932

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 campzor
Member since 2004 • 34932 Posts

this is probably my fav game from the 3 vita games i bought (motorstorm rc / escape plan + this)

Though its short...

Avatar image for zarshack
zarshack

9936

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 149

User Lists: 0

#14 zarshack
Member since 2009 • 9936 Posts

It's a great game, took about 3-4 hours to finish i think?

Avatar image for slaves
slaves

1443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#15 slaves
Member since 2004 • 1443 Posts

GS did in fact say earlier this year that they were going to try harder to use the full ten point scale, and that we would "be seeing a lot more 7's". Keep in mind, 7 means "Good" on their scale, and a 7.5 is on the high end of good.Randolph

So I guessing we can expect this years Call of Duty to get a 7 - 7.5? :roll:

Avatar image for JustPlainLucas
JustPlainLucas

80441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 226

User Lists: 0

#16 JustPlainLucas
Member since 2002 • 80441 Posts

So I guessing we can expect this years Call of Duty to get a 7 - 7.5? :roll:

slaves
Well, Modern Warfare 3 did get an 8.5, so it might be going down. :P
Avatar image for Totalgym9000
Totalgym9000

1456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Totalgym9000
Member since 2009 • 1456 Posts
Tales from space is actually a really good title on the Vita, id say it's more an 8 but watever, it's just an opinion, Motorstorm RC however deserves an 8.5 at the very least so if that gets a 7 gamespot can go jump.
Avatar image for inggrish
inggrish

10503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#18 inggrish
Member since 2005 • 10503 Posts

Good. More respect earned for GS for continuing to go against point inflation.

Phoenix534

Hmm yeah true, but looking back it seems last gen as a whole they rated games so much higher, I looked at GS's best rated games of all time, and you will be surprised how many 9.9s/10 there are!

Avatar image for evilgamer22
evilgamer22

2408

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 evilgamer22
Member since 2009 • 2408 Posts

Just take the average of IGN's and GS's scores and that will give you a better idea of what the game is.:P

Avatar image for logicalfrank
logicalfrank

1686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 96

User Lists: 0

#20 logicalfrank
Member since 2011 • 1686 Posts

Whatever Gamespot gives a game, it always backs it up w/ criticism so, if you actually read the review rather than just look at the number, you'll know if it's a 7.0 you'll hate or a 7.0 you'll like. I rather like their reviews and have bought a few lower rated titles (and enjoyed them) because of them.

Avatar image for THA-TODD-BEAST
THA-TODD-BEAST

4569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#21 THA-TODD-BEAST
Member since 2003 • 4569 Posts

After seeing Gamespot assign reviewers to its games that don't even enjoy the system they're playing (see: Uncharted's reviewer), I've completely stopped paying any attention to their reviews.

Avatar image for JustPlainLucas
JustPlainLucas

80441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 226

User Lists: 0

#22 JustPlainLucas
Member since 2002 • 80441 Posts

After seeing Gamespot assign reviewers to its games that don't even enjoy the system they're playing (see: Uncharted's reviewer), I've completely stopped paying any attention to their reviews.

THA-TODD-BEAST
And as I've said before, he doesn't hate Vita games. He hates the Vita's interface.
Avatar image for THA-TODD-BEAST
THA-TODD-BEAST

4569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#23 THA-TODD-BEAST
Member since 2003 • 4569 Posts

[QUOTE="THA-TODD-BEAST"]

After seeing Gamespot assign reviewers to its games that don't even enjoy the system they're playing (see: Uncharted's reviewer), I've completely stopped paying any attention to their reviews.

JustPlainLucas

And as I've said before, he doesn't hate Vita games. He hates the Vita's interface.

Yeah, and he mentioned Angry Birds and his desire for more titles like that instead of Uncharted, etc. It's hard to take someone like that seriously if he reviews games for a system he dislikes because of its interface and lack of dirt cheap, simplistic games. He's the last person I'm going to get my gaming advice and suggestions from.

Avatar image for JustPlainLucas
JustPlainLucas

80441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 226

User Lists: 0

#24 JustPlainLucas
Member since 2002 • 80441 Posts

Yeah, and he mentioned Angry Birds and his desire for more titles like that instead of Uncharted, etc. It's hard to take someone like that seriously if he reviews games for a system he dislikes because of its interface and lack of dirt cheap, simplistic games. He's the last person I'm going to get my gaming advice and suggestions from.

THA-TODD-BEAST
He's saying that he wants to see more games like those on a system that's trying to fight off mobile phone gaming. He may prefer simplistic games on his phone to a clunkier system, but that doesn't necessarily mean he's automatically biased against games on the Vita itself. I've played Uncharted: Golden Abyss myself, and although I gave it an 8.0, I can clearly see why he gave it a 7. Need I remind you that 12 other sites listed on Metacritic have given the game a similar or lower score? It's not just Mark Walton who wasn't floored by the game, and I can assure you it's not because he "hates the Vita." Once you start playing the game, the clunky interface no longer applies to... oh what the hell am I doing explaining this to you... You already made up your mind that he's biased. And that right there is a form of bias.
Avatar image for THA-TODD-BEAST
THA-TODD-BEAST

4569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#25 THA-TODD-BEAST
Member since 2003 • 4569 Posts

[QUOTE="THA-TODD-BEAST"]

Yeah, and he mentioned Angry Birds and his desire for more titles like that instead of Uncharted, etc. It's hard to take someone like that seriously if he reviews games for a system he dislikes because of its interface and lack of dirt cheap, simplistic games. He's the last person I'm going to get my gaming advice and suggestions from.

JustPlainLucas

He's saying that he wants to see more games like those on a system that's trying to fight off mobile phone gaming. He may prefer simplistic games on his phone to a clunkier system, but that doesn't necessarily mean he's automatically biased against games on the Vita itself. I've played Uncharted: Golden Abyss myself, and although I gave it an 8.0, I can clearly see why he gave it a 7. Need I remind you that 12 other sites listed on Metacritic have given the game a similar or lower score? It's not just Mark Walton who wasn't floored by the game, and I can assure you it's not because he "hates the Vita." Once you start playing the game, the clunky interface no longer applies to... oh what the hell am I doing explaining this to you... You already made up your mind that he's biased. And that right there is a form of bias.

Yeah, someone who wrote the article he did about the Vita has no business reviewing that system's games in my opinion.

Avatar image for gamenerd15
gamenerd15

4529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#26 gamenerd15
Member since 2007 • 4529 Posts

[QUOTE="THA-TODD-BEAST"]

After seeing Gamespot assign reviewers to its games that don't even enjoy the system they're playing (see: Uncharted's reviewer), I've completely stopped paying any attention to their reviews.

JustPlainLucas

And as I've said before, he doesn't hate Vita games. He hates the Vita's interface.

The last paragraph in the Uncharted review does not make sense. The reviewer claims the game is almost like the console versions but does not quite live up to the task.

"It's not quite the full-blown Uncharted experience on the move that you might have hoped for, but it's damn close." You cannot say a game is close the console version and give it a seven. If the narrative is as weak as this reviewer claimed, then it would not be close to the console versions.

Avatar image for Marzarmy
Marzarmy

67

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 Marzarmy
Member since 2012 • 67 Posts
whats with them rating all Vita games in the 70's?
Avatar image for omho88
omho88

3967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 omho88
Member since 2007 • 3967 Posts

how much is it?

Avatar image for Videodogg
Videodogg

12611

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#29 Videodogg
Member since 2002 • 12611 Posts

I have been playing the game for the last couple of hours. It is really engaging and entertaining. Its bright and colorful and inventive and hard to put down. It is, plain and simple, FUN. I wont give the game a numeric score, but i will say it is a "must play" for any Vita owner. You guys can argue scores, but i think its more fun to play the game instead.

Avatar image for JustPlainLucas
JustPlainLucas

80441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 226

User Lists: 0

#30 JustPlainLucas
Member since 2002 • 80441 Posts

Yeah, someone who wrote the article he did about the Vita has no business reviewing that system's games in my opinion.

THA-TODD-BEAST
Do you read what you write? So ONLY the people who love a system unconditionally should review the games for that platform? That's called fanboyism. Mark was being completely objective about his Uncharted review, but you're still hung up on that article. What would you say if someone wrote a positively gleaming article about the Vita but gave the game the same score?

The last paragraph in the Uncharted review does not make sense. The reviewer claims the game is almost like the console versions but does not quite live up to the task.

"It's not quite the full-blown Uncharted experience on the move that you might have hoped for, but it's damn close." You cannot say a game is close the console version and give it a seven. If the narrative is as weak as this reviewer claimed, then it would not be close to the console versions.

gamenerd15
Sure you can, because a seven is still a good score. And Golden Abyss is closer to Drake's Fortune than the last two installments, and GS gave that game an 8. Golden Abyss is close to that, so it got a 7. Again, 7's a good score.
whats with them rating all Vita games in the 70's?Marzarmy
Because they're good games getting good scores...